periodic reset of civilizations

Aryan

Title: Christianity, Race, and the Spirit of Origins: A Traditionalist Critique of Neo-Pagan Equivocations
Tags: #Evola #Traditionalism #Race #Spirituality #Paganism #Christianity #Aryan #Nordic #Hierarchy #CyclicalLaws

  1. Synthesis of Powers in Ancient States: Ancient states were characterized by the synthesis of temporal and spiritual powers, which spiritualized politics. Neo-paganism, in contrast, risks politicizing spirituality, reversing the true hierarchical order.
  2. Nation-Race and Aryan Hierarchy: The concept of the nation-race, when misunderstood, leads to a loss of Aryan hierarchical values. It conflates distinct entities (Judaism, Romanity, Church, etc.) into a homogenized “darkness,” obscuring true spiritual distinctions.
  3. Super-Race and Empire: The traditional conception of the Reich transcends both destructive internationalism and narrow nationalism. It envisions a “super-race” capable of uniting ethnically distinct groups under a higher spiritual hierarchy.
  4. Misinterpretations of Nordic Traditions: The “tragic heroism” and “love of destiny” attributed to Nordic spirituality by some neo-pagan circles are distortions. They reflect the twilight phase of Hyperborean races, not the original solar and heroic essence of Aryan spirituality.
  5. Wagner and Romanticism: Wagner’s art and romanticism represent a counterfeit of true Nordic traditions, emphasizing sentimentality and confusion over higher spiritual faculties. This reflects the “darkening of the divine” (ragna-rokkr) rather than the original solar content.
  6. Humanism and Renaissance Paganism: The “paganism” of Humanism and the Renaissance is a desecrated form, focusing on immanentism and the “affirmation of life.” It represents a fall from transcendent spirituality, leading to individualism and cultural decay.
  7. Catholic Dogmatism as a Barrier: Catholic dogmatism, despite its flaws, serves as a barrier against the mysticism of immanence and prevaricating invasions from below. It maintains a rigid limit for transcendent knowledge, which is essential for spiritual elevation.
  8. Critique of Immanentism: Immanentism, pantheism, and the cult of “nature” and “life” are incompatible with true Aryan spirituality. They represent a descent into anti-tradition, contrary to the spirit of origins and the doctrine of race.
  9. Spiritual Revolution and Fascism: Fascism, as a spiritually revolutionary idea, must avoid the errors of neo-pagan equivocations. It should strive for a worldview rooted in the primordial traditions, free from dilettantism and polemical antipathies.
  10. Return to Primordial Traditions: The true aspiration of the doctrine of race is a return to the world of origins, characterized by a rigorous and objective understanding of the spirit of primordial traditions. This requires transcending both neo-pagan and Christian distortions to reclaim the Aryan hierarchical vision.

CHRISTIANITY, RACE, SPIRIT OF ORIGINS.

Other neo-Pagan deviations concern the political realm. Here, Paganism often equates to the exclusive dominance of temporal power, which stands in stark contrast to the ancient states where the synthesis of spiritual and temporal authority was not statolatry but a means to spiritualize politics. Neo-paganism, however, risks politicizing spirituality and religion itself, akin to Gallicanism, thereby reversing the fundamental aim of modern renovating movements that seek to ground themselves in a spiritual worldview.

Consider certain circles, like that of Ludendorff—or more accurately, Mrs. Ludendorff, who is truly responsible for such aberrations—which conflate Judaism, Romanity, the Church, Masonry, and Communism, simply because their premises differ from those of the nation-race. This approach threatens to plunge into a darkness where all distinctions are lost, erasing the Aryan hierarchy of values. It fails to transcend the paralyzing antithesis between destructive internationalism and narrow nationalism. The traditional concept of the empire, or Reich, transcends both, embodying the idea of a “super-race” capable of creating a higher hierarchical unity. Within this framework, ethnically and nationally defined units retain their specific traits and relative autonomy while participating in a higher spiritual order. Some German circles, however, have gone so far as to condemn their own traditions, labeling figures like Charlemagne, the Hohenstaufens, and the Habsburgs as traitors to the nation-race due to their “Romanity.” Fortunately, practical necessity and Germany's evolving European role have curbed such extremes.

