Title: Israel as a Synthetic Construct Tags: #Evola #Tradition #Zionism #ModernDecadence #SpiritualInauthenticity

1. Artificial Nationhood: Israel is a modernist fabrication, imposed upon an ancient land without organic historical or spiritual continuity, reflecting the same rootlessness that plagues the modern world.
   
2. Rejection of Sacred Order: The Zionist manipulation of the Temple Mount violates traditional Jewish prohibitions, exposing a politicized pseudo-religiosity devoid of genuine sacred connection.
   
3. Cultural Deracination: Israel lacks an authentic cultural foundation, instead appropriating elements from diaspora Judaism and Palestinian heritage while fostering a hollow, consumerist identity (for example, electronic dance music as escapism).
   
4. Mechanized Propaganda: Like all modernist regimes, Israel depends on relentless propaganda, lobbying, and psychological manipulation to sustain its artificial legitimacy.
   
5. Imperial Pawn: Western support for Israel is not organic but engineered by oligarchic interests, serving as a destabilizing force in the Middle East to maintain imperial control over resources.
   
6. Spiritual Bankruptcy: The forced revival of Hebrew as a “national language” mirrors modernity’s obsession with constructing identities, devoid of the living, traditional linguistic spirit.
   
7. Media Subversion: The suppression of dissenting voices in Western media (for example, firings of critics like Briahna Joy Gray) reveals the totalitarian nature of Zionist influence, aligning with broader modernist thought-control.
   
8. Celebrity Complicity: The coercion of Hollywood figures into pro-Israel postures exemplifies the degradation of elites into tools of ideological manipulation, betraying any remnant of aristocratic independence.
   
9. Astroturfed Loyalty: Social media manipulation and fake grassroots support demonstrate the inherently inorganic nature of Zionism, reliant on deception rather than organic allegiance.
   
10. Inevitable Collapse: As with all modernist aberrations, Israel’s synthetic existence is unsustainable—its reliance on force and fraud ensures eventual dissolution, as Tradition reasserts itself against decadence.
    

Conclusion: Israel epitomizes the crisis of the modern world—a rootless, artificial construct upheld by violence and lies, destined to fall before the return of true order.

This is why Israel appeals so much to Christians and nationalists—because for both, the spirit is severed from the material. Israel is a Western problem. If you destroy Israel, you destroy the modern conception of the materialist West.

Metaphysical part:

Caitlin Johnstone – “Everything About Israel Is Fake”

Israel is not a country, it’s like a fake movie set version of a country. A movie set where the set pieces won’t even stand up on their own, so people are always running around in a constant state of construction trying to prop things up and nail things down. Image: caitlinjohnstone.com.au

Everything about Israel is fake. It’s a completely synthetic nation created without any regard for the organic sociopolitical movements of the land and its people, slapped rootless atop an ancient pre-existing civilisation with deep roots.

That’s why it cannot exist without being artificially propped up by nonstop propaganda, lobbying, online influence operations, and mass military violence.

Israel is so fake that its far right Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir has been stoking religious tensions by encouraging militant Zionists to pray on the Temple Mount — known to Muslims as Al-Aqsa.

This is an illustration of how phony Israel and its political ideology are because Jews were historically prohibited from praying at the Temple Mount under Jewish law; a sign placed there in 1967 and still upheld by Israel’s Chief Rabbinate reads, “According to Torah Law, entering the Temple Mount area is strictly forbidden due to the holiness of the site.”

It’s just this weird, evangelical Christian-like thing that Zionists have started doing in contravention of their own traditions and religious texts to advance their nationalist agendas.

Journalist Dan Cohen explains on Twitter:

“‘Prayer’ on the Temple Mount is 100% a Zionist invention in total contravention of Jewish law. Jews don’t step foot onto the Temple Mount, let alone ‘pray’ there. That’s why the sign below is posted at the entrance non-Muslims use.

“Ben Gvir publicly announced this in order to provoke a reaction to use as a pretext to restrict and expel Muslims from the site, explode Jerusalem and the West Bank, and expand the regional war.

“Ben Gvir holds Netanyahu hostage. Together, they’re leading Israel to self-destruction.”

There’s no authentic spirituality in such behaviour. It has no roots. No depth. No connection. It’s the product of busy minds with modern agendas, with nothing more to it than that.

Israel is so fake that Zionists artificially resurrected a dead language in order for its people to have a common “native” tongue for them to speak, so that they could all LARP as indigenous Middle Easterners together in their phony, synthetic country.

Israel has no real culture of its own — it’s all a mixture of (A) organic Jewish culture brought in from other parts of the world by the Jewish diaspora, (B) culture that was stolen from Palestinians (see “Israeli food”), and © the culture of indoctrinated genocidal hatred that is interwoven with the fabric of modern Zionism.

The way Israel has become a Mecca of electronic dance music points clearly to an aching cultural void that its people are trying desperately to fill with empty synthetic pop fluff.

Even international support for Israel is fake, manufactured astroturf that has to be enforced from the top down, because it would never organically occur to anyone that Israel is something that should be supported.

The phenomenally influential Israel lobby is used to push pro-Israel foreign policy in powerful Western governments like Washington and London. Just this week US Representative Thomas Massie told Tucker Carlson that every Republican in Congress besides himself “has an AIPAC person” assigned to them with whom they are in constant communication, who he describes as functioning “like your babysitter” with regard to lawmaking on the subject of Israel.

The Israel lobby exists with the full consent of the Western imperial war machine and its secretive intelligence cartel, because Western military support for Israel is also phony and fraudulent.

The Western empire whose strategic interests directly benefit from violence and radicalism in the Middle East pretends it is constantly expanding its military presence in the region in order to promote stability and protect an important ally, but in reality this military presence simply allows for greater control over crucial resource-rich territories whose populations would otherwise unite to form a powerful bloc acting in their own interests.

The Israel lobby is a self-funding consent manufacturer which helps the empire do what it already wants to do.

Support for Israel in the media is also phony and imposed from the top down. Since October outlets like The New York Times, CNN and CBC have been finding themselves fighting off scandals due to staff leaks about demands from their executives that they slant their Gaza coverage to benefit the information interests of Israel.

Briahna Joy Gray was just fired by The Hill for being critical of Israel as co-host of the show “Rising”, a fate that all mass media employees understand they will share if they are insufficiently supportive of the empire’s favorite ethnostate.

Israel’s support from celebrities is similarly forced. A newly leaked email from influential Hollywood marketing and branding guru Ashlee Margolis instructs her firm’s employees to “pause on working with any celebrity or influencer or tastemaker posting against Israel.”

As we discussed recently, celebrities are also naturally disincentivised from criticising any aspect of the Western empire by the fact that their status is dependent on wealthy people whose wealth is premised upon the imperial status quo.

Support for Israel on social media is likewise notoriously phony. For years Israel has been pioneering the use of social media trolls to swarm Israel’s critics and promote agendas like undermining the BDS movement.

