periodic reset of civilizations

Catholic Inquisition &: “Modernity”.

From Isabelle et Ferdinand, Rois catholiques d’Espagne/Isabelle and Ferdinand, Catholic Kings of Spain by Joseph Pérez:

“Is the Inquisition a medieval relic, an anachronism or, on the contrary, one of the first manifestations of modernity in Europe?

For me, the response is without doubt: the Inquisition prefigures the modern state in this most terrible of ways—the tendency toward totalitarianism.”

And to say that the Populace “thinks that democracy and modernity will save them”. L.O.L.. The Future 'will be fun'. And it 'will be joyful' to see the 'next progroms' that are being prepared 'now'.

The masses will remain the masses. 'Stupid and not UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING'.

“The Inquisition is charged with defending the catholic faith, with rooting out heterodox deviations [...].

[...] Since 1480, there has been this formidable machine of war against heresy, the Inquisition, but precisely, if it was necessary to set up this repressive apparatus and to use constraint to preserve the catholic faith FROM ANY HETERODOXIC DEVIATION [...].”

FROM ANY HETERODOXIC DEVIATION. That is 'why it's useless to fight against the Dogma of the “pro-vaccination”'. Everything what you would say, WILL “BE SYSTEMATICALLY CUT”.

From Critical Theories of Globalization: An Introduction by C. el-Ojeili and P. Hayden:

“[...] in regard to morality and politics, Nietzsche argued that Judeo-Christian morality was life-denying [...] promoted the values of humility, self-denial, meekness, and submission to authority.

By extension, modern egalitarianism and democracy exhibited the same [...] as Christian ‘slave morality’, by promoting [...] the equal worth and equal rights of the ‘common man’ and conformity TO MAJORITY OPINION.”

TOWARDS 'MAJORITY OPINION': This is why JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ethics always 'LEAD TO COLLECTIVISM'.

DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS 'ARE TOTALITARIAN':

In any democratic system “the voice of the majority” IS 'THE ONLY ONE THAT IS ALLOWED'. 'All personal aspiration' and 'dissonance' 'MUST BE SUPPRESSED'.

'THERE IS NO INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM' in a democratic system. 'The FABLE that has been SOLD FOR DEMOCRACY'; IS THAT CASTE SOCIETY 'broke the individuals'.

Let's go back to the text Isabelle et Ferdinand, Rois catholiques d’Espagne/Isabelle and Ferdinand, Catholic Kings of Spain by Joseph Pérez:

“[...] but here we are dealing with an organized, systematic, bureaucratized intolerance: civil servants are specially charged with collecting denunciations, investigating, making files, compiling dossiers... THIS FORM OF INSTITUTIONAL INTOLERANCE, even if it is less bloody than the other, is infinitely more redoubtable because it poses a permanent threat to the population. IT IS THE FIRST FORM OF TOTALITARIANISM IN MODERN TIMES.

I SAY: MODERN TIMES.

IS THE INQUISITION A MEDIEVAL RELIC, AN ANACHRONISM OR, ON THE CONTRARY, ONE OF THE FIRST MANIFESTATIONS OF MODERNITY IN EUROPE?

For me, the response is without doubt: THE INQUISITION PREFIGURES THE MODERN STATE IN THIS MOST TERRIBLE OF WAYS—THE TENDENCY TOWARD TOTALITARIANISM.

INQUISITION IS MODERN, in fact, from yet another point of view, perhaps more important than the previous one: it is, in Spain, for the entire duration of the Old Regime, the only court that has the right to PROSECUTE EVERYONE, without distinction of privilege, throughout the territory.

THE INQUISITION ESTABLISHES THE EQUALITY OF ALL before its law; it knows no privileged people; it is even much more severe towards the powerful than towards the little people who do not risk much: the poor devils, those who have not studied, who do not read, who do not write, WHO DO NOT TRAVEL ABROAD, WHO DO NOT MEDDLE WITH IDEAS, ALL OF THESE ARE NOT A THREAT AGAINST ORTHODOXY.

On the contrary, they willingly BECOME VOLUNTEERING AUXILIARIES OF THE INQUIRERS BY DENOUNCING COMMENTS and attitudes that they consider unconformist.

The Inquisition was based on the EGALITARIAN TENDENCIES of the spanish people. This is what Menéndez Pelayo called in the last century the “MONASTIC DEMOCRACY” (democracia frailuna): the Inquisition, he wrote, is a form of tyranny, if you like, but it was a “popular tyranny” (tirania popular), “A ROBUST UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE, A DEMOCRATIC JUSTICE THAT LEVELED EVERYTHING, FROM THE KING TO THE PLEBEIAN, FROM THE ARCHBISHOP TO THE TYCOON”.

THE INQUISITION IS THUS AN INSTITUTION THAT GOES IN THE DIRECTION OF MODERNITY [...] IT ANNOUNCES TOTALITARIANISM [...].

IT IS A MATTER, FOR SPAIN, OF BUILDING AN IDEOLOGICALLY HOMOGENEOUS NATION.”

HOMOGENEOUS, FUNNY, IN RELATION 'TO WHAT THIS HOMOGENEITY'?

WHAT IS THE STANDARD THAT IS USED “TO ESTABLISH THIS HOMOGENEITY”?

“So there is confusion OF THE POLITICAL AND THE RELIGIOUS.”

WHOSE FAULT IS IT?

WHO WANTED TO CONVERT “THE WHOLE WORLD” 'WITH HIS CHRISTIANISM'?

Where is, THIS TOTALITARIAN PROJECT, which 'says you HAVE TO BE CONVERTED'. I 'still find it funny' 'that this judeo-christian religion' complains 'hundreds of years' after its creation, ABOUT 'ITS OWN DESIRE TO CONVERT THE WHOLE EARTH' and understands NOW THE 'SOCIAL RAMIFICATIONS'.

As if they were “TRYING TO ABSOLVE THEMSELVES of their project” which has caused “SO MUCH HARM”.

“Christianism” “WILL BE JUDGED ONE DAY”, and WHEN THAT VERDICT will comes from 'THE CIVIL SOCIETY'; it “will not be good 'to be a Christian' anymore”; LET THAT BE SAID.

From The New Inquisitions: Heretic-Hunting and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Totalitarianism by Arthur Versluis:

“[...] THE EMERGENCE OF MODERNITY ULTIMATELY MEANT THE DEPOLITICIZATION OF THE WORLD—THE ABSENCE OF ENEMIES, OF HERETICS, OF THOSE AGAINST WHOM OTHERS CAN DEFINE THEMSELVES—NONE OTHER THAN THE CULTURAL VACUUM REPRESENTED BY TECHNOLOGICAL-CONSUMERIST MODERN SOCIETY.

[...] CATHOLIC INQUISITIONS PROVIDED AN ARCHETYPAL PREDECESSOR FOR ONE OF THE FUNDAMENTALLY NEW POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS OF MODERNITY: TOTALITARIANISM.”

Although the last great PAGE OF MODERNITY was turned by the 'JEWISH RELIGION' and its salesman in the west; 'CHRISTIANISM', modernity 'is thousands of years old'. 'Little by little'; “the Erosion of Tradition” Has taken place.

'The Cinematographer Jacques Tati' 'Had seen in the middle of the last century', 'this Western Society' Advancing 'EVEN MORE TOWARDS' what is now called “THE WESTERNIZATION OF THE WORLD”.

If you watch his film “MY UNCLE”, 'one of his two Poetic films' with “Monsieur Hulot's Holiday”, YOU CLEARLY 'SEE THIS MODERNIZATION' in action. THAT OF THE LIVES OF DAILY USES; everything BECOMES MECHANICAL, ROBOTIC, “COLD”.

The other films of JACQUES TATI, are more “TO WATCH TO SEE THE MASTERY” 'that he had'; 'A TRUE GENIUS', 'ONE OF THE GREATEST OF THE 20TH CENTURY'.

'I leave the Following video examples', 'One After The Other'; because 'THIS MARCH TOWARDS MODERNITY cannot be stopped'. If you look at his film “Playtime” shot '8 years after' “My uncle”; you see 'THAT URBANISM HAS 'BEEN TOTALLY TRANSFORMED' TOWARDS THIS TREND'.

And Jacques Tati shows you 'to WHAT EXTENT LIFE HAS BEEN DESACRALIZED'. It is therefore 'A COLDER FILM'.

Modernity is really 'CHARACTERIZED BY THIS ABSENCE OF MEANING'. Doing things, 'but the things are the end'; 'it is therefore the opposite of the Sacred'.

It is strange, and we have seen it underlined with the vaccination 'rates of covid', that the 'whole world' or almost the whole world, excluding for the 'moment Africa', IS NO LONGER interested in 'HAVING A MEANING to their lives'.

Which brings us back 'TO THE WANDERING JEW'.

For the more astute, they have understood 'that this WORLD IS NOT TO BE SAVED'. You don't save a 'DEAD WORLD'. Besides, if you reach 'A POINT OF INITIATION' 'you don't care about 'the drift of others''. On the contrary; 'IT FEEDS YOU'.

You 'see them 'DESTROY THEMSELVES', 'AND YOU ARE FED': 'FOR THE SPIRIT' IS STRONGER 'THAN THE MIND'.

The Elitism of INITIATION 'Has Been In Effect' in the world 'For A Long Time'. And 'IT'S NOT ABOUT TO CHANGE SOON'.

“I leave again” the Text on the 'jew-christian' and 'the hatred of paganism'.

The Jew ... the Christian, the Hatred for Nature: Paganism.

“Paganism is the true science. Jews have problem thriving in a NATURAL WORLD [...].”

There is a statistic I like to repeat:

The Jewish problem 0.2% World Population/20% of the Nobel prizes. When you understand THIS STATISTIC, you understand 'THE WORLD PROBLEM'.

“No one is safe until everyone is safe”, you can read 'ALL OVER THE PLACE' among the 'Covid Vaccination Promoters'.

This is the Judeo-Christian ethic of 'CONTROL OVER NATURE', originally driven by the 'JEWISH RELIGION'. THE CONTROL OF NATURE IS OF COURSE AN ILLUSION.

“For God's sake, BROTHERS, get vaccinated.”

Brothers?

Are we all brothers?

BY VIRTUE OF WHAT?

This judeo-christian ethic IS UNBEARABLE. NO, WE ARE NOT BROTHERS. BROTHERHOOD 'HAS NEVER EXISTED' WITHIN HUMANITY: 'THIS COLLECTIVIST CONCEPT IS TO BE VOMITED'.

THE HUMAN BEING IS UNIQUE 'IN HIS ESSENCE'.

If one day “You Awaken”; you will find yourself 'on the other side of the mind' “CONTEMPLATING THE MIND”, and you will understand “THAT DUALITY IS AN ILLUSION”.

BUT UNITY DOES NOT MEAN COLLECTIVISM, IT'S THE OPPOSITE.

THIS COLLECTIVIST INSANITY has given us all the socialisms and even their application... COMMUNISM.

NO WE ARE NOT BROTHERS.

From Swami Abhayananda:

“[...] in the following “Great Exposition” attributed to the gnostic, Simon Magus of Samaria, who was a contemporary of the Christian apostle, Peter, this mystically perceived duality-in-Unity is magnificently explained:

“There are two aspects of the One. The first of these is the Higher, the Divine Mind of the universe, which governs all things, and is masculine. The other is the lower, the Thought (epinoia) which produces all things, and is feminine. As a pair united, they comprise all that exists.

The Divine Mind is the Father who sustains all things and nourishes all that begins and ends. He is the One who eternally stands, without beginning or end. He exists entirely alone; for, while the Thought arising from Unity, and coming forth from the Divine Mind, creates [the appearance of] duality, the Father remains a Unity. The Thought is in Himself, and so He is alone. Made manifest to Himself from Himself, He appears to be two. He becomes “Father” by virtue of being called so by His own Thought.

Since He, Himself, brought forward Himself, by means of Himself, manifesting to Himself His own Thought, it is not correct to attribute creation to the Thought alone. For She (the Thought) conceals the Father within Herself; the Divine Mind and the Thought are intertwined. Thus, though [they appear] to be a pair, one opposite the other, the Divine Mind is in no way different from the Thought, inasmuch as they are one.

Though there appears to be a Higher, the Mind, and a lower, the Thought, truly, It is a Unity, just as what is manifested from these two [that is, the universe] is a unity, while appearing to be a duality. The Divine Mind and the Thought are discernible, one from the other, but they are one, though they appear to be two.””

It has been said for hundreds of years, the Christian and the Judeo-Christian ethic IS THE LOWEST IN TERMS OF INTELLIGENCE.

And this is confirmed with the covid, and these western hicks 'WHO TRY TO STOP NATURE'.

THE WESTERNER IS THE ULTIMATE IN DEPRAVITY; YOU CAN'T GET ANY LOWER.

That the Westerner HAS ADHERED 'to this Jewish ethic' IS 'ANOTHER THING', WHICH SHOWS 'HOW LITTLE VIABILITY THIS PEOPLE OF THE WEST HAD'.

No viable people would have adhered 'to the Jewish Ethic' 'if they WERE NOT ALREADY DESTROYED INTERNALLY'. The fact that they have not been able to CREATE ELITES since that time 'IS ANOTHER PROOF'.

From A Courtship after Marriage: Sexuality and Love in Mexican Transnational Families by Jennifer Hirsch:

“Habermas, DESCRIBES AS THE “PROJECT OF MODERNITY”:

“THE SCIENTIFIC DOMINATION OF NATURE PROMISED FREEDOM FROM SCARCITY, WANT, AND THE ARBITRARINESS OF NATURAL CALAMITY.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF RATIONAL FORMS OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION AND RATIONAL MODES OF THOUGHT PROMISED LIBERATION from the irrationalities of myth, religion, superstition, release from the arbitrary use of power as well as from the dark side of our own human natures.

Only through such a project could the universal, eternal, and the immutable qualities of all humanity be revealed.

Enlightenment thought ... embraced the idea of progress, and actively sought that break with history and tradition which modernity espouses.

It was, above all, a secular movement that sought the demystification and desacralization of knowledge and social organization in order to liberate human beings from their chains.””

If you have a ruling class, which deals WITH KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION.

WHY CHANGE THIS?

UNLESS YOU WANT TO 'BECOME THE RULER' INSTEAD OF THE RULER; “WHICH IS THE TRUE PROJECT OF MODERNITY” ... OF DEMOCRACY. 'THE POWER TO THE MANY'. NIHILISM, THROUGH THE ABANDONMENT 'OF THE SOCIAL PROJECT' AKA 'THE JEWISH ETHICS'.

But can the general public understand how the PCR Test WORKS, why it is unsuitable 'for testing diseases'?

Can the people understand 'that a virus can't be stopped', 'because humans ARE MOBILE BEINGS'?

Is the majority of the people able to understand 'that this mask that they wear IS USELESS'?

That vaccines WILL BE USELESS to stop this virus, 'BECAUSE HUMAN NATURE AS NATURE IS ORGANIC AND NOT ROBOTIC'. YOU CANNOT ANTICIPATE/ORGANIZE NATURE.

It is the OLD DREAM OF THE JEW and HIS HATRED OF THE PAGAN, TAKEN UP 'BY THAT IDIOT CHRISTIAN IN THE WEST'.

… NO, AGAINST ALL THIS, THE CHRISTIAN ETHIC OF MONOTHEISM “REBELS”; AGAINST NATURE … AGAINST LIFE. “EVERYTHING MUST BE CONTROLLED”, “AND ALL THE TIME”.

Nietzsche was right:

“Christianity is a revolt of all creatures that creep on the ground against everything that is lofty: the gospel of the “lowly” lowers....”

It happened in history, 'A REVOLT OF THE PEOPLE AGAINST THE TRUE ELITE', and who decided “to take in hand their destiny”. Except that 'this project 'DESTROYS EVERYTHING' that is ALIVE', and behind, IT IS THE GOAL; 'TO DESTROY LIFE'.

Who in his right mind WOULD HAVE STOPPED LIFE for months in order to stop nature.

THE OLD HATRED OF THE JEW, THEN 'OF THE CHRISTIAN' 'FOR EVERYTHING THAT IS ALIVE', EVERYTHING 'THAT IS INCARNATED' ... AND INSTEAD 'TO PREFER THE INTELLECT'.

THIS PEOPLE ARE UNABLE TO ORIENT THEMSELVES. Further on ... THIS PEOPLE have NO INTERNAL CONNECTION, 'NO CONNECTION WITH NATURE', NO CONNECTION WITH ANIMALS. THEY SEE THEMSELVES AS 'SUPERIOR' TO OTHER ANIMALS, TO NATURE'.

THEY WANDER; 'THE WANDERING JEW' … IN THE WEST 'IT IS THE CHRISTIAN'.

... Deep Connection which “Would allow them to have Deep Thoughts”, BUT ONLY HAVE THE INTELLECT 'TO RELY ON'.

IT IS THIS ESTABLISHED ORDER; OF THE TRADITION, THAT THE MODERNITY ATTACKED BY THE CHRISTIANISM 'HAS TRIED TO ERASE', 'UNTIL THE CURRENT TOTAL IMPLOSION OF THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

NOTHING 'WILL REMAIN OF THIS CONTINENT'. 'NOTHING'. 'OF THIS WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

WHICH 'ASKS FOR DEATH'.

'THIS IS WHAT THE JEW DEMANDS', BUT THE WESTERNER 'HAS ACCEPTED HIS THOUGHT'. 'HE IS AS MUCH A JEW AS THE JEW'.

AND AS THIS CONTINENT DOES NOT WANT TO RETURN TO THE TRADITION, “AND TO ADMIT ITS ERROR”; 'IT WILL PREFER TO COMMIT' SUICIDE RATHER 'THAN TO SURVIVE'.

THE WESTERN CONTINENT IS 'NOW TO FLEE', FOR THE 'ENTERPRISING' YOUNG GENERATIONS OF THE WEST.

THEY HAVE 'TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE', 'WHERE LIFE CAN TAKE'.

THE “MONOTHEISTIC” VIRUS 'HAS COME TO THE WEST'. IT IS NOW NECESSARY THAT THE BRAVEST LEAVE 'THIS CONTINENT', AND CONTINUE 'TO SPREAD' THE TRADITION 'IN ITS WESTERN FORM', WHICH EXISTED BEFORE 'IT WAS RAVAGED BY MONOTHEISM'.

THIS UNBEARABLE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC.

From A Freethinker's Primer of Male Love by John Lauritsen:

“In classical antiquity, sex between males was just that, sex between males; then, with the intrusion of Judeo-Christian morality, it became an abomination and a sin. With the desacralization of the penal code it became a crime (sodomy, buggery, unnatural lewdness, indecency, etc.).

Under the Medical and Minority Models it became a sickness and then a forme of deviance — which is precisely what is implied by the word “queer”.

The gay movement has lost its bearings: mired down in identity politics, masochistically committed to the cult of victimhood, and futilely striving for a simulacrum of respectability (for example “gay marriages”).”

QUEERS and all those who claim to be “different” HAVE BEEN OSTRACIZED BY THE “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT”, IN ANTIQUITY 'THEY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT “THOSE DIFFERENCES”'.

I'm not sure that this public now struggling not to be ostracized understand that THIS PURITANICAL JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT 'IS PRECISELY THAT WHICH OSTRACIZES THEM'. OR THAT THEY 'WANT TO UNDERSTAND', 'FAR TOO COILED UP “IN THEIR MASOCHISTIC CULT OF VICTIM”'.

THE CULT OF THE VICTIM IS PRECISELY DICTATED BY THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC. 'AS SOON AS YOU WANT TO CREATE A PERFECT SOCIETY', 'YOU ARE OBLIGED TO DESTROY THE ORGANIC SOCIETY'.

AND IT IS FROM THIS HORROR OF THE ORGANIC MODEL, 'OF BIOLOGY', OF LIFE, 'THAT THE MONOTHEIST HAS'.

'THIS HATRED OF THE LIVING', 'THIS HATRED OF NATURE'. 'NATURE THAT THEY SEEK TO DESTROY' 'BY THE ECOLOGIST MOVEMENT' applying Global Solutions.

THIS JEW ... THIS CHRISTIAN CANNOT STAND BEING 'AT THE MERCY OF THE ELEMENTS'. HENCE THE NEED TO TO BREAK AWAY 'WITH ANTIQUITY'. THE NEED 'TO TO BREAK AWAY WITH HIERARCHY'–'WITH POWER', 'AND THE CLASS MODEL'.

AND YET, TO TAKE THE EXAMPLE OF HOMOSEXUALS, “THEY CAN ONLY BE STRONG” IF THEY RESPECT “THEIR CLASS OF HOMOSEXUALS”.

THEY LOSE ALL THEIR POWER, THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT EQUALITY FOR ALL'. THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT TO BE EQUAL TO HETEROSEXUALS'.

OBVIOUSLY 'THERE WILL ALWAYS BE HETEROSEXUALS', SO THIS FEELING OF REJECTION TOWARDS HOMOSEXUALS 'WILL ALWAYS BE THERE'.

MONOTHEISM SEEKS TO RESOLVE ALL CONFLICTS, 'TO PACIFY ALL TIME'.

'LOOK AT THE JEWS', 'THEY ARE OBSESSED BY THIS', and do not understand that “like the homosexuals”, 'they do the opposite of what they should do'. Hence the reason for their systematic expulsion FROM ALMOST EVERYWHERE HISTORICALLY, BECAUSE THERE IS NO MORE INORGANIC PEOPLE THAN THEM.

THE MONOTHEIST “WANTS AN UNATTAINABLE PROJECT”; 'PEACE OF THE WORLD' WHERE THE ESOTERIC TEXTS SPEAK OF 'PEACE WITHIN'.

That's why 'I say THAT THIS IDIOT, FROM THE CHRISTIAN TO THE JEW' 'HAVE NEVER UNDERSTOOD ANYTHING ABOUT ESOTERICISM'. They don't get the Old and New Testament, they don't understand 'what is esoterically written 'in it'. They don't get Unity, they whom they awkwardly call 'God'.

IN SHORT, they don't understand 'ANYTHING', and 'destroy this world'.

PEACE IS AN 'ESOTERIC PROJECT'. It's giving up the ego. Christ means death: coffin (qrsw),

bury (qrs). The 'DEATH OF THE EGO' and 'THEREFORE OF THE INTELLECT'. The Monotheists DON'T WANT THIS, INVENT 'HISTORICAL FABLES'.

To awaken is 'to awaken INTERNALLY'.

THE MONOTHEIST, THE JEW...THE CHRISTIAN SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', 'BECAUSE HE IS UNABLE TO FIND CALM-PEACE 'WITHIN HIMSELF'.

'HE DOES NOT FIND THIS CALM'; 'HE THEREFORE PERPETUALLY PROJECTS 'WARS' IT ON THE OUTSIDE'; ONTO A 'POLITICAL WORLD'. THROUGH MORE INTELLECT 'GAMES', 'WITH MORE PROBLEM CREATIONS'.

AND THE MORE HE SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', THROUGH THE WEST 'AND ITS RAYS OF ACTION'; THE MORE 'HE WILL DESTABILIZE THIS WORLD'.

AND I BET THAT THE 'THIRD WORLD WAR' WILL BE AGAINST 'MONOTHEISM'. It was already 'More or Less' Latent 'WITH THE SECOND WORLD WAR'. AND THAT IT WILL BE ASIA AGAINST 'THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT'. ASIA THAT 'HAS NO DESIRE TO SUCCUMB TO THIS MORIBUND JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC'. AND THIS ASIA WHICH IS “GROWING DAY BY DAY”. THIS FORESHADOWS THE OUTCOME OF THE CONFLICT.

CHRISTIANISM HAS DESTROYED EVERYTHING IN ITS PATH:

• CASTE SYSTEM, PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM, FAMILY, TRIBES, PAGANISM. BUT IN DESTROYING 'ALL THIS':

IT HAS LEFT THE 'WHOLE WORLD' 'WITHOUT SUPPORT'. WITHOUT THE GROUP: ESSENTIAL 'CORE TO LIFE'.

IT HAS 'SUPPLANTED THIS' 'BY THE EGALITARIAN TOTALITARIAN MODEL'.

THE WESTERN FAMILY 'UNIT'; 'THE NUCLEAR FAMILY' HAS SUCCUMBED TO THE NUMBER OF DIVORCES, 'TO ITS UNREALISTIC NATURE'.

THESE CHRISTIAN STORIES 'WILL END BADLY'.

BY DINT OF PISSING OFF ALL THE TEMPERS, IT WILL CREATE THIS THIRD WORLD WAR.

WHICH IF PROJECTED, WILL BE GIGANTIC IN ITS MAGNITUDE MUCH MORE THAN THE TWO PREVIOUS ONES.

THIS CHRISTIAN ETHIC 'LEADS TO THAT'; TO DESTRUCTION.

THE WEST AND THE WESTERNER 'WILL PAY DEARLY FOR HIS AFFRONT TO NATURE'.

THE CHRISTIAN-JEW IS REALLY 'THE MOST VILE THING' 'THERE IS'. HE'S THE ACTUAL 'FIGURE OF REBELLION AGAINST NATURE'. BEYOND THAT ... IT'S THE DOMINATION OF THE INTELLECT 'OVER THE DAILY LIFE OF THE PEOPLE; A DOMINATION SOLD 'AS A LIBERATION'.

BUT WESTERNERS DON'T KNOW THAT, DON'T UNDERSTAND IT ... EXCEPT THAT THIS LIBERATION IS 'THE ONE ON THE MATTER' ... 'AND THAT IN THE END', “IT MEANS NOTHING”. “FOR YOU HAVE REALLY DOMINATED NOTHING”. YOU DESTROY YOURSELVES, YOU KNOW IT, BUT YOU ARE TOO MORBID 'TO GO BACK'.

IT IS THUS A 'FALSE DOMINATION' 'THAT IT IS ABOUT'. A DOMINATION “OF THE DEMOS” ... 'SOLD AS PROGRESS AND LIBERATION'.

EXCEPT THAT THE INTELLECT IS PRECISELY 'WHAT ONE MUST GET RID OF IN ORDER TO REACH AWAKENING'. AND THAT THE CHRISTIAN WESTERNERS 'HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT FAVOR IT SINCE THEY ARRIVED'.

THAT THE WESTERNERS CONTINUE 'THEIR WORK OF DESTRUCTION OF THE WORLD'. 'WORLD WHICH IN 'ITS TURN WILL DESTROY THEM''.

APPARENTLY, IT WILL TAKE 'A NEW CIVILIZATION TO UNDERSTAND THAT'.

Catholic Inquisition &: “Modernity” #Inquisition #Catholic-Inquisition #Catholicism #Christianism #Modernity #Christianity #west #Tatischeff #Jacques-Tati #Tati #Esotericism #Esoterism #Esoteric

https://bittube.tv/post/ead075a9-06ea-4bc7-8a60-c06da766c0e4 https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/Catholic-Inquisition-----Modernity-:6 https://tube.midov.pl/w/gfr1wAqfoXLtrvBnfp25Si https://www.bitchute.com/video/WPB043O1FPem/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ FINEARTAMERICA https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/periodicreset-ofcivilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com ▶ ZAZZLE https://www.zazzle.com/store/periodic_reset/products

The Jew ... the Christian, the Hatred for Nature: Paganism.

“Paganism is the true science. Jews have problem thriving in a NATURAL WORLD [...].”

There is a statistic I like to repeat:

The Jewish problem 0.2% World Population/20% of the Nobel prizes. When you understand THIS STATISTIC, you understand 'THE WORLD PROBLEM'.

“No one is safe until everyone is safe”, you can read 'ALL OVER THE PLACE' among the 'Covid Vaccination Promoters'.

This is the Judeo-Christian ethic of 'CONTROL OVER NATURE', originally driven by the 'JEWISH RELIGION'. THE CONTROL OF NATURE IS OF COURSE AN ILLUSION.

“For God's sake, BROTHERS, get vaccinated.”

Brothers?

Are we all brothers?

BY VIRTUE OF WHAT?

This judeo-christian ethic IS UNBEARABLE. NO, WE ARE NOT BROTHERS. BROTHERHOOD 'HAS NEVER EXISTED' WITHIN HUMANITY: 'THIS COLLECTIVIST CONCEPT IS TO BE VOMITED'.

THE HUMAN BEING IS UNIQUE 'IN HIS ESSENCE'.

If one day “You Awaken”; you will find yourself 'on the other side of the mind' “CONTEMPLATING THE MIND”, and you will understand “THAT DUALITY IS AN ILLUSION”.

BUT UNITY DOES NOT MEAN COLLECTIVISM, IT'S THE OPPOSITE.

THIS COLLECTIVIST INSANITY has given us all the socialisms and even their application... COMMUNISM.

NO WE ARE NOT BROTHERS.

From Swami Abhayananda:

“[...] in the following “Great Exposition” attributed to the gnostic, Simon Magus of Samaria, who was a contemporary of the Christian apostle, Peter, this mystically perceived duality-in-Unity is magnificently explained:

“There are two aspects of the One. The first of these is the Higher, the Divine Mind of the universe, which governs all things, and is masculine. The other is the lower, the Thought (epinoia) which produces all things, and is feminine. As a pair united, they comprise all that exists.

The Divine Mind is the Father who sustains all things and nourishes all that begins and ends. He is the One who eternally stands, without beginning or end. He exists entirely alone; for, while the Thought arising from Unity, and coming forth from the Divine Mind, creates [the appearance of] duality, the Father remains a Unity. The Thought is in Himself, and so He is alone. Made manifest to Himself from Himself, He appears to be two. He becomes “Father” by virtue of being called so by His own Thought.

Since He, Himself, brought forward Himself, by means of Himself, manifesting to Himself His own Thought, it is not correct to attribute creation to the Thought alone. For She (the Thought) conceals the Father within Herself; the Divine Mind and the Thought are intertwined. Thus, though [they appear] to be a pair, one opposite the other, the Divine Mind is in no way different from the Thought, inasmuch as they are one.

Though there appears to be a Higher, the Mind, and a lower, the Thought, truly, It is a Unity, just as what is manifested from these two [that is, the universe] is a unity, while appearing to be a duality. The Divine Mind and the Thought are discernible, one from the other, but they are one, though they appear to be two.””

It has been said for hundreds of years, the Christian and the Judeo-Christian ethic IS THE LOWEST IN TERMS OF INTELLIGENCE.

And this is confirmed with the covid, and these western hicks 'WHO TRY TO STOP NATURE'.

THE WESTERNER IS THE ULTIMATE IN DEPRAVITY; YOU CAN'T GET ANY LOWER.

That the Westerner HAS ADHERED 'to this Jewish ethic' IS 'ANOTHER THING', WHICH SHOWS 'HOW LITTLE VIABILITY THIS PEOPLE OF THE WEST HAD'.

No viable people would have adhered 'to the Jewish Ethic' 'if they WERE NOT ALREADY DESTROYED INTERNALLY'. The fact that they have not been able to CREATE ELITES since that time 'IS ANOTHER PROOF'.

From A Courtship after Marriage: Sexuality and Love in Mexican Transnational Families by Jennifer Hirsch:

“Habermas, DESCRIBES AS THE “PROJECT OF MODERNITY”:

“THE SCIENTIFIC DOMINATION OF NATURE PROMISED FREEDOM FROM SCARCITY, WANT, AND THE ARBITRARINESS OF NATURAL CALAMITY.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF RATIONAL FORMS OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION AND RATIONAL MODES OF THOUGHT PROMISED LIBERATION from the irrationalities of myth, religion, superstition, release from the arbitrary use of power as well as from the dark side of our own human natures.

Only through such a project could the universal, eternal, and the immutable qualities of all humanity be revealed.

Enlightenment thought ... embraced the idea of progress, and actively sought that break with history and tradition which modernity espouses.

It was, above all, a secular movement that sought the demystification and desacralization of knowledge and social organization in order to liberate human beings from their chains.””

If you have a ruling class, which deals WITH KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION.

WHY CHANGE THIS?