As for the “tragic heroism” and “love of destiny” that some neo-Pagan circles attribute to the Nordic worldview, these have little to do with original Nordic-Aryan spirituality. They are instead distorted reflections of the twilight phase of a Hyperborean-origin race, epitomized by the term ragna-rokkr—often romantically translated as “twilight of the gods” but more accurately meaning the “darkening of the divine,” signifying the end of a cycle. This is not a foundation for a worldview but a mere episode in a larger cyclical process. Wagner's art, often celebrated, is a counterfeit of true Nordic traditions, reducing their heroic and solar essence to a humanist parody. Similarly, romanticism, with its sentimental and confused impulses, reflects only the inferior, twilight aspects of these traditions, further obscuring their true nature.

The same applies to the “paganism” glorified in Humanism and the Renaissance, which focuses on immanentism, the “affirmation of life,” and the “rediscovery of the sanctity of the body and beauty.” This is a desecrated paganism, embracing only the superficial and inferior aspects of the ancient world. Humanism represents a mutilated humanity, turning away from the transcendent in favor of earthly conquest, leading to individualism, universalist leveling, and the erosion of racial and cultural traditions. This process culminates in a Judaisation of culture and a desacralized worldview, far removed from the true spirit of origins.

Such “paganism” aligns with the negative sense promoted by Christian apologetics, reflecting a profound ignorance of the potential paths for positive racialist action. Instead of transcending upward, these movements descend, playing into the hands of their adversaries.

These reflections are offered on a purely principled level to clarify the values of ancient Aryan spirituality and to prevent confusion. They do not propose specific solutions for modern reformist movements seeking new spiritual forms but emphasize that any such efforts must at least match the spiritual altitude of Western tradition. Catholic dogmatism, for instance, serves as a barrier against the excesses of immanent mysticism, maintaining a boundary for transcendent knowledge. While Christianity's adoption of transcendence may require rectification—particularly due to non-Aryan influences—it is essential to avoid profane criticism that reduces Aryanism to immanentism, pantheism, or the cult of “nature” and “life.” Such approaches lead to an inferior level, far from the true spirit of origins and into the realm of anti-tradition.

These considerations may displease both “pagan” and Christian racists, as they are rooted in impartial truth and experience. They do not advocate for specific revisions within Italian racism but highlight the need for a spiritually revolutionary worldview that avoids the errors and equivocations discussed. In this endeavor, doctrinal clarity, rigorous knowledge, and a rejection of dilettantism and emotional impulses are paramount. Only a precise understanding of primordial traditions can guide such a movement effectively.

Metaphysical part:

This brings us to a final, crucial point regarding the hidden dynamics of ordinary sexual relations. From a metaphysical perspective, the male embodies the active principle, while the female embodies the passive principle. However, in natural sexuality, this relationship is often inverted. Men rarely approach women as pure embodiments of “being” or as manifestations of the One's power. Instead, they typically “undergo” the woman's magnetic influence. This inversion is encapsulated in Titus Burckhardt's observation that woman is “actively passive,” while man is “passively active.” The “actively passive” nature of woman constitutes her essence of fascination, representing a higher form of activity. This is reflected in the common notion that women possess the power of “attraction,” akin to a magnet's force. In this dynamic, woman is active, and man is passive. As it is often said, “In the struggle for love, woman appears almost passive, but this passivity is far from real. It is the passivity of the magnet, whose apparent stillness draws iron into its vortex.”

This principle is evident even in the patriarchal societies of the Far East, where traditions like “acting without acting” (wei-wu-wei) recognize the superiority of the female in her apparent passivity. Paradoxically, it is always the man who is “seduced” in the etymological sense; his active pursuit is reduced to entering a magnetic field, where he becomes subject to its force. Woman, in her decisive power, always holds the upper hand over desiring men. Rather than giving herself, she “makes herself be taken.” This idea is vividly expressed in A. Charmel's Dernière semaine de Don Juan, where Don Juan's conquests are revealed as facets of a single, faceless woman (the eternal feminine or Durga) who orchestrated his seductions. He desired them “as iron desires the magnet,” a realization that ultimately led to his demise.