After the beginning of the Gaza onslaught Israel spent millions on PR spin via advertising on YouTube, Instagram and Facebook, and The New York Times has just confirmed earlier reports that Israel has been targeting US lawmakers with fake social media accounts to influence their policymaking on Israel.

In truth, nobody really organically supports Israel. If they’re not supporting it because their lobbyists and employers told them to, they’re supporting it because that’s what they were told to support by the leaders of their dopey political ideologies like Zionism, liberalism and conservatism, or by the leaders of their dopey religions like Christian fundamentalism.

It’s always something that’s pushed on people from the top down, rather than arising from within themselves due to their own natural interests and ideals.

Israel is not a country, it’s like a fake movie set version of a country. A movie set where the set pieces won’t even stand up on their own, so people are always running around in a constant state of construction trying to prop things up and nail things down, and scrambling to pick up things that are falling over, and rotating the set pieces so that they look like real buildings in front of the camera.

Without this constant hustle and bustle of propagandising, lobbying, online influence ops, and nonstop mass military violence, the whole movie set would fall over, and people would see all the film crew members and actors and cameras for what they are.

Clearly, no part of this is sustainable. Clearly, something’s going to have to give. Those set pieces are going to come toppling down sooner or later; it’s just a question of when, and of how high the pile of human corpses needs to be before it happens.

Title: The Call to Resistance: Rebuilding from the Ruins of Modernity
Tags: #Tradition #SpiritualWar #NewOrder #AntiModernism #LegionarySpirit

1. The End of a Cycle: We stand at the culmination of a degenerative process, where the West has dismantled all legitimate and natural human orders, celebrating materialism and mechanization as “progress.” This illusion has led to moral and spiritual decay, leaving us amidst the ruins of a once-great civilization.
   
2. The Legionary Spirit: The foundation of resistance lies in the legionary spirit—an unwavering commitment to fight even when the battle seems lost. This spirit embodies loyalty, honor, and a refusal to compromise, serving as the bedrock for a new Order.
   
3. Inner Renewal: The core of the struggle is internal. Before any external reconstruction, individuals must regain inner strength, self-discipline, and moral clarity. A new type of man must emerge, guided by resolute principles and a clear vision of life.
   
4. Rejection of Modern Myths: The illusions of democracy, liberalism, socialism, and communism are stages of the same degenerative process. These systems, rooted in materialism and egalitarianism, must be rejected entirely. True order can only be restored through a return to hierarchical, spiritual values.
   
5. Anti-Bourgeois and Anti-Proletarian: The new Order transcends the false dichotomies of class struggle. It rejects both the bourgeois obsession with security and the proletarian collectivism of Marxism, aspiring instead to a lucid, virile, and structured world governed by higher principles.
   
6. The Role of the Elite: The resurgence of tradition depends on the formation of a new elite—a group of individuals united by a shared vision and unwavering loyalty to the idea. This elite must embody the spirit of resistance and serve as a model for others.
   
7. The Failure of Nationalism: The naturalistic conception of the nation and fatherland is outdated. True unity is rooted in the idea, not in shared land or language. The state must be the embodiment of higher principles, transcending narrow nationalism.
   
8. Cultural Detoxification: Modern culture, poisoned by Darwinism, psychoanalysis, and existentialism, must be purged. These ideologies degrade the human spirit and undermine the possibility of renewal. A new worldview, rooted in transcendence and hierarchy, must replace them.
   
9. Spiritual Foundation: A heroic conception of life requires a sense of transcendence. While specific religious dogmas are not essential, the certainty of a higher reality is crucial for fostering unbreakable resolve and absolute commitment.
   
10. The Silent Revolution: The true struggle is not for immediate political gains but for the silent, internal revolution that prepares the ground for a new Order. This revolution will manifest externally when the time is ripe, replacing the forces of subversion with a restored hierarchy and authority.
    

There is no value in indulging in wishful thinking or the illusions of optimism: we are now at the end of a cycle. For centuries, initially imperceptibly and then with the force of an avalanche, multiple processes have dismantled every legitimate and natural human order in the West, corrupting all higher conceptions of life, action, knowledge, and struggle. This descent, with its accelerating momentum and dizzying pace, has been labeled “progress.” We have celebrated this so-called progress, deluding ourselves into believing that this civilization—a civilization of materialism and machines—was the pinnacle of human achievement, the ultimate destiny of history. Yet, the consequences of this process have awakened at least some to its true nature.

It is well known where and under what symbols the forces of potential resistance attempted to organize. On one side, a nation, previously mired in the mediocrity of liberalism, democracy, and constitutional monarchy, dared to adopt the symbol of Rome as the foundation for a new political vision and an ideal of virility and dignity. Similarly, in another nation, medieval traditions of imperium were revived to reaffirm the principles of authority and the primacy of values rooted in blood, race, and the deepest essence of a people. Meanwhile, in other parts of Europe, movements began to align with this direction, and in Asia, a nation of warriors—the samurai—joined the struggle, maintaining its fidelity to a martial tradition centered on the solar empire of divine right, even while adopting the external trappings of modern civilization.

It is not claimed that these movements clearly distinguished the essential from the superficial, that their ideas were embraced by individuals of true understanding, or that they fully overcame the corrupting influences of the very forces they sought to combat. The process of ideological purification would have required time, following the resolution of immediate political challenges. Nevertheless, it was evident that a gathering of forces was underway, posing a direct challenge to the “modern” civilization of democracies—heirs to the French Revolution—and to the even more degraded collectivist civilization of the Fourth Estate, the faceless mass of Communism. Tensions escalated, culminating in armed conflict. The victors were those who wielded overwhelming power, resorting to alliances and ideological manipulations to crush the emerging world that sought to assert its rightful place. Whether our leaders were equal to the task, whether mistakes were made in timing, preparation, or risk assessment, is beside the point. These details do not diminish the deeper significance of the struggle. Nor does it matter that history now turns against the victors, as the democratic powers, having allied with red subversion to pursue total war and unconditional surrender, now face a greater threat from their former allies.

What matters is this: we now stand amidst a world in ruins.

The question to ask is: do men of strength and resolve still exist among these ruins? And what must they do—what can they still do?

This issue transcends past alliances, as both victors and vanquished now stand on equal footing, with the Second World War reducing Europe to a pawn of external powers and interests. The devastation we witness is primarily moral. We live in an era of moral amnesia and profound disorientation, masked by the rhetoric of consumerism and democracy. Post-war humanity is marked by the loss of character, dignity, ideological decay, the dominance of base interests, and a day-to-day existence. Recognizing this means understanding that the core problem is internal: regaining inner strength, self-discipline, and moral order. Those who believe in purely political solutions or systems, without embodying a new human quality or a clear opposing vision, have failed to learn from recent history. A crucial principle must be clear: even the most theoretically perfect political or social system will fail if its people are morally corrupt. Conversely, a people capable of producing individuals of integrity and instinctive virtue can achieve and sustain a high level of civilization, even with an imperfect political system. We must reject false “political realism” focused solely on programs, partisan issues, and economic solutions. These are secondary. The possibility of salvation lies in the presence of individuals who serve as models, resisting mass demagogy and materialism, and reviving higher sensibilities and values. The true task is to rebuild from the ruins, cultivating a new type of man guided by a resolute spirit, a clear vision of life, and unwavering adherence to fundamental principles.