UNLESS YOU WANT TO 'BECOME THE RULER' INSTEAD OF THE RULER; “WHICH IS THE TRUE PROJECT OF MODERNITY” ... OF DEMOCRACY. 'THE POWER TO THE MANY'. NIHILISM, THROUGH THE ABANDONMENT 'OF THE SOCIAL PROJECT' AKA 'THE JEWISH ETHICS'.

But can the general public understand how the PCR Test WORKS, why it is unsuitable 'for testing diseases'?

Can the people understand 'that a virus can't be stopped', 'because humans ARE MOBILE BEINGS'?

Is the majority of the people able to understand 'that this mask that they wear IS USELESS'?

That vaccines WILL BE USELESS to stop this virus, 'BECAUSE HUMAN NATURE AS NATURE IS ORGANIC AND NOT ROBOTIC'. YOU CANNOT ANTICIPATE/ORGANIZE NATURE.

It is the OLD DREAM OF THE JEW and HIS HATRED OF THE PAGAN, TAKEN UP 'BY THAT IDIOT CHRISTIAN IN THE WEST'.

… NO, AGAINST ALL THIS, THE CHRISTIAN ETHIC OF MONOTHEISM “REBELS”; AGAINST NATURE … AGAINST LIFE. “EVERYTHING MUST BE CONTROLLED”, “AND ALL THE TIME”.

Nietzsche was right:

“Christianity is a revolt of all creatures that creep on the ground against everything that is lofty: the gospel of the “lowly” lowers....”

It happened in history, 'A REVOLT OF THE PEOPLE AGAINST THE TRUE ELITE', and who decided “to take in hand their destiny”. Except that 'this project 'DESTROYS EVERYTHING' that is ALIVE', and behind, IT IS THE GOAL; 'TO DESTROY LIFE'.

Who in his right mind WOULD HAVE STOPPED LIFE for months in order to stop nature.

THE OLD HATRED OF THE JEW, THEN 'OF THE CHRISTIAN' 'FOR EVERYTHING THAT IS ALIVE', EVERYTHING 'THAT IS INCARNATED' ... AND INSTEAD 'TO PREFER THE INTELLECT'.

THIS PEOPLE ARE UNABLE TO ORIENT THEMSELVES. Further on ... THIS PEOPLE have NO INTERNAL CONNECTION, 'NO CONNECTION WITH NATURE', NO CONNECTION WITH ANIMALS. THEY SEE THEMSELVES AS 'SUPERIOR' TO OTHER ANIMALS, TO NATURE'.

THEY WANDER; 'THE WANDERING JEW' … IN THE WEST 'IT IS THE CHRISTIAN'.

... Deep Connection which “Would allow them to have Deep Thoughts”, BUT ONLY HAVE THE INTELLECT 'TO RELY ON'.

IT IS THIS ESTABLISHED ORDER; OF THE TRADITION, THAT THE MODERNITY ATTACKED BY THE CHRISTIANISM 'HAS TRIED TO ERASE', 'UNTIL THE CURRENT TOTAL IMPLOSION OF THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

NOTHING 'WILL REMAIN OF THIS CONTINENT'. 'NOTHING'. 'OF THIS WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

WHICH 'ASKS FOR DEATH'.

'THIS IS WHAT THE JEW DEMANDS', BUT THE WESTERNER 'HAS ACCEPTED HIS THOUGHT'. 'HE IS AS MUCH A JEW AS THE JEW'.

AND AS THIS CONTINENT DOES NOT WANT TO RETURN TO THE TRADITION, “AND TO ADMIT ITS ERROR”; 'IT WILL PREFER TO COMMIT' SUICIDE RATHER 'THAN TO SURVIVE'.

THE WESTERN CONTINENT IS 'NOW TO FLEE', FOR THE 'ENTERPRISING' YOUNG GENERATIONS OF THE WEST.

THEY HAVE 'TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE', 'WHERE LIFE CAN TAKE'.

THE “MONOTHEISTIC” VIRUS 'HAS COME TO THE WEST'. IT IS NOW NECESSARY THAT THE BRAVEST LEAVE 'THIS CONTINENT', AND CONTINUE 'TO SPREAD' THE TRADITION 'IN ITS WESTERN FORM', WHICH EXISTED BEFORE 'IT WAS RAVAGED BY MONOTHEISM'.

THIS UNBEARABLE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC.

From A Freethinker's Primer of Male Love by John Lauritsen:

“In classical antiquity, sex between males was just that, sex between males; then, with the intrusion of Judeo-Christian morality, it became an abomination and a sin. With the desacralization of the penal code it became a crime (sodomy, buggery, unnatural lewdness, indecency, etc.).

Under the Medical and Minority Models it became a sickness and then a forme of deviance — which is precisely what is implied by the word “queer”.

The gay movement has lost its bearings: mired down in identity politics, masochistically committed to the cult of victimhood, and futilely striving for a simulacrum of respectability (for example “gay marriages”).”

QUEERS and all those who claim to be “different” HAVE BEEN OSTRACIZED BY THE “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT”, IN ANTIQUITY 'THEY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT “THOSE DIFFERENCES”'.

I'm not sure that this public now struggling not to be ostracized understand that THIS PURITANICAL JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT 'IS PRECISELY THAT WHICH OSTRACIZES THEM'. OR THAT THEY 'WANT TO UNDERSTAND', 'FAR TOO COILED UP “IN THEIR MASOCHISTIC CULT OF VICTIM”'.

THE CULT OF THE VICTIM IS PRECISELY DICTATED BY THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC. 'AS SOON AS YOU WANT TO CREATE A PERFECT SOCIETY', 'YOU ARE OBLIGED TO DESTROY THE ORGANIC SOCIETY'.

AND IT IS FROM THIS HORROR OF THE ORGANIC MODEL, 'OF BIOLOGY', OF LIFE, 'THAT THE MONOTHEIST HAS'.

'THIS HATRED OF THE LIVING', 'THIS HATRED OF NATURE'. 'NATURE THAT THEY SEEK TO DESTROY' 'BY THE ECOLOGIST MOVEMENT' applying Global Solutions.

THIS JEW ... THIS CHRISTIAN CANNOT STAND BEING 'AT THE MERCY OF THE ELEMENTS'. HENCE THE NEED TO TO BREAK AWAY 'WITH ANTIQUITY'. THE NEED 'TO TO BREAK AWAY WITH HIERARCHY'–'WITH POWER', 'AND THE CLASS MODEL'.

AND YET, TO TAKE THE EXAMPLE OF HOMOSEXUALS, “THEY CAN ONLY BE STRONG” IF THEY RESPECT “THEIR CLASS OF HOMOSEXUALS”.

THEY LOSE ALL THEIR POWER, THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT EQUALITY FOR ALL'. THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT TO BE EQUAL TO HETEROSEXUALS'.

OBVIOUSLY 'THERE WILL ALWAYS BE HETEROSEXUALS', SO THIS FEELING OF REJECTION TOWARDS HOMOSEXUALS 'WILL ALWAYS BE THERE'.

MONOTHEISM SEEKS TO RESOLVE ALL CONFLICTS, 'TO PACIFY ALL TIME'.

'LOOK AT THE JEWS', 'THEY ARE OBSESSED BY THIS', and do not understand that “like the homosexuals”, 'they do the opposite of what they should do'. Hence the reason for their systematic expulsion FROM ALMOST EVERYWHERE HISTORICALLY, BECAUSE THERE IS NO MORE INORGANIC PEOPLE THAN THEM.

THE MONOTHEIST “WANTS AN UNATTAINABLE PROJECT”; 'PEACE OF THE WORLD' WHERE THE ESOTERIC TEXTS SPEAK OF 'PEACE WITHIN'.

That's why 'I say THAT THIS IDIOT, FROM THE CHRISTIAN TO THE JEW' 'HAVE NEVER UNDERSTOOD ANYTHING ABOUT ESOTERICISM'. They don't get the Old and New Testament, they don't understand 'what is esoterically written 'in it'. They don't get Unity, they whom they awkwardly call 'God'.

IN SHORT, they don't understand 'ANYTHING', and 'destroy this world'.

PEACE IS AN 'ESOTERIC PROJECT'. It's giving up the ego. Christ means death: coffin (qrsw),

bury (qrs). The 'DEATH OF THE EGO' and 'THEREFORE OF THE INTELLECT'. The Monotheists DON'T WANT THIS, INVENT 'HISTORICAL FABLES'.

To awaken is 'to awaken INTERNALLY'.

THE MONOTHEIST, THE JEW...THE CHRISTIAN SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', 'BECAUSE HE IS UNABLE TO FIND CALM-PEACE 'WITHIN HIMSELF'.

'HE DOES NOT FIND THIS CALM'; 'HE THEREFORE PERPETUALLY PROJECTS 'WARS' IT ON THE OUTSIDE'; ONTO A 'POLITICAL WORLD'. THROUGH MORE INTELLECT 'GAMES', 'WITH MORE PROBLEM CREATIONS'.

AND THE MORE HE SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', THROUGH THE WEST 'AND ITS RAYS OF ACTION'; THE MORE 'HE WILL DESTABILIZE THIS WORLD'.

AND I BET THAT THE 'THIRD WORLD WAR' WILL BE AGAINST 'MONOTHEISM'. It was already 'More or Less' Latent 'WITH THE SECOND WORLD WAR'. AND THAT IT WILL BE ASIA AGAINST 'THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT'. ASIA THAT 'HAS NO DESIRE TO SUCCUMB TO THIS MORIBUND JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC'. AND THIS ASIA WHICH IS “GROWING DAY BY DAY”. THIS FORESHADOWS THE OUTCOME OF THE CONFLICT.

CHRISTIANISM HAS DESTROYED EVERYTHING IN ITS PATH:

• CASTE SYSTEM, PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM, FAMILY, TRIBES, PAGANISM. BUT IN DESTROYING 'ALL THIS':

IT HAS LEFT THE 'WHOLE WORLD' 'WITHOUT SUPPORT'. WITHOUT THE GROUP: ESSENTIAL 'CORE TO LIFE'.

IT HAS 'SUPPLANTED THIS' 'BY THE EGALITARIAN TOTALITARIAN MODEL'.

THE WESTERN FAMILY 'UNIT'; 'THE NUCLEAR FAMILY' HAS SUCCUMBED TO THE NUMBER OF DIVORCES, 'TO ITS UNREALISTIC NATURE'.

THESE CHRISTIAN STORIES 'WILL END BADLY'.

BY DINT OF PISSING OFF ALL THE TEMPERS, IT WILL CREATE THIS THIRD WORLD WAR.

WHICH IF PROJECTED, WILL BE GIGANTIC IN ITS MAGNITUDE MUCH MORE THAN THE TWO PREVIOUS ONES.

THIS CHRISTIAN ETHIC 'LEADS TO THAT'; TO DESTRUCTION.

THE WEST AND THE WESTERNER 'WILL PAY DEARLY FOR HIS AFFRONT TO NATURE'.

THE CHRISTIAN-JEW IS REALLY 'THE MOST VILE THING' 'THERE IS'. HE'S THE ACTUAL 'FIGURE OF REBELLION AGAINST NATURE'. BEYOND THAT ... IT'S THE DOMINATION OF THE INTELLECT 'OVER THE DAILY LIFE OF THE PEOPLE; A DOMINATION SOLD 'AS A LIBERATION'.

BUT WESTERNERS DON'T KNOW THAT, DON'T UNDERSTAND IT ... EXCEPT THAT THIS LIBERATION IS 'THE ONE ON THE MATTER' ... 'AND THAT IN THE END', “IT MEANS NOTHING”. “FOR YOU HAVE REALLY DOMINATED NOTHING”. YOU DESTROY YOURSELVES, YOU KNOW IT, BUT YOU ARE TOO MORBID 'TO GO BACK'.

IT IS THUS A 'FALSE DOMINATION' 'THAT IT IS ABOUT'. A DOMINATION “OF THE DEMOS” ... 'SOLD AS PROGRESS AND LIBERATION'.

EXCEPT THAT THE INTELLECT IS PRECISELY 'WHAT ONE MUST GET RID OF IN ORDER TO REACH AWAKENING'. AND THAT THE CHRISTIAN WESTERNERS 'HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT FAVOR IT SINCE THEY ARRIVED'.

THAT THE WESTERNERS CONTINUE 'THEIR WORK OF DESTRUCTION OF THE WORLD'. 'WORLD WHICH IN 'ITS TURN WILL DESTROY THEM''.

APPARENTLY, IT WILL TAKE 'A NEW CIVILIZATION TO UNDERSTAND THAT'.

The Jew ... the Christian, the Hatred for Nature: Paganism #Jew #Christian #Paganism #Nature-Hatred #Nature #Jewish #Christianity #Christianism #Esotericism #Esoterism #Esoteric

https://bittube.tv/post/e619ed1c-d523-4c2e-81d5-f76bd89df941 https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/The-Jew-...-the-Christian,-the-Hatred-for-Nature--Paganism:5 https://tube.midov.pl/w/eiFE2NN5fSGtZyjZfqYky9 https://www.bitchute.com/video/FETmIyWQfM3N/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ FINEARTAMERICA https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/periodicreset-ofcivilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com ▶ ZAZZLE https://www.zazzle.com/store/periodic_reset/products

Queers homos and 'modernity': Exasperation of Judeo-Christian Ethics.

“Paganism is the true science. Jews have problem thriving in a NATURAL WORLD [...].”

There is a statistic I like to repeat:

The Jewish problem 0.2% World Population/20% of the Nobel prizes. When you understand THIS STATISTIC, you understand 'THE WORLD PROBLEM'.

“No one is safe until everyone is safe”, you can read 'ALL OVER THE PLACE' among the 'Covid Vaccination Promoters'.

This is the Judeo-Christian ethic of 'CONTROL OVER NATURE', originally driven by the 'JEWISH RELIGION'. THE CONTROL OF NATURE IS OF COURSE AN ILLUSION.

“For God's sake, BROTHERS, get vaccinated.”

Brothers?

Are we all brothers?

BY VIRTUE OF WHAT?

This judeo-christian ethic IS UNBEARABLE. NO, WE ARE NOT BROTHERS. BROTHERHOOD 'HAS NEVER EXISTED' WITHIN HUMANITY: 'THIS COLLECTIVIST CONCEPT IS TO BE VOMITED'.

THE HUMAN BEING IS UNIQUE 'IN HIS ESSENCE'.

If one day “You Awaken”; you will find yourself 'on the other side of the mind' “CONTEMPLATING THE MIND”, and you will understand “THAT DUALITY IS AN ILLUSION”.

BUT UNITY DOES NOT MEAN COLLECTIVISM, IT'S THE OPPOSITE.

THIS COLLECTIVIST INSANITY has given us all the socialisms and even their application... COMMUNISM.

NO WE ARE NOT BROTHERS.

From Swami Abhayananda:

“[...] in the following “Great Exposition” attributed to the gnostic, Simon Magus of Samaria, who was a contemporary of the Christian apostle, Peter, this mystically perceived duality-in-Unity is magnificently explained:

“There are two aspects of the One. The first of these is the Higher, the Divine Mind of the universe, which governs all things, and is masculine. The other is the lower, the Thought (epinoia) which produces all things, and is feminine. As a pair united, they comprise all that exists.

The Divine Mind is the Father who sustains all things and nourishes all that begins and ends. He is the One who eternally stands, without beginning or end. He exists entirely alone; for, while the Thought arising from Unity, and coming forth from the Divine Mind, creates [the appearance of] duality, the Father remains a Unity. The Thought is in Himself, and so He is alone. Made manifest to Himself from Himself, He appears to be two. He becomes “Father” by virtue of being called so by His own Thought.

Since He, Himself, brought forward Himself, by means of Himself, manifesting to Himself His own Thought, it is not correct to attribute creation to the Thought alone. For She (the Thought) conceals the Father within Herself; the Divine Mind and the Thought are intertwined. Thus, though [they appear] to be a pair, one opposite the other, the Divine Mind is in no way different from the Thought, inasmuch as they are one.

Though there appears to be a Higher, the Mind, and a lower, the Thought, truly, It is a Unity, just as what is manifested from these two [that is, the universe] is a unity, while appearing to be a duality. The Divine Mind and the Thought are discernible, one from the other, but they are one, though they appear to be two.””

It has been said for hundreds of years, the Christian and the Judeo-Christian ethic IS THE LOWEST IN TERMS OF INTELLIGENCE.

And this is confirmed with the covid, and these western hicks 'WHO TRY TO STOP NATURE'.

THE WESTERNER IS THE ULTIMATE IN DEPRAVITY; YOU CAN'T GET ANY LOWER.

That the Westerner HAS ADHERED 'to this Jewish ethic' IS 'ANOTHER THING', WHICH SHOWS 'HOW LITTLE VIABILITY THIS PEOPLE OF THE WEST HAD'.

No viable people would have adhered 'to the Jewish Ethic' 'if they WERE NOT ALREADY DESTROYED INTERNALLY'. The fact that they have not been able to CREATE ELITES since that time 'IS ANOTHER PROOF'.

From A Courtship after Marriage: Sexuality and Love in Mexican Transnational Families by Jennifer Hirsch:

“Habermas, DESCRIBES AS THE “PROJECT OF MODERNITY”:

“THE SCIENTIFIC DOMINATION OF NATURE PROMISED FREEDOM FROM SCARCITY, WANT, AND THE ARBITRARINESS OF NATURAL CALAMITY.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF RATIONAL FORMS OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION AND RATIONAL MODES OF THOUGHT PROMISED LIBERATION from the irrationalities of myth, religion, superstition, release from the arbitrary use of power as well as from the dark side of our own human natures.

Only through such a project could the universal, eternal, and the immutable qualities of all humanity be revealed.

Enlightenment thought ... embraced the idea of progress, and actively sought that break with history and tradition which modernity espouses.

It was, above all, a secular movement that sought the demystification and desacralization of knowledge and social organization in order to liberate human beings from their chains.””

If you have a ruling class, which deals WITH KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION.

WHY CHANGE THIS?

UNLESS YOU WANT TO 'BECOME THE RULER' INSTEAD OF THE RULER; “WHICH IS THE TRUE PROJECT OF MODERNITY” ... OF DEMOCRACY. 'THE POWER TO THE MANY'. NIHILISM, THROUGH THE ABANDONMENT 'OF THE SOCIAL PROJECT' AKA 'THE JEWISH ETHICS'.

But can the general public understand how the PCR Test WORKS, why it is unsuitable 'for testing diseases'?

Can the people understand 'that a virus can't be stopped', 'because humans ARE MOBILE BEINGS'?

Is the majority of the people able to understand 'that this mask that they wear IS USELESS'?

That vaccines WILL BE USELESS to stop this virus, 'BECAUSE HUMAN NATURE AS NATURE IS ORGANIC AND NOT ROBOTIC'. YOU CANNOT ANTICIPATE/ORGANIZE NATURE.

It is the OLD DREAM OF THE JEW and HIS HATRED OF THE PAGAN, TAKEN UP 'BY THAT IDIOT CHRISTIAN IN THE WEST'.

… NO, AGAINST ALL THIS, THE CHRISTIAN ETHIC OF MONOTHEISM “REBELS”; AGAINST NATURE … AGAINST LIFE. “EVERYTHING MUST BE CONTROLLED”, “AND ALL THE TIME”.

Nietzsche was right:

“Christianity is a revolt of all creatures that creep on the ground against everything that is lofty: the gospel of the “lowly” lowers....”

It happened in history, 'A REVOLT OF THE PEOPLE AGAINST THE TRUE ELITE', and who decided “to take in hand their destiny”. Except that 'this project 'DESTROYS EVERYTHING' that is ALIVE', and behind, IT IS THE GOAL; 'TO DESTROY LIFE'.

Who in his right mind WOULD HAVE STOPPED LIFE for months in order to stop nature.

THE OLD HATRED OF THE JEW, THEN 'OF THE CHRISTIAN' 'FOR EVERYTHING THAT IS ALIVE', EVERYTHING 'THAT IS INCARNATED' ... AND INSTEAD 'TO PREFER THE INTELLECT'.

THIS PEOPLE ARE UNABLE TO ORIENT THEMSELVES. Further on ... THIS PEOPLE have NO INTERNAL CONNECTION, 'NO CONNECTION WITH NATURE', NO CONNECTION WITH ANIMALS. THEY SEE THEMSELVES AS 'SUPERIOR' TO OTHER ANIMALS, TO NATURE'.

THEY WANDER; 'THE WANDERING JEW' … IN THE WEST 'IT IS THE CHRISTIAN'.

... Deep Connection which “Would allow them to have Deep Thoughts”, BUT ONLY HAVE THE INTELLECT 'TO RELY ON'.

IT IS THIS ESTABLISHED ORDER; OF THE TRADITION, THAT THE MODERNITY ATTACKED BY THE CHRISTIANISM 'HAS TRIED TO ERASE', 'UNTIL THE CURRENT TOTAL IMPLOSION OF THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

NOTHING 'WILL REMAIN OF THIS CONTINENT'. 'NOTHING'. 'OF THIS WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

WHICH 'ASKS FOR DEATH'.

'THIS IS WHAT THE JEW DEMANDS', BUT THE WESTERNER 'HAS ACCEPTED HIS THOUGHT'. 'HE IS AS MUCH A JEW AS THE JEW'.

AND AS THIS CONTINENT DOES NOT WANT TO RETURN TO THE TRADITION, “AND TO ADMIT ITS ERROR”; 'IT WILL PREFER TO COMMIT' SUICIDE RATHER 'THAN TO SURVIVE'.

THE WESTERN CONTINENT IS 'NOW TO FLEE', FOR THE 'ENTERPRISING' YOUNG GENERATIONS OF THE WEST.

THEY HAVE 'TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE', 'WHERE LIFE CAN TAKE'.

THE “MONOTHEISTIC” VIRUS 'HAS COME TO THE WEST'. IT IS NOW NECESSARY THAT THE BRAVEST LEAVE 'THIS CONTINENT', AND CONTINUE 'TO SPREAD' THE TRADITION 'IN ITS WESTERN FORM', WHICH EXISTED BEFORE 'IT WAS RAVAGED BY MONOTHEISM'.

THIS UNBEARABLE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC.

From A Freethinker's Primer of Male Love by John Lauritsen:

“In classical antiquity, sex between males was just that, sex between males; then, with the intrusion of Judeo-Christian morality, it became an abomination and a sin. With the desacralization of the penal code it became a crime (sodomy, buggery, unnatural lewdness, indecency, etc.).

Under the Medical and Minority Models it became a sickness and then a forme of deviance — which is precisely what is implied by the word “queer”.

The gay movement has lost its bearings: mired down in identity politics, masochistically committed to the cult of victimhood, and futilely striving for a simulacrum of respectability (for example “gay marriages”).”

QUEERS and all those who claim to be “different” HAVE BEEN OSTRACIZED BY THE “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT”, IN ANTIQUITY 'THEY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT “THOSE DIFFERENCES”'.

I'm not sure that this public now struggling not to be ostracized understand that THIS PURITANICAL JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT 'IS PRECISELY THAT WHICH OSTRACIZES THEM'. OR THAT THEY 'WANT TO UNDERSTAND', 'FAR TOO COILED UP “IN THEIR MASOCHISTIC CULT OF VICTIM”'.

THE CULT OF THE VICTIM IS PRECISELY DICTATED BY THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC. 'AS SOON AS YOU WANT TO CREATE A PERFECT SOCIETY', 'YOU ARE OBLIGED TO DESTROY THE ORGANIC SOCIETY'.

AND IT IS FROM THIS HORROR OF THE ORGANIC MODEL, 'OF BIOLOGY', OF LIFE, 'THAT THE MONOTHEIST HAS'.

'THIS HATRED OF THE LIVING', 'THIS HATRED OF NATURE'. 'NATURE THAT THEY SEEK TO DESTROY' 'BY THE ECOLOGIST MOVEMENT' applying Global Solutions.

THIS JEW ... THIS CHRISTIAN CANNOT STAND BEING 'AT THE MERCY OF THE ELEMENTS'. HENCE THE NEED TO TO BREAK AWAY 'WITH ANTIQUITY'. THE NEED 'TO TO BREAK AWAY WITH HIERARCHY'–'WITH POWER', 'AND THE CLASS MODEL'.

AND YET, TO TAKE THE EXAMPLE OF HOMOSEXUALS, “THEY CAN ONLY BE STRONG” IF THEY RESPECT “THEIR CLASS OF HOMOSEXUALS”.

THEY LOSE ALL THEIR POWER, THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT EQUALITY FOR ALL'. THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT TO BE EQUAL TO HETEROSEXUALS'.

OBVIOUSLY 'THERE WILL ALWAYS BE HETEROSEXUALS', SO THIS FEELING OF REJECTION TOWARDS HOMOSEXUALS 'WILL ALWAYS BE THERE'.

MONOTHEISM SEEKS TO RESOLVE ALL CONFLICTS, 'TO PACIFY ALL TIME'.

'LOOK AT THE JEWS', 'THEY ARE OBSESSED BY THIS', and do not understand that “like the homosexuals”, 'they do the opposite of what they should do'. Hence the reason for their systematic expulsion FROM ALMOST EVERYWHERE HISTORICALLY, BECAUSE THERE IS NO MORE INORGANIC PEOPLE THAN THEM.

THE MONOTHEIST “WANTS AN UNATTAINABLE PROJECT”; 'PEACE OF THE WORLD' WHERE THE ESOTERIC TEXTS SPEAK OF 'PEACE WITHIN'.

That's why 'I say THAT THIS IDIOT, FROM THE CHRISTIAN TO THE JEW' 'HAVE NEVER UNDERSTOOD ANYTHING ABOUT ESOTERICISM'. They don't get the Old and New Testament, they don't understand 'what is esoterically written 'in it'. They don't get Unity, they whom they awkwardly call 'God'.

IN SHORT, they don't understand 'ANYTHING', and 'destroy this world'.

PEACE IS AN 'ESOTERIC PROJECT'. It's giving up the ego. Christ means death: coffin (qrsw),

bury (qrs). The 'DEATH OF THE EGO' and 'THEREFORE OF THE INTELLECT'. The Monotheists DON'T WANT THIS, INVENT 'HISTORICAL FABLES'.

To awaken is 'to awaken INTERNALLY'.

THE MONOTHEIST, THE JEW...THE CHRISTIAN SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', 'BECAUSE HE IS UNABLE TO FIND CALM-PEACE 'WITHIN HIMSELF'.

'HE DOES NOT FIND THIS CALM'; 'HE THEREFORE PERPETUALLY PROJECTS 'WARS' IT ON THE OUTSIDE'; ONTO A 'POLITICAL WORLD'. THROUGH MORE INTELLECT 'GAMES', 'WITH MORE PROBLEM CREATIONS'.

AND THE MORE HE SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', THROUGH THE WEST 'AND ITS RAYS OF ACTION'; THE MORE 'HE WILL DESTABILIZE THIS WORLD'.

AND I BET THAT THE 'THIRD WORLD WAR' WILL BE AGAINST 'MONOTHEISM'. It was already 'More or Less' Latent 'WITH THE SECOND WORLD WAR'. AND THAT IT WILL BE ASIA AGAINST 'THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT'. ASIA THAT 'HAS NO DESIRE TO SUCCUMB TO THIS MORIBUND JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC'. AND THIS ASIA WHICH IS “GROWING DAY BY DAY”. THIS FORESHADOWS THE OUTCOME OF THE CONFLICT.

CHRISTIANISM HAS DESTROYED EVERYTHING IN ITS PATH:

• CASTE SYSTEM, PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM, FAMILY, TRIBES, PAGANISM. BUT IN DESTROYING 'ALL THIS':

IT HAS LEFT THE 'WHOLE WORLD' 'WITHOUT SUPPORT'. WITHOUT THE GROUP: ESSENTIAL 'CORE TO LIFE'.

IT HAS 'SUPPLANTED THIS' 'BY THE EGALITARIAN TOTALITARIAN MODEL'.

THE WESTERN FAMILY 'UNIT'; 'THE NUCLEAR FAMILY' HAS SUCCUMBED TO THE NUMBER OF DIVORCES, 'TO ITS UNREALISTIC NATURE'.

THESE CHRISTIAN STORIES 'WILL END BADLY'.

BY DINT OF PISSING OFF ALL THE TEMPERS, IT WILL CREATE THIS THIRD WORLD WAR.

WHICH IF PROJECTED, WILL BE GIGANTIC IN ITS MAGNITUDE MUCH MORE THAN THE TWO PREVIOUS ONES.

THIS CHRISTIAN ETHIC 'LEADS TO THAT'; TO DESTRUCTION.

THE WEST AND THE WESTERNER 'WILL PAY DEARLY FOR HIS AFFRONT TO NATURE'.

THE CHRISTIAN-JEW IS REALLY 'THE MOST VILE THING' 'THERE IS'. HE'S THE ACTUAL 'FIGURE OF REBELLION AGAINST NATURE'. BEYOND THAT ... IT'S THE DOMINATION OF THE INTELLECT 'OVER THE DAILY LIFE OF THE PEOPLE; A DOMINATION SOLD 'AS A LIBERATION'.

BUT WESTERNERS DON'T KNOW THAT, DON'T UNDERSTAND IT ... EXCEPT THAT THIS LIBERATION IS 'THE ONE ON THE MATTER' ... 'AND THAT IN THE END', “IT MEANS NOTHING”. “FOR YOU HAVE REALLY DOMINATED NOTHING”. YOU DESTROY YOURSELVES, YOU KNOW IT, BUT YOU ARE TOO MORBID 'TO GO BACK'.

IT IS THUS A 'FALSE DOMINATION' 'THAT IT IS ABOUT'. A DOMINATION “OF THE DEMOS” ... 'SOLD AS PROGRESS AND LIBERATION'.

EXCEPT THAT THE INTELLECT IS PRECISELY 'WHAT ONE MUST GET RID OF IN ORDER TO REACH AWAKENING'. AND THAT THE CHRISTIAN WESTERNERS 'HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT FAVOR IT SINCE THEY ARRIVED'.

THAT THE WESTERNERS CONTINUE 'THEIR WORK OF DESTRUCTION OF THE WORLD'. 'WORLD WHICH IN 'ITS TURN WILL DESTROY THEM''.

APPARENTLY, IT WILL TAKE 'A NEW CIVILIZATION TO UNDERSTAND THAT'.

Queers homos and 'modernity': Exasperation of Judeo-Christian Ethics #Judeo-Christian_Ethics #modernity #Judeo-Christian #Ethics #Queers #homos #Esotericism #Esoterism

The christian democracy: separation of Church and State, liberal democracies.

Christians DESTROYED EUROPE by implanting 'THE RULE OF ALTRUISM' into politics ... GIVING DEMOCRACY.

All is not lost, I finally FOUND A 'BOOMER' 'THAT MAKES SENSE'.

From What is the West? by Philippe Nemo, Kenneth Casler (trans):

“I maintain that this desacralization of power in Europe is the fruit of the Judeo-Christian tradition; that the very notion of secularity comes from the Bible; and that this is the reason democracy arose only in the West — indeed, that its flourishing may only be possible in the West.

Graham Maddox, the Australian writer, put this remarkably in perspective [in Religion and the Rise of Democracy].

It was the Hebrew prophets who initiated the deep division and creative struggle between “spiritual” and “temporal” power [...]. The prophet does not submit to the king [...].”

THESE CHRISTIAN BASTARDS spread monotheism; the jewish thought in the West; Destroying all Western Thought.

“THE KING CANNOT BE RID OF THE PROPHET: [...].”

SINFUL BABYLON: The State.

THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE:

Christians Refuse the CIVIL SOCIETY—The State. Hence the 'Modern Separation of State and Religion'.

“THE VARIOUS HISTORY BOOKS OF THE BIBLE SHOW THAT THE TWO SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL POWERS CANNOT BE COMBINED IN A SINGLE FIGURE, WHETHER A SACRED KING OR AN EMPEROR POPE.

I explained why this is so above: temporal power as such plays no role in the economy of salvation. It is the prophets and the saints that work for the inner conversion of mortal human beings.

THE ROLE OF THE STATE IS TO GUARANTEE ORDER, TO ENSURE THAT HUMAN SOCIETY DOES NOT DESCEND INTO HELL.

