periodic reset of civilizations

Modernity

Europe is not merely a geographical entity—it is a spiritual inheritance. The European belongs to the Indo-European tradition, rooted in a solar, heroic ethos. The term Aryan signifies a sacred, regal principle—transcending mere ethnicity, it embodies the kshatriya ideal, the divine order of kingship.

All Solar Peoples have, at some point, broken free from the grip of the earth, abandoning the chthonic goddesses in favor of the solar stars.

Lunar Inversion (Solar-Feminine, Lunar-Masculine):
In all lunar languages, the sun is feminine (Old English sunne, Old Norse sól, Gothic sunnō, Old High German sunna, Modern German die Sonne, Dutch de zon, Arabic ash-shams, Hebrew shemesh), while the moon is masculine (Old English mōna, Old Norse máni, Old High German māno, Modern German der Mond, Dutch de maan, Arabic al-qamar, Hebrew yareach). This inversion reveals the fundamentally lunar, chthonic, and Demetrian nature of their thought.

The Germanic branch, with its tendency toward liberalism and gynocracy, is a decadent deviation from the primordial Aryan spirit. It has succumbed to the leveling forces of modernity, losing touch with the transcendent hierarchy of the sacred.

True Aryan tradition exists beyond moralistic dualism—there is no “good” or “evil,” only order, strength, and the sacred law of domination.

The Degeneration of Language

One clear sign that history has not progressed—except in purely material terms—is the impoverishment of modern languages compared to their ancient counterparts. In structural organicity, articulation, and flexibility, no modern Western “living” language can rival classical Latin or Sanskrit. Among European tongues, only German retains traces of its archaic form (hence its reputation for difficulty), while English and the Scandinavian languages have suffered erosion and flattening. Ancient languages were three-dimensional; modern ones are two-dimensional. Time has corroded them, rendering them “practical” and fluid at the expense of coherence—a decline mirrored across culture and life.

Words, too, have a history, and their shifting meanings reveal changes in the spiritual and intellectual disposition of their speakers. A telling comparison can be made between Latin terms and their Romance derivatives, which often retain the same outward form but have suffered a degradation in essence. The original, higher meaning either lingers only residually or has been distorted, even trivialized.

Examples of Semantic Decline

1 — Virtus
The most striking case is virtus. Modern “virtue” bears almost no relation to its ancient meaning. Virtus signified strength of mind, courage, prowess, and virile fortitude—rooted in vir (man in the strict, not merely biological, sense). Today, the word has been moralized, often conflated with puritanical sexual morality—so much so that Pareto mocked it as “virtuism.” A “virtuous person” now implies the opposite of the classical vir virtute praeditus: where once it denoted heroic pride and fearlessness, it now suggests bourgeois conformity.

Only in limited contexts—such as the “virtues” of a plant or acting “by virtue of” something—does the original sense of virtus as an efficacious force survive.

2 — Honestus. Linked to the ancient concept of honos, this term originally signified ‘honorable,’ ‘noble,’ and ‘of high rank.’ The modern interpretation has degenerated into bourgeois mediocrity—mere ‘decency’ and moral conformity. Where once nato da onesti genitori denoted noble lineage, it is now reduced to a hollow, almost mocking phrase. In Rome, vir honesta facie described a man of superior bearing, just as the Sanskrit arya embodied both spiritual and physical nobility—a concept antithetical to modern egalitarian decay.

3 — Gentilis, gentilitas. Today, these terms evoke the image of a “gentleman”—a polite and amiable figure. Yet, in antiquity, they denoted the idea of gens: lineage, stock, race, or caste. For the Romans, one was gentilis by virtue of qualities inherited from a distinct bloodline. These qualities might, in some cases, manifest as an air of detached nobility—far removed from mere “good manners” (which even an upstart can learn) or the modern diluted notion of “kindness.” Few today grasp the true depth of phrases like “a gentle spirit,” remnants of a nobler understanding preserved only in the language of past writers.

4 — Genialitas
Who is a “genius” today? A hyper-individualistic man, imaginative and brimming with original ideas—exemplified by the artistic “genius,” fetishized as the pinnacle of humanistic and bourgeois civilization, even surpassing the hero, the ascetic, or the aristocrat.

But the Latin genialis points to something far removed from individualism and humanism. It derives from genius, which originally signified the formative, generative, and mystical force of a gens—a blood lineage. Thus, genialitas in the ancient sense was tied to “racial” qualities in the higher, sacred meaning.

Unlike the modern “genius,” this element rejects individualism and arbitrariness. It is anchored in deep roots, obeying an inner necessity through fidelity to supra-personal forces of blood and race—forces that, in patrician lineages, were always bound to sacred tradition.