As spirit, there exists something that can serve as a foundation for the forces of resistance and revival: the legionary spirit. It is the attitude of one who chooses the most arduous path, who fights even when the battle is fundamentally lost, and who embodies the ancient saying: “Loyalty is stronger than fire.” Through this spirit, the traditional idea is affirmed. It is the sense of honor and shame—not diluted by weak morals—that creates a profound, existential distinction between beings, akin to the difference between one race and another.

On the other hand, there is the realization of those for whom what was once an end now appears only as a means. They recognize the illusory nature of many myths, yet remain steadfast in their pursuit of what they hold sacred, navigating the boundary between life and death, beyond the realm of the contingent.

These spiritual forms can serve as the foundation for a new unity. The essential task is to grasp, apply, and extend them from wartime to peacetime—especially this peace, which is merely a fleeting respite and a poorly managed disorder—until new distinctions and groupings emerge. This must occur in terms far more fundamental than a mere “party,” which is only a temporary tool for political struggles, or even a “movement,” if by “movement” we mean a mass phenomenon driven more by quantity than quality, by emotion rather than a rigorous adherence to an idea. What we seek is a silent revolution, unfolding in the depths, where the premises of a new Order are first established internally within individuals. This Order will eventually manifest externally, replacing the forms and forces of a subverted world at the opportune moment. The “style” that must prevail is one of unwavering loyalty to oneself and to an idea, marked by intense focus, rejection of compromise, and total commitment—not only in political struggle but in every aspect of existence: factories, laboratories, universities, the streets, and even personal relationships. We must reach a point where the type of individual we envision, the core of our group, is unmistakable and distinct. Only then can we say, “He is one who embodies the spirit of the movement.”

This was the mission of those who envisioned a new Order for Europe, though it was often thwarted by various factors. Today, this mission must be revived. The conditions are now more favorable, as the situation has become clearer. We need only look around, from public squares to Parliament, to see that our calling is being tested and that we are confronted with a clear measure of what we must reject. In a world of mediocrity, where principles like “You have no choice,” “Morals can wait until we’ve taken care of our stomachs and our skin,” or “These are not times for character” prevail, we must respond firmly: “For us, there is no other way. This is our life, our essence.” Any meaningful achievements will not come from the tactics of agitators or political operatives but from the natural prestige and recognition of individuals, both from the past and, more importantly, from the new generation, who embody their ideals with unwavering resolve.

A new essence must gradually emerge, transcending the confines, structures, and social roles of the past. A new archetype must stand before us, serving as a measure of our strength and vocation. It is crucial—indeed, fundamental—to understand that this archetype is unrelated to economic classes or the conflicts they generate. It can manifest in the form of the rich or the poor, the worker or the aristocrat, the businessman or the explorer, the technician, theologian, farmer, or even the politician in the strictest sense. Yet, this new essence will undergo an internal differentiation, reaching its fullness when there is no ambiguity about the vocations and functions to follow or to lead; when a restored symbol of unwavering authority reigns at the heart of new hierarchical orders.

This vision is inherently anti-bourgeois and anti-proletarian, free from democratic distortions and 'social' frivolities, as it aspires to a world that is lucid, virile, and structured, governed by men and their guides. It rejects the bourgeois obsession with 'security' and the trivial, standardized, conformist, and domesticated existence. It scorns the lifeless constraints of collectivist and mechanistic systems, as well as ideologies that prioritize vague 'social' values over the heroic and spiritual principles that define the true man, the absolute individual. A pivotal achievement will be the revival of an ethos of active impersonality, where the work itself matters, not the individual. Through this, we learn to see ourselves as secondary, for what truly matters is the function, the responsibility, the task undertaken, and the goal pursued. Where this spirit prevails, many challenges—including those of an economic and social nature—will be resolved, as they remain unsolvable without a corresponding shift in spiritual orientation and the eradication of ideological corruptions that obstruct any return to normality. Indeed, they obscure even the recognition of what normality truly entails.

It is crucial, both for doctrinal clarity and practical action, that the members of the new order clearly recognize the chain of causes and effects, as well as the essential continuity of the current that has shaped the various political forms now clashing in the chaos of modern ideologies. Liberalism, democracy, socialism, radicalism, and ultimately Communism and Bolshevism, are not isolated phenomena but sequential stages of the same degenerative process. This decline began when Western man broke free from tradition, rejected higher symbols of authority and sovereignty, and embraced a false sense of individual liberty, reducing himself to an atomized entity rather than a conscious part of an organic, hierarchical whole. This atomization inevitably led to the tyranny of the masses, where materialism and economic idolatry reign supreme.

This process is irreversible and interconnected. Without the French Revolution and liberalism, constitutionalism and democracy would not have emerged; without democracy, socialism and demagogic nationalism would not have arisen; and without socialism, radicalism and Communism would not have followed. These forms, though often seen in opposition, are fundamentally linked, each paving the way for the next in the same downward spiral. The illusion that democracy and liberalism are antithetical to Communism is as absurd as claiming that dusk is the opposite of night or that a diluted poison is fundamentally different from its concentrated form. The so-called “liberated” governments, particularly in Italy, remain blind to these truths, clinging to outdated political concepts and engaging in a futile dance of parliamentary decadence.

Our stance must be one of radical intransigence, a firm rejection of all forms of political decay, whether from the Left or the so-called Right. There can be no compromise with subversion; any concession today ensures total defeat tomorrow. We must uphold the purity of our ideals and be prepared to act decisively when the time comes.

This also requires rejecting the ideological distortions that have infected even some of our youth, who mistakenly believe that the destruction wrought by modernity serves some greater “progress.” They chase after a vague future rather than defending the timeless truths that have always underpinned legitimate social and political order. We must dismiss the notion of “History” as a progressive force; it is men, not abstract historical forces, who shape the world. The label of “reactionary” is meaningless—our position is rooted in positive, original values that do not rely on the false promises of a utopian future.

The supposed antithesis between the “red East” and the “democratic West” is irrelevant to our radical perspective. A potential conflict between these blocs is equally inconsequential. While the immediate threat of Communist victory might seem more dire, both America and Russia represent the same destructive force, albeit in different forms. Americanism, with its cult of materialism, consumerism, and economic growth, is as dangerous as Communism, if not more so, because it operates subtly, eroding tradition and quality through cultural and societal shifts rather than overt coercion. Europe, by embracing Americanism under the guise of democracy, is already on the path to total abdication, a process that may culminate without the need for military conflict. Americanism, whether intentionally or not, paves the way for collectivism, and there is no halting this decline once it has begun.