The priapic man is deluded in believing he “possesses” a woman simply through physical union. A woman's pleasure in being “possessed” is an elemental trait; she is not taken but welcomes, and in welcoming, she absorbs and conquers. This dynamic finds a biological parallel in the interaction between germinal cells: the spermatozoon, though active and initiative-driven, lacks vital substance and is ultimately absorbed by the ovum, which is rich in nourishment and seemingly passive. The woman's yielding is so profound that it surpasses the man's aggressive pursuit in its active nature. Psychologically, during coitus, the man often becomes passive, his attention irresistibly drawn to the woman's physical and psychic states, which become the catalyst for his rapture.

In mythological symbolism, the “nonacting” power of woman is represented by figures like Potnia Theron, Cybele, and Durga, who dominate wild beasts, symbolizing their sovereignty. Similarly, in Tarot symbolism, the card of Strength depicts a woman effortlessly holding open the jaws of a lion. Every woman, as a participant in the “absolute woman,” possesses this force to some degree. Men, often unconsciously compensating for an inferiority complex, may display exaggerated masculinity, indifference, or brutality, but this only underscores their vulnerability to woman's subtle power. While women may appear victimized on external or social levels, this does not alter the fundamental dynamic.

On a deeper level, man's passivity increases the more he embodies materialistic, instinctive, or sensual traits. The Western ideal of manhood—the activist, the achiever, the athlete, or the man of “iron will”—is often the most susceptible to woman's subtle influence. In contrast, Eastern civilizations, such as those of India and Arabia, have a more refined understanding of true manliness, which diverges significantly from the Western archetype.

In summary, the apparent activity of men and passivity of women pertain only to the superficial plane. On a deeper level, woman is active (“actively passive”), and man is passive (“passively active”). In procreation, it is the woman who absorbs and possesses. This inversion characterizes profane eros, creating its inherent ambiguity. Transcendence in erotic ecstasy is rare in ordinary relationships, as the metaphysical order is only restored when eros is elevated to sacred purposes. In such contexts, the polarity is reversed, and man becomes truly active, embodying the virya's higher potential. This sacred inversion is symbolized in Tantric practices like viparita-maithuna, where man's stillness signifies his higher activity, immune to the enchantments of woman or the allure of “naked Diana.”

Title: The True Aryan Ideal: A Spiritual and Metaphysical Perspective
Tags: #Aryan #SpiritualAscent #Traditionalism #Metaphysics #Initiation #HinduTradition #RaceOfTheSpirit #Evola

  1. The term “Aryan” originally signified a superior human type, embodying nobility, excellence, and spiritual ascent, transcending mere biological or racial classifications.
  2. In ancient traditions, the Aryan was associated with a divine struggle against chaotic, dark forces, reflecting a higher, initiatory dimension.
  3. The Aryan quality was tied to the concept of a “race of the spirit,” requiring both noble birth and spiritual initiation for its full realization.
  4. In Hindu tradition, the Aryan was identified with the dvija or “twice-born,” symbolizing a spiritual rebirth through initiation (upanayana).
  5. Initiation into the Aryan community was reserved for those of Aryan birth, emphasizing the interplay between hereditary purity and spiritual elevation.
  6. The Aryan caste system (spiritual, warrior, and familial elites) was rooted in sacred tradition, prioritizing spiritual hierarchy over materialistic or egalitarian values.
  7. The Aryan ideal aligned with the “way of the gods” (devayana), representing a path of transcendence beyond lower, telluric cycles of reincarnation.
  8. Modern distortions of the Aryan concept reduce it to a simplistic racial classification, stripping it of its profound metaphysical and spiritual significance.
  9. The true Aryan ideal stands in opposition to materialistic and degraded interpretations, upholding a vision of spiritual nobility and sacred order.
  10. This ancient conception of Aryanity serves as a reminder of the higher, initiatory path that transcends modern decadence and aligns with the perennial wisdom of Tradition.