BUT THE STATE DOES NOT HOLD THE KEYS TO PARADISE. THE WORK OF SALVATION is on a different register, completely removed from politics.”

THOSE CHRISTIANS JERKS WITH THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THINKING HAVE JUST DESTROYED 'THE ANCIENT CITY-STATE'.

“For the Hebrews, THE STATE HAD ALWAYS BEEN BABYLON: [...].”

HENCE THE CHRISTIAN'S HATRED FOR THE STATE.

“For the Hebrews, the State had always been Babylon: the Beast, “the abomination that causes desolation.” But Christ lived in a society that, for some time, HAD BEEN CIVILIZED BY THE GREEKS AND THE ROMANS. NO DOUBT HE APPRECIATED THE ABILITY OF THE CIVIC STATE TO IMPOSE ORDER, the lesser evil referred to by Saint Augustine as “the peace of Babylon.” He did not denounce the State. When Pilate questioned him, he answered simply: “I came into the world to bear witness to the

truth.” “Jesus’ statement “Render unto Caesar . . .” endorses this distribution of roles.

His meaning is clear: EACH OF THE TWO POWERS HAS ITS VOCATION AND ITS DOMINION.

The State administers the present, the prophets and saints prepare the future. All Christian societies exhibit this irreducible yet productive discontinuity.

Maddox demonstrated that this was the driving force behind the birth of democracies in modern times.

If Thomism and the Neo-Thomism of the Spanish “Second Scholastic,” joint instigators of the revival of ancient jusnaturalism, were the starting points of liberal principles in Europe, there is little doubt that democracy itself emerged from the fertile soil of Calvinism.

In the writings of the French Huguenots, the Dutch rebels, the English Puritans, and every evangelist of the American Revolution — Calvinists all, steeped in the Old Covenant — again and again the battle cry is for the saints that struggle relentlessly against the kingly idols and “sinful Babylon” of the State.

Only the moral and intellectual elites of civil society — this “holy remnant of Israel” who bear witness to and guide what later will be called “public opinion” — are sacred.”

Christians have never 'understood anything about ESOTERICISM' ... applying these ESOTERIC PRECEPTS to the outside; TO SOCIETY. While these ESOTERIC PRECEPTS “were integrated” in the 'ANTIQUE SOCIETY'.

“Statesmen do not have — and will never have — a monopoly on or privilege of distinguishing Truth, Beauty, or Good. Men and women in government are individuals like any others.

In fact, they may be worse because they have the potential to commit greater sins in view of their greater powers.

Therefore, it would be foolhardy to suppose they have either greater knowledge, inspiration, or vocation that might justify placing them above the law.

UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE, REGULAR ELECTIONS, COLLEGIATE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PEOPLE: THESE ARE THE SIMPLEST AND SECUREST INSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS TO ENSURE CIVIL SOCIETY’S CONSTANT CONTROL OF THE STATE.

Because these safeguards may in certain circumstances be insufficient, the option of insurrection must be left open, which is what Locke does with his “Right of Resistance against Tyranny” (the French Declaration of 1789 included THIS RIGHT OF RESISTANCE AMONG THE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS).

THUS THE STATE IS ONLY LEGITIMATE IF IT DROPS ITS CLAIM TO BEING ABSOLUTE, AND IF IT ACCEPTS THE STATUS OF BEING AN INSTRUMENT.

THIS IS THE PATTERN OF DEMOCRACY.

THUS THE STATE IS ONLY LEGITIMATE IF IT DROPS ITS CLAIM TO BEING ABSOLUTE, AND IF IT ACCEPTS THE STATUS OF BEING AN INSTRUMENT.

THIS IS THE PATTERN OF DEMOCRACY.”

AND TO THINK THAT THESE WESTERN IDIOTS BELIEVE 'THAT DEMOCRACY IS FREEDOM'.

“It would not be unreasonable to claim that the biblical spirit — through the successive agency of the Papal and Calvinist Revolutions — ACCOMPLISHED THE DESACRALIZATION OF THE STATE.

It is this attitude that accustomed Westerners to the idea THAT THE STATE IS MORE FALLIBLE THAN SOCIETY AND that, THEREFORE, SOCIETY MUST BE SOVEREIGN IN THE FINAL INSTANCE.

All else, including the choice of regime — constitutional monarchy, republic, presidential regime, mono/bicameral government, electoral calendars, type of vote, etc. — is a question of procedure.

On the other hand, EVERY POLITICAL PHILOSOPHER WHO EXPRESSED HOSTILITY TO BIBLICAL HERITAGE ALSO EXTOLLED NON-DEMOCRATIC FORMS OF THE STATE, THAT IS THE RE-SACRALIZATION OF THE STATE IN THE FORM OF AUTHORITARIAN OR ABSOLUTIST REGIMES (Machiavelli, Hobbes, Rousseau, Hegel, Maurras), or in the form of totalitarian regimes (Marx, Lenin, neopaganistic Nazis).

Refounding the state in absolute terms, Hegel caused the setback of democracy in Germany by at least 100 years.

Absolutist and, later, Jacobin France ALSO RESACRALIZED THE STATE, indeed to such an extent that whatever was not under State control was reputed to be impure. This is the basis for the claim of the Jacobin-Napoleonic State, and later the Gaullist and Socialist State, to run education and, in general, to be the sole social institution capable of speaking in the name of the general interest.

EVERYWHERE ANTI-BIBLICAL THINKERS FACTIONS REMOVED THE FOUNDATIONS FROM UNDER THE DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLE OF THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE PEOPLE.

THIS HAPPENED WITH EVERY “RED” REVOLUTION AND INSURRECTION FROM THE REIGN OF TERROR DURING THE FRENCH REVOLUTION TO THE RIOTS OF JUNE 1848, FROM THE PARIS COMMUNE TO THE OCTOBER REVOLUTION IN RUSSIA.

IN EACH OF THESE INSTANCES OF VIOLENCE, THE FREE EXPRESSION OF THE PEOPLE’S VOICE WAS IGNORED AND DESPISED, AND ELECTIONS WERE SYSTEMATICALLY POSTPONED SINE DIE.

To Summarize The Argument, DEMOCRACY WAS BORN IN A NATIVE CULTURAL SOIL THAT NURTURED A CONVICTION AND DOCTRINE OF HUMAN FALLIBILITY, [...].”

'A RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE'; THE DOCTRINE “OF HUMAN FALLIBILITY” IS THUS 'AT THE ORIGIN OF THIS CHRISTIAN WEST'.

“TO SUMMARIZE THE ARGUMENT, DEMOCRACY WAS BORN IN A NATIVE CULTURAL SOIL THAT NURTURED A CONVICTION AND DOCTRINE OF HUMAN FALLIBILITY, AS WELL AS THE RIGHT OF HUMANITY TO ASPIRE TO A BETTER FUTURE, AND THE ILLEGITIMACY OF POLITICAL POWER TO TAKE CHARGE OF THIS FUTURE, [...].”

“A HERESY FOR THE ANCIENTS”. THE CHRISTIAN IS THE 'ENEMY OF TRADITION' AND 'OF THE WESTERN THOUGHT'. BUT HE SELLS HIMSELF “TO THE PUBLIC EYE” AS THE OPPOSITE; HE HAS INFILTRATED “ALL RIGHT-WING AND 'TRADITIONALIST CIRCLES'”. 'ALL'.

“TO SUMMARIZE THE ARGUMENT, DEMOCRACY WAS BORN IN A NATIVE CULTURAL SOIL THAT NURTURED A CONVICTION AND DOCTRINE OF HUMAN FALLIBILITY, AS WELL AS THE RIGHT OF HUMANITY TO ASPIRE TO A BETTER FUTURE, AND THE ILLEGITIMACY OF POLITICAL POWER TO TAKE CHARGE OF THIS FUTURE, THUS INCARNATING THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF HUMAN LIFE.”

THE ENEMY OF THE WEST 'HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE CHRISTIAN'.

From A History of Political Ideas – From Antiquity to the Middle Ages by Philippe Nemo, Kenneth Casler (trans):

“A PERSON’S OBLIGATION TO BEHAVE MORALLY ARISES UNDER THE IMPULSE OF THE SAME NATURE THAT GOVERNS THE UNIVERSE.

HERE WE SEE THE DISTANCE SEPARATING THIS CONCEPTION FROM THAT OF THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN WORLD.

Together with Hellenism and Romanitas, Judeo-Christianity is the third pillar of the Western political tradition.

IT USHERS IN AN ENTIRELY NEW POLITICAL AND LEGAL INSPIRATION, ONE FOREIGN TO THE SPIRITUAL UNIVERSE OF THE GRECO-ROMAN WORLD: A NEW MORAL SENSE—A REJECTION OF THE NORMALITY OF EVIL—implying a radical transformation of the perception of time, the idea of history as directed toward improvement [THE THEORY OF PROGRESS], and the idea THAT SPIRITUAL POWER OUTWEIGHS TEMPORAL POWER AND THAT THE STATE, A “SINFUL BABYLON,” MUST BE HARNESSED TO AVOID CONSTITUTING THE ULTIMATE HORIZON OF HUMAN EXISTENCE.

The “West” was born in the Middle Ages, more precisely between the eleventh and thirteenth centuries, such that, after centuries of contact, AN INNOVATIVE SYNTHESIS OCCURRED BETWEEN THE NEW MORAL ELEMENT FROM “JERUSALEM” AND THE GREAT CIVIC LEGACY OF ANCIENT ATHENS AND ROME.

THIS SYNTHESIS MADE POSSIBLE THE RISE OF EUROPEAN MODERNITY, ROOTED IN SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS, AND STRUCTURING ITSELF ON THE MODEL OF LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES WHERE THE STATE HAS CONDITIONAL AND LIMITED POWERS.

FOR AN IN-DEPTH UNDERSTANDING OF THIS HISTORY, WE MUST STEP FAR BACK IN TIME TO THE BIBLE ITSELF.

AT ITS DEEPEST ORIGIN, BIBLICAL THOUGHT IS FREE OF GREEK INFLUENCE.

In terms of its reference model of social organization, the biblical world offers an alternative route out of the magico-religious universe of the ancient Near Eastern sacred monarchies, A ROUTE VERY DIFFERENT FROM THE GREEK CITY-STATE. FURTHERMORE, THE INTELLECTUAL PRODUCT OF THE BIBLE, IN TERMS OF PROFUNDITY AND INSIGHT, HOLDS ITS OWN AGAINST GREEK PHILOSOPHY.

Our discussion begins with the “political” ideas in the ancient biblical world and in the New Testament. We will attempt to identify the most original concepts of this thought: THE RELEGATION OF TEMPORAL POWER TO A SECONDARY ROLE RELATIVE TO SPIRITUAL POWER, the eschatological orientation of time in history [...].

Despite a brief resurrection of the Empire (under the Carolingian and Ottonian dynasties), THE STATE REGRESSED UNTIL IT DISAPPEARED ALTOGETHER (AT ANY RATE IN CERTAIN TIMES AND PLACES).

THE CHURCH, AS KEEPER OF THE CLASSICAL WORLD AND CONVEYOR OF NEW VALUES, STRUGGLED AGAINST THIS DECLINE AND IMPOSED ITS SPIRITUAL AND MORAL AUTHORITY OVER THE YOUNG STATES OF EUROPE[...].”

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.

“Toward the end of the Middle Ages, THE SEPARATION OF SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL POWERS, THE SHOOTS OF WHICH WERE ALREADY VISIBLE DURING THE PAPAL REVOLUTION, FINALLY FLOWERED.

THE WIDESPREAD STUDY OF ROMAN LAW, GREEK PHILOSOPHY, AND LATIN HUMANISM PROVIDED THE FRAMEWORK [...] TO LAY THE INTELLECTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE MODERN CONCEPT OF THE STATE [...].

THE STATE—IN THE SENSE OF AN OBJECT OF POLITICAL THOUGHT—DID NOT EXIST IN THE EARLIEST PERIODS OF HEBREW HISTORY; then, for nearly four centuries after its creation, the Hebrew state was associated with the sacred monarchies of the Near East [...]; after this, the Jews had no state of their own, except for one short period, and the state became something foreign, ruled by the Assyrians, Chaldeans, Persians, Greeks, or Romans.

AS FOR SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT, THE PRECONDITION FOR POLITICAL THOUGHT, IT CAME INTO EXISTENCE ONLY MUCH LATER IN THE BIBLICAL WORLD, AND THEN IN BROAD BRUSHSTROKES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF HELLENISM; IT DISAPPEARED, IN FACT, FROM RABBINIC JUDAISM WITH HELLENISM ITSELF.

So, for all these reasons, THERE IS NOTHING IN THE BIBLE, STRICTLY SPEAKING, THAT CAN BE COMPARED WITH THE POLITICAL THOUGHT OF GRECO-ROMAN PHILOSOPHERS AND ORATORS.

[...] IN CONTRAST, THE GREEK WORLD—RATIONAL, CRITICAL, AND DESACRALIZING—WAS CAPABLE OF DESIRING AND ACCEPTING CHANGE.

[...] IN CONTRAST, THE GREEK WORLD—RATIONAL, CRITICAL, AND DESACRALIZING—WAS CAPABLE OF DESIRING AND ACCEPTING CHANGE.”

This is why christian societies, liberal democracies, 'ARE DESTROYING THEMSELVES ALL THE TIME'. Because THEY DO NOT ACCEPT THE CHANGE. The world of 'the western christian bourgeois' 'IS THE WORLD OF THE STATUS QUO'. “HE REFUSE CHANGE” because 'CHANGE IS BASED ON ESOTERICISM', 'internal transformations'. And the jew ... then the christian, IS ITS ENEMY.

CHRISTIAN AND ALL MONOTHEISTS 'NEVER LEARNS ANYTHING FROM LIFE': 'HATE LIFE'. THEY ARE THE ENEMY OF CHANGE AND OF 'THE AWAKENING OF THE INDIVIDUAL', AND THEREFORE 'ALSO OF SOCIETY'.

“IN CONTRAST, THE GREEK WORLD—RATIONAL, CRITICAL, AND DESACRALIZING—WAS CAPABLE OF DESIRING AND ACCEPTING CHANGE. HOWEVER, CRITICAL OF THE NOMOS, IT THEN ALSO SACRALIZED THE PHYSIS, STARTING WITH HUMAN NATURE.

[THE GREEK WORLD ...] SACRALIZED THE HUMAN NATURE.”

The jew … the christian hates humans. HATES MAN AND 'THE EARTHLY INCARNATION'.

“IN OUR EARLIER DISCUSSION OF THE NATURAL LAW, WE SAW THAT THE GREEK WORLD REGARDED PHYSIS AS THE ABSOLUTE, TRANSCENDENT NORM.

CONSEQUENTLY, THE GREEK WORLD NEVER DEVELOPED THE CONCEPT OF HISTORY AS A PROGRESSIVE PROCESS; NOR DID IT EVER HAVE A POLITICAL AND SOCIAL “PROGRAM.””

“THE RELIGION OF THE BIBLE IS AN UNPRECEDENTED SPECIAL CASE, WHERE IT IS SACRED POWER ITSELF THAT, THROUGH THE AGENCY OF THE PROPHETS, DEMANDS A PROFOUND TRANSFORMATION OF MAN AND THE WORLD AND CREATES THE PROSPECT OF A TOTALLY NEW FUTURE.

THUS, IN THE KNOWLEDGE THAT GOD SUSTAINS HIM, AND THAT HE IS HIS CO-WORKER, MAN CAN AND MUST TRANSFORM HISTORY INTO A PROGRAM.”

From christianism, 'judeo-christian thinking' to marxism ... NO STEP. IT'S THE SAME THING.

Without christians in Europe ... NO MARXISM-no communism, 'ONE BROUGHT THE OTHER'. 'ONE IS THE OTHER'.

“THUS, IN THE KNOWLEDGE THAT GOD SUSTAINS HIM, AND THAT HE IS HIS CO-WORKER, MAN CAN AND MUST TRANSFORM HISTORY INTO A PROGRAM. HE CAN BEGIN BY THINKING HISTORY, BY DEVELOPING THE CONCEPT ITSELF. Historical progress does not so much involve providing solutions to problems as recognizing problems and anomalies WHERE PREVIOUSLY NOTHING OF THE SORT WAS VISIBLE, WHERE THE NORMAL AND ETERNAL NATURE OF THINGS WAS ALL THAT WAS POSSIBLE.

IN THIS SENSE, THE GREATEST MERIT GOES NOT TO THE PROBLEM SOLVERS BUT TO THE PROBLEM CREATORS, irrespective of their impact on the conventions of the age.

THIS IS PRECISELY WHAT THE BIBLICAL PROPHETS DID.

In the words of André Neher, THE BIBLICAL PROPHETS—THAT IS, WOUNDED AND “ALTERED” MEN—IDENTIFIED AND CREATED PROBLEMS AND MADE UNPRECEDENTED MORAL DEMANDS, EVEN AT THE EXPENSE OF THEIR OWN PERSONAL RUIN.”

THE WHOLE JEWISH THOUGHT 'SYNTHESIZED'; which the christian moron relayed in Europe.

“Jesus did exactly so: THERE HAD BEEN NO PROBLEM WITH DIVORCE; THEN HE CREATED ONE; THERE HAD BEEN NO PROBLEM CONDEMNING PUBLICANS AND PROSTITUTES OR THROWING THE FIRST STONE AT SOMEONE THE COMMUNITY FOUND GUILTY, OF FIGHTING WITH ONE’S ENEMIES, AND SO ON.

NOW, ALL THESE ATTITUDES ARE PROBLEMATIC.”

I hope that “you understand better THE MODERN WORLD”.

“THEREFORE, NEW SOLUTIONS MAY LOOM BEHIND EACH OF THESE NEW PROBLEMS—FOR EXAMPLE, THE CREATION OF AN INSTITUTION, AND HISTORICAL PROGRESS.”

THE WESTERN WORLD WILL NOT IMPROVE BUT WILL DESTROY ITSELF. And Asia will BE THE WINNER OF THIS GAME.

JUDEO-CHRISTIAN SOCIETIES SEE THEMSELVES AS TRANSFORMATIVE SOCIETIES.”

“THE DISCREDITING OF TEMPORAL POWER.

THE SECOND CONVICTION OF THE PEOPLE OF THE BIBLE—A CONVICTION THAT ALSO PASSES INTO THE POLITICAL TRADITION OF THE WEST—IS THAT TEMPORAL POWER AS SUCH PLAYS NO MORE THAN A SECONDARY ROLE IN HUMAN LIFE, BECAUSE IT PLAYS NO PART IN THE ECONOMY OF SALVATION, WHICH DEPENDS ENTIRELY ON THE INNER CONVERSION OF A PERSON.”

THE JEW HAS NEVER UNDERSTOOD 'ANYTHING ABOUT ESOTERICISM'.

“WE NOTED THIS FUNDAMENTAL DISCORDANCE OF THE TWO POWERS EVER SINCE THE CRITICISM OF KINGSHIP BY THE PROPHETS, THEN THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE MESSIANIC KING AND PRIEST, WHO BECAME LESS AND LESS IDENTIFIED WITH REAL INSTITUTIONS AND INCREASINGLY “SPIRITUALIZED,” THEN, UNDER THEOCRACY, THE DISINTEREST MANIFESTED BY PRIESTS FOR THE INSTITUTIONS OF STATE RELINQUISHED TO FOREIGN POWERS (ALBEIT RELUCTANTLY), AND FINALLY IN THE SELEUCID AND ROMAN ERAS WHEN THE JEWISH SECTS OPENLY LED WARS AGAINST THE OCCUPYING POWERS AND THEIR HASMONEAN AND HERODIAN REPRESENTATIVES.”

THE JEW ... AND HIS COMMERCIAL REPRESENTATIVE IN THE WEST: 'THE CHRISTIAN' DOES NOT UNDERSTAND 'ANYTHING ABOUT ESOTERICISM. NOTHING'.

“FINALLY, THE SEPARATION OF SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL POWER BECAME TOTAL WITH RABBINIC JUDAISM AND EARLY CHRISTIANITY.

FINALLY, THE SEPARATION OF SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL POWER BECAME TOTAL WITH RABBINIC JUDAISM AND EARLY CHRISTIANITY.

IN THE ATTITUDE OF THE BIBLICAL PROPHETS AND SAINTS, WE ENCOUNTER A GENUINE FEELING OF SUPERIORITY IN REGARD TO THE STATE, AS WELL AS THE WILL TO DIRECT IT FROM A DISTANCE BY THE EXERTION OF MORAL PRESSURE ON THE PEOPLE AND THEIR LEADERS.

EVERY STATE IS NECESSARILY AND ALWAYS A “BABYLON,” ONE OF THE BEASTS FROM THE SEA. THE RIGHTEOUS CAN NEVER COMPLETELY TRUST IT AND COOPERATE WITH IT.”

CHRISTIANS DESTROYED EUROPE. People think it's the 'jewish thought but the representatives in the West ARE THE CHRISTIANS.

“THIS BIBLICAL CONTEMPT FOR TEMPORAL POWER—THE CONVICTION OF THE “SAINTS” THAT THEY EXIST IN A HISTORY THAT LIES OUTSIDE THE REALM OF ACTION AND BEYOND THE SIGHT OF THE POWERFUL OF THIS WORLD— PLAYS A FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN THE POLITICAL HISTORY OF CHRISTIANIZED SOCIETIES, INCLUDING THOSE OF WESTERN EUROPE, WHICH CONTINUE TO HOLD IN HIGH ESTEEM THE CIVIC TRADITIONS OF ANTIQUITY.

BUT THE GRECO-ROMAN TRUST IN THE STATE WOULD NEVER BE FULLY RESTORED.”

CHRISTIANS WILL ALWAYS BE THE RAMPART IN THE WEST 'AGAINST THE RETURN TO TRADITION'.

GET RID OF “THE CHRISTIAN POLITICALLY” ... AND “YOU WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF THE WEST”.

“GRAHAM MADDOX BELIEVES THAT THE VERY IDEA OF DEMOCRACY IS THE FRUIT OF A BIBLICAL TRADITION OF STATE MISTRUST. IN FACT, MODERN DEMOCRACIES ARE REGIMES THAT HAVE ESTABLISHED A SET OF INSTITUTIONS FOR THE SYSTEMATIC CONTROL OF THE STATE: A FREE PRESS, PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, AN INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY, AND SO ON.”

THESE IDIOTS WESTERN DEMOCRATS THINK THAT 'THESE INSTITUTIONS ARE THERE FOR THEM'.

BLOODY IDIOTS!

“THE IDEA THAT THE STATE NEEDS CONSTANT CONTROL COULD ONLY COME TO THOSE WHO, IN PRINCIPLE, WERE SUSPICIOUS OF ITS VILLAINY AND PERVERSIONS.”

THIS IS WHY THE SOCIALIST IS A CHRISTIAN ... EVEN IF “HE SEES HIMSELF AS AN ATHEIST”: “HE CARRIES THE JEWISH THOUGHT”.

“THE SECULARIZATION OF THE STATE—THAT IS, THE REDUCTION OF THE STATE TO A SIMPLE TECHNICAL TOOL SERVING OBJECTIVES THAT IT HAS NO AUTHORITY TO DEFINE FOR ITSELF—IS THE BRAINCHILD OF CALVINIST COUNTRIES (THE NETHERLANDS, ENGLAND, THE UNITED STATES) WHOSE POLITICAL THINKERS AND LEADERS WERE DEEPLY IMMERSED IN AND INFLUENCED BY THE BIBLICAL TRADITION (ESPECIALLY THE OLD TESTAMENT).

IT WAS THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION THAT PRESERVED THE WEST FROM THE TEMPTATION OF LOOKING AT THE STATE AS AN ABSOLUTE ENTITY.”

From Histoire des idées politiques aux Temps modernes et contemporains/History of political ideas in modern and contemporary times by Philippe Nemo:

ABOUT MACHIAVELLI'S THOUGHT:

“THE HARMFUL CHARACTER OF CHRISTIANISM AND THE PAPACY FOR ITALY. “IF THE NATION IS THE TRUE REALITY OF HISTORY, TO WHICH EVERYTHING MUST BE SACRIFICED, IT IS CLEAR THAT, ON THE CONTRARY, CHRISTIANISM, WITH ITS UNIVERSALISM, IS FOR ITALY ONE OF THE FUNDAMENTAL CAUSES OF ITS WEAKNESS. IF ITALY IS NOT AND CAN NO LONGER BE A ROME, IT IS BECAUSE CHRISTIANISM HAS REPLACED PAGANISM.

It is the roman Church that has kept us divided.

A COUNTRY CAN ONLY BE TRULY UNITED AND PROSPEROUS WHEN IT OBEYS ONLY ONE GOVERNMENT, EITHER MONARCHY OR REPUBLIC.

Such is France or Spain. IF THE GOVERNMENT OF EARLY ITALY IS NOT SO ORGANIZED, EITHER AS A REPUBLIC OR A MONARCHY, IT IS TO THE CHURCH ALONE THAT WE OWE IT.”

BUT FREEDOM WAS REVEALED TO HUMANITY BY CHRISTIANISM, MUCH MORE THAN BY THE GRECO-ROMAN UNIVERSE.

ONLY CHRISTIAN MORALITY GIVES FREEDOM AN INFINITE VALUE, SINCE ONLY FREEDOM ALLOWS MORAL RESPONSIBILITY.”

HOW STUPID THEY ARE! IT'S EDIFYING! AFTER FIFTY YEARS, I STILL DON'T “GET USED TO THE CHRISTIAN'S STUPIDITY”. They don't understand anything about Esotericism; THEY ARE 'TOTALLY HERMETIC TO IT'.

“DEMOCRACY AIMS AT MAKING POSSIBLE THE EXPRESSION OF EACH INDIVIDUAL AND AT MAKING IMPOSSIBLE HIS CRUSHING; INTELLECTUAL LIBERTIES PRODUCE THE PROGRESS OF SCIENCE, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL LIBERTIES THE PROSPERITY, THE VIRTUAL EXTINCTION OF PAUPERISM. ALL THIS IS LIKELY TO REALIZE THE ETHICAL AND ESCHATOLOGICAL PROJECT OF THE BIBLE, RELAYED IN THE MIDDLE AGES BY THE “PAPAL REVOLUTION”, AND IN MODERN TIMES BY THE MODERATE FOUNTAINS OF CALVINISM THAT INSPIRED THE DUTCH, ENGLISH AND AMERICAN REVOLUTIONS, WHICH WERE LED, AS WE HAVE SEEN, BY ARDENTLY CHRISTIAN LEADERS AND GROUPS.

It was only natural – although it implied a new intellectual effort in this direction – that christians in catholic Europe should now make explicit the kinship and affinity they felt existed between the ideals of 1789 and their faith. This trend has been referred to as “liberal catholicism”, “catholic liberalism”, “christian democracy”.

[Félicité de Lamennais] from 1830 on, [...] thinks that it is necessary to free christianism from any too close link with any political and social regime AND THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO SEPARATE THE CHURCH AND THE STATE.”

THE SEPARATION OF THE CHURCH AND THE STATE, 'IS THE FRUIT OF THE BIBLE', contrary to the popular belief that it is there to free people.

“THE REFUSAL TO RECOGNIZE THE LEGITIMACY OF THE ACTION OF GREAT MEN CAME FROM A BAD INTERPRETATION OF CHRISTIANISM (THAT OF KANT, BUT ALSO THAT OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS). IT IS CHRISTIANISM WHICH, THE FIRST, PROMOTED “THE RIGHT OF THE SUBJECT TO FIND HIS SATISFACTION” AND BROKE COMPLETELY IN THIS RESPECT WITH THE FATALISM OF THE GRECO-ROMAN UNIVERSE. THAT ONE COULD SURPASS NATURE, THAT ONE COULD WANT THE IMPOSSIBLE, WAS SOMETHING GOOD IN ITSELF.”

THAT'S WHY THESE WESTERN IDIOTS ARE DELUSIONAL, THINKING THEY CAN STOP A VIRUS, THE COVID … HENCE THE HATRED OF THE CHRISTIAN 'FOR NATURE'.

WE KNOW 'HOW CAREFUL THE CHRISTIANS WERE 'TO DESTROY ALL TRACES OF PAGANISM AND TO COVER IT UP':

• JESUS 'IS BORN ON THE WINTER SOLSTICE';
• THE FEAST DAY OF HIS FORERUNNER JOHN THE BAPTIST 'IS ON THE SUMMER SOLSTICE';
• JESUS IS RESURRECTED 'AT THE VERNAL EQUINOX'.

THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT, THE LAST CHRISTIAN EMANATION, HATES NATURE AND APPLIES MEASURES THAT WILL DESTROY 'ALL ECOSYSTEMS FOR MAN'. THE CHRISTIAN IS A PSYCHIATRIC CASE 'UNTO HIMSELF'.

“HERE IS HOW ROUSSEAU TRIES TO JUSTIFY THIS INSTITUTION. THE FIRST RELIGIOUS STATE OF HUMANITY WAS POLYTHEISM, CONSEQUENCE OF THE DIVISION OF HUMANITY INTO NATIONS (OR TRIBES). EACH PEOPLE HAD ITS OWN GOD AND IMPOSED IT ON THE OTHER PEOPLES WHEN IT DEFEATED THEM, BUT IT RESPECTED, EXCEPT IN THIS CASE, THE GODS: OF THE OTHER NATIONS.

THERE WAS THUS A PERFECT IDENTITY BETWEEN POLITICAL COHESION AND RELIGIOUS COHESION.

EVERYTHING CHANGED WITH THE JEWS WHO INVENTED A STRICT MONOTHEISM THAT WAS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTENCE OF NATIONAL RELIGIONS.

HENCE THE RUPTURE OF RELIGIOUS PEACE, AGGRAVATED LATER BY CHRISTIANISM. FROM THEN ON, THERE WAS A “SPIRITUAL POWER” WITH A UNIVERSAL VOCATION, AND “TEMPORAL POWERS” WITH A NATIONAL VOCATION, AND THAT IS WHY EACH STATE “ CEASED TO BE ONE ”.

THE SACRIFICE.

Christ is the mediation between God and man.

Man has sinned and deserves death. Christ alone takes upon himself the HATRED OF GOD and the punishment.

By his sacrifice, he therefore reconciles man and God; WITHOUT THE SACRIFICE OF CHRIST, MAN COULD SIMPLY NOT LIVE. The ritual of the mass constantly recalls this structure.”

EXCEPT THAT SACRIFICE 'IS AN ESOTERIC ACT'. THERE HAVE NEVER BEEN 'ANY CHRISTS'.

ESOTERICALLY 'CHRIST IS DEATH' ... Now all you have to do is find out 'what kind of DEATH IT IS'...

FOR THAT THE EGYPTIANS, USED “THIS WORD” AS: SARCOPHAGUS: coffin (qrsw),

bury (qrs). At least, THE EGYPTIANS, KNEW 'WHAT IT MEANT', APPARENTLY 'NO MONOTHEIST DOES'.

From Histoire du libéralisme en Europe/History of liberalism in Europe by Philippe Nemo (Editor), Jean Petitot (Editor):

“This aspect will seem particularly curious to the French to whom republican secularism wanted to make believe that Modernity had been built against Judeo-Christianity, that the great freedoms of modern man had been affirmed in direct proportion to the retreat of faith and the loss of influence of the Churches.”

L.O.L.. BLOODY STUPID WESTERNERS.

“But this is not the conclusion that can be drawn from the study of the history of ideas, nor from history as such. CHRISTIANISM PLAYED A MAJOR ROLE IN THE CREATION OF THE LIBERAL INSTITUTIONS, IN PARTICULAR, AS MAX WEBER EXPLAINED, DURING THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION (WE KNOW THE PLACE THAT CALVINISM OCCUPIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF MODERN DUTCH, ENGLISH AND AMERICAN SOCIETIES), BUT ALSO DURING THE SPANISH “SECOND SCHOLASTICISM” AND IN ITS WAKE.

IN FACT, AS RENÉ GIRARD HAS LUMINOUSLY EXPLAINED, THE EVENT THAT THE GOSPEL COMMEMORATES IS INDEED, AS IN ALL ARCHAIC RELIGIONS, THE SACRIFICE OF A VICTIM BY A CROWD.