Our dedication to a radical reconstruction is crucial here, as it rejects not only all forms of Marxist and socialist ideologies but also the pervasive obsession with economics, which we view as a form of collective delusion or possession. The belief that economic factors dominate both individual and collective life, and that the focus on production and material wealth is normal or even desirable, is a grave error. Both capitalism and Marxism are ensnared in this narrow, materialistic worldview. To transcend this, we must reject the notion that human progress is tied to economic systems or the distribution of wealth. Instead, we must affirm that economic concerns, which merely address physical needs, should always remain subordinate in a healthy society. Beyond this, we must uphold a higher order of values—political, spiritual, and heroic—that transcends the categories of “proletarian” or “capitalist.” It is within this higher order that true meaning, hierarchy, and dignity are established, culminating in a superior command, an Imperium.

We must also confront and eliminate the misguided ideas that have infiltrated even our own ranks, such as the glorification of a “state of labor,” “national socialism,” or the “humanism of work.” These concepts, along with attempts to reduce politics to economics, reflect a dangerous regression. Similarly, the obsession with “socialization” and the elevation of the “social idea” as a panacea for civilization are misguided. These notions often stem from a degraded political environment and a misunderstanding of the true nature of the “social question.” Marxism did not emerge in response to a genuine social issue; rather, the social issue is often artificially created by Marxist agitators. As Lenin himself acknowledged, revolutionary movements are rarely spontaneous but are instead driven by external manipulation.

To move forward, we must focus on ideological deproletarianization, purging the socialist influence from those still untainted. Only then can meaningful reforms be pursued without risk. In this context, the corporative idea can serve as a foundation for reconstruction—not as a bureaucratic system that perpetuates class conflict, but as a means to restore unity and solidarity within businesses. This requires transforming businesses into cohesive, almost military-like entities, led by individuals of responsibility, energy, and competence, who inspire loyalty and collaboration among their workers. The goal is the organic reconstruction of business, free from the demagoguery of unions and the false promises of “social justice.” We must revive the dignity, solidarity, and impersonality of ancient guilds, ensuring that each individual finds fulfillment in their rightful role, recognizing their limits and potential for excellence. A craftsman who excels in his craft is superior to a king who fails to uphold his dignity.

Furthermore, we can replace the partisan parliamentary system with a structure based on technical expertise and corporative representation. However, these technical hierarchies must remain subordinate to the higher, integral hierarchy that encompasses the political and spiritual dimensions of the state. The “state of labor” or production is a reductionist concept, akin to reducing a human being to mere physical functions. Our standard must be the integral hierarchical idea, which stands as the true antithesis to both the “East” and the “West.” In this, there can be no compromise.

If the ideal of a virile and organic political unity was a cornerstone of the world that was ultimately overwhelmed—and through it, the Roman symbol was revived in Italy—we must also acknowledge instances where this ideal strayed and nearly succumbed to the errors of 'totalitarianism.' This distinction must be clearly understood to avoid conflating the two and to prevent providing ammunition to those who seek to obscure the truth. Hierarchy is not hierarchism; the latter is a recurring malady that must be resisted. The organic conception of society is fundamentally opposed to state-worshiping rigidity and leveling centralization. True unity transcends both individualism and collectivism, emerging only when individuals stand before one another in their natural diversity and dignity. This unity must be spiritual and centrally orienting, adapting its expression to different realms while opposing the rigid, extrinsic relations characteristic of 'totalitarianism.' Within this framework, the dignity and liberty of the human person—misconceived by liberalism in individualistic, egalitarian, and privatized terms—can be fully realized. It is in this spirit that the structures of a new political and social order must be designed, with clarity and solidity.

Such structures require a central, supreme point of reference—a new symbol of sovereignty and authority. This commitment must be unequivocal, free from ideological wavering. The focus here is not primarily on institutional forms but on cultivating a specific climate, a fluidity that animates relationships of loyalty, dedication, and service, devoid of individualistic ambition. This is necessary to transcend the gray, mechanical, and devious nature of the current political and social order. Today’s situation is at an impasse, as those at the top lack the asceticism required for the pure idea. The correct direction is obscured for many, whether due to unfortunate precedents in national traditions or the tragic events of the past. The inadequacy of the monarchical solution is evident, as its remnants are defended only in a hollow, castrated form, such as constitutional parliamentary monarchy. Equally, we must reject the republican idea, as modern republics are products of Jacobinism and the anti-traditional, anti-hierarchical subversion of the 19th century. A nation transitioning from monarchy to republic can only be seen as degraded. In Italy, loyalty to the Salò Republic’s Fascism must not lead us down the false path of republicanism, as this would betray the core ideology of the Fascist Twenty Years—its doctrine of the state as authority, power, and imperium.

This doctrine must be upheld without compromise, refusing to descend to lower levels or align with any faction. The specific form of the symbol can remain undecided for now. The immediate task is to prepare, in silence, the spiritual environment necessary for the resurgence of a superior, untouchable authority. This authority cannot be embodied by a republican president subject to removal, nor by a tribune or populist leader whose power is formless, devoid of higher legitimacy, and reliant on mass appeal. Such figures represent not the antithesis of democracy but its logical conclusion—a manifestation of Spengler’s 'decline of the West.' This serves as a new touchstone for our side: a sensitivity to these distinctions. Carlyle’s 'Valet-World,' governed by the 'Sham-Hero,' must be rejected in favor of a true, transcendent authority.

We must address another point in a similar vein, focusing on the stance to take regarding nationalism and the concept of the fatherland. This discussion is particularly relevant today, as many, in an attempt to salvage what remains, advocate for a sentimental and naturalistic view of the nation. This perspective is alien to the highest European political tradition and conflicts with the idea of the state we have previously discussed. Even setting aside the fact that the notion of the fatherland is invoked by vastly different groups, including those aligned with red subversion, this conception is increasingly outdated. On one hand, we see the emergence of large supranational blocs, while on the other, the need for a unifying European reference point becomes more apparent—one that transcends the narrow particularism inherent in the naturalistic idea of the nation and nationalism.

The principle at stake is paramount. The political level represents superior unities compared to those defined in naturalistic terms, such as nation, fatherland, or people. At this higher level, what unites or divides is the idea—an idea carried by a distinct elite and embodied in the state. Fascist doctrine, faithful to the best European political tradition, prioritized the idea and the state over the nation and the people, recognizing that the latter only gain significance and form within the framework of the state. In times of crisis, like today, it is crucial to adhere firmly to this doctrine. Our true fatherland lies in the idea, not in shared land or language, but in shared principles. This is the foundation.

Against the collectivistic unity of the nation—des enfants de la patrie—which has dominated since the Jacobin revolution, we must uphold an Order: men loyal to principles, embodying a higher authority and legitimacy rooted in the idea. For practical goals, achieving new national solidarity is possible, but not through compromise. The essential precondition is the formation of a group defined by a shared political idea and vision of life. There is no alternative, especially now. Amidst the ruins, we must initiate a process of renewal, where elites and symbols of sovereignty and authority elevate a people to the status of a traditional great state, rising from chaos. Failing to grasp this realism of the idea means remaining in a sub-political realm of naturalism and sentimentalism, if not outright chauvinism.