5 — Pietas. Today, the term “pious” has been degraded to signify a sentimental, humanitarian attitude—synonymous with mere compassion. In ancient Rome, however, pietas belonged to the sacred. It defined the Roman’s primordial bond with the gods, and secondarily with all elements of Tradition, including the State. Before the divine, it signified a disciplined veneration—a recognition of belonging, yet tempered by respect, duty, and loyalty. This was an elevated form of the reverence owed to the pater familias (hence pietas filialis). Pietas also extended to the political sphere: pietas in patriam demanded unwavering fidelity to the State and fatherland. In certain contexts, it even assumed the meaning of iustitia. He who lacks pietas is unjust, impious—a man adrift, ignorant of his ordained place within the higher order, both divine and human.

6 — Innocentia. This term conveyed ideas of clarity and strength, reflecting its ancient meaning—purity of soul, integrity, disinterestedness, and righteousness. It was not merely the negation of guilt. Unlike today’s trivialized notion of an “innocent soul,” which implies naivety or simplemindedness, the ancient concept carried a higher, more virile significance. In modern Romance languages, such as French, “innocent” has even been degraded to denote feeble-mindedness, further illustrating the decline of its original noble meaning.

7 — Patientia. The modern understanding of the term, compared to its ancient meaning, again reveals a process of weakening and degradation. Today, a “patient” person is merely someone who avoids anger, remains passive, and displays tolerance. In Latin, patientia signified one of the fundamental virtues of the Roman: it embodied inner strength, unshakable resolve, and the ability to hold firm, maintaining an indomitable spirit against all trials and adversities. This is why the Roman race was said to possess both the power to achieve greatness and to endure equally formidable hardships (cf. Livy’s famous phrase: et facere et pati fortia romanum est). In contrast, the modern interpretation is entirely diluted—now, even a donkey is held up as an example of so-called “patience.”

8 — Humilitas
In the dominant religious framework of the West, “humility” has been distorted into a false virtue—utterly alien to the Roman conception. True Roman virtus stands in stark opposition to humilitas, which signified baseness, wretchedness, cowardice, and dishonor. For the Romans, death or exile was preferable to such degradation (humilitati vel exilium vel mortem anteponenda esse). Expressions like mens humilis et prava (“a low and evil mind”) and humilitas causam dicentium (denoting the inferior status of the accused) reinforced this disdain.

Race and caste further defined humilitas—humilis natus parentis indicated plebeian birth, a mark of inferiority compared to noble lineage. The modern, economically driven notion of “humble origins” would have been incomprehensible to the Romans, who valued hierarchy and innate superiority. No true Roman would have exalted humilitas as a virtue, much less preached it. As one emperor noted, nothing is more contemptible than the pride of those who claim humility—though this does not justify arrogance. True dignity lies in strength, nobility, and unwavering self-awareness.

9 — Ingenium. The modern term retains only a fragment of the ancient meaning—and, as usual, its least significant aspect. In Latin, ingenium encompassed not just mental acuity, insight, and foresight, but also one’s innate character, the organic and authentic essence of an individual. Thus, vana ingenia denoted those devoid of true character, while redire ad ingenium meant a return to one’s inherent nature, a life in accordance with one’s deepest being. This essential dimension has been erased in modern usage, which now conveys nearly the opposite. Today’s “ingeniousness” reflects intellectualist and dialectical superficiality—a restless, hyperactive cleverness—directly opposed to the classical sense of ingenium as the expression of a disciplined, character-rooted mode of thought and being.

10 — Labor. The shift in the meaning of the word labor reflects a profound transformation in worldview. In Latin, labor primarily conveyed toil, suffering, and burden—never virtue. The Greek ponos carried a similar sense. For the Romans, labor denoted servile, material exertion, opposed to higher action (agere), which was free, deliberate, and dignified. Those engaged in meaningful, vocation-driven craftsmanship were artifex or opifex—never mere “workers.”

The modern glorification of labor exposes the plebeian degradation of the West. Industrialization has stripped work of any higher purpose, yet it is now exalted as an ethical duty—a perverse inversion. Traditional societies elevated action and art above base toil; modernity reduces even art and action to mechanized drudgery, driven by profit rather than vocation.

11 — Otium. This term has undergone an inversion in meaning. In modernity, “idleness” is seen as uselessness—a state of indolence, distraction, and passivity. Yet, in the Roman tradition, otium signified a sacred pause: a meditative state of concentration, calm, and contemplation. While misuse could lead to dissipation (hebescere otio), its true meaning was nobler. For Cicero, Seneca, and others, otium was the necessary counterbalance to action—without it, action degenerates into mere agitation (negotium) or vulgar labor.