BUT WHEREAS IN THESE, SOCIETY PRESERVES THE VERSION OF THE EVENT GIVEN BY THE PERSECUTING MOB, THAT IS THE MYTH, THIS TIME THE FAITHFUL AND THE APOSTLES OF THE NEW RELIGION PRESERVE AND SPREAD THE VERSION OF THE EVENT GIVEN BY THE VICTIM.”

HENCE THE WESTERN CULT OF THE VICTIM.

“FROM NOW ON, THEREFORE, WHEN A VICTIM BEGINS TO BE PERSECUTED, THERE WILL BE SOMEONE TO SEE IN HIM OR HER A CHRIST, TO SAY THAT THE ACCUSATION IS UNJUST OR DISPROPORTED.

ACCORDING TO RENÉ GIRARD, THE TRADITIONAL ASSERTION THAT THE BIBLE IS “REVELATION” MUST BE TAKEN IN THE SCIENTIFIC SENSE. IT REVEALS TO MEN THE MECHANISM OF THE SCAPEGOAT WHICH WAS “HIDDEN SINCE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD”.

THUS, AS JUDEO-CHRISTIAN MORALITY PENETRATES WESTERN SOCIETIES, THE INDIVIDUAL WILL BE MORE AND MORE PROTECTED BY MORAL AND, SOONER, BY LAW.

ALL SOCIALISM, IN FACT – AT LEAST WHEN IT BEGINS TO BECOME REAL – SUPPOSES, IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, THE PRIMAT OF THE GROUP OVER THE INDIVIDUAL, THE TRIUMPH OF A “SINGLE THOUGHT”, THE CRUSHING OF THE PERSON, OF HIS THOUGHT AND OF HIS POTENTIALITIES.

IT IS THEREFORE NO COINCIDENCE THAT THE MOST INTRACTABLE RESISTANCES THAT AROSE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY [...] WERE CHRISTIAN OR EMANATED FROM A HUMANISM NOURISHED BY BIBLICAL SOIL.

IN THIS RESPECT TOO, THE BIBLE IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE “GENETIC PROGRAM” OF ALL PAST AND FUTURE LIBERALISM.

As Graham Maddox has magnificently shown, THE BIBLE IS FINALLY THE EFFICIENT CAUSE OF THE APPEARANCE OF DEMOCRACY IN HISTORY. FOR DEMOCRACY TO APPEAR, IN FACT, THE STATE HAD TO BE DESACRALIZED AND REDUCED TO A PURELY INSTRUMENTAL STATUS.

NOW THIS IS WHAT WAS ACCOMPLISHED BY THE HEBREW PROPHETS FROM THE CREATION OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL IN THE TIME OF SAUL, DAVID AND SOLOMON. THE PROPHETS ARE RETICENT ABOUT THIS CREATION. It is understandable, no doubt, that the people want a state, which will protect them from their warlike neighbors and lift them out of their socially inferior status as nomads and proletarian people.

BUT IF THERE IS A STATE, THERE WILL BE A KING, AND GOD WILL NO LONGER BE THE ONLY KING.

FOR THE REPRESENTATIVES OF MOSAIC MONOTHEISM, THE INSTITUTION OF THE STATE IS, BY ITSELF, SUSPECTED.”

WHAT MAKES ME ALWAYS LAUGH, IS TO THINK OF THESE IDIOTS WHO CALL THEMSELVES 'TRADITIONALIST CHRISTIANS'.

Nietzsche:

“CHRISTIANITY IS A REVOLT OF ALL CREATURES THAT CREEP ON THE GROUND AGAINST EVERYTHING THAT IS LOFTY: THE GOSPEL OF THE “LOWLY” LOWERS....”

“IN THE REST OF ISRAEL'S HISTORY, THE PROPHETS WILL ALWAYS CONSTITUTE A “SPIRITUAL POWER” RIVALING THE “TEMPORAL POWER”. CHRISTIANISM WILL INHERIT THIS FRUITFUL DUALITY [...].

THIS IS A REVOLUTION COMPARED TO ALL PREVIOUS FORMS OF STATE. UP TO NOW, ALL STATES HAVE BEEN SACRED, FROM THE AFRICAN RAINMAKER KING TO THE EMPERORS OF CHINA OR JAPAN.

THE CHRISTIAN STATE IS DESACRALIZED.

BUT AMONG THE JEWS, THE STATE HAS AN EVEN LESSER STATUS, SINCE IT IS ALWAYS, SINCE THE EXILE, THE THING OF THE FOREIGNER.

THE STATE, FOR JUDAISM, IS “ BABYLON ”, THAT IS TO SAY, SIN, THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION, whether it be Babylon itself, or the Persians, the Greeks, the Romans, or any of the States in which the diaspora would later live, States for which the Jews will have, if need be, a strong attachment and even a perfect loyalty, but which they will always consider as a mere instrument of social welfare, subject to critical judgment, NEVER AS AN ABSOLUTE [...].

FOR JUDEO-CHRISTIANISM, THE STATE IS GOOD ONLY TO ENSURE A LESSER EVIL, what St. Augustine precisely calls the “peace of Babylon,” that is, LAW AND ORDER, AND IT IS DISQUALIFIED TO ENSURE THAT PERFECT JUSTICE AND HAPPINESS WHICH ARISTOTLE AND THE STOICS CONCEIVED IN THE SINGLE HORIZON OF THE CITY.”

THAT'S WHY ALL MODERN STATES 'ARE EUNUCHS'.

“THE STATE IS ONLY AN INSTRUMENT OF THIS SOCIETY. THUS, IT MUST BE ARGUED THAT IT WAS JUDEO-CHRISTIANISM THAT CREATED THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR THE IDEA OF “SECULARISM”; IT WAS THE BIBLE THAT PROMOTED, IN THE END, THE MODERN LIMITED STATE, THE LIBERAL STATE THAT RESPECTS THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, AND THE DEMOCRATIC STATE THAT ACCEPTS TO BE SUBJECT TO POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY [...].”

The theoreticians of the modern times who, little by little, will elaborate and perfect the doctrines respectively democratic and liberal, will start from this asset, as well those who will come from the catholic camp (the neo-thomists, the Second Spanish Scholasticism...) as those who will come from the calvinist camp (the French huguenots, the Dutch rebels, the English and American revolutionaries...).

Certainly, as the 18th and 19th centuries progressed, and especially in France where, for singular and essentially contingent reasons, ANTICLERICALISM AND IRRELIGION raged, the formulations of THESE DOCTRINES WILL TRY TO SECULATE THEMSELVES AND DISSIMULATE THEIR THEOLOGICAL ROOT [...].”

The American historian Berman proposed to call the great change in the Church and in european society that occurred between the eleventh and thirteenth centuries, which is usually referred to as the “Gregorian reform”. Let us refer to the great work of Berman to take the full measure of the phenomenon. WE WILL ONLY SAY HERE THAT IT CONSISTED IN THE DELIBERATE CHOICE MADE BY THE MEN OF THIS PERIOD AND OF THIS MOVEMENT TO USE GREEK SCIENCE AND ROMAN LAW TO REALIZE THE ETHICAL AND ESCHATOLOGICAL ENDS OF THE BIBLE.

THE SALVATION promised by christianism will not be accomplished only, as was believed in the High Middle Ages, by supernatural means, prayers, pilgrimages, cults of saints and relics, valorization of the monastic life alone on the margins of the world; IT WILL COME FROM PACIFYING, ORGANIZING, IMPROVING THE SECULAR WORLD ITSELF.”

THEY REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND ANYTHING ABOUT 'THE ESOTERICISM OF THESE MYSTICAL TEXTS'.

“IT IS IN THE FUTURE, AND THROUGH THE VOLUNTARY ACTION OF MEN, THAT NATURE WILL RECOVER ALL THE SPLENDOR THAT GOD HAD INTENDED FOR HIS CREATION. It is therefore in the name of natural law that IT IS NECESSARY TO accomplish, not certainly the violent Revolution willed by the millenarianists,– but what one would call in modern vocabulary A WORK OF “REFORM”, let us understand by this a correction of what, in the world in which St. Thomas lives, feudal and still half pagan, is bad.”

That is why the nature of socialist revolutions; IS “REFORMING”.

'As for God':

THE GOD OF THE RELIGIOUS ... THOSE MEN OF FAITH ... BUT IN FACT OF INTELLECT 'DOES NOT EXIST'.

“JOHN 10:30:

I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE.”

From Mysticism and Science: A Call for Reconciliation by Swami Abhayananda:

“THIS UNITIVE EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN DESCRIBED NUMEROUS TIMES IN THE SCRIPTURES OF ALL RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS. IT HAS BEEN KNOWN BY MYSTICS THROUGHOUT HISTORY AND HAS BEEN TOLD IN MANY WAYS. It is only today, in the midst of our Western materialistic society, that it appears as a startlingly new and extraordinary fact. To be sure, such an experience occurs but rarely, and is therefore little heard of by the uninitiated populace; but the experience of Unity, and the knowledge (gnosis) derived from this experience, has begun to influence the way people think about the reality in which they live today. Science has gone far afield of this transpersonally acquired knowledge and must now come to terms with it and reconcile its own theories of reality with the realizations of the gnostics.

[...] in the following “Great Exposition” attributed to the gnostic, Simon Magus of Samaria, who was a contemporary of the Christian apostle, Peter, this mystically perceived duality-in-Unity is magnificently explained:

“There are two aspects of the One. The first of these is the Higher, the Divine Mind of the universe, which governs all things, and is masculine. The other is the lower, the Thought (epinoia) which produces all things, and is feminine. As a pair united, they comprise all that exists.

The Divine Mind is the Father who sustains all things and nourishes all that begins and ends. He is the One who eternally stands, without beginning or end. He exists entirely alone; for, while the Thought arising from Unity, and coming forth from the Divine Mind, creates [the appearance of] duality, the Father remains a Unity. The Thought is in Himself, and so He is alone. Made manifest to Himself from Himself, He appears to be two. He becomes “Father” by virtue of being called so by His own Thought.

Since He, Himself, brought forward Himself, by means of Himself, manifesting to Himself His own Thought, it is not correct to attribute creation to the Thought alone. For She (the Thought) conceals the Father within Herself; the Divine Mind and the Thought are intertwined. Thus, though [they appear] to be a pair, one opposite the other, the Divine Mind is in no way different from the Thought, inasmuch as they are one.

Though there appears to be a Higher, the Mind, and a lower, the Thought, truly, It is a Unity, just as what is manifested from these two [that is, the universe] is a unity, while appearing to be a duality. The Divine Mind and the Thought are discernible, one from the other, but they are one, though they appear to be two.””

Let's go back to the text From Histoire du libéralisme en Europe/History of liberalism in Europe by Philippe Nemo (Editor), Jean Petitot (Editor):

“IT IS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT SOCIAL, POLITICAL AND JURIDICAL ACTIONS, WHICH ARE PRUDENT, BUT WHICH REALLY SOLVE THE PROBLEMS OF HUMAN SOCIETY. NATURAL LAW WILL BE THE FERMENT OF THESE REFORMS. It will be used as a guide to revise the “bad customs” of the feudal system that at the same time Saint Louis begins to abolish by his first royal legislations, a revision that he recommends to his son Philippe to continue. IF ONE WANTS TO CHRISTIANIZE THE WORLD, ONE MUST GIVE THE SECULAR POWERS A POLITICAL PROGRAM, [...].”

From Philosophie de l'impôt/Philosophy of taxation by Philippe Nemo:

“WESTERN SOCIETIES HAVE PAVED THE WAY FOR SCIENTIFIC, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL PROGRESS BY BREAKING DOWN TRIBAL MENTALITIES precisely characterized by holism. It is known that there were three triggers in this respect whose effects were mutually reinforcing.

THE BIBLE, FIRST, HISTORICALLY FOUNDED MODERN INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AS OPPOSED TO THE UNANIMITY OF TRIBAL SOCIETIES. It is to Abraham or Moses, AND TO EACH PERSON whom God “knows by name” (Isaiah 43:1) that the Word of God is addressed, NOT TO THE ANONYMOUS GROUP.

AND IT IS EACH INDIVIDUAL PERSON, NOT THE GROUP, who answers or not “Here I am!” (Genesis 22:1).

RENÉ GIRARD HAS SHOWN THAT IT WAS THIS EMERGENCE OF PERSONAL MORAL RESPONSIBILITY THAT BROKE DOWN THE MECHANISMS OF MIMESIS THAT HELD TRIBAL GROUPS TOGETHER. “Let the one who has never sinned cast the first stone,” Jesus asks the members of the group that is about to perform an irresponsible collective sacrifice (John 8:7). HE FORMULATES A NEW MORAL STANDARD: NEVER PASSIVELY FOLLOW A GROUP, [...].”

'THIS IS ESOTERICISM', IDIOTS. NOT POLITICS. THE MEANING 'IS NOT EXTERNAL':

From Swami Abhayananda: “THAT SELF IS ETERNITY. IT IS PERFECTLY ALONE.

[...] I WAS THE UNCHANGING AND ETERNAL CONSCIOUSNESS. THE MYSTIC EXPERIENCES THIS AS OCCURRING FROM HIMSELF, SINCE HE IS UNITED.”

IT'S JUST THAT THESE TEXTS 'HAVE BEEN INTERPRETED FOR 2000 YEARS 'POLITICALLY ... EXOTERICALLY', WHEN THEY WERE 'MYSTICAL TEXTS'. And, that now the Westerner ... HAS NO WAY OUT ... OF HIS STUPID HUMANIST TRAP.

… How can he, UNLESS HE IS DESTROYED —BY HIS OWN 'HUMANITARIAN IDEOLOGY'—. THIS IS 'WHAT WILL HAPPEN AND PAINFULLY'.

Let's go back to the text From Philosophie de l'impôt/Philosophy of taxation by Philippe Nemo:

“WHAT HE MAKES, BY HIS PASSION, A TRANSCENDENT TRUTH. FOR BY RECOGNIZING THE VICTIM OF THE SCAPEGOAT MECHANISM AS GOD AND BY RECEIVING HIS WORDS, AND NOT THOSE OF HIS MURDERERS, AS THE NORMATIVE MORAL SOURCE, CHRISTIANISM STOPS THESE MECHANISMS FOR EVER. FROM NOW ON, WHENEVER SOMEONE IS ACCUSED BY AN ANONYMOUS GROUP, THE FAITHFUL WILL

RECOGNIZE IN HIM A CHRIST TO WHOM WE MUST GUARD AGAINST INFLICTING A NEW PASSION.”

THAT'S WHY EVEN THE WORST CRIMINALS ARE NOT JUDGED IN THE WEST.

AND CHAOS REIGNS.

And it 'WILL GO FROM BAD TO WORSE' ... and the West will really really become THE HELL OF THIS WORLD.

“THE TRAGEDY IS THAT, IN A DECHRISTIANIZING EUROPE, SOCIALISM THREATENS TO BRING OUR SOCIETIES BACK BELOW THIS PROGRESS.”

I've told christians people 'THOUSAND TIMES':

• 'YOU'RE GOING TO PAY 'DEARLY YOUR BULLSHIT''.

  “He did this by methodically criticizing the legal and social institutions that had guaranteed individual liberties since the beginning of modern times. His diablery is that he has succeeded in passing off this process of decomposition as the implementation of judeo-christian altruistic morality. This is an imposture, since it completely inverts the meaning by putting in the place of God and the neighbor, who are persons, the State, which is an undifferentiated Whole on which the persons can discard their moral responsibility and, consequently, shamelessly commit violence and plunder.”

You are about TO SUFFER WESTERNERS ... A LOT, beyond 'WHAT YOU THINK IMAGINABLE', but in the end 'YOU WILL BE DESTROYED'.

The christian democracy: separation of Church and State, liberal democracies #democracy #christian-democracy #liberal-democracies #west #Esotericism #Esoterism

https://bittube.tv/post/5c2d853f-fa9e-45d7-b77b-b91bda57dbfe https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/The-christian-democracy--separation-of-Church-and-State,-liberal-democracies:3 https://tube.midov.pl/w/bBJjmAV381711NNNVEx36Z https://www.bitchute.com/video/Mfv3zlrfKVys/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ FINEARTAMERICA https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/periodicreset-ofcivilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com ▶ ZAZZLE https://www.zazzle.com/store/periodic_reset/products

Covid; the Taste for Death.

Why are you trying to infect yourself with a virus (through a vaccine) when you are not sick?

Try to explain your logic to me?

Because I don't understand it.

I can understand a case with multiple pathologies, such as diabetes-breathing problems, that he is wanting to inject a virus to protect themselves in advance.

IT'S A LIVING ACT. But to be injected with a virus, when you are not sick, IS A MORBID ACT.

And considering the vaccination rates of Westerners compared to Asians, it is still “clear” that this WESTERN POPULATION is totally “MORIBUND”.

Westerners have really started to believe that they can stop a virus (its spread). This is how far this Continent has been CUT OFF FROM REALITY since the Inception of Christianism ('judeo'-christian Thinking).

Morbidity is really the SUSPENSION OF TIME.

For a moment, the mind stops everything, and lets itself be lulled into an illusion of reality; which it invents as it goes along.

IN A HEALTHY SOCIETY, THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN.

In a moribund society like the West, 'IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME'.

Westerners FANTASIZE ABOUT A REALITY OUTSIDE OF NATURE WHICH 'JUST DOESN'T EXIST', since the Inception of Christianism (Judeo-Christian thinking).

THEY “COLLECTIVELY” CONVINCE themselves that they have mastered Nature, WHICH IS CRAZY.

To Face reality IS TO FACE REALITY; TO ADAPT TO IT; you cannot live 'IN AN INNER UNIVERSE that does not exist'.

THE MORE YOU RUN AWAY FROM THE REALITY, the more you will 'sink into madness'.

And this Judeo-Christian bullshit has been going 'ON FOR ALMOST 2000 YEARS NOW'.

The West has been drifting 'MANIACALLY' for 2000 years in this 'Jewish delirium' brought to the “West by the christians”.

'YOU DO NOT CONTROL NATURE', 'WE ARE AT THE MERCY' of the elements; and that is fine, AND AS IT 'SHOULD BE'.

Throwing the Jews out or exterminating them 'WILL DO NOTHING', WHAT IS NEEDED IS TO GET 'RID OF THE 'JEWISH THOUGHT' IN THE WEST'.

From A Hideous Bit of Morbidity: An Anthology of Horror Criticism from the Enlightenment to World War I by Jason Colavito:

“The art critic Harry Quilter seemed near to a paroxysm of rage upon reading “Pan,” resorting TO THE IMPLICATION OF INSANITY:

“There is but one point of view from which such writing can be tolerated, and that is the point of view of those who deny that there is any obligation, any responsibility laid upon a writer not to produce unwholesome work.... Why should we tolerate in our fiction that which we could not tolerate in our conversation or our life?

WHY SHOULD WE ALLOW A NOVELIST TO DESCRIBE ABORTIONS, MORAL AND PHYSICAL, WHICH IN REALITY WOULD FILL US WITH HORROR AND DISGUST?

... WHY SHOULD HE BE ALLOWED, FOR THE SAKE OF A FEW MISERABLE POUNDS, TO CAST INTO OUR MIDST THESE MONSTROUS CREATIONS OF HIS DISEASED BRAIN?”

Something like this is, we take it, the interpretation of Mr. Machen’s uncanny parable, WHICH IS TOO MORBID TO BE THE PRODUCTION OF A HEALTHY MIND.”

But yet it sold, and was praised by those who represented the more libertine future beyond Victoria’s reign. However, even the period’s visual arts did not escape the critics’ ire. J. Charles Cox savaged Philip Burne-Jones’s The Vampire (1897), a painting depicting a female vampire atop a recumbent male—a subversive inversion of traditional vampire stories—as “uselessly morbid.”

This, one must remember, came in the context of a culture besotted by death, WHICH PRESERVED POST MORTEM PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DEAD AS TREASURED KEEPSAKES, AND WHOSE EXEMPLAR, QUEEN VICTORIA, SPENT MOST OF HER LIFE IN MOURNING.

Nearer the nineteenth century’s end and into the twentieth century, authors produced a volume of ghost stories unparalleled before and largely unmatched since.”

We have forgotten HOW THE TWENTIETH CENTURY OF HORROR 'WAS INVENTED'.

“This was mostly in response to the SPIRITUALIST MOVEMENT, [...].”

“[...] Harry Quilter. The Gospel of Intensity:

There is one misconstruction against which in writing the following article I AM DESIROUS OF GUARDING MYSELF.

I DO NOT SEEK NOR WISH TO PUT THE CLOCK BACKWARD;

I have no desire to limit the provinces of art or literature, or to question the right of either to deal with life as a whole in its every manifestation. On the other hand, I do maintain that life can be dealt with fully and honestly only when it is considered from a healthy and manly (or womanly) point of view.

I DENY THAT THE MORBID EXTRAVAGANCES OF HYSTERICALLY NEUROTIC AND EROTIC IMAGINATION ARE TO BE ACCEPTED AS A SOUND BASIS OR A PROPER SPHERE OF ANALYSIS FOR EITHER ART OR LITERATURE;

I AM ASSURED THAT THERE ARE SOME SUBJECTS IN THEMSELVES SO REPELLENT, SO ENERVATING, AND SO UNPROFITABLE, THAT THEY SHOULD BE PRACTICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THE DOMAIN OF LITERARY DISCUSSION OR ARTISTIC REPRESENTATION.

AND I CONSIDER THAT IT IS THE ABSOLUTE DUTY OF EVERY PUBLIC WRITER WHO IS ENGAGED IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CRITICISM TO DISCOURAGE AND CONDEMN WORK OF SUCH CHARACTER, AND EVEN WORK WHICH LEADS MORE OR LESS DIRECTLY TOWARDS IT.”

THE USE OF MASKS IS MORBID, and comes from this principle of moribidity; A VIRUS “CAN'T BE STOPPED”.

To believe that it can be stopped is madness.

The statistics of countries that have not practiced population restrictions 'PROVE IT'.

THE ONLY PURPOSE OF THIS EXERCISE 'WAS AN ACT OF MORBIDITY', in which the 'WESTERN POPULATION', as always, rushed in.

There is NOTHING ALIVE in the West FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

And 'MASKS ARE FOR SLAVES'.

Well, I will explain 'a little' MORE THE MENTAL process of man; Otherwise I will again 'HAVE THE TRADITIONAL KNEE-JERK reactions of christians people'.

People who think 'THAT I AM ATTACKING them WHEN I WANT 'only good for them; that is to say, to get out of 'this Judeo-Christian ALTRUISTIC STUPID THINKING'.

ALTRUISM 'IS POSSIBLE', but you must first HAVE DESTROYED THE EGO; that is “understanding your real nature behind the mind and body”; this is —RESERVED FOR AN ELITE GROUP OF MYSTICS—.

—MOST OF YOU WILL NEVER REACH THIS STATE OF KNOWLEDGE—.

For someone WHO HAS AWAKENED, 'Altruism becomes THE NORM'; that is why it is WRITTEN 'in all ESOTERIC TRADITIONS';

• that before awakening, 'YOU ARE OF NO USE TO SOCIETY'. Or as it is written in the bible:

Luke 22:42:

“NOT MY WILL, BUT THINE, BE DONE”, which Means that the mind “Is no longer the Master”, because once again, 'you have understood your nature', 'not the mind', 'not the body'.

I'm not sure 'WHAT HAPPENED IN CHRISTIANISM', because obviously 'PAUL AND LUKE' 'were obviously INITIATED', probably '—NOT TO THE POINT OF AWAKENING—'; that is 'seeing through the looking glass'; the Functioning of the Mind.

Which is described in the 'DARK NIGHT OF THE SOUL'.

I am not sure, FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE, that Those at the origin of the Texts of the new testament, ARE AT FAULT.

'But to preach ALTRUISM' as the Judeo-Christians do, IS IMPOSSIBLE, 'before the Awakening of the person'; because the Control of the mind is not carried out.

THESE ESOTERIC TEXTS of the bible; Old and New testament; ARE OBVIOUSLY “ESOTERIC”:

• Otherwise You would 'have NO NEED TO MENTION':

  Matthew 7:6:

  “Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, NEITHER CAST YE YOUR PEARLS BEFORE SWINE, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.”

This is the —NUMBER 1 PRINCIPLE OF ESOTERICISM—; —DO NOT REVEAL THE MYSTERIES—.

So Judeo-Christianism 'IS A FALSE DOCTRINE';

• because its number one PREACHING 'IS ALTRUISM'.

It is quite 'obvious' in other esoteric traditions, 'notably Buddhism', 'that before enlightenment', 'altruism IS ONLY EGO-CENTRICITY': From Zen Essence: The Science of Freedom by Thomas Cleary:

“[...] Emphasis in Buddhism on individual liberation, even in schools whose express aim is collective liberation, has given rise to the misconception THAT IT IS A SOCIALLY PASSIVE, EVEN ESCAPIST, RELIGION. While passivism and escapism are well-documented corruptions of certain practices, THESE ATTITUDES ARE FAR FROM THE SPIRIT OF BUDDHISM.

Importance is placed on the commonweal even in the schools that focus primarily ON INDIVIDUAL LIBERATION; the liberation of individuals is seen as an integral part of the WELFARE OF SOCIETY [...].

According to Buddhist teaching, even a simple act of generosity IS NOT REALLY GENUINE AS LONG AS IT IS TAINTED BY PERSONAL FEELINGS, even the desire to give or the satisfaction of giving.”

“IS NOT REALLY GENUINE —AS LONG AS IT IS TAINTED BY PERSONAL FEELINGS—.”

'THIS IS CLEAR IN BUDDHISM', BUT NOT IN JUDEO-CHRISTIANISM, 'which is why' I KEEP ATTACKING this cult. WHICH PUTS MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of people 'in the Illusion of the possibility of altruism 'FOR THE COMMON PEOPLE', when they have not been initiated.

It is “you”; THE PRIORITY on this planet; not the other.

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT 'Western society says' 'or what religious people say':

'BEFORE YOU AWAKEN', YOU IS THE ONLY PRIORITY.

Covid the Taste for Death: altruism #covid #death #altruism #west #deathwish #morbid #morbidity #masks

https://bittube.tv/post/72302851-2caa-4a15-916b-09e907975f72 https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/Covid-the-Taste-for-Death--altruism:6 https://tube.midov.pl/w/cugWa46FwqUmmnh4BSqZN9 https://www.bitchute.com/video/nZoLu4VZnzyZ/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ FINEARTAMERICA https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/periodicreset-ofcivilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com ▶ ZAZZLE https://www.zazzle.com/store/periodic_reset/products

RELIGIOUS ESCAPISM: the Fear of life.

Escapism is the very opposite of Liberation.

From Approval Addiction: Overcoming Your Need to Please Everyone by Joyce Meyer:

“ESCAPISM.

Escapism is another result we see among people with a fear of rejection. They create their own pleasant world through daydreaming. There is nothing wrong with a healthy daydream or two, but living in a pretend world to escape from the real one is a sign of real mental and emotional problems.”

From Breaking out of Homeostasis: Achieve Mind-Body Mastery and Continue Evolving When Others Stagnate by Ludvig Sunstrom:

“The path of LEAST EFFORT IS THEREFORE ESCAPISM.

The escapism and instant gratification that so many people indulge in eventually becomes unconscious and instinctive. It starts out with a vague reason (to kill time, perhaps) and soon gathers its own momentum. Then they keep doing IT FOR NO REASON AT ALL.

Most people can’t read books. Not because they’re too dumb to do it, but because they haven’t “acquired the taste” for reading. They’re too ingrained with watching TV, browsing the Internet, and taking in information in ways that REQUIRE LESS MENTAL EFFORT.

Reading rarely provides those quick dopamine spikes that TV, Internet, or social media gives you. You need to actively concentrate to do it—it’s higher up neocortex hierarchy of effort than many people are used to.

For example, many highly successful people got addicted to the right sort of stimuli early in life—and just kept chasing it. The right sort of stimulation is one that’s:

Making you curious and concentrated.

Making you scared and uncomfortable.

Making you reflect and solve problems.

Thomas Edison, Albert Einstein, and Steve Jobs come to mind. They all went to great lengths to keep their brains activated from a young age—and never stopped.

Edison burnt down his father’s barn when he was six years old because he was curious to find out how the fire would spread once it had been initiated. His father took him to the town square and beat him up in public to punish him for this! But that didn’t dissuade young Edison from his incessant tinkering with chemistry (later making him half-deaf).

In his late teens and early twenties Edison worked as a telegraphist for many different employers in the U.S. He got fired a lot; not because he was bad at the job—he was always the best telegraphist around—but because he kept pulling pranks and doing new experiments (which enraged the tradition-bound ones).

The Different Reward Systems of Homeostasis Dwellers and Homeostasis Breakers.

Homeostasis Dwellers and Homeostasis Breakers have reward systems that are wired very differently, and therefore they derive their daily dosage of stimulation from a different set of activities and actions.

Homeostasis Dwellers have a crappy reward system; they’re constantly craving quick stimulation at the expense of their attention, their health, their productivity, and their career.

Always eager to watch whatever “cool” things other people are doing, they can’t stop themselves from indulging and quickly convince themselves with some compelling narrative. They reward themselves excessively and rarely, if ever, punish themselves. This results in a HIGHER STIMULATORY THRESHOLD.

Homeostasis Breakers have a productive reward system.

They derive their sense of stimulation mainly from work, seeing progress, undertaking challenging activities, NOVELTY AND VARIATION, OVERCOMING THEIR FEARS, and receiving praise from hard-found peers. They know everything counts as a repetition for their reward system.

The Crappy Reward System of a Homeostasis Dweller.

Addicted to activities that don’t serve them at all, probably same since teenage years.

HIGH STIMULATORY THRESHOLD DUE TO DOPAMINE ADDICTION AND OVER-STIMULATION.

Over-reliant on technology (Internet & social media).

Unaware of how they’ve associated actions to rewards.

Then compare that to the…

The Productive Reward System of a Homeostasis Breaker:

Addicted to activities that help THEIR GOALS AND TALENTS.

Deserved rewards and self-punishment when needed.

LOW STIMULATORY THRESHOLD; careful about over-stimulation.

Mindful use of technology (not going to social media when bored).

AWARE OF ASSOCIATIONS AND CAREFUL ABOUT UNWANTED EXPOSURE.

How Long Does it Take to Make the Switch?”

If you are not born that way, YOU CANNOT SWITCH BIOLOGY. If you believe in reincarnation, then say a prayer to be better served 'in the next life'. L.O.L..

From BUDDHISM: Buddhism for Beginners: A Practical Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment by Tai Morello:

“[...] Such coping mechanisms generally fall into several categories:

1) Escapism into drugs or alcohol – resulting in anti-social behavior,

2) Escapism into destructive behavior – such as violence or theft because they hurt and therefore want others to feel some of their pain,

3) Escapism into religion – which provides meaning FOR THEIR PAIN AND SUFFERING,

4) Escapism into nihilism – the idea that life is meaningless or that all existence is a delusion as a way of either negating their feelings or in an attempt to disempower their feelings, and

5) Escapism into depression or insanity – since life is too much and their only way of coping is by surrendering to their feelings and shutting themselves off from the world.

[...] coping mechanisms that victims of trauma engage in. More positive examples include:

1) Accepting suffering as a learning opportunity,

2) Accepting suffering as an opportunity for change,

3) Accepting suffering as a tool for introspection,

4) Accepting suffering as a means of growing stronger, and

5) Accepting suffering as inspiration for expression – artistic or otherwise.”

Hey, you stupid Christians, MAYBE ONE DAY you will understand “the myth of suffering in Christ”.

From The Golden Sequence: A Manual for Reclaiming Our Humanity by Jonni Pollard:

“ESCAPISM.

ESCAPISM IS THE RELENTLESS PURSUIT OF PLEASURE through devices of external, and often instant, gratification.