We must also be cautious when national traditions are invoked to support our idea, as there exists a Masonic and anti-traditional interpretation of history that distorts the Italian national character, emphasizing its most problematic aspects, such as the communal revolts and Guelphism. This tendentious portrayal of an “Italian character” is one we reject, leaving it to those who celebrated the so-called “second Risorgimento” through the partisan movement.

Idea, order, elite, state, men of the Order—these must define our battle lines for as long as possible.

A few words must be said about the problem of culture, though not too many. We do not overvalue culture. What we term a “worldview” is not rooted in books but is an internal form that may be clearer in an uncultured individual than in an “intellectual” or writer. The harmful effects of a “free culture,” accessible to all, lie in leaving individuals exposed to myriad influences, even when they lack the capacity to engage with them critically or discern properly.

This is not the place to delve deeply into this issue, except to note that today's youth must internally defend themselves against specific currents. We have previously discussed a style of uprightness and self-mastery, which presupposes a proper understanding. Young people, in particular, must recognize the poison fed to an entire generation through distorted and false visions of life that have weakened their inner strength. These poisons persist in culture, science, sociology, and literature, acting as infectious agents that must be identified and countered. Beyond historical materialism and economism, which we have already addressed, the most significant of these are Darwinism, psychoanalysis, and existentialism.

Against Darwinism, we must reaffirm the fundamental dignity of the human person, recognizing its true place not as a mere animal species differentiated by “natural selection” and tied to primitive origins, but as a being capable of transcending the biological plane. Though Darwinism is less discussed today, its essence endures. The biologistic myth of Darwinism, in various forms, functions as a dogma upheld by the materialism of both Marxist and American civilizations. Modern man has grown accustomed to this degraded view, accepting it as natural.

Against psychoanalysis, we must uphold the ideal of an ego that refuses to abdicate, remaining conscious, autonomous, and sovereign in the face of the subconscious and the chaotic forces of sexuality. This ego is neither “repressed” nor torn apart but achieves a harmonious balance of faculties aligned with a higher purpose. Psychoanalysis has shifted authority from the conscious principle to the subconscious, the irrational, and the “collective unconscious,” mirroring the broader societal crisis where the lower undermines the higher. This tendency operates on both individual and societal levels, reinforcing each other.

As for existentialism, even if we distinguish it as a confused philosophy relevant only to narrow circles, it reflects a systematized spiritual crisis. It embodies the fragmented, contradictory human type that experiences freedom as anguish, tragedy, and absurdity, feeling condemned in a valueless world. Yet, Nietzsche pointed the way to reclaiming meaning and establishing an unshakable law and value, even in the face of nihilism, under the banner of a “noble nature.”

These lines of overcoming must not remain intellectual abstractions but must be lived and realized in their direct significance for inner life and conduct. True clarity, uprightness, and strength can only be attained by freeing oneself from the influence of these distorted and false ways of thinking.

Let us briefly address a final point: the relationship with the dominant religion. For us, the secular state, in any form, belongs to the past. We particularly reject the so-called “ethical state,” a product of a shallow and hollow “Idealist” philosophy that attached itself to Fascism but could just as easily support anti-Fascism through a dialectical sleight of hand. However, while we oppose such ideologies and the secular state, we also find a clerical or clericalizing state equally unacceptable.

A religious dimension is essential as a foundation for a truly heroic conception of life, which is crucial for our group. It is necessary to feel within ourselves the certainty of a higher life beyond this earthly existence, as only those who possess this conviction have an unbreakable and indomitable strength. Such individuals are capable of absolute commitment. Without this sense of transcendence, confronting death and disregarding one's life can only occur in fleeting moments of exaltation or irrational outbursts, lacking the discipline that derives from a higher, autonomous purpose. However, this spirituality, which should animate our people, does not require the rigid dogmas of any specific religious confession. The lifestyle we advocate is not one of Catholic moralism, which seeks merely to domesticate humanity through virtue. Politically, this spirituality fosters skepticism toward elements central to the Christian worldview, such as humanitarianism, equality, love, and forgiveness, prioritizing instead honor and justice.

Certainly, if Catholicism could embrace a capacity for high asceticism and, on that basis, transform faith into the soul of a militant force—akin to the spirit of the Crusades or a new Templar order, resolute against chaos, surrender, subversion, and modern materialism—we would support it without hesitation. Even if it merely adhered to the positions of the Syllabus, it would suffice. However, given the current state of confessional religions, which have largely succumbed to mediocrity, bourgeois values, and modernism, and given the post-conciliar Church's shift toward the Left, a mere reference to the spiritual suffices for us. This spirituality serves as evidence of a transcendent reality, infusing our struggle with a higher purpose and attracting an invisible consecration for a new world of leaders and men.

Here are the essential guidelines for the struggle we must undertake, particularly aimed at the younger generation, so they may carry forward the torch and commitment from those who have not faltered. They must learn from past mistakes, discern clearly, and revise what has been—and continues to be—shaped by contingent circumstances. It is crucial not to stoop to the level of our adversaries, avoid relying on simplistic slogans, and refrain from overemphasizing the past, which, though worthy of remembrance, lacks the contemporary and impersonal force of the guiding idea. Equally important is resisting the allure of false political realism, a weakness inherent in every partisan approach. While our forces must engage in the immediate political struggle to carve out space and counter the unchecked advance of the Left, the true priority lies in forming an elite capable of defining an idea with intellectual rigor and unwavering intensity. This idea must unite us, embodied in the figure of the new man—the man of resistance, who stands firm amidst the ruins. If we emerge from this era of crisis and illusory order, the future will belong to this man alone. The modern world is now overwhelmed by the destiny it has forged. Even if this tide cannot be halted, adhering to these principles will preserve our inner resolve. Whatever unfolds, we will do what must be done, and we will remain part of a fatherland no enemy can ever occupy or destroy.

Suffering will bring you back: Esotericism & Christianity.

You don't know 'why suffering'?

I do.

1 Corinthians 13:12

“For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.”

It's a MIND-BOGGLING CULT: Christianism:

• “these people who are supposed to be the priests, repeat 'they don't understand their books”'.

But why repeat them IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THEM?

From Symbol and the Symbolic: Ancient Egypt, Science, and the Evolution of Consciousness by R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz:

When you Reject the objectification:

“In reality, esotericism is as old as humanity, but hitherto the state of intelligence of this esotericism belonged ONLY TO ISOLATED INDIVIDUALS.

The symbol demonstrates THE ESOTERICISM which, by means of the symbolic, unifies that which IS DIVIDED and puts an end to the problem of causality. The cause, apparently outside of the system, is in it, ETERNALLY UNITED AND PRESENT [...].

It is this life of the symbol (its esotericism) identifying with this life, THAT IS REALITY [...].”

Common people “perceive reality” without 'seeing' the causes ('MECHANISMS'). Or, 'very rarely'.