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF “ARYAN”?

The term “Aryan” has undergone significant distortion in modern usage, often reduced to a simplistic racial classification. Originally, however, it carried a profound spiritual and metaphysical meaning, deeply rooted in ancient traditions. The Aryan quality was not merely a matter of biological descent but also involved a higher, initiatory dimension that transcended mere physical birth.

In its authentic sense, “Aryan” referred to a superior human type, associated with nobility, excellence, and a spiritual ascent. This concept was central to the civilizations of ancient India and Iran, where the Aryan was seen as part of a divine struggle against dark, chaotic forces. The term “Aryan” (from arya) denoted qualities of being noble, faithful, and honorable, and it was closely tied to the idea of a “race of the spirit,” which required both birth and initiation to fully realize.

In the Hindu tradition, the Aryan was identified with the dvija, or “twice-born,” signifying a second, spiritual birth achieved through initiation (upanayana). This initiation was essential for entering the Aryan community, much like baptism in Christianity, but it was reserved only for those of Aryan birth. The Aryan caste system, comprising the spiritual, warrior, and familial elites, was defined by both hereditary purity and adherence to a sacred tradition that emphasized spiritual elevation over mere biological lineage.

Thus, the true Aryan ideal was not limited to racial or ethnic criteria but encompassed a higher, metaphysical order. It represented a path of spiritual ascent, aligned with the “way of the gods” (devayana), in contrast to the lower, telluric cycles of reincarnation. This conception of Aryanity, rooted in ancient wisdom, stands in stark contrast to the degraded, materialistic interpretations that have emerged in modern times.

Metaphysical part:

Three elements converge in the emergence of a human being. The first is transcendental, linked to the initial three nidānas: “ignorance,” mental formations (sankhāra), and a descending current that, through the second nidāna, gains direction, and through the third, begins to assume an individuated form with an “I”-consciousness. The second factor involves organized forces and influences, a determined will, aligning with the processes of “combustion” within saṁsāra. These influences and will can be seen as a distinct entity, termed the “saṁsāric entity” or “entity of craving.” This entity transcends individual limits, embodying concepts like “daemon,” “double,” or “genius,” found in various traditions, such as the liñga-śarīra in Saṁkhya or the gandharva in early Buddhist texts. In Buddhist theory (Abhidharmakośa), this entity is called antarābhava, existing pre- and postnatally, driven by desire and impulses from past lives, seeking manifestation in a new existence. This factor aligns with a largely predetermined “name-and-form” (nāma-rūpa), where the obscured principle merges with the antarābhava, integrating into a specific saṁsāric heredity.

The third factor involves the supersensible perception of the daemon seeking a new “combustion” through suitable parents, whose heredity aligns with its cravings. This process mirrors psychoanalytic concepts like the libido or the “Oedipus complex,” as the entity develops desire for one parent and aversion for the other, based on its previous life's gender. Through infatuation and delight, the entity enters the womb, initiating conception. The khandhās (aggregates) then condense around it, forming the basis of personality, followed by the physiological process of embryonic development. The internal development is guided by the remaining nidānas, which we will explore further.

In the texts, the relationship between the three principles is illustrated through the following simile: the seed represents viññāṇa (consciousness), the earth symbolizes kamma (action or karma), and the water that nourishes the seed to grow into a plant signifies thirst (craving). Here, kamma is the force, already shaped by the sankhārā, which corresponds to the “saṃsāric entity.” Into this entity, the descending principle (the seed) enters and is propelled into a new existence due to craving. However, in exceptional cases of “descents,” which are of a fatidic nature, beings who have partially transcended ignorance and are primarily composed of “illumination” (bodhi—this is the literal meaning of bodhisattva) utilize a “celestial body” or “body of splendor” (tusita-kāya) as their “vehicle,” replacing the antarābhava or the entity of craving. In such instances, birth occurs without any interruption in the continuity of consciousness. The individual remains fully self-possessed, imperturbable, and endowed with vision, with the ability to choose the place, time, and mother of their nativity.