This gratification can MOMENTARILY suppress the fear, anxiety, and pain we feel, particularly when that fear, anxiety, and pain comes from a belief that we don’t have the capacity to meet the challenges of our lives. Our lack of confidence and capability stem from OUR DISCONNECTION FROM THE DEEPER TRUTH OF OUR POWER AS HUMAN BEINGS.

These devices of instant gratification are generally not very good for us, as they tend to suppress our sensitivity to our needs and the needs of others in the present moment. Our methods of escapism are varied. Some binge on food, alcohol, drugs, sex, porn, TV, exercise, gambling, social media, or shopping. Others overwork to avoid life outside of it, or obsess over the way they look or ways to become more famous. The list goes on and on. The common theme is that all forms of escapism attempt TO USE THINGS OUTSIDE us to either FILL A VOID inside or soothe our internal feelings of being overwhelmed and inadequate, without addressing the cause.

2. BLAME.

The second way we distract ourselves is through blame. Blame is an attempt to quell our pain and anxiety, when we can’t escape them anymore, BY PUTTING THE RESPONSIBILITY for the way we feel on something OUTSIDE OURSELVES.”

Blame IS THE SAME PROCESS:

• 'TO ESCAPE REALITY', then to “GLORIFY OURSELVES”; the religious are 'Masters in this': Always pretending 'to be better'.

From UNDEFEATED : Russia's most notorious rape and abduction crime by Carsten Graff & Katya Martynova:

“Escapism is engaging yourself in an activity THAT TAKES YOU AWAY FROM REALITY.

As I tell my story, I realize how escapism became my most important resource for my survival. Almost everything that I did in the dungeon was in some way or another connected to escapism. When Viktor gave us magazines and books, I engaged myself deeply in stories about love or light romance novels. I didn’t just read these stories but lived on each page of the books. Through them and through the memories of my relationships with my family, I kept my faith in the existence of mutual love and passion between a man and a woman. This helped me to remember that Victor was not a representative of the male gender, while also reinforcing the fact that sex did not have to be rooted in disrespect, violence, abuse, and suffering.

Another activity that helped me to keep my faith in romance and love was connected to my writing. Before captivity, I had never had the urge to write. But in the process of keeping my mind engaged in something based on real emotions, I started writing poems. Most of them were dedicated to my family, but some were also trying to depict my memories of nature. In a few of my poems, I tried to write about my romantic dreams for the kind of love that results from a strong relationship between a man and a woman. By the end of our nightmare in the dungeon, I had written more than three hundred poems.”

It's funny, and shows how the West is THE OPPOSITE OF ESOTERIC KNOWLEDGE, in this rape that has lasted a long time, the person runs away. Whereas, the “HEALTHY POSITION” IS TO FACE THE CRUDITY OF HER REALITY:

• That is, in her case; “I am sequestered by a sexual pervert, who is going to rape me “MULTIPLE TIMES THROUGH THE WEEKS-MONTHS”. And I'm alone to defend myself.” The only way, to face reality, is to look it in the face.

THE MORE YOU ISOLATE YOURSELF FROM REALITY, THE MORE YOUR STRENGTH WILL DIMINISH. BECAUSE STRENGTH IS LOCATED IN THE MIND. YOU'RE USING THE MIND 'FOR FEAR'. SO LOGICALLY 'THE MIND WILL PRODUCE FEAR'.

It seems that only a small part of the population CAN BE INITIATED; THE REST ARE DAYDREAMING.

And, as we have seen with Covid, the western population is dreaming AND DOES NOT WANT TO FACE REALITY ANYMORE. IT HAS MOREOVER PASSED 'THE STATE OF ZOMBIFICATION'.

This population 'fantasized about its own death', whereas this virus is harmless for a healthy population. The eternal gap between the WESTERNER AND THE REALITY, if we compare 'with the Asian'.

I have always said that “REALITY IS MORE BEAUTIFUL THAN ALL THOSE PEOPLE” “who run away from it”.

These are the people who 'turn the daily life INTO HELL'.

FOR THOSE INTERESTED;

—THE AWAKENING IS IN THERE—.

• WHEN YOU HAVE BURNED ALL THE RESISTANCES of this body, THERE COMES THE AWAKENING,

but first you have to wear down all the RESISTANCES.

And it is 'PAINFUL AND LONG', years... decades.

'All THE MYSTICS HAVE SAID SO'.

From Zen Essence: The Science of Freedom by Thomas Cleary:

“One of the most attractive illusions of modern times has been the popular myth that freedom can be gained and safeguarded simply by appropriately DESIGNED SYSTEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND GOVERNMENT.”

That is why all modern states ARE MATERNALIST.

We saw it with the covid recently again.

“While one system may prove more effective than another under given conditions, nevertheless the fact remains that people still CREATE AND OPERATE THE SYSTEMS, making individual human development critical TO ANY PROCESS OF SOCIAL IMPROVEMENT.”

The collectivists, these people WHO ARE AFRAID, ALWAYS WANT MORE STATES. And we have seen in the 20th century, what it gave.

“[...] Emphasis in Buddhism on individual liberation, even in schools whose express aim is collective liberation, has given rise to the misconception THAT IT IS A SOCIALLY PASSIVE, EVEN ESCAPIST, RELIGION. While passivism and escapism are well-documented corruptions of certain practices, THESE ATTITUDES ARE FAR FROM THE SPIRIT OF BUDDHISM.

Importance is placed on the commonweal even in the schools that focus primarily ON INDIVIDUAL LIBERATION; the liberation of individuals is seen as an integral part of the welfare of society [...].”

NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

“According to Buddhist teaching, even a simple act of generosity is not really genuine AS LONG AS IT IS TAINTED BY PERSONAL FEELINGS, even the desire to give or the satisfaction of giving.”

THIS IS NOT UNDERSTOOD by all religious people, who in order to 'ESCAPE REALITY', BOAST OF THEIR ACTIONS.

“Buddhism confronts the individual and society as a whole with the problems of self and mind, and does not allow for escapism—whether that escapism be by nihilism and quietism, or by immersion in movements that provide people with ready-made ideas, activities, and interests in which the devotee can “forget the self.”

Buddhist literature contains many warnings about the seductive delusions presented by THESE ATTEMPTS TO AVOID THE QUESTIONS OF SELF, MIND, AND TRUE REALITY.”

From Beyond Words: Daily Readings in the ABC's of Faith by Frederick Buechner:

“ESCAPISM.

Religion has often been denounced as escapism, and it often is. To deny the prevalence of pain in the world and the perennial popularity of evil. To abdicate responsibility for them by assuming that God will take care of them very nicely on his own. To accept them as divine judgment upon the sins especially of other people. To dismiss them or to encourage others to dismiss them by stressing the promise of pie in the sky. To pretend like a Forest Lawn cosmetologist that there’s no such thing as death. To maintain your faith by refusing to face any nasty fact that threatens it. These are all ways of escaping reality through religion and should be denounced right along with such other modes of escape as liquor, drugs, TV, or any simplistic optimism such as jingoism, right-wing evangelicalism, moralism, idealism, and so on, which assume that IF EVERYBODY WOULD ONLY SEE IT OUR WAY, EVIL WOULD VANISH AND ALL WOULD BE SWEETNESS AND LIGHT.”

From Beginning Game Graphics by Harry Evry:

“ESCAPISM.

An important aspect of role-playing is escapism. Movies, books, television, and themeparks all provide outlets for escapism. They offer audiences an opportunity to momentarily forget reality. Audiences are mentally transported to an alternative reality with its own rules, limits, and opportunities.

Games are extremely powerful instruments of escapism. They offer players the chance to escape to another location, another time, another universe, and even into another body.

Game artists are responsible for designing rich and enticing alternate realities into WHICH PLAYERS WISH TO ESCAPE. To support escapism, a game world must seem consistent and immersive. The player should feel that they are completely surrounded by the game’s virtual environment.

A more controversial aspect of escapism can be seen in many games. GAMES CAN ALLOW PLAYERS TO ESCAPE THE BOUNDS OF SOCIETY’S RULES AND MORALITY. As a character in a fictional world, you are free to do many things you would never do in reality.”

TO CUT OFF THEIR SENSES:

“DESENSITIZING is the psychological process of making a person or animal less affected by a particular stimulus by repeated or prolonged exposure to that stimulus.”

This is the goal of those who seek to cut themselves off from reality: 'TO CUT OFF THEIR SENSES'.

From Global Marketing by Svend Hollensen:

“Escapism.

Escapism can be defined as a tendency to escape from daily realities or routines by indulging in daydreams, fantasies or entertainment that provides a break from reality. Escapist activities are those that involve a high degree of both involvement and intensity, and are clearly a central feature of much of luxury consumption and lifestyle experiences, often connected to the fitness trend. This is clearly evident in the luxury tourism and hospitality sector, with the growth of SPECIALIZED HOLIDAY OFFERINGS, in which customers are closely involved in CO-CREATING THEIR EXPERIENCES.

In conclusion, whereas traditional marketing frameworks view consumers as rational decision-makers focused on the functional features and benefits of products, experiential marketing views consumers AS EMOTIONAL BEINGS, focused on achieving MEMORABLE EXPERIENCES. Finally, the more a company ENGAGES ALL FIVE SENSES IN THE CREATION OF A CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE, the more effective and memorable it can be.”

From The Brain Show — Behind the Scenes: What is Going on Inside Our Brain While We are Living Our Life by Zeev Nitsan:

“The “infomania” (TIRELESSLY LONGING FOR NEW INFORMATION) IS ALSO A TYPE OF ESCAPISM that puts our brain resources IN THE HANDS OF THE EVER-CHANGING WORLD MANIFESTATIONS.

The need for escapism causes many of us to wallow in the universe of news, which is created AND DESTROYED MOMENTARILY—AND THIS IS THE SECRET OF NEWSPAPERS AND THE NEWS FLASHES ON TV, RADIO, OR INTERNET.

The frequent shifting of glances toward routine nuisances, which flash in our mental field of vision now and again, often prevents us from gazing inquiringly AT THE CORE MANIFESTATIONS OF REALITY.

The compulsive occupation with everyday nuisances, which consume our time and energy in an attempt to float in the whirlpools of the sea of life, prevents us from focusing on the fundamental issues.

It seems that our tendency to focus on the essential issues is higher when we rest under the coconut trees in the oasis of our imagination.”

What is funny is that;

• It is the Westerners, sellers of modernity, who are unable to manage it.

  “Maximal assimilation in the present, detached from past scars and concerns about the future, is an effective escapism approach. Children have a natural ability to experience the present with their entire being—when they are immersed in play, for example.”

THIS NATURAL THING IS LOST WITH AGE. The Majority FALL ASLEEP WITH LIFE, AND WILL NEVER WAKE UP AGAIN, becoming literally “Zombies”.

From The Economics of Addictive Behaviours Volume III: The Private and Social Costs of the Abuse of Illicit Drugs and Their Remedies by John Joshua:

“Epicurus, who was an ancient Greek philosopher who lived from 341 to 271 B.C., also argued that A STATE OF ANXIETY IS THE GREATEST DESTROYER OF HAPPINESS [...].”

THIS IS THE GOAL. THIS STATE OF ANXIETY IS THE 'NATURAL STATE'; WANTING TO 'ESCAPE IT' through mental activity WILL GRADUALLY OVER THE YEARS DESTROY THIS BIOLOGY.

I REINFORCE WHAT I SAID EARLIER; liberation as told by the mystics, consists of 'FACING REALITY'.

FACING THE REALITY.

THE MORE YOU FACE IT, THE LESS IT WILL WEIGH ON YOU, and the stronger your essence; the more you will learn 'about yourself', THE STRONGER IT WILL BE.

“ESCAPISM.

ESCAPISM IS THE RELENTLESS PURSUIT OF PLEASURE through devices of external, and often instant, gratification.

This gratification can MOMENTARILY suppress the fear, anxiety […].”

It's the perdition of the religious; who immediately Relapse as soon as 'a new difficulty appears'.

From Fallacy of Militant Ideology: Competing Ideologies and Conflict among Militants, the Muslim World and the West by Munir Masood Marath:

“The failure of rational knowledge leads humanity towards escapism instead of confronting the questions regarding the meaning of life.”

On the other hand, democracy and its system, has inserted 'A DOSE OF IRRATIONALITY IN LIFE', because the majority of people ARE NOT RATIONAL. Hence, the purpose to avoid democracy AS A MODE OF GOVERNMENT.

AND TO LET A SELF-CONFIDENT ELITE RUN THINGS.

But I don't see how the West will ever be able to take THIS STEP, Step away from the Ancient Thought, 'STEP WHICH HAS LED IT TO ITS PERDITION'.

RELIGIOUS ESCAPISM: the Fear of life #Escapism #Christianity #Fantasy

https://bittube.tv/post/a12ed1fc-34b7-4ff4-94bb-9056e9b364dc https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/RELIGIOUS-ESCAPISM--the-Fear-of-life:9 https://tube.midov.pl/w/qBHEdvJMW8mbQMGya7okny https://www.bitchute.com/video/YFnMppyQH6zk/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ TEEPUBLIC https://www.teepublic.com/user/periodic-reset-of-civilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com

EGALITARIANISM.

“From a sociological perspective, hierarchy and egalitarianism ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. Organizations that are hierarchical are, by definition, the opposite of those that are “egalitarian.””

Christians are always lost 'IN THE AFFAIRS OF OTHERS'; that is why 'they have never understood anything about the Bible/and the New Testament'.

THESE IDIOTS think that THERE IS GOD, and do not “understand THE UNITARY PRINCIPLE OF THEIR OWN NATURE”. IT'S HOPELESS!

From Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies by David Bentley Hart:

“The picture MacMullen presents of pagan philanthropy is positively enchanting, even idyllic, but—alas—the evidence he cites from Libanius betrays him: if anything, it reflects only the rather restricted and occasional almsgiving practices adopted by pagan temples during the Christian era, as a result of the emperor Julian’s attempts to force the pagan PRIESTHOOD TO IMITATE THE CHURCH’S AID TO THE POOR.”

This is why the Christian's 'Savior Complex.'

“Again, I will happily stipulate that the rise of Christianity did not miraculously transform ancient society from the ground up, or for that matter from the top down; nor did it rid that society of its immemorial injustices.

To begin with, it is more than a touch perverse to credit the pagan cults with a religious egalitarianism greater than—or even comparable to—that of the early church. With some rare exceptions, such as the Bacchic mysteries, most organized religious societies of the ancient world admitted only one sex (GENERALLY MEN) AND STRICTLY EXCLUDED SLAVES from their memberships.”

“The Christians, by contrast, admitted men and women, free and bound, to equal membership and obliged them to worship together. This was, in many ways, the most radical novelty of their community: that it transcended and so, in an ultimate sense, annulled “natural” human divisions.”

From Christianity Without God: Moving Beyond the Dogmas and Retrieving the Epic Moral Narrative by Daniel C. Maguire:

“This sociopolitical egalitarianism in Israel put it at odds with the hierarchic centralized rules of neighboring city-states in that general area, and this often led to war. So protecting this EGALITARIAN SOCIETY [...].

SEEDS OF DEMOCRATIC THEORY.

THIS SYSTEM YAHWEH WAS TO PROTECT WAS A FIRST GLIMMERING OF DEMOCRATIC RULE.

It “depended greatly on consensual understanding of and commitment to COMMON INTERESTS requiring, as it were, the ancient tribal equivalent of ‘an enlightened and publicly active citizenry.’”

The feisty tribes of Yahweh were enlightened enough to know that UNLIMITED WEALTH wreaks “violence” (Micah 6:12) and is always shielded by lies and deceit, an insight that stands out in its enduring contemporaneity.

Yahweh and the people who crafted him were stubborn pioneers in early democracy.

As Gottwald asks: “What other instances do we possess from the ancient Near East OF THE UNDERCLASSES FROM A FEUDAL SOCIETY overthrowing their lords and living in an egalitarian social system over a wide area of formerly feudalized land for two centuries” before succumbing to monarchy?”

MARX BEFORE MARX.

“So, is God brutal? Or is God egalitarian and progressive? It all depends on the society’s shifting needs. For Tacitus, the gods were with the mighty. That made good imperial sense to the Romans.

When the early tribes of Yahweh pioneered an EGALITARIAN SOCIETY THAT FAVORED THE POOR OVER THE RICH [...] , their god became a “God of justice” (Isa. 30:18), described by Judith as a “God of the humble … the poor … the weak … the desperate … and the helpless” (Jud. 9:11). Strange credentials indeed for a god, but perfectly REFLECTIVE OF THE REVOLUTIONARY MOOD OF EARLY ISRAEL.”

What makes me laugh is the congenital hatred of the Jew by the Christian, whereas it is he the Christian, who carries the Jewish mentality in the West.

Hence the problem we have with the Christian, and how to get rid of him “politically”.

“In sum, the Hebrew gods show two things: (1) the people make the gods, not the other way around; and, (2) those gods have social functions. They can have a long shelf life and can be invoked centuries after their creation to prod folks to evil as with the Crusaders or Christian anti-Semites.

These prophetic movers and shakers put words like these into the mouth of God: “I remember the unfailing devotion of your youth, the love of your bridal days, when you followed me in the wilderness, through a land unsown,” when we pioneered together an EGALITARIAN JUST SOCIETY AND DREAMT DREAMS OF PEACE unparalleled in history (Jer. 2:2).”

From ,Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays by Murray N. Rothbard:

“WHEN EGALITARIANISM IS MEASURED BY THIS COMMONSENSE CRITERION, THE RESULTS ARE DEVASTATING. EVERYWHERE IN NATURE WE FIND INEQUALITY.

Attempts to remake human beings so that everyone fits the same mold lead INEVITABLY TO TYRANNY.”

From Third World to First: The Singapore Story – 1965-2000 by Lee Kuan Yew:

“Ostentatious egalitarianism is good politics. For decades in Mao’s China, the people wore the same-style Mao jacket and trousers, ostensibly of the same material with the same ill-fitting cut.

IN FACT THERE WERE DIFFERENT GRADES OF MAO JACKETS. A provincial leader in charge of tourism explained to one of my ministers that while they might look alike, they were of different quality cloth. To emphasise his point, he unbuttoned his jacket to show that it was fur-lined.”

From Jesus Is Dead by Robert M. Price:

“Christianity turned the norms upside down and said that birth, ethnicity, gender, and wealth — that which determined a person’s honor and worth in this setting — MEANT ZIPOLA.”

From The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies—-How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths by Michael Shermer:

“Hierarchical social structures are almost UNIVERSAL.

EGALITARIANISM WORKS (BARELY) ONLY AMONG TINY BANDS OF HUNTER-GATHERERS IN RESOURCE-POOR ENVIRONMENTS WHERE THERE IS NEXT TO NO PRIVATE PROPERTY.

Egalitarianism works (barely) only among tiny bands of hunter-gatherers in resource-poor environments where there is next to no private property.”

In the following preface, THE WHOLE EGALITARIAN THOUGHT IS LAID DOWN, and you will understand to what extent our modern societies are just that:

From Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior by Christopher Boehm:

“To one who is living one’s life as a democrat, egalitarianism is a topic that affects not only the head, but the heart. My heart was in this book, not only in the research that underlies it, but in its writing. For egalitarianism, as opposed to actual equality, is intrinsic to the democracy that many people on this planet enjoy and often take for granted. We democrats live in societies that define us as political equals, and in spite of voter apathy and predatory lobbies we continue to wield our votes: the collective voice of the people continues to be, ultimately, powerful. It is this essential political leverage in the political decision-making process that keeps alive human freedom and human rights as we know them, and I shall argue that this type of political stance is quite ancient.

To a democrat the power of centralized government, be it national or local, is a perpetual threat to the personal autonomy of its citizens [...].”

Democracy is precisely that which removes “autonomy of the citizens”, by practicing majority voting. For a collectivist, the majority and the individual; it's a bit the same thing. But individualism is still 1.

“Our earliest precursor, in this respect, may well have been an African ape living some 5 to 7 million years ago. This vanished ancestral hominoid was likely to have formed political coalitions that enabled the rank and file, those who otherwise would have been utterly subordinated, to whittle away at the powers of alpha individuals whose regular practice it was to bully them. Our direct evolutionary precursor was a human physically just like ourselves, who lived in the Late Paleolithic and possessed an egalitarian ethos and an egalitarian political order similar to those of present-day hunting bands who have remained nomadic.”

These idiots are 'fantasizing about an egalitarian world that never existed' and never will.

Always from the same idiot:

From Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame by Christopher Boehm:

“[...] egalitarianism can stay in place only with the vigilant and active suppression of bullies, who as free riders could otherwise openly take what they wanted from others who were less selfish or less powerful.

It’s here that my work on the evolution of hunter-gatherer egalitarianism comes in, namely, the emphasis on the active and potentially quite violent policing of alpha-male social predators by their own band-level communities. I’m speaking of large, well-unified coalitions of subordinates and their aggressive and effective control of selfish bullies, whose predatory free rides at the expense of less powerful or less selfish others could otherwise be easily taken by force. In the next chapter, we’ll see that 45,000 years ago very likely almost all the humans on this planet were practicing such egalitarianism.”

“Their aggressive and effective control of selfish bullies” EXCEPT that it WAS COLLECTIVIST IDEOLOGIES THAT KILLED OVER 100 MILLION PEOPLE in the 20th century.

EGALITARIANISM HAS NEVER WORKED; AND WILL NEVER WORK.

In any group, LEADERS TAKE CONTROL.

The “egalitarian model” HAS LITERALLY KILLED EUROPE SINCE ITS INCEPTION; BY CHRISTIANISM.

As long as the West DOES NOT RETURN TO THE TRADITIONALIST MODEL, THEN THERE WILL BE NO WEST.

And the good thing about idiots is that they contradict themselves all the time, their doctrines being the wrong ones. Further 'in the Book':

“Indeed, egalitarianism itself is based on competition between A FEW STRONGER INDIVIDUALS AND THE SUBORDINATES WHO UNITE TO OPPOSE THEM.”

So, we need to know:

• The hierarchy, THE TRADITIONALIST MODEL works or does not work?

THERE HAVE NEVER BEEN DEMOCRATIC, EGALITARIAN MODELS.

EVERY TIME THIS ONE IS IMPLANTED, 'HIERARCHIES ARE RE-FORMED'.

When you look at it, HISTORICALLY, it's always the leaders “WHO TAKE CARE OF THE WEAKEST”, never the weakest who take care of the weakest.

Moreover, TO SAY THAT THERE ARE WEAK AND STRONG, nullifies this egalitarian argument.

BUT HOW STUPID THESE IDIOTS CAN BE!

From The Know Your Bill of Rights Book: Don't Lose Your Constitutional Rights—Learn Them! by Sean Patrick:

“NEW RIGHT VS. OLD RIGHT.

What is “new” about the North American New Right, and how does it relate to the “Old Right”?

Before I can answer that, I need to clarify what the Old Right and the New Right have in common and what differentiates them from today’s phony Right: namely the present-day center-Right parties and all forms of classical liberalism.

The true Right, in both its Old and New versions, is founded ON THE REJECTION OF HUMAN EQUALITY AS A FACT AND AS A NORM.”

“The true Right, in both its Old and New versions, is founded on the rejection of human equality as a fact and as a norm.

The true Right embraces the idea that mankind is and ought to BE UNEQUAL, that is DIFFERENTIATED.

MEN ARE DIFFERENT FROM WOMEN.

ADULTS ARE DIFFERENT FROM CHILDREN.

THE WISE ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE FOOLISH, THE SMART FROM THE STUPID, THE STRONG FROM THE WEAK, THE BEAUTIFUL FROM THE UGLY.

We are differentiated by RACE, HISTORY, LANGUAGE, RELIGION, NATION, TRIBE, AND CULTURE.

These differences matter, AND BECAUSE THEY MATTER, all of life is governed BY REAL HIERARCHIES of fact and value, not by the chimera of EQUALITY.

THE TRUE RIGHT REJECTS EGALITARIANISM ROOT AND BRANCH.

EVERY TRADITIONAL SOCIETY KNOWN TO MAN IS INEGALITARIAN.”

It is for this reason that the Christian, EGALITARIAN BY ESSENCE, rejects Tradition.

“All forms of traditional society have been destroyed—or are in the process of being destroyed—BY MODERN, EGALITARIAN, MASS SOCIETY.

The New Right and the Old Right share the same goal: a society that is not just hierarchical but also organic, a body politic, a racially and culturally homogeneous people, a people that is one in blood and spirit, a people that is politically organized and sovereign and thus in control of its OWN DESTINY.”

This is what the 'CASTE SOCIETY' PROVIDES, organized from above, and fundamentally 'anti-egalitarian'. And if the West 'wants to survive modernity', it has no choice but this: Reject democracy en masse/and let itself be ruled BY AN ELITE.

“I believe that America today is very much like Eastern Europe in the 1980s: a totalitarian system committed publicly to another version of the lie of egalitarianism. Like Communism, the American system is becoming increasingly hollow and brittle as more whites decide, in the privacy of their own minds, THAT EQUALITY IS A LIE, diversity is a plague, and the system is stacked against them. But they do not act on these convictions because they think that they are basically alone. If they slip, they know they will be persecuted, and nobody will come to their defense.”

THE ONLY SOLUTION IS TO 'HAND OVER TO LEADERS': Something that 'the Westerners' are not yet 'ready' to do.

From Rediscovering Americanism: And the Tyranny of Progressivism by Mark R. Levin:

“PROGRESSIVISM IS THE IDEA OF THE INEVITABILITY OF HISTORICAL PROGRESS AND THE PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN—AND HIS SELF-REALIZATION—THROUGH THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY OR COLLECTIVE.”

Yuck!

“Moreover, Croly, like many before and since, tied historic progress and the modern state to the idea of MATERIAL EGALITARIANISM, a central tenet of Marxism.

Let us remember, for the progressive, historical progress is said to be a process of never-ending cultural and societal adjustments intended to address the unique circumstances of the time, the ultimate goal of which is economic egalitarianism and the material LIBERATION OF “THE MASSES.””

Yuck! Yuck!

“Moreover, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY IS IMPOSSIBLE if the GOVERNING GOAL is the PURSUIT OF ECONOMIC EGALITARIANISM AND SOCIAL SAMENESS.”

Yuck!

“For the Founders, EQUALITY MEANT EQUAL JUSTICE AND EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW, NOT THE UNIFORMITY OF MEN AND CONFORMITY TO CENTRALIZED PLANS AND RULES.”

NOT REALLY WHAT YOU HAVE IN AMERICA. BUT YOU WANT DEMOCRACY AND YOUR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM THAT ARE INCOMPATIBLE.

“Hayek explained: “[O]nly because men are IN FACT UNEQUAL CAN WE TREAT THEM EQUALLY.””

From Rubicon Last Years of Roman Republic by Tom Holland:

“FOR A CITIZEN, THE ESSENCE OF LIFE was competition; wealth and votes the accepted measures of success. On top of that, of course, the REPUBLIC WAS A SUPERPOWER, WITH A REACH AND PREPONDERANCE quite new in Western history.

A few decades ago, in the late 1930s, the great Oxford classicist Ronald Syme saw IN THE RISE TO POWER OF THE CAESARS A ‘ROMAN REVOLUTION’, A PREFIGURING OF THE AGE OF THE FASCIST AND COMMUNIST DICTATORS.

[...] Yet parallels can be deceptive. THE ROMANS, IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING, EXISTED UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES – PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, INTELLECTUAL – PROFOUNDLY DIFFERENT FROM OUR OWN.

OFTEN, IN FACT, THE ROMANS CAN BE STRANGEST WHEN THEY APPEAR MOST FAMILIAR.

A poet mourning the cruelty of his mistress, or a father his dead daughter, these may seem to speak to us directly of something permanent in human nature, and yet how alien, how utterly alien a Roman’s assumptions about sexual relations, or family life, would appear to us.

So too the values that GAVE BREATH TO THE REPUBLIC ITSELF, THE DESIRES OF ITS CITIZENS, THE RITUALS AND CODES OF THEIR BEHAVIOUR.

Understand these and much THAT STRIKES US AS ABHORRENT ABOUT THE ROMANS, ACTIONS WHICH TO OUR WAY OF THINKING ARE SELF-EVIDENTLY CRIMES, CAN BE, IF NOT FORGIVEN, THEN AT LEAST BETTER UNDERSTOOD.

The spilling of blood in an arena, THE OBLITERATION OF A GREAT CITY, THE CONQUEST OF THE WORLD – THESE, TO THE ROMAN WAY OF THINKING, MIGHT BE REGARDED AS GLORIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS.

Periodically, waste from the insulae would be wheeled out in barrows to fertilise gardens beyond the city walls, but there was always too much of it, urine sloshing over the rims of fullers’ jars, mounds of excrement submerging the streets.

IN DEATH, THE POOR THEMSELVES WOULD BE SUBSUMED INTO WASTE. NOT FOR THEM the dignity of a tomb beside the Appian Way.

Instead their carcasses would be tossed with all the other refuse into giant pits beyond the easternmost city gate, the Esquiline. Travellers approaching Rome by this route would see bones littering the sides of the road. Degradation on such a scale was something new in the world. The suffering of the urban poor was all the more terrible because, by depriving them of the solaces of community, it denied them everything that made a Roman what he was. THE LONELINESS OF LIFE ON THE TOP FLOOR OF AN APARTMENT BLOCK REPRESENTED THE ANTITHESIS OF ALL THAT A CITIZEN MOST PRIZED.

TO BE CUT OFF FROM THE RITUALS AND RHYTHMS OF SOCIETY was to sink to the level of a barbarian.

THE LONELINESS OF LIFE ON THE TOP FLOOR OF AN APARTMENT BLOCK REPRESENTED THE ANTITHESIS OF ALL THAT A CITIZEN MOST PRIZED. TO BE CUT OFF FROM THE RITUALS AND RHYTHMS OF SOCIETY was to sink to the level of a barbarian.

To its own citizens, as to its enemies, the Republic was unyielding.

IT GAVE UP ON THOSE WHO GAVE UP ON IT.”

You wanted your freedom, people of modernity, abandoning the City. And you have lost everything:

• Your real INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM

and your soul.

“It was no wonder that life in ROME SHOULD HAVE BEEN A DESPERATE STRUGGLE TO AVOID SUCH A FATE. COMMUNITY WAS CHERISHED WHEREVER IT WAS FOUND.

THE POTENTIAL ANONYMITY OF BIG-CITY LIFE WAS NOT ALL-CONQUERING. VAST AND FORMLESS THOUGH THE METROPOLIS APPEARED, THERE WERE PATTERNS OF ORDER DEFYING ITS CHAOS.

TEMPLES WERE NOT THE ONLY REPOSITORIES OF THE DIVINE. Crossroads, TOO, WERE BELIEVED TO BE CHARGED WITH SPIRITUAL ENERGY.

Shadowy gods, the Lares, watched over the intersection of all the city’s high streets.

These streets, THE VICI, WERE SO SIGNIFICANT AS A FOCUS FOR COMMUNITY LIFE THAT THE ROMANS USED THE SAME WORD TO DESCRIBE AN ENTIRE URBAN QUARTER.

Every January, at the festival of the Compitalia, inhabitants of a vicus would hold a great public feast. Woollen dolls would be hung beside the shrine of the Lares, one for every free man and woman in the quarter, and a ball for every slave. This relative egalitarianism was reflected in the trade associations that were also centred on the vicus, and were open to everyone: citizen, freedman and slave alike.

It was in these ASSOCIATIONS, THE COLLEGIA, rather than on the broader stage of the city, that most citizens sought to win that universal goal of a Roman – prestige. In a vicus a citizen could know his fellows, sit down to supper with them, join in festivities throughout the year, and live confident that mourners would attend his funeral. In a patchwork of communities across the metropolis, the intimacies of traditional small-town life still endured.

[UPPER CLASSES] scorn for ‘the mob’ was unvarying. It embraced not only the wretches starving on the streets or crammed into insulae, but also traders, shopkeepers and craftsmen. ‘Necessity’, it was assumed, ‘made every poor man dishonest.’

Such contempt – unsurprisingly – was much resented by those who were its object.