“And if this consciousness is particular for each person (since each individual, according to his faculties, may or may not recognize in it the state of the moment) it remains NONETHELESS UNIVERSAL, PRESENT, just as a universal container can hold all forms, just as the light-synthesis can offer all appearances.

FOR ESOTERICISM, a problem of original causality DOES NOT EXIST.

Nature, on the other hand, is the world of the Creature; everything in it is DUALIZED IN ITS APPEARANCE [The mind], which is cerebrally perceptible for us.

This is the exoteric world, the world which, for us, is OUTSIDE OF OURSELVES, “OBJECTIVE.”

ONLY THAT WHICH IS INVARIABLE AND UNDIVIDED IS REAL: the Present Moment, which is ETERNAL AND INDIVISIBLE, CEREBRALLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE, but known through OUR INNATE CONSCIOUSNESS [THE SPIRIT].

This is the esoteric world, IN WHICH high and low, front and back, right and left, CEASE TO BE [...].

A RESEARCH WITHOUT ILLUMINATION IS THE CHARACTER OF MODERN WESTERN SCIENCE. This indecision colors everything, Art as well as social organization, and even, in many cases, Faith.

The West is ignorant of that serenity of which all of ancient Egypt bears the imprint.”

And of all the Ancient Civilizations 'where Esotericism was the Law'.

“Our exoteric evolution, through the Greek metaphysical phases, leading currently TO AN EXCLUSIVE RATIONALISM, has given us, owing to the necessity for analysis, a “mentality of complexity” which today prevents us from seeing simply.

To cultivate oneself TO BE SIMPLE and to see simply is the first task of anyone wishing to approach the sacred symbolic of ancient Egypt.

This is difficult because the obvious blinds us.

One forgets, for example, that in sitting down to relax, all the fatigue goes to the thighs, the “support of the body.” It is therefore worthwhile to study their role in the vital economy and the importance they have in terms of the symbolic.

One forgets that in sleeping to restore one's energy, the simple fact of eliminating cerebral consciousness enables us to draw from the universal source of life, which might induce us to seek out (and find) its deeper cause.

In order to know the TRUE SECRETS OF LIFE, it is necessary to ABANDON SCIENTIFIC REASONING, WHICH IS QUITE SEDUCTIVE BUT DECEPTIVE, and to learn how to examine that which, because we see it, we no longer observe.”

These things WERE 'KNOWN TO THE ANCIENTS'.

“Pharaonic Egypt is essentially PRACTICAL.”

Moderns ARE NOT. To believe oneself outside of Nature shows it ... to want to “eradicate a virus” shows how much the westerner-the modern IS CUT OFF FROM NATURE.

There are TWO TYPES OF SUFFERING;

• One brings towards the interior; THE ESOTERIC;

• the other 'externalizes', the Exoteric.

One leads to peace, the other to the pleasure of destruction of within.

Give yourself a gift for Christmas; 'get rid of YOUR ENTOURAGE'.

From East and West: Comparative Studies in Pursuit of Tradition by Julius Evola

“[...] (‘everything is in God’) which, instead of culminating in the Personal God, like Monotheism, ends in what Rudolf Otto calls ‘Theopantism’.

[...] the essential morphological differences existing between religious thought and metaphysical thought, between esoterism and exoterism, between “metaphysics” and simple faith.

Here is the way in which the problem is faced: On the one hand, there is a “spiritual hemisphere” including Jews, Christians, and Muslims, which conceives of the Absolute as a person; opposite to it there is another spiritual hemisphere, inclusive of Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Confucianism, and Shintoism, for which the Absolute in its ultimate and transcendent divine reality is impersonal, and is personal only in its relative aspects and in its immanent manifestation.”

“But in this case, it is no longer a question of the presence or non-presence of the conception of God as a person, but of the rank assigned to this conception in a given system.

Judaism has indeed known the Kabbalah; Islam, Sufism; and in the case of the traditions of antiquity, Pythagoreanism, Neo-Platonism, and many traditions of the Mysteries have been characterized as well by the recognition of that dimension of the Absolute that transcends the personal, theistic God.

In Christianity itself, both in its origins (especially in Dionysius the Areopagite, Ireneus, Synesius, and many others) and in the great mystics or theologians that we might say are of the “dry path” (such as Scotus Eriugena, Meister Eckhart, Tauler, etc.), we find here and there references to this SUPERIOR METAPHYSICAL DIMENSION.

[To characterize the “Eastern” path, some have spoken not of ecstasy but of “enstasy”: that is to say of a concentric movement, of detachment of the mind from the object and from the external world of phenomena; of an interiorizing convergence towards the deeper Ego, the divine Self.]

[...] All this had been clearly seen by the metaphysical teachings—it is, in a way, related by the Ancients to the distinction between the Lesser Mysteries and the Greater Mysteries [...].

[...] Undoubtedly, metaphysics also recognizes that between the concentric and the vertical realization there is a rupture of continuity, a hiatus; but it is just the ability to surmount this hiatus actively that gives to the real initiate his chrism. THIS IS THE ESSENTIAL POINT.”

The Spirit:

“He admits that that path is characterized by depersonalization, by the overcoming of the personality and attainment of a naked Ego, which, like the nous, is pre-conceptual, pre-affective, pre-volitional.

He speaks of the opposition that exists in regard to time between the Judeo-Christian view of creation from which, in his opinion, proceeds the idea of historical development, more or less in terms of progress, and the “Eastern” conception of the world as an unchangeable emanation, as a pure symbol and perpetual image of a metacosmic and timeless reality [...].”

That is why 'NO CHRISTIAN WILL EVER AWAKEN'.

The judeo-christian places himself outside of society/reality, so he cannot awaken.

That is why “HIS OBSESSION WITH CHANGE” because he is not in reality.

The worst thing is that no one excludes him from reality but himself, for it is he who wants to improve society “by his cult of progress”.

The way the West has treated covid 'is not new'; it wants to control Nature and obviously 'it can't'.

This is how “MILLIONS OF PEOPLE” got infected “with vaccines or pseudo-vaccines” ... and will pay “dearly” in their bodies “this death choice”.

What I am about to say will make even more christians seethe, 'because all the keys to INITIATION are encrypted 'in their books''.

But 'there is no longer the “Initiatory Branch to form THE YOUNG”.

Christianism 'is therefore a DEAD CULT'.

The whole 'initiatory process' is no longer known from the

Christian church, 'if it has ever been known'. 'Mystics are able to orient' themselves anywhere 'even in a dead society'.

They just need “the word of other mystics who passed before them where they pass”. But Christianism is useless and destructive 'TO SOCIETY' because it no longer has an initiatory branch.

“We will not make note [...] Nor will we go back to what Celsus ironically pointed out in this connection, when he said that it is because they know only a fragment of a cycle that the Christians and the Jews speak so much of “history” and of “the end of the world” [...].”

L.O.L..

The Esoteric Tradition has been lost in the west, 'not totally' ... the cycles 'are present' IN THE BIBLE 'TO WHOEVER CAN SEE THEM'. Once again, we fall back 'on this new-born naked cult that is christianism' WHICH IS NOT 'AWARE OF THE SCOPE OF ITS TEXTS'.