Plebs was a word never spoken by a nobleman without a curling of the lip, but the plebs themselves took a certain pride in it. A description once spat as an insult had become a BADGE OF IDENTITY, and in Rome SUCH BADGES WERE ALWAYS HIGHLY PRIZED.”

Christianism that is egalitarianism: the Negation OF “THE SENSE OF SOCIAL CLASSES”, which obviously ends up “uprooting this idiot” “WHO NO LONGER BELONGS TO ANY GROUP”.

“Of all Rome’s seven hills, however, the Palatine was the most exclusive by far. Here the city’s elite chose to cluster. Only the very, very rich could afford the prices. Yet, incongruously, there on the world’s most expensive real estate stood a shepherd’s hut made of reeds. The reeds might dry and fall away, but they would always be replaced, so that the hut never seemed to alter. It was the ultimate triumph OF ROMAN CONSERVATIONISM – the childhood home of Romulus, Rome’s first king, and Remus, his twin.

THERE WERE NO SUBTLE GRADATIONS OF WEALTH IN ROME, Nothing that could approximate to a modern middle class.”

That's why I always say; “that the advent of the bourgeois-merchant class”, was the end of the tradition.

This bourgeoisie class “that always WANTS TO BE THE ELITE”. The mentality “IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE JEWS”, but all “MIDDLE CLASSES” HAVE THE SAME ATTRIBUTES. POLITICALLY, THE “MIDDLE CLASS” IS ALWAYS TO BE PUT DOWN.

“For all the gulf that yawned between them, the ideal of a SHARED COMMUNITY STILL HELD FIRM FOR MILLIONAIRE AND PAUPER ALIKE. BOTH WERE CITIZENS OF THE SAME REPUBLIC.”

I repeat:

“For all the gulf that yawned between them, the ideal of a SHARED COMMUNITY STILL HELD FIRM FOR MILLIONAIRE AND PAUPER ALIKE. BOTH WERE CITIZENS OF THE SAME REPUBLIC.”

And we have abandoned this for EGALITARIAN MONOTHEISM in the West.

“Blood in the Labyrinth.

THE CENTRAL PARADOX OF ROMAN SOCIETY – THAT SAVAGE DIVISIONS OF CLASS COULD COEXIST WITH AN ALMOST RELIGIOUS SENSE OF COMMUNITY [...].”

Difficult for a 'modern to understand this', who lives in an 'EGALITARIAN FANTASY'.

“Indeed, in the early years of the Republic’s history, Roman society had come perilously close to ossifying altogether. The plebeians, however, refusing to accept they BELONGED TO AN INFERIOR CASTE, had fought back in the only way they could – by going on strike.

Gradually, over the years, the class system had become ever more permeable. The old rigid polarisation between patrician and plebeian had begun to crack. ‘What sort of justice is it to preclude a native-born Roman from all hope of the consulship simply because he is of humble birth?’ the plebeians had demanded. No justice at all, it had finally been agreed. In 367 BC a law had been passed that permitted any citizen TO STAND FOR ELECTION TO THE GREAT OFFICE of the state – previously a prerogative of the PATRICIANS ALONE.

IN PRACTICE AS WELL AS PRINCIPLE THE REPUBLIC WAS SAVAGELY MERITOCRATIC. Indeed, this, to the Romans, WAS WHAT LIBERTY MEANT. It appeared self-evident to them that the entire course of their history had been an evolution away from slavery, towards a freedom based on the dynamics of perpetual competition. The proof of the superiority of this model of society lay in its trouncing of every conceivable alternative. The Romans knew that had they remained the slaves of a monarch, or of a self-perpetuating clique of aristocrats, they would never have succeeded in conquering the world. ‘It is almost beyond belief how great the REPUBLIC’S ACHIEVEMENTS were once the people had gained THEIR LIBERTY, such was the longing for glory WHICH IT LIT IN EVERY MAN’S HEART.’

Just as the Roman streets formed a labyrinth, SO THE BYWAYS THAT A CITIZEN HAD TO NEGOTIATE THROUGHOUT HIS PUBLIC LIFE WERE CONFUSING, OCCLUDED AND FULL OF DEAD ENDS. YET THEY HAD TO BE FOLLOWED.”

THAT'S WHY DEMOCRACY IS CHAOS, because there are NO RULES OF SOCIETY in democracy. Everyone is free 'in a democratic society'; WHICH ALSO MEANS by definition; “NO ONE IS FREE”.

'IT IS CONSTRAINT THAT MAKES ONE FREE', that is in esoteric terms; 'TO BE FREE FROM MATTER'.

For freedom is not in 'MATERIAL PLEASURES'.

“FOR ALL THE RUTHLESSNESS OF COMPETITION IN THE REPUBLIC, IT WAS STRUCTURED BY RULES as complex and fluid as THEY WERE INVIOLABLE.

TO MASTER THEM WAS A LIFETIME’S WORK.”

Hence the “active character” of the Republic and of the citizen, and Contrary “to the passive character” of Democracy and of the democrat.

“AS WELL AS TALENT AND APPLICATION, THIS REQUIRED CONTACTS, MONEY AND FREE TIME. The consequence was yet further paradox: meritocracy, real and relentless as it was, nevertheless served to perpetuate a society in which only THE RICH COULD AFFORD TO DEVOTE THEMSELVES TO A POLITICAL CAREER. INDIVIDUALS MIGHT RISE TO GREATNESS, ancient families might decline, yet through it all the faith in hierarchy ENDURED UNCHANGING.

Inequality was the price that citizens of the Republic WILLINGLY PAID FOR THEIR SENSE OF COMMUNITY.”

I repeat “for your modern ears”:

“Inequality was the price that citizens of the Republic WILLINGLY PAID FOR THEIR SENSE OF COMMUNITY.

The class-based agitation that had brought the plebeians their equality with the patricians was a thing of the long-vanished past – not merely impossible, but almost IMPOSSIBLE TO CONCEIVE.

THAT THIS WAS THE CASE REFLECTED AN IRONY TYPICAL OF THE REPUBLIC. IN THE VERY HOUR OF THEIR TRIUMPH THE PLEBEIANS HAD DESTROYED THEMSELVES AS A REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT.”

From The Historical Jesus: A Guide for the Perplexed by Helen K. Bond:

“[...] all ancient societies were patriarchal, and there are no examples of egalitarianism as we would understand it in any contemporary context, whether Jewish or Graeco–Roman.

Tempting as it might be to see Jesus as a ‘FEMINIST’, the evidence cannot support SUCH A CLAIM.

Women play a role in his movement not primarily because of Jesus’ radical social views but rather because Jewish society of the time allowed them to act in these ways.”

From The Multilingual Jesus and the Sociolinguistic World of the New Testament by Hughson T. Ong:

“I do not intend to enter into this debate over gender equality in the New Testament nor do I want to argue against any particular view, especially since I acknowledge that there are in fact many views within a particular view’s camp.

BUT BASED ON THE GOSPELS’ EVIDENCE, IT IS MOST LIKELY THAT JESUS DID VIEW THE KINGDOM OF GOD AS AN EGALITARIAN COMMUNITY [...].”

From The Jesus Movement Was Not Egalitarian but Family-oriented by John Elliott:

“A close examination of texts of the authentic Jesus tradition alleged to attest Jesus’ creation of a “discipleship of equals” reveals that the egalitarian argument is fatally flawed in several respects. Most of these problems also plague egalitarian interpretations of the New Testament [...].

1. Egalitarian theorists have left undefined the key terms under discussion; namely, “equal,” “equality,” “egalitarian,” “egalitarianism.”

Consequently the nature of the equality proposed is left unclear and the idea of equality is often confused with its concrete economic and social manifestation, a manifestation never demonstrated by the theorists.

WHEN THE FAMILY OF TERMS IS CLARIFIED, HOWEVER, THEIR APPLICABILITY TO THE SOCIAL REALITIES OF THE BIBLICAL WORLD IS IMMEDIATELY OPEN TO QUESTION.

“EGALITARIAN,” IS DEFINED AS MEANING “ASSERTING, RESULTING FROM, OR CHARACTERIZED BY BELIEF IN THE EQUALITY OF ALL PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY IN POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, OR SOCIAL LIFE.”

THIS CONCEPT THAT ALL PERSONS ARE EQUAL IN RESPECT TO ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, LEGAL, AND POLITICAL DOMAINS IS OF MODERN, [...].

The equality celebrated in the American and French revolutions, has little, if anything, in common with the comparatively rarely discussed concept of equality (MORE FREQUENTLY “EQUITY” OR PROPORTIONAL EQUALITY) IN THE ANCIENT WORLD.

ACCORDINGLY, SEARCHING FOR INSTANCES OF EGALITARIANISM in the New Testament communities, indeed in the ANCIENT WORLD on the whole, IS AS POINTLESS as hunting for modern needles in ancient haystacks.

1. EGALITARIAN THEORISTS HAVE SUCCUMBED TO THE “IDEALIST FALLACY” of regarding assumed visions, ideas and ideals of equality as concrete economic and social realities.

There is no cogent evidence that Jesus ever did or ever could reject the patriarchalism of his time and establish a “discipleship of equals” during his lifetime.

A key feature of the Jesus movement in the Pauline period, scholars agree, was its household orientation:

its mission focused not on individuals but household groups; believers assembled in houses for worship; and the household or family (oikos) provided a chief metaphor, as it did for Jesus, for characterizing relations and responsibilities within and among the believing communities.

On the other hand, to what extent these house churches were “egalitarian” communities is a highly debated issue.

Some scholars claim that the house churches were divested of their patriarchal features and were thoroughly egalitarian in structure and spirit like voluntary associations were assumed to be.

Elizabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, for example, imagines that in the Pauline period the house churches were structured not like patriarchal families but like religious associations, which, she claims, were “associations of equals” presumably structured along egalitarian lines.”

It always amuses me when I hear this, because whatever the organizational structure “patriarchal families versus religious associations”, THERE IS ALWAYS A LEADER 'FORMING' IN THIS GROUP.

So it's not a male/female problem, but the negation of the presence of the reality of a leader in the group: WHICH PROVES “EVERY TIME THAT THE EGALITARIAN MODEL IS A CRAZY DELUSION”.

“House churches, like associations, had certain persons who performed supervisory and leadership functions that distinguished them from, and ranked them above, the other members. PATRON BENEFACTORS OF THE ASSOCIATIONS, LIKE PATRON HOUSEHOLDERS OF THE HOUSE CHURCHES, WERE EVEN MORE DISTINGUISHED IN THESE GROUPS than the hoi polloi and enjoyed even HIGHER PRESTIGE AND STATUS THAN THE GROUPS’ functionaries. From a sociological perspective, HIERARCHY AND EGALITARIANISM ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE HIERARCHICAL ARE, BY DEFINITION, THE OPPOSITE OF THOSE THAT ARE “EGALITARIAN.”

IN SUM, ALTHOUGH SEARCHING FOR TRACES OF EGALITARIANISM, Schmeller has proved only that both associations and HOUSE CHURCHES WERE STRATIFIED OR “HIERARCHICAL” IN STRUCTURE.”

No. no kidding.

“In a cogent critique, Karl Olav Sandnes (1997) has shown that household and brotherhood models are not alternative models but rather converge, as, it might be added, is clearly evident in 1 Peter; see Elliott 1990, 2000. Sandnes justly concludes that the New Testament shows NOT EGALITARIAN GROUPS REPLACING OR BEING REPLACED BY PATRIARCHAL STRUCTURES BUT RATHER “THE BROTHERHOOD-LIKE NATURE OF THE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP in the making, embedded in household structure” (1997:151, 162-63).”

WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.

1 Corinthians 11:8, Lamsa Bible:

“For the man was not created from the woman; but the woman was created from the man.”

NO. THE BIBLE IS NOT EGALITARIAN. Never has been “and never will be”.

“Not one New Testament text points to an instance of actual economic or social equality among the house churches of the Pauline period. This alone is a fatal blow to the egalitarian theory. Compounding this fatality is the further fact that the house churches of Paul and of later time were stratified along conventional lines and marked by a plethora of economic and social disparities.

Paul’s proposed solution in every case was not to criticize or condemn the inequities, but to encourage those of superior status not to scandalize and rather respect brothers and sisters of inferior status.”

This is the Aristocratic Ethic.

“[…] as already noted above, females were considered inferior, not equal, to males and believing wives were expected to continue to subordinate themselves to their husbands.

[… Paul] but never advocated MANUMISSION OR THE ELIMINATION of slavery altogether.”

It's not very socially egalitarian, because the Bible is not egalitarian but traditional.

It may piss off 'many Christians', but nowhere in the Bible is the concept of social equality written.

“As another example of inequality, Paul reckoned Israel, the recipient of God’s promise, to be, as “stock,” prior to— and thus superior to—the Gentiles, though both were recipients of God’s grace.

The house churches of the Pauline period were not groups of equals but were stratified economically, socially and culturally.

The Post-Pauline Period.

Families and households, PATRIARCHALLY STRUCTURED, remained the focus of mission and the locus of assembly as the messianic movement continued its spread across the Mediterranean world.”

Where is the Equality?

“There is no incontestable evidence of a supposed egalitarian phase of the Jesus movement prior to Paul and hence no evidence that Paul and his successors undermined and reversed this egalitarianism. To the contrary, after Jesus’ death the movement was marked by the same social, economic and legal inequalities that prevailed earlier.”

From Christian Origins, Egalitarianism, and Utopia by Mary Ann Beavis:

“[John] Elliott trenchantly asserts:

“The currently-advanced theory that Jesus was an egalitarian who founded a “community of equals” is devoid of social and political plausibility and, more importantly, of textual and historical evidence. More over, it DISTORTS THE ACTUAL HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL NATURE OF THE NASCENT Jesus movement and CONSTITUTES A GRAPHIC EXAMPLE OF AN “IDEALIST FALLACY.” The biblical texts to which proponents of the EGALITARIAN THEORY appeal show Jesus and his followers engaged NOT IN SOCIAL REVOLUTION, DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS, EQUALITY, AND THE ERADICATION OF THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY, BUT IN ESTABLISHING A FORM OF COMMUNITY MODELLED ON THE FAMILY AS REDEFINED BY JESUS and united by familial VALUES, NORMS, AND MODES OF CONDUCT.””

From Jesus Was Not an Egalitarian. A Critique of an Anachronistic and Idealist Theory by John Elliott:

“As a preliminary observation, it is necessary to note that if there is New Testament evidence of EGALITARIANISM and social equality within the Jesus movement, THIS WOULD CONSTITUTE A UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ANCIENT WORLD.”

L.O.L..

I AM WAITING FOR “FEMINISTS” to show me 'historically' a non-traditional society, that is “WITHOUT LEADERS”.

They will find 'none', because NATURE 'LIKES ORDER'.

Otherwise, it would make men and women of 'EQUAL INTELLIGENCE', which is not the case.

From The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies by Mark Juergensmeyer (Editor), Saskia Sassen (Editor), Manfred B. Steger (Editor), and Victor Faessel (Editor):

“After four decades of reforms, China—which was once one of the world’s most egalitarian societies—had become one of the most unequal societies, its Gini coefficient being higher than that of the United States .”

Because it's the Way of the world; this Fantasy of MATERIAL EQUALITY IS, AS ITS NAME 'INDICATES IT', MATERIALISM.

AND MATERIALISM 'IS NOT ORGANIC'.

Which means sooner or later, THESE EGALITARIAN DEMOCRATIC POLICIES CREATE MORE DIVERSITY, WHILE THEY SEEK TO DO THE OPPOSITE. What the simpletons have 'still not understood', INEQUALITY IS ORGANIC, to think that it's not is inorganic.

From Homo Americanus: Child of the Postmodern Age by Tomislav Sunic:

“Regardless of the fact that millions of Americans adhere to various Christian and non-Christian sects and denominations, or even belong to anti-Christian tribes or cults, the mindset of the majority of Americans is shaped by the Bible. The same Biblical fanaticism that had accompanied the Civil War in England was to be detected in the English colonies overseas—in what was to become America.”

You find the same fanaticism today in all Right-Wing Circles in America. And my reason, why 'I can't stand them'.

There is not an inch of reason in these groups, JUST BLIND FAITH. And you don't build 'a daily life on Fanaticism'.

“PURITANISM WAS AN IDEAL RELIGION for American pilgrims as it fostered social discipline and hard work, urging avoidance of violent rhetoric, while promoting a remarkable degree of civic decency.”

Yuck!

“The American way of life and the so-called “have a nice day” mentality, which Europeans wrongly deride as a form of hypocrisy or a capitalist facade, are direct behavioral products of early Puritanism.”

And you don't build a nation on Puritanism.

“Although America prides itself on a high degree of social tolerance and rejects in practice political interference of any organized church, its obsession with moralistic preaching borders on mass delirium.”

This is the Hypocrisy OF THE RELIGIOUS;

Saying one thing

he Does another.

“Most Americans are hardly aware of it and usually take their moralistic stance as something desirable for all human beings.”

No. Dear americans, moralism 'IS IMMORAL AND ANTI-SOCIAL'.

“The former president Ronald Reagan used to say that “the prosperity and might of America are the proof that America is blessed by God.””

Dah! What does this have to do with anything?

“The country which is closest to God must also be Gods’ representative on Earth with the three godly characteristics; omniscience, omnipotence, and generosity.”

“Therefore, it is questionable to what extent America can be a free country for all if the Biblical moralistic framework, however secular it appears, is a precondition for professional success.”

AMERICA IS NOT A FREE COUNTRY.

Religious people “think they are free but are slaves to their minds and therefore 'as far from God as possible'.”

“[Emma Goldman] realizes that Puritanism inevitably leads to the “stifling of free speech and creates a culture of mediocrity. Modern American heretics are summarily dismissed as the “enemies of democracy” or “racists,” or “right-wingers.” The new neo-Puritan offspring advocate now “safe and clean sex,” “safe and clean politics,” affirmative action,” et cetera.

The ideology of political correctness, which was described in the previous chapter, also originated in America in the 80s as a form of intellectual self-censorship. Yet it also represents the postmodern version of the old Puritan mindset.”

Hey, what is the difference between DEMOCRACY AND PURITANISM?

No difference.

“Today this political correctness ruins the careers of independent American and European free minds and makes intellectual inquiry into modern American taboos VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE.”

Not virtually impossible, impossible.

I have always said “that it was the Christians who were the main obstacle to getting my ideas across and in 50 years, that has never changed. On the Contrary, IT HAS GOTTEN WORSE.”

I have no problem TO COMMUNICATE WITH ASIANS but Westerners, and Americans in particular, it's impossible. They are completely OSSIFIED.

“American founding myths drew their inspiration from Hebrew thought. The notion of the “City on the Hill” and “God’s own country” were borrowed from the Old Testament and the Jewish people.”

It pisses Christians off to hear this, but no mystic could have written such crap as “God's own country”. And religious TEXTS ARE ESOTERIC IN NATURE.

“Sombart further writes that “the United States is filled to the brim with the JEWISH SPIRIT.”

Even American Christian anti-Semites are subconsciously enamored with the Jewish idea of predestination, while at the same time harboring anti-Semitic sentiments.”

There is nothing MORE DUMB THAN AN ANTI-SEMITE.

“In fact, American anti-Semitism can be described as a distorted form of hidden philo-semitism which, while not able to materialize itself on its own American choseness, projects its would-be supremacy through its hatred against Jews.”

I spend my TIME REPEATING IT, a kind of Oedipal complex.

“Americanism is designed for all peoples, races and nations on earth.”

Hence the American Civil War, and the Refusal of the South “TO SUBSCRIBE TO THIS DEMOCRATIC IDEAL.”

Appearances in the USA:

“In a country whose ideological principles are entrenched in an aggressive rhetoric about free speech, only few authors dare critically address the issue of Judaism in America.”

“American Neurosis: Love or Hate for the Jews?”

Both.

It is the permanent fight against THE ESOTERIC BY THE MATERIALISM ('EXOTERIC').

The religious “wants to awaken”, but he's always in the complex as to quote above, oedipal. He's always Attached to this identification 'with Matter'(body/mind). He wants to awaken but cannot; 'HENCE THIS STRUGGLE'; and the Jew is “World Champion in this internal neurosis”.

The Christian has only followed this example, and does not understand in any case the Esoteric Texts that He Repeats.

So Basically a tool.

EGALITARIANISM #progress #Egalitarianism #western-societies #West #Western-Society #Esotericism #Esoterism https://bittube.tv/post/e6dfc7c3-31f9-44fc-9881-790d27eb177f https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/EGALITARIANISM:d https://tube.midov.pl/w/ubgxzikgEHdvX4Xww71Luz https://www.bitchute.com/video/J6bETRBubfqL/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ TEEPUBLIC https://www.teepublic.com/user/periodic-reset-of-civilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com

The power of Hate & Dark Night of the Soul.

IT'S A DRY, AWFUL, SENSE OF ONE’S OWN NOTHINGNESS.

IF THERE EVER WERE SUPERIOR RACES before ours, OURS IS NOT WORTH IT. There will be 'no way' to awaken the ENTIRE POPULATION, and we will be 'doomed to destroy our environment without even realizing it'.

THE SOONER we “get every last one of us” off this planet, THE BETTER.

...The Ridiculous episode of the Covid and the Stop of the economy (life) has shown us; this species IS OF NO USE.

“God doesn't care about right and wrong” is an expression to signify 'the error of the religious' —in their appreciation— of god; god being not an object.

What I doubt 'many people' 'can understand'.

'The state of God' is a state 'as dry as Dust'.

Do not Expect to have fun when you're awake.

From Mysticism: A Study of the Nature and Development of Man's Spiritual Consciousness by Evelyn Underhill:

“[...] the desolation of that “ dark night of the soul in which it seems abandoned by the Divine: THE PAINFUL DEATH OF THE SELF, its resurrection to the glorified existence of the UNITIVE WAY, ITS FINAL REABSORPTION IN ITS SOURCE [...].”

From Your Soul's Compass: What Is Spiritual Guidance? by Joan Z. Borysenko and Jack Myers:

“Joan:

The thought that there might be a personal God — one who cares for us particularly — was especially poignant for me.

Over the years, even though had directly experienced the love of God in mystical states, somehow that relationship had become lost to me.

This is the classic Dark Night of the Soul, where God disappears from sight and we feel alone and bereft.”

NOPE. The 'Personal god' Is An Illusion. The Illusion Of the Religious people.

Their damned Monotheism SPREAD 'by the Jews' in the West ORIGINALLY, then by the christians. Hence the christian Hatred of the jews, hatred misunderstood by them. HATRED WHO ONLY ADD MORE POWER to this Monotheism.

The Christian being 'the Inarticulate being, he 'does not understand' 'the trap he's in'; a monotheistic trap.

Nazism was Christian, 'Hitler was Christian'.

Without christians, there would never have been a 'holocaust', which, by the way served 'NO PURPOSE'. Another Error of the Racists of Christianism.

“where God disappears”

GOD DOES NOT DISAPPEAR, “the false god does”; 'that of the monotheists' – A DUALISTIC CONCEPTION of God disappears.

UNITY APPEARS in this contemplation, and what God really is.

Hence my eternal HATRED OF THE CHRISTIANS, who sell 'a False Doctrine to the World'.

Until you have passed 'through this Purifying Mirror' you do not know what God is.

BEING NOT DEAD.

From A Politics of Love: A Handbook for a New American Revolution by Marianne Williamson:

“Democracy is important because it is a conduit for the will and the wisdom of the people ourselves.

“Through the night with the light from above” from the song “God Bless America” is not just a lyrical phrase. America is experiencing a dark night of the soul now, and we need our LIGHT [...].”

NO. The goal for the US and all Modern Nations IS TO —DESTROY DEMOCRACY— AND INSTALL A 'CASTE SYSTEM'.

WHAT YOU NEED IS TO TRAIN A FUCKING ELITE, which goes through all the —STAGES OF INITIATION—.

From A Guide to St. Symeon the New Theologian by Hannah Hunt:

“St. John of the Cross’s “dark night of the soul” picks up on this image of enlightenment THROUGH ABSENCE OF LIGHT, another paradox in which it is through cloud or darkness that true insight is gained.”

FINALLY SOMEONE UNDERSTANDS.

From A History of Western Philosophy: The Medieval Mind by W. T. Jones:

“Not all, certainly, but perhaps most Christian mystics seem to pass through what St. John of the Cross called “the dark night of the soul”—AN OVERWHELMING SENSE OF SINFULNESS AND HELPLESSNESS. This, as we shall see, was true of Augustine.

YES. YOU SEE YOURSELF FOR —WHO YOU REALLY ARE—.

This is a REDEMPTIVE MOMENT.

“BUT Plotinus was never burdened in this way, for in his view evil was not real. He was, as Dean Inge says, “serene and cheerful, confident that the ultimate truth of the world is on his side” and that sooner or later he would return to god.”

No. Because your view is Dualistic.

From Reflections on the Art of Living: A Joseph Campbell Companion by Joseph Campbell (Author), Diane K. Osbon (Editor):

“The dark night of the soul comes just before revelation.

When everything is lost, and all seems darkness, then comes the new life and all that is needed.”

From Modern Consciousness Research and the Understanding of Art: Including The Visionary World of H.R. Giger by Stanislav Grof:

“[...] healing and transcendence, for psychospiritual death and rebirth. In the history of religion, a profound encounter with the Giger’s determined quest for creative self-expression was inseparable SHADOW in the form of the Dark Night of the Soul or Temptation has often from his relentless self-exploration and self-healing. In analytic psychology been a prerequisite FOR SPIRITUAL OPENING.”

From 40 Days Living the Jesus Creed by Scot McKnight:

“Mother Teresa, so we are now learning, endured decades of the dark night of the soul [...].”

From A Compact Guide to the Christian Life by Karen Lee-Thorp:

“The psalmists (Psalm 42) and Christians of every age have experienced what is called “the dark night of the soul” when God seems absent.”

'WISHFUL THINKING'. Your god is not Real.

From With God in Solitary Confinement by Richard Wurmbrand:

“The time of depression has been a blessing, too. It showed me how horrible eternity without God would be. God brought me into a Communist prison, God made me pass through tortures and through the dark night of the soul, so that I may learn what hell is and do my utmost to avoid it.”

'THE SAME'. WISHFUL THINKING.

'Communism is not hell', the religious ARE HELL INCARNATE.

From Worked Up Selves: Personal Development Workers, Self-Work and Therapeutic Cultures by E. Swan:

“Thus, for some practitioners transformation involves a NARRATIVE OF SUFFERING, which involves A ‘DARK NIGHT OF THE SOUL’ in which the SELF has to come to terms with ‘ITS DARK SIDE’.”

Yes. THIS IS IT.

From You Are the Placebo: Making Your Mind Matter by Joe Dispenza:

“Some people call this experience the dark night of the soul. It’s the phoenix igniting itself and burning to ashes. The old self has to die for a new one to be reborn.”

No. A new self is not reborn. DUALITY IS FINISHED.

From With Empty Hands: The Message of St. Therese of Lisieux by Conrad De Meester:

“[... Thérèse] described HER PERSONAL ‘DARK NIGHT of the soul’, she used such obviously relevant metaphors as ‘storm’, ‘darkness’, ‘struggle’, ‘torment’, ‘trial’, ‘tunnel’, ‘fog’, ‘night’, ‘wall’ [...].

In the meantime Thérèse passed through a ‘DARK TUNNEL’ and crossed a ‘DESOLATE LAND’, where the darkness mocked her, crying:

“YOU DREAM OF LIGHT, of a native land balmy with the sweetest of scents; you dream of the eternal possession of the Creator of all these marvels, you think you will emerge some day from the fog that envelops you!

ADVANCE, GO FORWARD, REJOICE IN THE DEATH THAT WILL GIVE YOU, NOT WHAT YOU ARE HOPING FOR, BUT A NIGHT DEEPER YET, THAT OF THE NIGHT OF NOTHINGNESS.””

From You Can Understand The Bible: A Practical And Illuminating Guide To Each Book In The Bible by Peter Kreeft:

“Another problem is that of timing. Why does God hang Job out to dry for thirty-seven chapters? Why does Job have to go through his long and agonizing dark night of the soul? “Seek and you shall find”—but Job seeks and fails to find for a long time. Why?

Because God is the Finder, not the found [...].”

NOT EVEN THAT. STILL DUALITY.

I would have spent “my life” to make people understand that awakening is unique:

From A Dictionary of Asian Mythology by David Leeming:

“Descent to the Underworld—IN MYTHOLOGIES FROM ALL PARTS OF THE WORLD, the motif of the descent to the UNDERWORLD [...] IS COMMON.

Sometimes THE HERO —for example, the Greeks Herakles, Orpheus, and Theseus—makes the descent in SEARCH OF DESTINY or of a lost lover or relative.

In some cases a god or goddess—for example, the Summerian-Babylonian INANNA— descends.

As part of THE TRADITIONAL HERO JOURNEY, THE MYTH OF THE DESCENT [...]. PSYCHOLOGICALLY, the descent is the “NIGHT JOURNEY” or “DARK NIGHT OF THE SOUL,” which points to the fact that to be whole the self must rule his or her inner world.”

THIS IS THE MYTH of Jesus among Christians, 'not understood', transformed into a 'historical jesus'.

“In India there is the popular story of the beautiful Savitri (see Savitri), who follows Yama [...] the Vedic [...] god of death, to THE GATES OF THE UNDERWORLD and convinces him to release her husband Satyavan FROM DEATH.

In the Upanisads [...], the story is told of the young Brahman Naciketas, WHO IN THE UNDERWORLD manages to obtain from Yama the knowledge that beyond death itself IS THE ABSOLUTE [...].”

ABSOLUTE, UNITARY; 'SAME THING'.

“In China, the goddess Guanyin [...] is also a HEROINE WHO DIES AND RETURNS FROM THE UNDERWORLD where she demonstrates her powers.

Having been killed by her wrathful father's servant, Guanyin rides on the back of a tiger to the LAND OF THE DEAD [...].

In Japan it is the creator god Izanagi who makes a DISASTROUS DESCENT TO THE UNDERWORLD in search of his wife Izanami [...].”

This is not noted in this description, but of course all EGYPTIAN MYTHS that revolve around death.

IT'S A DRY, AWFUL, SENSE OF ONE’S OWN NOTHINGNESS.

From History Of Mysticism: The Unchanging Testament by Swami Abhayananda:

“However, following that sweet time, comes another, often referred to as “The Dark Night Of The Soul”; the Sufis call it gabd.

This is a state of DRYNESS AND EMPTINESS, when the soul, struggling to become completely selfless, egoless, HAS NOT YET REACHED the ultimate degree of extinction, AND SUFFERS THE HEAVY SENSE OF DEATH, with no light of superconscious life yet visible.

IT IS A DRY, AWFUL, SENSE OF ONE’S OWN NOTHINGNESS, ONE’S OWN EMPTINESS, which may be likened TO THE DARKNESS EXPERIENCED while going THROUGH A DARK TUNNEL when the light at the other end cannot yet be seen.

The ego-self is WITHERED, DRIED-UP, and all but gone; but the greater SELFHOOD has not yet revealed Itself.

The suffering soul feels great agony in the lack of both WORLDLY AND SPIRITUAL CONSOLATION [...].”

IT'S DARK, even as a Mystic “I have experienced MANY DARK STAGES but this one SURPASSES ALL”. It is 'as it is written Above'.

“The suffering soul feels great agony in the lack of both WORLDLY AND SPIRITUAL CONSOLATION”

THERE IS 'NOTHING TO HOLD ON TO'. And yet YOU CANNOT AWAKEN WITHOUT GOING 'THROUGH THIS STAGE'.

THIS PROVES THAT ONLY 'MYSTICS CAN AWAKEN'.

And this 'SOCIAL NONSENSE' that the Masses Will One day be able to Reach a Paradise on earth; HAS ENDED UP IN 'COMMUNISM', and it's not finished; we saw it 'with the collectivism' Deployed for the Covid; the Butchery will Continue.

“Then comes the revelation of Love and Spiritual Knowledge (mahabba and ma’rifa).”

From The Restored New Testament: The Hellenic Fragments, Freed From the Pseudo-Jewish Interpolations, Harmonized, and Done Into English Verse and Prose With Introductory Analyses, and Commentaries by James Morgan Pryse:

“Thus Plato [...] are quite unintelligible to any one who does not possess the key to the zodiacal language; and this is also true of most of the sacred writings of antiquity.

The point where the arcane system sharply diverges from all the conventional schools of thought is in the means of acquiring knowledge.

To make this clear, Plato's analysis of the four faculties of the soul, with their four corresponding degrees of knowledge, may be taken. (Rep. vi. 511.)

Plato's analysis of the four faculties [...] Tabulated, it is as follows :

Doxa, opinion, illusory knowledge:

1. Eikasia, perception of images.

2. Pistis, faith, psychic groping.

Gnosis, episteme, wisdom, true knowledge:

3. Dianoia, philosophic reason.

4. NOESIS, DIRECT COGNITION.”

NOESIS, DIRECT COGNITION BEING this Spiritual Knowledge (MAHABBA and MA’RIFA):

Other Words more tinged with conceptualization (duality) have also been used:

• liberating knowledge;

• jnana, gyāna, gyan, ginans, gnosis, ma'rifa, ma‘rifah, et cetera;

• 'intuitional' mind.

DIRECT COGNITION has been CALLED MANY WORDS 'in Different Esoteric Traditions':

• direct knowledge;

• direct cognition;

• real experience;

• direct apprehension;

• immediate evidence;

• direct life;

• integrity of 'intellection';

• recollection of the mind;

• 'unified consciousness';

• nondual knowledge;

• noesis;

• noetic mind

• and so on.

Those who had 'this knowledge' 'WERE CALLED':

• Perfect ones, “Parfaits”;

• Stars;

• Gnostics;

• Jnanis;

• and so on.

From Stairway to the Stars: Sufism, Gurdjieff and the Inner Tradition of Mankind by Max Gorman:

“As has been already indicated, the sleep which the mystics say we are in is greater and more complex than only the self-forgetfulness just described, however serious a deficiency of our consciousness it undoubtedly is.

Higher realm of consciousness possible to us, which the ancients called ‘Wisdom’, which the Mystery Schools called ‘Vision’, which Jesus called ‘The Kingdom of Heaven’, which the Gnostics called ‘Gnosis’, which the Illuminati called ‘Illumination’, termed ‘The Fourth State’ by Gurdjieff, and ‘Perception of Knowledge’ by the Sufis.”

From Islam in South Asia in Practice by Barbara D. Metcalf:

“[...] the four stages of the Sufi path: shari‘at (following the law), tariqat (the Sufi way), MA‘RIFAT (GNOSIS), and haqiqat (realizing the truth).

Alternatively, they could be a reference to the four states of existence: nasut (the human world), malakut (the angelic world), jabarut (the heavenly realm), and lahut (absolute divinity).”

LET'S RETURN TO THE TEXT; “From History Of Mysticism: The Unchanging Testament by Swami Abhayananda”:

“Then comes the revelation of Love and Spiritual Knowledge (mahabba and ma’rifa). The soul awakens to an incredibly CLEAR AWARENESS that embraces both DIVINE LOVE AND KNOWLEDGE.

IT IS AN INNER realization by the soul that the God it sought IS ALL-INCLUSIVE LOVE, and the soul experiences that Love within itself.

It knows THAT THIS IS THE SUSTAINING POWER AND GUIDE OF ALL ITS LIFE.

And it vows to SURRENDER ALL else for the sake of being filled throughout life with this perfect Love.”

This means, “renounce IMMEDIATE EARTHLY PLEASURES” ...THE MATERIAL PLEASURES.

The two are obviously incompatible.

“It is this love longing which leads to the station of Annihilation (fana). This is the profoundly transformative experience previously referred to as NIRVANA, SAMADHI, OR “THE VISION OF GOD.”

FOR, AT THE MOMENT THE EGO IS EXTINGUISHED,

THE ETERNAL AND ALL PERVASIVE “I” IS REALIZED.

It is an experience that OVERTURNS all previous conceptions of God and the soul.

Previously, there was a relationship: the soul to God, the lover to the Beloved; but now, the ego-soul is no more.

The false sense of selfhood, which is part of the ILLUSION OF PHENOMENAL EXISTENCE, has been erased, and only the Real, the One, exists.

What shall we call It?

The Dharmakaya of the Buddhists? The Atman of the Vedantists? The “One” of Plotinus? The Sufis call It Haqq, “the Real.”

Scholars may imagine that a Buddhist experiences one thing, a Vedantist another, and so forth; but one who has experienced It, whether a Sufi, Christian or Hindu, KNOWS THAT IT IS THE FINAL TRUTH, THE ONLY ONE.

THERE ARE NOT DIFFERENT UNITYS, one for each sect or denomination; there is only one One, and it is That which is experienced by Christians, Buddhists, Hindus and Sufis alike.

It should be obvious that, if there is such a thing as Unity, and if It can be experienced, then the experience must be the same for all; since Unity, by its very definition, by its very nature, is one.

So what if that One is called by different names in different lands! In every place and in every generation, new terms are ever being invented IN THE HOPE OF ELUCIDATING THE KNOWLEDGE OF UNITY.

WHEN THE EGO-MIND IS DISSOLVED, HAVING BEEN DRAWN TO ITS EXTINCTION BY ITS OWN SOURCE, THERE IS NO LONGER A SUBJECT-OBJECT RELATIONSHIP.

There is only the UNNAMABLE, beyond all subject-object predications. It is what has been called by the Sufis, jam, or “Unity.””

Why do you believe, you stupid Christians, THAT ALL TRADITIONS HAVE POINTED TO 'THIS UNNAMABLE character of god', and that your 'god does not exist'.

“The Upanishadic seers of this Unity declared that, “When one realizes Brahman, he becomes Brahman.””

THIS IS THE REASON for my hatred of Christians and of the MONOTHEISTIC CULT, which has 'brought Destruction' to the West.

““When I died to myself,” says the Sufi, “I became the Beloved.” “I have ceased to exist, and have passed out of self,” said Rabi’a [...].

It is from the standpoint of this experience of Unity that al-Hallaj declared, ana’l Haqq, “I am He”; and Bistami exclaimed, “Glory be to Me!”

Or that Nisargadatta said “I Am That”.

IT'S THE END OF SELF, self 'with a small 's'.

“For, AFTER SUCH A REVELATION, if one is to speak the truth, he can no longer MAKE A DISTINCTION BETWEEN “ME” AND “THEE.”

HE KNOWS FULL WELL that there is no other in all the universe but “I.”

If he makes the slightest separation between “I” and “Thou,” he has forfeited the Truth, and re-established Duality.

How strange and baffling, that only moments before, he was a soul on fire with love; and now HE IS ENJOINED BY THE TRUTH revealed to him to forget about SOULS AND DESIRE FOR UNION.”

Religious people 'GO AROUND IN CIRCLES LIKE FISH IN A BOWL'. The more they seek God, THE MORE THEY LENGTHEN the 'Labyrinth' in which they are lost.

“One might imagine this experience of fana to be the final station on the Sufi path, but, in Sufism, as in nearly every mystical tradition, there is recognized to be a further, final, station on the journey to perfection.

This ultimate summit of spiritual attainment is called RETENTION OF IDENTITY (BAQA).

THIS IS THE STATE OF ONE LIVING CONTINUOUSLY IN THE ENLIGHTENED AWARENESS OF UNITY.

It is the state of the jivanmukta of Vedanta; the state of Buddhahood of the Buddhists; the Beatitude of the Christians; the Sagehood of the Taoists.

Baqa, the final and ultimate station, is nothing less than the continuous retention of the awareness of Unity throughout ONE’S LIFE; IN EVERY MOMENT and breath, to live in the awareness of one’s true, all pervasive, Identity.

This is the perfect life of freedom, contentment, and utter surrender of the soul to the will of GOD WITHIN.

We find this state of perfection described by the Taoist, Lao Tze, by the Bhagavad Gita, by the Avadhut, by the Christians, Zen Buddhists, and all the ENLIGHTENED SAINTS OF ALL TIME; yet all have declared AS WELL THAT THIS STATE IS BEYOND DESCRIPTION.”

YOU CANNOT DESCRIBE THIS EXPERIENCE. AND IT WOULD NOT MAKE SENSE.

I'VE ALWAYS PUSHED people towards Awakening, but they have to 'go and see for themselves'.

“[...] it would make no sense at all to those unprepared for it by inner experience, and besides, no words can tell just what the life of such a man is like. It must be lived TO KNOW IT.”

THE PERSECUTION OF THE MYSTICS.

“Naturally, it is very difficult for people at a lower station of knowledge to recognize or appreciate the view of one at the highest station, and it is because of this that they SO OFTEN DERIDE AND PERSECUTE THE SAINTS.”

As Joseph Campbell said:

“The function OF THE ORTHODOX COMMUNITY IS TO TORTURE THE MYSTIC TO DEATH: HIS GOAL.”

“On the other hand, one who has reached the final state cannot malign the preliminary stations as incorrect; for it was BY THE ASCENSION OF THE PATH, BY WAY OF THESE VERY STATIONS, that he arrived at his Goal.

WITHIN ISLAM, AS WITHIN ALL RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS, THERE ARE INDIVIDUALS OF VARYING DEGREES OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCE AND UNDERSTANDING, WITH THE MYSTIC STANDING AT THE HIGHEST DEGREE, OPPOSED AT THE OTHER END OF THE SCALE by those pious and pretentious people whose understanding of spiritual experience IS DIM.”

That is why I have 'always said' that it is USELESS to communicate 'with the religious'.

“THESE TWO CONTRARY ELEMENTS WITHIN ANY RELIGIOUS TRADITION TEND NATURALLY TO CONFLICT MIGHTILY WITH ONE ANOTHER; and, in Islam, AS ELSEWHERE, this conflict has often resulted in the extreme persecution and martyrdom of the mystics.”

From Hidden Wisdom in the Holy Bible, Vol. 1 by Geoffrey Hodson:

“[...] the dark night of the Soul, is frequently experienced by both individuals and nations [...].”

No. NATIONS “ARE IMAGINARY Creations.”

From The Pagan Christ: Is Blind Faith Killing Christianity? by Tom Harpur:

“THE PASSION NARRATIVES.

I have examined in detail how, in the Egyptian Ritual, a multitude of symbolic events are thrown into the night preceding the Passover of the spring equinox, March 21, the most important date in the Egyptian calendar and in all the various sun-based myths.

The spring equinox was, next to the summer solstice, the single most important cosmic event for all ancient cultures and religions, from the Druids at Stonehenge to the Native North Americans, from the heart of the African jungle to the fertile plains of Mesopotamia.

IT’S THE SUPREMELY SYMBOLIC moment when the sun’s returning vigour actually draws equal to and then surpasses THE FORCES OF DARKNESS.

For the Egyptians, this particular night was symbolic of “THE DARK NIGHT OF THE SOUL” in incarnation, which ended with the soul passing over the boundary at Easter, just three days later.”

THIS IS 'WHY YOU ALWAYS HAVE 'THE SUN' on the tunic of the Christian Priests or even symbolized in OTHER WAYS in this cult'. Cult “that has forgotten its 'Esoteric origin'”. And Lose the Western people with its fall.

“Kuhn writes, “ALL PROCESSES OF TRANSFORMATION, purifying, perfecting, glorifying, reach their consummation on the last marge OF THE NIGHT PERIOD AS IT BREAKS INTO THE DAWN OF EASTER’S SPIRITUAL SUN.

In the Egyptian calendar this WOULD BE THE NIGHT OF THE PASSOVER OF SPRING.”

It was for this reason that the EGYPTIAN DRAMA placed the crowning of every spiritual process on this EVENTFUL EQUINOCTIAL NIGHT.”

From Women of Wisdom by Tsultrim Allione:

“THIS “DARK NIGHT OF THE SOUL,” OR DESCENT INTO DARKNESS, is experienced by Nangsa Obum when she is beaten to death by her husband; by Jomo Memo when she loses consciousness and enters the INITIATORY CAVE; by Drenchen Rema when she defies her mother's statement that “girls cannot practice the Dharma!” and spends years IN RETREAT LIVING ON WATER AND MINERAL ESSENCES.”

From Working with Kundalini: An Experiential Guide to the Process of Awakening by Mary Mueller Shutan:

“While we may have periods of ecstasy, bliss, emptiness, and other heightened spiritual states, they are fleeting. Often a profound depression and existential crisis lurks afterwards. This is best expressed by St. John of the Cross, whose Dark Night of the Soul describes the crash that comes from experiencing divinity and then falling out of such a state. The phrase has been popularized to mean any type of depression or difficulty on the spiritual path, but those who have experienced higher consciousness states and then found themselves crashing down to earth will understand it in its original meaning.”

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT; the dark night of the

soul Destroys and Does not let anything behind. The episodes of depression are still joyful episodes, BECAUSE YOU'RE ALIVE.

From World Christianity and Marxism by Denis R. Janz:

“The Orthodox Church has traditionally been in many ways the very epicenter of Russian culture, the heart of the Russian national character. But by 1917, when Russian Marxism snatched away this historic role, it had become spiritually moribund. Perhaps the seventy-five-year hiatus that followed should be thought of as a “dark night of the soul”—not pleasant, to be sure, but nevertheless an opportunity for growth. Now, as the CHURCH emerges [...].”

'IT AMUSES ME'; as if the Church is a Palpable and Real thing. When you understand that the human 'IS LOST IN HIS HEAD' 'AND THAT'S WHAT MAKES EARTH 'A HELL TO LIVE''.

From Your Head In The Tigers Mouth by Ramesh S. Balsekar:

“Nina:

If the Source is within me, I should be able to be in touch with It. I should be able to know It.

Ramesh:

“Who” is this “I”? All there is is God.

That is the whole point.

If you truly accept this from your personal experience—even this is not in your control—and not because I say it, that whatever happens just happens and is not Nina's action—it is a reaction of the brain to an impulse over which you have no control—if this experience is repeatedly there, then at some point the mind-intellect which is Nina begins to ask itself,

“If there is no action which is 'mine' then 'who' is this Nina that I'm so concerned about? Is there a Nina at all?“ That's when the real seeking begins.

[...] All there is is God, or Consciousness, and this “I” is merely a creation of the mind. Then the dark night of the soul ends in dawn—the dawn of Wisdom.”

POWER OF HATE.

I had made this video months ago, AND LIKE THE OTHERS, 'it was not understood by the masses'.

Good for me: it had generated views, AND IN PARALLEL, those 'who had spread in the mire of hatred' 'HAD THEIR BODIES destroyed by it'.

'AWAKENING IS NOT FOR EVERYONE'.

THE DISAPPEARANCE of the ego 'IS TOO SUBTLE' to be explained to the Masses.

When I made this video, it wasn't about hate, but about the process of the 'DISAPPEARANCE OF DUALITY'.

But like the rest of the 'Esoteric Doctrine', THIS HAS NOT BEEN UNDERSTOOD BY THE MASSES.

So Much for the 'Caste hierarchical Organization' of Ancient Civilizations.

—IT IS FUTILE TO EDUCATE— the people.

Give them the ILLUSION 'THAT THEY UNDERSTOOD'. That's enough. The cult of the Historical Jesus 'does the job'.

It Sounds Cold, but this world is not to be ruled by the masses.

When WE TALK ABOUT THE DRYING UP, the death of the ego: “Dark Night of the Soul”, —YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN— 'THAT TO PEOPLE'.

THERE IS A REASON why in ancient times THE INITIATORY CIRCLES 'WERE ONLY OPEN TO SMALL NUMBERS' like today.

And it 'should Remain So'.

What Captain Nemo explains in the book/movie is the death of “THIS SOUL TO THE WORLD”.

INITIATION 'TAKES SEVERAL STEPS':

... disgust ... death. It's not a DEATH THAT 'CAN BE DECREED' by the brain ('the mind'). It is born 'UNCONSCIOUSLY' AT HIS EXPENSE.

From A Dictionary of Symbols: Revised and Expanded Edition by Juan Eduardo Cirlot (Author), Jack Sage (translator) & Valerie Miles (translator):

“DARKNESS, OBSCURITY.

A dual, ambivalent symbol. Generally, darkness is said to be the opposite of light, acknowledging the value of light as being “cosmic intelligence,” as happens in Phoenician mythology, or divine emanation.

But the Zohar (13th century) speaks of a black fire THAT IS “THE PRIMORDIAL LIGHT.”

Perhaps this is why there are TWO DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF DARKNESS [...].”

'THIS FIRST CONCEPTION' IS WHERE THE RELIGIOUS WILL PEAK. Hence their “verbal incessant miasmas” about GOOD AND EVIL.

THE SECOND CONCEPTION 'is that of the Mystics'.

“Gregory of Nyssa’s idea of DIVINE DARKNESS posited that “true KNOWLEDGE OF GOD is a form of seeing that consists IN NOT SEEING [...].”

By the way, IF YOU ARE FAMILIAR with “the Non-Dualistic Teachings, this is a phrase that 'you will often find'.”

“The concept of darkness appears with fervour in MYSTICAL LITERATURE.” Rudolf Otto testifies to this in The Idea of the Holy, citing examples from St. John of the Cross, who addresses the idea of “dark contemplation” in Dark Night of the Soul, saying that the divine absorbs the SOUL INTO A DEEP DARKNESS.”

From Initiation in the Aeon of the Child: The Inward Journey by J. Daniel Gunther:

“The Dark Night.

No sooner do students firmly set themselves upon the path, having experienced the central initiation of the Neophyte, then they may find themselves in a state that we call “The Dark Night of the Soul.” The exact nature of this passage through Night differs somewhat from Candidate to Candidate, depending on the intellectual and emotional character of the aspirant. What can be said with certainty is that it is not a pleasant business.

The simplest practices become burdensome in the extreme and one is loathe to persist. That spiritual quest which was a source of joy becomes the yoke of slavery; the fount of inspiration which flowed so freely becomes as dry as dust […].”

AND THAT'S REALLY WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT; 'AS DRY AS DUST'.

“[...] as dry as dust; the quest for Light upon the path seems hopelessly impossible; there is the ONSET OF DEPRESSION.

Miguel de Molinos describes it with the passionate words of one who has experienced it:

“Nature herself, apparently, will torment thee, she being always AN ENEMY TO THE SPIRIT, which in depriving HER of SENSIBLE PLEASURES, REMAINS WEAK, MELANCHOLY, AND FULL OF IRKSOMNESS, so that it feels like a HELL IN ALL SPIRITUAL EXERCISES, PARTICULARLY THAT OF PRAYER, hence it grows extremely impatient to be at an end of it, through the uneasiness of Thoughts, the lassitude of Body, importunate Sleep, and the not being able to CURB THE SENSES, every one of which would for its own share, follow up ITS OWN PLEASURE. Happy art thou if THOU CANST PERSEVERE AMIDST THIS MARTYRDOM!””

A Note:

“Nature herself, apparently, will torment thee, she being always an ENEMY TO THE SPIRIT”

An often repeated NOTE BY ME. That's why the 'Ecologist' circles are the Same 'as the Religious ones'.

AND THAT THESE IDIOTS' spend their time DESTROYING NATURE' applying solutions WHEN THERE ARE NO PROBLEMS.

CREATING PROBLEMS.

IT IS THANKS TO THEM that WE WILL DISAPPEAR. The socialist political circles are the same people. Milieus that HAVE KILLED MORE THAN A HUNDRED MILLION people in the last century. AND WITH THE COVID, THE ENTIRE BLOCKAGE OF THE ECONOMY, and the unhealthy conditions that this has caused, you understand where we are going: towards a THIRD WAVE OF BOLSHEVISM

“The onset of the Dark Night is considered by the Brothers of the A∴A∴ to be equivalent to the descent of Grace, rather than a curse, for it is a cleansing procedure [...].

It is for this reason that the great mystics write OF ITS NECESSITY and its redeeming quality. This Dark Night of the soul likewise corresponds to the first major phase of the Alchemical process which is called the Nigredo, or “blackness.”

In psychological terms, the Nigredo equates to confrontation with the Shadow, THE NEGATIVE ASPECTS OF THE PERSONALITY.”

FOR THE FIRST TIME, you're facing yourself.

IT'S NOT DESCRIBABLE.

“To accomplish this requires passage through the “gates of blackness,” the passage of the Midnight Sun. Crowley called Atu XVIII “the Gateway of Resurrection.””

And He was Right, as usual.

“This intolerable blackness of soul is THE ORDEAL OF THE ABYSS, and rather than a LOWLY NEOPHYTE, the ASPIRANT is truly a MASTER OF THE TEMPLE!

Work without lust for result.”

THIS IS NOT TRANSFERABLE 'TO THE MASSES'.

“If the practice drives you mad, THEN YOU WILL JUST HAVE TO GO MAD, but the practice WILL CONTINUE IN THE ASYLUM.

IT MUST BE REAL INDIFFERENCE, and only continued effort WILL ACHIEVE IT.”

THIS IS THE KEY.

Proverbs 1:7:

“The beginning of wisdom IS FEAR OF THE LORD, [...] AND PIETY TO GOD is the beginning of perception.

But WISDOM AND INSTRUCTION the impious shall treat with contempt.”

“In his commentary on Atu XVIII in The Book of Thoth, Crowley stated, “This is that which is written of Abraham in the Book of the Beginning:

‘AN HORROR OF GREAT DARKNESS CAME UPON HIM.’”

And, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him.

“IN THE NIGHT OF THAT GREAT DARKNESS, God made his Covenant with Abram.

Several years later, when Abram was ninety-nine years old, God returned and revealed Himself as El Shaddai, “Almighty God.” In this form of El Shaddai, He then changes both the names of Abram and his wife Sarai to Abraham and Sarah and reaffirming the PROMISE THAT A SON would BE BORN UNTO THEM.

The newly named Sarah had a reaction to this news that one might expect from a woman who was almost ninety years old. SHE LAUGHED.”

From Wikipedia:

“Not long afterwards, Abraham and Sarah WERE VISITED BY THREE MEN. One of the visitors told Abraham that upon his return next year, Sarah would have a son.” FAMILIAR STORY, CHRISTIANS?

The power of hate & Dark Night of the Soul #God #DarkNightoftheSoul #Good-Evil #GoodvsBad #Dark-Night-of-the-Soul #DarkNightoftheSoul #Soul https://bittube.tv/post/c97e18df-089a-4cc3-802b-06b40e517966 https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/The-power-of-hate---Dark-Night-of-the-Soul:5 https://tube.midov.pl/w/nu4Kcsaac4Hjn5HVV3CN4Y https://www.bitchute.com/video/xEG0Dc0FfaU9/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ TEEPUBLIC https://www.teepublic.com/user/periodic-reset-of-civilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com

Homo americanus vs Homo sovieticus: & EGALITARIANISM.

“From a sociological perspective, hierarchy and egalitarianism ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. Organizations that are hierarchical are, by definition, the opposite of those that are “egalitarian.””

I have never been able to stand this “egalitarian western mentality”, inherited from an EXOTERIC INTERPRETATION of Christianism.

The Christians, the masses, have implanted it 'in the West'. Because they do not understand 'the esoteric nature' of the texts they manipulate. And anyway the 'masses is not initiatable'.

Fucking Christian do-gooders.

Christians are always lost 'IN THE AFFAIRS OF OTHERS'; that is why 'they have never understood anything about the Bible/and the New Testament'.

THESE IDIOTS think that THERE IS GOD, and do not “understand THE UNITARY PRINCIPLE OF THEIR OWN NATURE”. IT'S HOPELESS!

From Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies by David Bentley Hart:

“The picture MacMullen presents of pagan philanthropy is positively enchanting, even idyllic, but—alas—the evidence he cites from Libanius betrays him: if anything, it reflects only the rather restricted and occasional almsgiving practices adopted by pagan temples during the Christian era, as a result of the emperor Julian’s attempts to force the pagan PRIESTHOOD TO IMITATE THE CHURCH’S AID TO THE POOR.”

This is why the Christian's 'Savior Complex.'

“Again, I will happily stipulate that the rise of Christianity did not miraculously transform ancient society from the ground up, or for that matter from the top down; nor did it rid that society of its immemorial injustices.

To begin with, it is more than a touch perverse to credit the pagan cults with a religious egalitarianism greater than—or even comparable to—that of the early church. With some rare exceptions, such as the Bacchic mysteries, most organized religious societies of the ancient world admitted only one sex (GENERALLY MEN) AND STRICTLY EXCLUDED SLAVES from their memberships.”

“The Christians, by contrast, admitted men and women, free and bound, to equal membership and obliged them to worship together. This was, in many ways, the most radical novelty of their community: that it transcended and so, in an ultimate sense, annulled “natural” human divisions.”

From Christianity Without God: Moving Beyond the Dogmas and Retrieving the Epic Moral Narrative by Daniel C. Maguire:

“This sociopolitical egalitarianism in Israel put it at odds with the hierarchic centralized rules of neighboring city-states in that general area, and this often led to war. So protecting this EGALITARIAN SOCIETY [...].

SEEDS OF DEMOCRATIC THEORY.

THIS SYSTEM YAHWEH WAS TO PROTECT WAS A FIRST GLIMMERING OF DEMOCRATIC RULE.

It “depended greatly on consensual understanding of and commitment to COMMON INTERESTS requiring, as it were, the ancient tribal equivalent of ‘an enlightened and publicly active citizenry.’”

The feisty tribes of Yahweh were enlightened enough to know that UNLIMITED WEALTH wreaks “violence” (Micah 6:12) and is always shielded by lies and deceit, an insight that stands out in its enduring contemporaneity.

Yahweh and the people who crafted him were stubborn pioneers in early democracy.

As Gottwald asks: “What other instances do we possess from the ancient Near East OF THE UNDERCLASSES FROM A FEUDAL SOCIETY overthrowing their lords and living in an egalitarian social system over a wide area of formerly feudalized land for two centuries” before succumbing to monarchy?”

MARX BEFORE MARX.

“So, is God brutal? Or is God egalitarian and progressive? It all depends on the society’s shifting needs. For Tacitus, the gods were with the mighty. That made good imperial sense to the Romans.

When the early tribes of Yahweh pioneered an EGALITARIAN SOCIETY THAT FAVORED THE POOR OVER THE RICH [...] , their god became a “God of justice” (Isa. 30:18), described by Judith as a “God of the humble … the poor … the weak … the desperate … and the helpless” (Jud. 9:11). Strange credentials indeed for a god, but perfectly REFLECTIVE OF THE REVOLUTIONARY MOOD OF EARLY ISRAEL.”

What makes me laugh is the congenital hatred of the Jew by the Christian, whereas it is he the Christian, who carries the Jewish mentality in the West.

Hence the problem we have with the Christian, and how to get rid of him “politically”.

“In sum, the Hebrew gods show two things: (1) the people make the gods, not the other way around; and, (2) those gods have social functions. They can have a long shelf life and can be invoked centuries after their creation to prod folks to evil as with the Crusaders or Christian anti-Semites.

These prophetic movers and shakers put words like these into the mouth of God: “I remember the unfailing devotion of your youth, the love of your bridal days, when you followed me in the wilderness, through a land unsown,” when we pioneered together an EGALITARIAN JUST SOCIETY AND DREAMT DREAMS OF PEACE unparalleled in history (Jer. 2:2).”

From ,Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays by Murray N. Rothbard:

“WHEN EGALITARIANISM IS MEASURED BY THIS COMMONSENSE CRITERION, THE RESULTS ARE DEVASTATING. EVERYWHERE IN NATURE WE FIND INEQUALITY.

Attempts to remake human beings so that everyone fits the same mold lead INEVITABLY TO TYRANNY.”

From Third World to First: The Singapore Story – 1965-2000 by Lee Kuan Yew:

“Ostentatious egalitarianism is good politics. For decades in Mao’s China, the people wore the same-style Mao jacket and trousers, ostensibly of the same material with the same ill-fitting cut.

IN FACT THERE WERE DIFFERENT GRADES OF MAO JACKETS. A provincial leader in charge of tourism explained to one of my ministers that while they might look alike, they were of different quality cloth. To emphasise his point, he unbuttoned his jacket to show that it was fur-lined.”

From Jesus Is Dead by Robert M. Price:

“Christianity turned the norms upside down and said that birth, ethnicity, gender, and wealth — that which determined a person’s honor and worth in this setting — MEANT ZIPOLA.”

From The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies—-How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths by Michael Shermer:

“Hierarchical social structures are almost UNIVERSAL.

EGALITARIANISM WORKS (BARELY) ONLY AMONG TINY BANDS OF HUNTER-GATHERERS IN RESOURCE-POOR ENVIRONMENTS WHERE THERE IS NEXT TO NO PRIVATE PROPERTY.

Egalitarianism works (barely) only among tiny bands of hunter-gatherers in resource-poor environments where there is next to no private property.”

In the following preface, THE WHOLE EGALITARIAN THOUGHT IS LAID DOWN, and you will understand to what extent our modern societies are just that:

From Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior by Christopher Boehm:

“To one who is living one’s life as a democrat, egalitarianism is a topic that affects not only the head, but the heart. My heart was in this book, not only in the research that underlies it, but in its writing. For egalitarianism, as opposed to actual equality, is intrinsic to the democracy that many people on this planet enjoy and often take for granted. We democrats live in societies that define us as political equals, and in spite of voter apathy and predatory lobbies we continue to wield our votes: the collective voice of the people continues to be, ultimately, powerful. It is this essential political leverage in the political decision-making process that keeps alive human freedom and human rights as we know them, and I shall argue that this type of political stance is quite ancient.

To a democrat the power of centralized government, be it national or local, is a perpetual threat to the personal autonomy of its citizens [...].”

Democracy is precisely that which removes “autonomy of the citizens”, by practicing majority voting. For a collectivist, the majority and the individual; it's a bit the same thing. But individualism is still 1.

“Our earliest precursor, in this respect, may well have been an African ape living some 5 to 7 million years ago. This vanished ancestral hominoid was likely to have formed political coalitions that enabled the rank and file, those who otherwise would have been utterly subordinated, to whittle away at the powers of alpha individuals whose regular practice it was to bully them. Our direct evolutionary precursor was a human physically just like ourselves, who lived in the Late Paleolithic and possessed an egalitarian ethos and an egalitarian political order similar to those of present-day hunting bands who have remained nomadic.”

These idiots are 'fantasizing about an egalitarian world that never existed' and never will.

Always from the same idiot:

From Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame by Christopher Boehm:

“[...] egalitarianism can stay in place only with the vigilant and active suppression of bullies, who as free riders could otherwise openly take what they wanted from others who were less selfish or less powerful.

It’s here that my work on the evolution of hunter-gatherer egalitarianism comes in, namely, the emphasis on the active and potentially quite violent policing of alpha-male social predators by their own band-level communities. I’m speaking of large, well-unified coalitions of subordinates and their aggressive and effective control of selfish bullies, whose predatory free rides at the expense of less powerful or less selfish others could otherwise be easily taken by force. In the next chapter, we’ll see that 45,000 years ago very likely almost all the humans on this planet were practicing such egalitarianism.”

“Their aggressive and effective control of selfish bullies” EXCEPT that it WAS COLLECTIVIST IDEOLOGIES THAT KILLED OVER 100 MILLION PEOPLE in the 20th century.

EGALITARIANISM HAS NEVER WORKED; AND WILL NEVER WORK.

In any group, LEADERS TAKE CONTROL.

The “egalitarian model” HAS LITERALLY KILLED EUROPE SINCE ITS INCEPTION; BY CHRISTIANISM.

As long as the West DOES NOT RETURN TO THE TRADITIONALIST MODEL, THEN THERE WILL BE NO WEST.

And the good thing about idiots is that they contradict themselves all the time, their doctrines being the wrong ones. Further 'in the Book':

“Indeed, egalitarianism itself is based on competition between A FEW STRONGER INDIVIDUALS AND THE SUBORDINATES WHO UNITE TO OPPOSE THEM.”

So, we need to know:

• The hierarchy, THE TRADITIONALIST MODEL works or does not work?

THERE HAVE NEVER BEEN DEMOCRATIC, EGALITARIAN MODELS.

EVERY TIME THIS ONE IS IMPLANTED, 'HIERARCHIES ARE RE-FORMED'.