“involutionary conception of history [...] becoming more and more apparent in the West.”

BUT THE CHRISTIAN FEELS THAT 'HE HAS ARRIVED'.

Where?

Nobody knows.

Good for him, 'he will rejoice even more 'IN WHAT IS TO COME.' Everything is interpreted “theistically” 'by this idiot'. Whereas the Esoteric message 'IS THE OPPOSITE'.

The Break in the West 'was made by him'.

And therefore he will not be 'the saving element' of the West. The Contrary. He will continue to Contribute to the destruction of the West.

What the Catholic HAS NEVER UNDERSTOOD “by mixing paganism and judeo-christian 'altruism'”.

With a mystical character but not with an initiatory character.

From Revolt Against the Modern World by Julius Evola:

“Thus, in comparison with historical Judaism, primitive Christianity may be credited with a mystical character along the same lines of prophetism, but not with an INITIATORY CHARACTER [...]

We should never forget though that if Christianity developed from the ancient Jewish tradition, orthodox Judaism developed in an independent fashion through the Talmud and the Kabbalah, which represents an INITIATORY TRADITION that was ALWAYS MISSING IN CHRISTIANITY.”

The christian, the destroyer of the 'traditional society'.

From Studies in the Cult of Yahweh: Volume 1. Studies in Historical Method, Ancient Israel, Ancient Judaism by Morton Smith:

“It is important to realize that esoterism admits of degrees, and to consider the possibility that what we have from Qumran is mostly the exoteric literature of an esoteric sect.”

The most important things are never revealed to the public or heavily heavily encrypted in esoteric texts.

INITIATION IS NOT RESERVED FOR THOSE “WHO DO NOT WANT TO MAKE ANY EFFORT”.

The Holy Spirit is not outside 'as Christians repeat';

if you destroy the mind

What's Left?

From The Ultimate Canon of Knowledge by Alvin Boyd Kuhn:

“Symbolism constitutes a language extending beyond the written or spoken idioms.

It was when ignorance and grossly material misconception distorted the transparent imagery of symbols into caricature and falsity that the interior import of mythology and archetypal concepts faded out and left intelligence holding the husks and empty shells of truth.

As the outward and visible form of an idea, a symbol is STILL THE MAGIC WAND TO AWAKEN INTELLIGENCE.

One of the originators of medical science, the physicist and philosopher Galen, speaks of the Mystery cults as grounding their system of medical morality upon the natural mystery.

The rituals were a sacred drama, portraying the principles of moral and spiritual truth by representations drawn from nature. “Nature is the great teacher of man; for it is the revelation [...] IT PRESENTS ITS SYMBOLS to us and ADDS NOTHING by way of explanation.”

ADDS NOTHING.

Mind 'does not perceive Principles, the Spirit behind does.

We have degrees of functioning, THE MIND IS USEFUL in daily life 'FOR ACHIEVE ACTIVITIES'; if you follow it to the letter 'you will see that it always tells you WHAT ACTION TO TAKE (ACCORDING TO THE SITUATION)'.

But the mind 'cannot understand' THE PRINCIPLES.

Only the Spirit can.

'For they are revealed' 'to that level only'.

That is why the Esotericist “KEEPS QUIET”.

Some truths can't be revealed “to MIND-ORIENTED-ONLY-PEOPLE”.

The Adept must “PURIFY HIMSELF first and then THESE TRUTHS WILL BE REVEALED TO HIM”.

What we are, humans, “is the most evolved Living Thing”.

“To employ nature’s universal symbolism instead of technicalities of language. . . discloses its secret to every one in proportion TO HIS POWER TO COMPREHEND IT.”

Massey’s view that mankind passed through an early stage in which nature symbolism WAS A UNIVERSAL IDIOM in religious literature is well buttressed by all the intimations and root motivations underlying that prodigious creation of the EARLY GENIUS OF MANKIND whose efforts produced the literary wonder of mythology.

It is doubtful if modernity has yet grasped the import of ancient mythology AS A WHOLE, much less interpreted truly and lucidly THE INDIVIDUAL MYTHS.”

Christians 'don't understand the myth of the savior', so…

From The Traveler's Key to Ancient Egypt: A Guide to Sacred Places by John Anthony West:

“Massey detested the organized, institutionalized church, yet recognized the Christian revelation as an expression of the esotericism of Egypt.

He considered Christianity a garbled and perverse bowdlerization of the original and believed that there was no historical Jesus at all, that early Christians in their ignorance had taken the great spiritual teaching of Egypt and turned it into a spurious historical event which, because undemonstrable, could not help but eventually arouse opposition and generate its own demise.”

There is a little more to this cult than the 'Egyptian aspect', 'although all the rites are Egyptian'.

“Schwaller de Lubicz regarded the Christian/Egypt connection altogether differently. He maintained that the laws of Genesis WERE UNIVERSAL and applied to EVERYTHING, that galaxies and planets and people and civilizations were all subject to the separate stages of conception / gestation / birth / growth / maturity / senescence / death and renewal.”

The West 'WILL NOT SAVE ITSELF'.

“Christianity represented an organic development, an unfolding of the original Egyptian doctrine. In Egypt the esotericism of the temple was in a sense open to all, in that the secrets were revealed to those who asked the RIGHT QUESTIONS; but as far as the general public was concerned, SALVATION AND CONSCIOUSLY DIRECTED SPIRITUAL DEVELOPMENT WERE RESTRICTED TO THE FEW.

The role of Christianity, according to Schwaller de Lubicz, was TO TAKE SALVATION OUT OF THE TEMPLE AND TO MAKE IT AVAILABLE to all, AN OPTION THAT WAS AT ONCE A PRIVILEGE AND BIRTHRIGHT, AND A MIGHTY RESPONSIBILITY.

But there can be no doubt whatever that in its essentials the spiritual message of the Osiris / Isis / Horus myth and the Christian revelation is the same.”

From A Handbook of Traditional Living: Theory & Practice – Book 1 of 2 by Raido:

“All traditional systems articulate their doctrines on two levels:

one a popular, external level (exotericism); the other an inner, symbolic and allegorical level (esotericism).

The latter expresses the highest and most essential character of any doctrine: it concerns metaphysical teaching and is revealed to a MINORITY ALONE, A NECESSARILY QUALIFIED ELITE CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING IT.

THE ELITE PRESERVES A BODY OF METAPHYSICAL AND TRANSFORMATIVE DOCTRINES that allow the individual TO EFFECTIVELY ATTAIN SPIRITUAL KNOWLEDGE.”

But, before “you need to destroy THE EGO AND ITS MIND which is positioned in front of this direct knowledge”.

“THAT OF EXOTERICISM IS THE LEVEL OF RELIGION, RELIGIOUS DOGMAS, DEVOTION AND EMOTION, WHICH NEVER LEADS BEYOND INDIVIDUALITY [...].

Hence, every religion is adapted to the conditions suited for given peoples in given ages.”