When you look at it, HISTORICALLY, it's always the leaders “WHO TAKE CARE OF THE WEAKEST”, never the weakest who take care of the weakest.

Moreover, TO SAY THAT THERE ARE WEAK AND STRONG, nullifies this egalitarian argument.

BUT HOW STUPID THESE IDIOTS CAN BE!

From The Know Your Bill of Rights Book: Don't Lose Your Constitutional Rights—Learn Them! by Sean Patrick:

“NEW RIGHT VS. OLD RIGHT.

What is “new” about the North American New Right, and how does it relate to the “Old Right”?

Before I can answer that, I need to clarify what the Old Right and the New Right have in common and what differentiates them from today’s phony Right: namely the present-day center-Right parties and all forms of classical liberalism.

The true Right, in both its Old and New versions, is founded ON THE REJECTION OF HUMAN EQUALITY AS A FACT AND AS A NORM.”

“The true Right, in both its Old and New versions, is founded on the rejection of human equality as a fact and as a norm.

The true Right embraces the idea that mankind is and ought to BE UNEQUAL, that is DIFFERENTIATED.

MEN ARE DIFFERENT FROM WOMEN.

ADULTS ARE DIFFERENT FROM CHILDREN.

THE WISE ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE FOOLISH, THE SMART FROM THE STUPID, THE STRONG FROM THE WEAK, THE BEAUTIFUL FROM THE UGLY.

We are differentiated by RACE, HISTORY, LANGUAGE, RELIGION, NATION, TRIBE, AND CULTURE.

These differences matter, AND BECAUSE THEY MATTER, all of life is governed BY REAL HIERARCHIES of fact and value, not by the chimera of EQUALITY.

THE TRUE RIGHT REJECTS EGALITARIANISM ROOT AND BRANCH.

EVERY TRADITIONAL SOCIETY KNOWN TO MAN IS INEGALITARIAN.”

It is for this reason that the Christian, EGALITARIAN BY ESSENCE, rejects Tradition.

“All forms of traditional society have been destroyed—or are in the process of being destroyed—BY MODERN, EGALITARIAN, MASS SOCIETY.

The New Right and the Old Right share the same goal: a society that is not just hierarchical but also organic, a body politic, a racially and culturally homogeneous people, a people that is one in blood and spirit, a people that is politically organized and sovereign and thus in control of its OWN DESTINY.”

This is what the 'CASTE SOCIETY' PROVIDES, organized from above, and fundamentally 'anti-egalitarian'. And if the West 'wants to survive modernity', it has no choice but this: Reject democracy en masse/and let itself be ruled BY AN ELITE.

“I believe that America today is very much like Eastern Europe in the 1980s: a totalitarian system committed publicly to another version of the lie of egalitarianism. Like Communism, the American system is becoming increasingly hollow and brittle as more whites decide, in the privacy of their own minds, THAT EQUALITY IS A LIE, diversity is a plague, and the system is stacked against them. But they do not act on these convictions because they think that they are basically alone. If they slip, they know they will be persecuted, and nobody will come to their defense.”

THE ONLY SOLUTION IS TO 'HAND OVER TO LEADERS': Something that 'the Westerners' are not yet 'ready' to do.

From Rediscovering Americanism: And the Tyranny of Progressivism by Mark R. Levin:

“PROGRESSIVISM IS THE IDEA OF THE INEVITABILITY OF HISTORICAL PROGRESS AND THE PERFECTIBILITY OF MAN—AND HIS SELF-REALIZATION—THROUGH THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY OR COLLECTIVE.”

Yuck!

“Moreover, Croly, like many before and since, tied historic progress and the modern state to the idea of MATERIAL EGALITARIANISM, a central tenet of Marxism.

Let us remember, for the progressive, historical progress is said to be a process of never-ending cultural and societal adjustments intended to address the unique circumstances of the time, the ultimate goal of which is economic egalitarianism and the material LIBERATION OF “THE MASSES.””

Yuck! Yuck!

“Moreover, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY IS IMPOSSIBLE if the GOVERNING GOAL is the PURSUIT OF ECONOMIC EGALITARIANISM AND SOCIAL SAMENESS.”

Yuck!

“For the Founders, EQUALITY MEANT EQUAL JUSTICE AND EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW, NOT THE UNIFORMITY OF MEN AND CONFORMITY TO CENTRALIZED PLANS AND RULES.”

NOT REALLY WHAT YOU HAVE IN AMERICA. BUT YOU WANT DEMOCRACY AND YOUR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM THAT ARE INCOMPATIBLE.

“Hayek explained: “[O]nly because men are IN FACT UNEQUAL CAN WE TREAT THEM EQUALLY.””

From Rubicon Last Years of Roman Republic by Tom Holland:

“FOR A CITIZEN, THE ESSENCE OF LIFE was competition; wealth and votes the accepted measures of success. On top of that, of course, the REPUBLIC WAS A SUPERPOWER, WITH A REACH AND PREPONDERANCE quite new in Western history.

A few decades ago, in the late 1930s, the great Oxford classicist Ronald Syme saw IN THE RISE TO POWER OF THE CAESARS A ‘ROMAN REVOLUTION’, A PREFIGURING OF THE AGE OF THE FASCIST AND COMMUNIST DICTATORS.

[...] Yet parallels can be deceptive. THE ROMANS, IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING, EXISTED UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES – PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, INTELLECTUAL – PROFOUNDLY DIFFERENT FROM OUR OWN.

OFTEN, IN FACT, THE ROMANS CAN BE STRANGEST WHEN THEY APPEAR MOST FAMILIAR.

A poet mourning the cruelty of his mistress, or a father his dead daughter, these may seem to speak to us directly of something permanent in human nature, and yet how alien, how utterly alien a Roman’s assumptions about sexual relations, or family life, would appear to us.

So too the values that GAVE BREATH TO THE REPUBLIC ITSELF, THE DESIRES OF ITS CITIZENS, THE RITUALS AND CODES OF THEIR BEHAVIOUR.

Understand these and much THAT STRIKES US AS ABHORRENT ABOUT THE ROMANS, ACTIONS WHICH TO OUR WAY OF THINKING ARE SELF-EVIDENTLY CRIMES, CAN BE, IF NOT FORGIVEN, THEN AT LEAST BETTER UNDERSTOOD.

The spilling of blood in an arena, THE OBLITERATION OF A GREAT CITY, THE CONQUEST OF THE WORLD – THESE, TO THE ROMAN WAY OF THINKING, MIGHT BE REGARDED AS GLORIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS.

Periodically, waste from the insulae would be wheeled out in barrows to fertilise gardens beyond the city walls, but there was always too much of it, urine sloshing over the rims of fullers’ jars, mounds of excrement submerging the streets.

IN DEATH, THE POOR THEMSELVES WOULD BE SUBSUMED INTO WASTE. NOT FOR THEM the dignity of a tomb beside the Appian Way.

Instead their carcasses would be tossed with all the other refuse into giant pits beyond the easternmost city gate, the Esquiline. Travellers approaching Rome by this route would see bones littering the sides of the road. Degradation on such a scale was something new in the world. The suffering of the urban poor was all the more terrible because, by depriving them of the solaces of community, it denied them everything that made a Roman what he was. THE LONELINESS OF LIFE ON THE TOP FLOOR OF AN APARTMENT BLOCK REPRESENTED THE ANTITHESIS OF ALL THAT A CITIZEN MOST PRIZED.

TO BE CUT OFF FROM THE RITUALS AND RHYTHMS OF SOCIETY was to sink to the level of a barbarian.

THE LONELINESS OF LIFE ON THE TOP FLOOR OF AN APARTMENT BLOCK REPRESENTED THE ANTITHESIS OF ALL THAT A CITIZEN MOST PRIZED. TO BE CUT OFF FROM THE RITUALS AND RHYTHMS OF SOCIETY was to sink to the level of a barbarian.

To its own citizens, as to its enemies, the Republic was unyielding.

IT GAVE UP ON THOSE WHO GAVE UP ON IT.”

You wanted your freedom, people of modernity, abandoning the City. And you have lost everything:

• Your real INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM

and your soul.

“It was no wonder that life in ROME SHOULD HAVE BEEN A DESPERATE STRUGGLE TO AVOID SUCH A FATE. COMMUNITY WAS CHERISHED WHEREVER IT WAS FOUND.

THE POTENTIAL ANONYMITY OF BIG-CITY LIFE WAS NOT ALL-CONQUERING. VAST AND FORMLESS THOUGH THE METROPOLIS APPEARED, THERE WERE PATTERNS OF ORDER DEFYING ITS CHAOS.

TEMPLES WERE NOT THE ONLY REPOSITORIES OF THE DIVINE. Crossroads, TOO, WERE BELIEVED TO BE CHARGED WITH SPIRITUAL ENERGY.

Shadowy gods, the Lares, watched over the intersection of all the city’s high streets.

These streets, THE VICI, WERE SO SIGNIFICANT AS A FOCUS FOR COMMUNITY LIFE THAT THE ROMANS USED THE SAME WORD TO DESCRIBE AN ENTIRE URBAN QUARTER.

Every January, at the festival of the Compitalia, inhabitants of a vicus would hold a great public feast. Woollen dolls would be hung beside the shrine of the Lares, one for every free man and woman in the quarter, and a ball for every slave. This relative egalitarianism was reflected in the trade associations that were also centred on the vicus, and were open to everyone: citizen, freedman and slave alike.

It was in these ASSOCIATIONS, THE COLLEGIA, rather than on the broader stage of the city, that most citizens sought to win that universal goal of a Roman – prestige. In a vicus a citizen could know his fellows, sit down to supper with them, join in festivities throughout the year, and live confident that mourners would attend his funeral. In a patchwork of communities across the metropolis, the intimacies of traditional small-town life still endured.

[UPPER CLASSES] scorn for ‘the mob’ was unvarying. It embraced not only the wretches starving on the streets or crammed into insulae, but also traders, shopkeepers and craftsmen. ‘Necessity’, it was assumed, ‘made every poor man dishonest.’

Such contempt – unsurprisingly – was much resented by those who were its object.

Plebs was a word never spoken by a nobleman without a curling of the lip, but the plebs themselves took a certain pride in it. A description once spat as an insult had become a BADGE OF IDENTITY, and in Rome SUCH BADGES WERE ALWAYS HIGHLY PRIZED.”

Christianism that is egalitarianism: the Negation OF “THE SENSE OF SOCIAL CLASSES”, which obviously ends up “uprooting this idiot” “WHO NO LONGER BELONGS TO ANY GROUP”.

“Of all Rome’s seven hills, however, the Palatine was the most exclusive by far. Here the city’s elite chose to cluster. Only the very, very rich could afford the prices. Yet, incongruously, there on the world’s most expensive real estate stood a shepherd’s hut made of reeds. The reeds might dry and fall away, but they would always be replaced, so that the hut never seemed to alter. It was the ultimate triumph OF ROMAN CONSERVATIONISM – the childhood home of Romulus, Rome’s first king, and Remus, his twin.

THERE WERE NO SUBTLE GRADATIONS OF WEALTH IN ROME, Nothing that could approximate to a modern middle class.”

That's why I always say; “that the advent of the bourgeois-merchant class”, was the end of the tradition.

This bourgeoisie class “that always WANTS TO BE THE ELITE”. The mentality “IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE JEWS”, but all “MIDDLE CLASSES” HAVE THE SAME ATTRIBUTES. POLITICALLY, THE “MIDDLE CLASS” IS ALWAYS TO BE PUT DOWN.

“For all the gulf that yawned between them, the ideal of a SHARED COMMUNITY STILL HELD FIRM FOR MILLIONAIRE AND PAUPER ALIKE. BOTH WERE CITIZENS OF THE SAME REPUBLIC.”

I repeat:

“For all the gulf that yawned between them, the ideal of a SHARED COMMUNITY STILL HELD FIRM FOR MILLIONAIRE AND PAUPER ALIKE. BOTH WERE CITIZENS OF THE SAME REPUBLIC.”

And we have abandoned this for EGALITARIAN MONOTHEISM in the West.

“Blood in the Labyrinth.

THE CENTRAL PARADOX OF ROMAN SOCIETY – THAT SAVAGE DIVISIONS OF CLASS COULD COEXIST WITH AN ALMOST RELIGIOUS SENSE OF COMMUNITY [...].”

Difficult for a 'modern to understand this', who lives in an 'EGALITARIAN FANTASY'.

“Indeed, in the early years of the Republic’s history, Roman society had come perilously close to ossifying altogether. The plebeians, however, refusing to accept they BELONGED TO AN INFERIOR CASTE, had fought back in the only way they could – by going on strike.

Gradually, over the years, the class system had become ever more permeable. The old rigid polarisation between patrician and plebeian had begun to crack. ‘What sort of justice is it to preclude a native-born Roman from all hope of the consulship simply because he is of humble birth?’ the plebeians had demanded. No justice at all, it had finally been agreed. In 367 BC a law had been passed that permitted any citizen TO STAND FOR ELECTION TO THE GREAT OFFICE of the state – previously a prerogative of the PATRICIANS ALONE.

IN PRACTICE AS WELL AS PRINCIPLE THE REPUBLIC WAS SAVAGELY MERITOCRATIC. Indeed, this, to the Romans, WAS WHAT LIBERTY MEANT. It appeared self-evident to them that the entire course of their history had been an evolution away from slavery, towards a freedom based on the dynamics of perpetual competition. The proof of the superiority of this model of society lay in its trouncing of every conceivable alternative. The Romans knew that had they remained the slaves of a monarch, or of a self-perpetuating clique of aristocrats, they would never have succeeded in conquering the world. ‘It is almost beyond belief how great the REPUBLIC’S ACHIEVEMENTS were once the people had gained THEIR LIBERTY, such was the longing for glory WHICH IT LIT IN EVERY MAN’S HEART.’

Just as the Roman streets formed a labyrinth, SO THE BYWAYS THAT A CITIZEN HAD TO NEGOTIATE THROUGHOUT HIS PUBLIC LIFE WERE CONFUSING, OCCLUDED AND FULL OF DEAD ENDS. YET THEY HAD TO BE FOLLOWED.”

THAT'S WHY DEMOCRACY IS CHAOS, because there are NO RULES OF SOCIETY in democracy. Everyone is free 'in a democratic society'; WHICH ALSO MEANS by definition; “NO ONE IS FREE”.

'IT IS CONSTRAINT THAT MAKES ONE FREE', that is in esoteric terms; 'TO BE FREE FROM MATTER'.

For freedom is not in 'MATERIAL PLEASURES'.

“FOR ALL THE RUTHLESSNESS OF COMPETITION IN THE REPUBLIC, IT WAS STRUCTURED BY RULES as complex and fluid as THEY WERE INVIOLABLE.

TO MASTER THEM WAS A LIFETIME’S WORK.”

Hence the “active character” of the Republic and of the citizen, and Contrary “to the passive character” of Democracy and of the democrat.

“AS WELL AS TALENT AND APPLICATION, THIS REQUIRED CONTACTS, MONEY AND FREE TIME. The consequence was yet further paradox: meritocracy, real and relentless as it was, nevertheless served to perpetuate a society in which only THE RICH COULD AFFORD TO DEVOTE THEMSELVES TO A POLITICAL CAREER. INDIVIDUALS MIGHT RISE TO GREATNESS, ancient families might decline, yet through it all the faith in hierarchy ENDURED UNCHANGING.

Inequality was the price that citizens of the Republic WILLINGLY PAID FOR THEIR SENSE OF COMMUNITY.”

I repeat “for your modern ears”:

“Inequality was the price that citizens of the Republic WILLINGLY PAID FOR THEIR SENSE OF COMMUNITY.

The class-based agitation that had brought the plebeians their equality with the patricians was a thing of the long-vanished past – not merely impossible, but almost IMPOSSIBLE TO CONCEIVE.

THAT THIS WAS THE CASE REFLECTED AN IRONY TYPICAL OF THE REPUBLIC. IN THE VERY HOUR OF THEIR TRIUMPH THE PLEBEIANS HAD DESTROYED THEMSELVES AS A REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT.”

From The Historical Jesus: A Guide for the Perplexed by Helen K. Bond:

“[...] all ancient societies were patriarchal, and there are no examples of egalitarianism as we would understand it in any contemporary context, whether Jewish or Graeco–Roman.

Tempting as it might be to see Jesus as a ‘FEMINIST’, the evidence cannot support SUCH A CLAIM.

Women play a role in his movement not primarily because of Jesus’ radical social views but rather because Jewish society of the time allowed them to act in these ways.”

From The Multilingual Jesus and the Sociolinguistic World of the New Testament by Hughson T. Ong:

“I do not intend to enter into this debate over gender equality in the New Testament nor do I want to argue against any particular view, especially since I acknowledge that there are in fact many views within a particular view’s camp.

BUT BASED ON THE GOSPELS’ EVIDENCE, IT IS MOST LIKELY THAT JESUS DID VIEW THE KINGDOM OF GOD AS AN EGALITARIAN COMMUNITY [...].”

From The Jesus Movement Was Not Egalitarian but Family-oriented by John Elliott:

“A close examination of texts of the authentic Jesus tradition alleged to attest Jesus’ creation of a “discipleship of equals” reveals that the egalitarian argument is fatally flawed in several respects. Most of these problems also plague egalitarian interpretations of the New Testament [...].

1. Egalitarian theorists have left undefined the key terms under discussion; namely, “equal,” “equality,” “egalitarian,” “egalitarianism.”

Consequently the nature of the equality proposed is left unclear and the idea of equality is often confused with its concrete economic and social manifestation, a manifestation never demonstrated by the theorists.

WHEN THE FAMILY OF TERMS IS CLARIFIED, HOWEVER, THEIR APPLICABILITY TO THE SOCIAL REALITIES OF THE BIBLICAL WORLD IS IMMEDIATELY OPEN TO QUESTION.

“EGALITARIAN,” IS DEFINED AS MEANING “ASSERTING, RESULTING FROM, OR CHARACTERIZED BY BELIEF IN THE EQUALITY OF ALL PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY IN POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, OR SOCIAL LIFE.”

THIS CONCEPT THAT ALL PERSONS ARE EQUAL IN RESPECT TO ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, LEGAL, AND POLITICAL DOMAINS IS OF MODERN, [...].

The equality celebrated in the American and French revolutions, has little, if anything, in common with the comparatively rarely discussed concept of equality (MORE FREQUENTLY “EQUITY” OR PROPORTIONAL EQUALITY) IN THE ANCIENT WORLD.

ACCORDINGLY, SEARCHING FOR INSTANCES OF EGALITARIANISM in the New Testament communities, indeed in the ANCIENT WORLD on the whole, IS AS POINTLESS as hunting for modern needles in ancient haystacks.

1. EGALITARIAN THEORISTS HAVE SUCCUMBED TO THE “IDEALIST FALLACY” of regarding assumed visions, ideas and ideals of equality as concrete economic and social realities.

There is no cogent evidence that Jesus ever did or ever could reject the patriarchalism of his time and establish a “discipleship of equals” during his lifetime.

A key feature of the Jesus movement in the Pauline period, scholars agree, was its household orientation:

its mission focused not on individuals but household groups; believers assembled in houses for worship; and the household or family (oikos) provided a chief metaphor, as it did for Jesus, for characterizing relations and responsibilities within and among the believing communities.

On the other hand, to what extent these house churches were “egalitarian” communities is a highly debated issue.

Some scholars claim that the house churches were divested of their patriarchal features and were thoroughly egalitarian in structure and spirit like voluntary associations were assumed to be.

Elizabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, for example, imagines that in the Pauline period the house churches were structured not like patriarchal families but like religious associations, which, she claims, were “associations of equals” presumably structured along egalitarian lines.”

It always amuses me when I hear this, because whatever the organizational structure “patriarchal families versus religious associations”, THERE IS ALWAYS A LEADER 'FORMING' IN THIS GROUP.

So it's not a male/female problem, but the negation of the presence of the reality of a leader in the group: WHICH PROVES “EVERY TIME THAT THE EGALITARIAN MODEL IS A CRAZY DELUSION”.

“House churches, like associations, had certain persons who performed supervisory and leadership functions that distinguished them from, and ranked them above, the other members. PATRON BENEFACTORS OF THE ASSOCIATIONS, LIKE PATRON HOUSEHOLDERS OF THE HOUSE CHURCHES, WERE EVEN MORE DISTINGUISHED IN THESE GROUPS than the hoi polloi and enjoyed even HIGHER PRESTIGE AND STATUS THAN THE GROUPS’ functionaries. From a sociological perspective, HIERARCHY AND EGALITARIANISM ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE HIERARCHICAL ARE, BY DEFINITION, THE OPPOSITE OF THOSE THAT ARE “EGALITARIAN.”

IN SUM, ALTHOUGH SEARCHING FOR TRACES OF EGALITARIANISM, Schmeller has proved only that both associations and HOUSE CHURCHES WERE STRATIFIED OR “HIERARCHICAL” IN STRUCTURE.”

No. no kidding.

“In a cogent critique, Karl Olav Sandnes (1997) has shown that household and brotherhood models are not alternative models but rather converge, as, it might be added, is clearly evident in 1 Peter; see Elliott 1990, 2000. Sandnes justly concludes that the New Testament shows NOT EGALITARIAN GROUPS REPLACING OR BEING REPLACED BY PATRIARCHAL STRUCTURES BUT RATHER “THE BROTHERHOOD-LIKE NATURE OF THE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP in the making, embedded in household structure” (1997:151, 162-63).”

WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.

1 Corinthians 11:8, Lamsa Bible:

“For the man was not created from the woman; but the woman was created from the man.”

NO. THE BIBLE IS NOT EGALITARIAN. Never has been “and never will be”.

“Not one New Testament text points to an instance of actual economic or social equality among the house churches of the Pauline period. This alone is a fatal blow to the egalitarian theory. Compounding this fatality is the further fact that the house churches of Paul and of later time were stratified along conventional lines and marked by a plethora of economic and social disparities.

Paul’s proposed solution in every case was not to criticize or condemn the inequities, but to encourage those of superior status not to scandalize and rather respect brothers and sisters of inferior status.”

This is the Aristocratic Ethic.

“[…] as already noted above, females were considered inferior, not equal, to males and believing wives were expected to continue to subordinate themselves to their husbands.

[… Paul] but never advocated MANUMISSION OR THE ELIMINATION of slavery altogether.”

It's not very socially egalitarian, because the Bible is not egalitarian but traditional.

It may piss off 'many Christians', but nowhere in the Bible is the concept of social equality written.

“As another example of inequality, Paul reckoned Israel, the recipient of God’s promise, to be, as “stock,” prior to— and thus superior to—the Gentiles, though both were recipients of God’s grace.

The house churches of the Pauline period were not groups of equals but were stratified economically, socially and culturally.

The Post-Pauline Period.

Families and households, PATRIARCHALLY STRUCTURED, remained the focus of mission and the locus of assembly as the messianic movement continued its spread across the Mediterranean world.”

Where is the Equality?

“There is no incontestable evidence of a supposed egalitarian phase of the Jesus movement prior to Paul and hence no evidence that Paul and his successors undermined and reversed this egalitarianism. To the contrary, after Jesus’ death the movement was marked by the same social, economic and legal inequalities that prevailed earlier.”

From Christian Origins, Egalitarianism, and Utopia by Mary Ann Beavis:

“[John] Elliott trenchantly asserts:

“The currently-advanced theory that Jesus was an egalitarian who founded a “community of equals” is devoid of social and political plausibility and, more importantly, of textual and historical evidence. More over, it DISTORTS THE ACTUAL HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL NATURE OF THE NASCENT Jesus movement and CONSTITUTES A GRAPHIC EXAMPLE OF AN “IDEALIST FALLACY.” The biblical texts to which proponents of the EGALITARIAN THEORY appeal show Jesus and his followers engaged NOT IN SOCIAL REVOLUTION, DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS, EQUALITY, AND THE ERADICATION OF THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY, BUT IN ESTABLISHING A FORM OF COMMUNITY MODELLED ON THE FAMILY AS REDEFINED BY JESUS and united by familial VALUES, NORMS, AND MODES OF CONDUCT.””

From Jesus Was Not an Egalitarian. A Critique of an Anachronistic and Idealist Theory by John Elliott:

“As a preliminary observation, it is necessary to note that if there is New Testament evidence of EGALITARIANISM and social equality within the Jesus movement, THIS WOULD CONSTITUTE A UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ANCIENT WORLD.”

L.O.L..

I AM WAITING FOR “FEMINISTS” to show me 'historically' a non-traditional society, that is “WITHOUT LEADERS”.

They will find 'none', because NATURE 'LIKES ORDER'.

Otherwise, it would make men and women of 'EQUAL INTELLIGENCE', which is not the case.

From The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies by Mark Juergensmeyer (Editor), Saskia Sassen (Editor), Manfred B. Steger (Editor), and Victor Faessel (Editor):

“After four decades of reforms, China—which was once one of the world’s most egalitarian societies—had become one of the most unequal societies, its Gini coefficient being higher than that of the United States .”

Because it's the Way of the world; this Fantasy of MATERIAL EQUALITY IS, AS ITS NAME 'INDICATES IT', MATERIALISM.

AND MATERIALISM 'IS NOT ORGANIC'.

Which means sooner or later, THESE EGALITARIAN DEMOCRATIC POLICIES CREATE MORE DIVERSITY, WHILE THEY SEEK TO DO THE OPPOSITE. What the simpletons have 'still not understood', INEQUALITY IS ORGANIC, to think that it's not is inorganic.

From Homo Americanus: Child of the Postmodern Age by Tomislav Sunic:

“Regardless of the fact that millions of Americans adhere to various Christian and non-Christian sects and denominations, or even belong to anti-Christian tribes or cults, the mindset of the majority of Americans is shaped by the Bible. The same Biblical fanaticism that had accompanied the Civil War in England was to be detected in the English colonies overseas—in what was to become America.”

You find the same fanaticism today in all Right-Wing Circles in America. And my reason, why 'I can't stand them'.

There is not an inch of reason in these groups, JUST BLIND FAITH. And you don't build 'a daily life on Fanaticism'.

“PURITANISM WAS AN IDEAL RELIGION for American pilgrims as it fostered social discipline and hard work, urging avoidance of violent rhetoric, while promoting a remarkable degree of civic decency.”

Yuck!

“The American way of life and the so-called “have a nice day” mentality, which Europeans wrongly deride as a form of hypocrisy or a capitalist facade, are direct behavioral products of early Puritanism.”

And you don't build a nation on Puritanism.

“Although America prides itself on a high degree of social tolerance and rejects in practice political interference of any organized church, its obsession with moralistic preaching borders on mass delirium.”

This is the Hypocrisy OF THE RELIGIOUS;

Saying one thing

he Does another.

“Most Americans are hardly aware of it and usually take their moralistic stance as something desirable for all human beings.”

No. Dear americans, moralism 'IS IMMORAL AND ANTI-SOCIAL'.

“The former president Ronald Reagan used to say that “the prosperity and might of America are the proof that America is blessed by God.””

Dah! What does this have to do with anything?

“The country which is closest to God must also be Gods’ representative on Earth with the three godly characteristics; omniscience, omnipotence, and generosity.”

“Therefore, it is questionable to what extent America can be a free country for all if the Biblical moralistic framework, however secular it appears, is a precondition for professional success.”

AMERICA IS NOT A FREE COUNTRY.

Religious people “think they are free but are slaves to their minds and therefore 'as far from God as possible'.”

“[Emma Goldman] realizes that Puritanism inevitably leads to the “stifling of free speech and creates a culture of mediocrity. Modern American heretics are summarily dismissed as the “enemies of democracy” or “racists,” or “right-wingers.” The new neo-Puritan offspring advocate now “safe and clean sex,” “safe and clean politics,” affirmative action,” et cetera.

The ideology of political correctness, which was described in the previous chapter, also originated in America in the 80s as a form of intellectual self-censorship. Yet it also represents the postmodern version of the old Puritan mindset.”

Hey, what is the difference between DEMOCRACY AND PURITANISM?

No difference.

“Today this political correctness ruins the careers of independent American and European free minds and makes intellectual inquiry into modern American taboos VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE.”

Not virtually impossible, impossible.

I have always said “that it was the Christians who were the main obstacle to getting my ideas across and in 50 years, that has never changed. On the Contrary, IT HAS GOTTEN WORSE.”

I have no problem TO COMMUNICATE WITH ASIANS but Westerners, and Americans in particular, it's impossible. They are completely OSSIFIED.

“American founding myths drew their inspiration from Hebrew thought. The notion of the “City on the Hill” and “God’s own country” were borrowed from the Old Testament and the Jewish people.”

It pisses Christians off to hear this, but no mystic could have written such crap as “God's own country”. And religious TEXTS ARE ESOTERIC IN NATURE.

“Sombart further writes that “the United States is filled to the brim with the JEWISH SPIRIT.”

Even American Christian anti-Semites are subconsciously enamored with the Jewish idea of predestination, while at the same time harboring anti-Semitic sentiments.”

There is nothing MORE DUMB THAN AN ANTI-SEMITE.

“In fact, American anti-Semitism can be described as a distorted form of hidden philo-semitism which, while not able to materialize itself on its own American choseness, projects its would-be supremacy through its hatred against Jews.”

I spend my TIME REPEATING IT, a kind of Oedipal complex.

“Americanism is designed for all peoples, races and nations on earth.”

Hence the American Civil War, and the Refusal of the South “TO SUBSCRIBE TO THIS DEMOCRATIC IDEAL.”

Appearances in the USA:

“In a country whose ideological principles are entrenched in an aggressive rhetoric about free speech, only few authors dare critically address the issue of Judaism in America.”

“American Neurosis: Love or Hate for the Jews?”

Both.

It is the permanent fight against THE ESOTERIC BY THE MATERIALISM ('EXOTERIC').

The religious “wants to awaken”, but he's always in the complex as to quote above, oedipal. He's always Attached to this identification 'with Matter'(body/mind). He wants to awaken but cannot; 'HENCE THIS STRUGGLE'; and the Jew is “World Champion in this internal neurosis”.

The Christian has only followed this example, and does not understand in any case the Esoteric Texts that He Repeats.

So Basically a tool.

Homo americanus vs Homo sovieticus: & EGALITARIANISM #progress #Egalitarianism #western-societies #West #Western-Society #Tomislav-Sunic #Homo-americanus #Homo-sovieticus #arktos #Esotericism #Esoterism

https://bittube.tv/post/0980d385-47f7-4893-9846-572d6a7fea9b – Part 1 https://bittube.tv/post/e12990d8-a32f-4ff5-9bb0-d4a7b72763b9 – Part 2 https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/Homo-americanus-vs-Homo-sovieticus----EGALITARIANISM:b https://tube.midov.pl/w/mv94VFTD2sA3fr9Xdds5jP https://www.bitchute.com/video/i2GZEgRHtxAW/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com

Fix UPLOAD PROBLEMS for Bitchute!

The problem is related to their platform, either the code, it has been coded wrong.

TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM ON YOUR SIDE:

• you don't fill Anything in the “Description”

JUST PUT THE TITLE, and the COVER IMAGE.

Then CONFIRM.

Then you can add a description.

I take this opportunity to add that in computer science, 99% of the time, if you don't succeed, IT'S BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T TRIED EVERYTHING.

'TRY THE HACKER SPIRIT'; use things in a different way.

'WHAT CHILDREN KNOW INSTINCTIVELY', AND THAT WE FORGET 'WHEN WE GROW UP'.

YOU WILL SEE THAT IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF CASES, YOU SOLVE YOUR PROBLEMS 'BY WORKING AROUND THEM'.

AND WHILE I'M AT IT; I remind as I make A SITE ABOUT 'ESOTERICISM' ... ESOTERICISM Which 'means that WE CAN EVOLVE THIS BIOLOGY THAT 'WE ARE''.

WHICH MEANS STOP WAITING for Solutions FROM THE OUTSIDE; SOLUTIONS THAT WON'T COME.

Fix UPLOAD PROBLEMS for Bitchute! #UPLOAD #Bitchute #Problem #Upload-Problem #Upload-Bitchute