I have thus 'never been in fight against religions', because they have their uses, but always in fight against the religious, 'WHICH IS VERY DIFFERENT'.

'They are Useless'.

“While a degree of religious intolerance can occur in the realm of exotericism, no such thing can occur on the level of esotericism, FOR ESOTERIC DOCTRINE IS ONE, UNIVERSAL AND ETERNAL.”

It is for this reason 'that the PAGAN SOCIETY was UNIVERSAL' and that the judeo-christians 'proclaim themselves universal and egalitarian and they are not' since they are obliged to make laws to deal with 'these problems of universality'.

SELF-PACIFYING:

“While exotericism often supports religious fundamentalism, ESOTERICISM ALWAYS AFFIRMS THE TRANSCENDENTAL UNITY OF RELIGIONS AND TRADITIONAL FORMS.

The symbolism of the mountain can be seen to convey this reality: ‘Many paths lead upward, towards the same goal’. Such a view, which emphasises unity, should not be confused with ‘syncretism’, or – worse still – with the kind of forgery of the sacred that is promoted by neo-spiritualist movements like Theosophy, Anthroposophy, ufology and occultism. At best, syncretism and neo-spiritualism lead to the superimposition of elements of different origin, which are merely brought together by human agency.

These pseudo-religious paths exploit and mangle the rules and symbols of different traditional forms, leading their FOLLOWERS TO RUIN.

TO REMOVE ONESELF BOTH FROM THE COMPANY OF RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISTS [...] IS ONE OF THE BEST STEPS THAT ANY MAN MINDFUL OF TRADITIONAL SPECIFICITIES CAN TAKE [...].

TO REMOVE ONESELF BOTH FROM THE COMPANY OF RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISTS, who foster fratricidal strife, and ‘d.i.y.’ neo-spiritualists IS ONE OF THE BEST STEPS THAT ANY MAN MINDFUL OF TRADITIONAL SPECIFICITIES CAN TAKE in order to avoid falling victim to subversion.”

Give yourself a christmas present [christ-Mass, christ and Mass]:

• Get away from all this 'WESTERN ECOSYSTEM', I SHOUT IT, “YOU CANNOT LIVE in a NON-VIABLE ECO-SYSTEM”, 'AMONG NON-VIABLE PEOPLE'.

TO BELIEVE that “you can awaken or that the nature of awakening is this new-age syncretist verbiage 'OF LIVING AMONG THE MADMEN IS FALSE'.”

AWAKENING IS KNOWING 'ITS TRUE NATURE', as soon as you wake up 'in the morning', 'YOU ENTER DUALITY', the mind is forced to be the organ of the everyday 'BECAUSE IT WAS DESIGNED like this'; FOR ORGANIZATION OF DAILY TASKS, what the Spirit 'doesn't care about'.

This means, then, that once you are awake “nothing touches anymore” but you still have “TO DEAL WITH THIS REALITY DAILY”.

You are not going to Levitate '20 centimeters off the ground' 'ONCE YOU ARE AWAKE'.

THIS THOUGHT has been going on 'as long as the Exoteric has taken over the Society'.

You don't have to be nice 'with shitty People'.

'The Opposite'.

This is absolutely 'not the goal' of enlightenment and leads “ONLY TO THE SUBVERSION OF MAN BY MAN”. That is why I repeat that this judeo-christian thought of “turning the other cheek” has given 'RISE TO COMMUNISM' and TENS OF MILLIONS OF DEATHS. Where we could have 'KILLED AN AGITATING MINORITY' and not had 'what has been the TWENTIETH CENTURY OF HORROR.'

“TRADITION IS SYNONYMOUS WITH TRUTH AND JUSTICE, AS IT REPRESENTS THE AFFIRMATION OF ORDER against the falsehood and rebellion that inform a modern view of life.

Another characteristic of Tradition is its direct link WITH AUTHORITY, a term deriving from the Indo-European root aug- = to increase.

Tradition brings to mind the notion of authority, which is directly connected to Imperium: sovereign, ordering force. Imperium is that power bestowed by divinity, WHICH IS CONNECTED TO VIRTUE AND KINGSHIP – the figure of the king embodying political, military, legislative and religious power.

One example of Imperium is ARISTOCRATIC SOCIETY, in which AUTHORITY creates a natural DISTINCTION AMONG MEN ACCORDING TO THE VALUE, ROLE, VOCATION AND QUALITY OF EACH PERSON.

THE IDEAL, ORGANIC AND TRADITIONAL STATE is regulated by FOUR CASTES: priests, warriors, producers and servants. These castes symbolically correspond to the division of the human body into head/brain (priests), breast/heart (warriors), stomach/liver (producers) and limbs (servants).

Caste means law and order [...].

Every human activity, on the other hand, offers the same possibility of spiritual elevation: to fulfil one’s duty is to contribute to the implementation of Order and hence to partake in the metaphysical Principle.

The political and social reflection of this perspective can be found in the organisation of the Indo-European peoples, who divided their own communities according to three chief functions corresponding to the three aspects of being (soul, spirit and body) – the fourth function being reserved for servants. The first function corresponds to the mysterious administration of the universe, with its divine laws and rituals, and embodies the affirmation of a general cosmic order in the world of men.

This is the function of priests, who guard the primordial and holy knowledge and actualise the sacred by means of ritual.

When decadence first took its course, kings were replaced by priests.

As spiritual authority became separate from temporal, a lunar form of spirituality came to prevail, and the virile element assumed a passive role before the female (embodied by Demeter).

This decadence allowed priests to be invested with power that was neither regal nor sacred, but merely material and secular.

With the advent of the merchant caste, instead, a utilitarian view of economy came to permeate all aspects of life: wealth and material gain thus became the highest ideals.”

This is what we have experienced until the last few months, when we have 'seen movements like B.L.M.' which mean 'that we are in the Fourth Phase':

“The prevailing of the servant caste, with its darkness, has led to the folly of collectivism [...].”

Even if the collectivist movements of the twentieth century 'were only the beginning', now 'the bourgeois society has been destroyed totally'.

That's why I say “it will be even more violent” THAN BEFORE. And if with the covid and 'THE WORLD BLOCKADE', 'YOU STILL HAVEN'T UNDERSTOOD'.

Now we are 'in the people era', 'THE TOTAL ANARCHY' 'and what you believe will stand, will fall soon'.

Suffering will bring you back: Esotericism & Christianity #Esotericism #Evola #Yuga #Lubicz #Tradition #Holy-Spirit #Spirit #Yuga #Christianity #Esoterism

https://bittube.tv/post/c9b9ef91-5286-4a8f-b0f9-94abb4d333c1 https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/Suffering-will-bring-you-back--Esotericism---Christianity:7 https://tube.midov.pl/w/dRgMTcvNHQwid8mKbiaicR https://www.bitchute.com/video/GaX9HQI05N0P/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ FINEARTAMERICA https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/periodicreset-ofcivilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com ▶ ZAZZLE https://www.zazzle.com/store/periodic_reset/products