The Greeks, as Cicero noted, flourished not only through intellect but through otium and diligence. Scipio the Elder embodied this higher idleness: “He was never less idle than when idle, nor less alone than in solitude.” Sallust declared his leisure more beneficial to the State than others' busyness. Seneca’s De Otio elevates otium to pure contemplation, framing it as service to the greater, metaphysical State—the realm of gods and eternal principles. True otium is not escapism but an ascent to the perception of the transcendent order.

Even Catholicism once recognized sacrum otium—sacred contemplation—before surrendering to modern decadence. Today, in a civilization reduced to mechanical toil and neurotic frenzy, the classical meaning of otium is lost. Modern man flees himself, drowning in distractions—radio, television, sports, politics—anything to avoid solitude. These are the narcotics of a disintegrated age, ensuring no inner life remains, no resistance to the collective current of so-called “progress.”

12 — Theoria. The modern degradation of the Greek term theoria reflects a broader decline. Today, “theory” implies lifeless abstraction, detached from reality—a sentiment echoed in the quote: “All theory is grey, my friend. But forever green is the tree of life.” This is a distortion of its original meaning. True theoria signifies an active, fulfilling vision, the operation of the highest principle in man: the (Olympian intellect), which will be explored later.

13 — Servitium. The Latin verb servio, servire carries the positive connotation of “to be faithful,” yet its predominant meaning is the negative one: “to be a servant.” This latter sense forms the basis of servitium, which explicitly denoted slavery or serfdom, deriving from servus (slave). In modernity, the term “to serve” has gained widespread use while shedding its degrading implications, particularly among Anglo-Saxon peoples, where “service” as “social service” has been elevated into an ethical ideal—the sole modern ethic. Just as the absurdity of “intellectual workers” goes unnoticed, so too has the sovereign been reduced to “the first servant of the nation.”

The Romans, far from being a race of “idlers,” exemplified the highest political loyalty—to the State and its leaders—yet in a fundamentally different spirit. The shift in the essence of these words is no accident. The modern vulgarization of terms like labor, servitium, and otium reflects a deeper decline—a movement away from virile, aristocratic, and qualitative values.

14 — Stipendium. Today, the term “stipend” evokes bureaucracy, civil servants, and payday. In ancient Rome, however, stipendium referred almost exclusively to military service. Stipendium merere meant to serve in the army under a commander. Emeritis stipendis denoted completion of military service; homo nullius stipendii described one unfamiliar with martial discipline. Stipendis multa habere signified participation in many campaigns. The contrast is telling.

Similarly, Latin terms like studium and studiosus retain only fragments of their original meaning. Today, studium suggests dry academic pursuits, but in Latin, it conveyed intensity, fervor, even love. In re studium ponere meant to take something deeply to heart. Studium bellandi was the love of combat. Homo agendi studiosus was a man of action—the antithesis of the modern laborer. Studiosi Caesaris did not mean scholars of Caesar, but his devoted followers.

Other forgotten meanings include:
– Docilitas: not docility, but a readiness to learn.
– Ingenuus: not “ingenuous,” but free-born, non-servile.
– Humanitas: not modern “humanity,” but self-cultivation and lived experience.
– Certus: not mere certainty, but resolve. Certum est mihi meant “it is my decision.” Certus gladio was one skilled with the sword. Diebus certis meant fixed, appointed days—a certainty rooted in will, not chance.

This leads to an active conception of certainty, as in Vico’s verum et factum convertuntur—later diluted by neo-Hegelian deviations.

The original Roman understandings of fatum, felicitas, and fortuna will be examined next.

15 — Fatum: The Traditional Roman Concept of Fate

In modernity, “fate” is often understood as a blind, oppressive force that crushes human will, leading to tragedy and misfortune. This negative view fosters fatalism, where man is powerless against an indifferent, deterministic universe.

In contrast, the ancient Roman conception of fatum was fundamentally different. Rather than a blind law, fatum represented a meaningful, intelligent order—a divine will governing the cosmos and history. Rooted in the Indo-European rih-tuh, Roman fatum reflected the idea of a higher, just law unfolding through events. The Fata (Fates) were not mere arbiters of doom but embodiments of cosmic justice, despite later chthonic influences distorting their image.

Rome, as a civilization of action, saw fatum not as an abstract metaphysical principle but as a dynamic force within history. The term derives from fari (to speak), linking it to fas—divine law as revealed through oracles and omens. Thus, fatum was both the decree of the gods and the guiding word that allowed men to align their actions with higher forces.

Traditional Roman piety (pietas) demanded that man actively conform to this sacred order. Success—fortuna and felicitas—was not mere luck but the result of acting in harmony with fatum. Military and political triumphs were seen as proof of this alignment, while failures stemmed from neglecting divine signs (religio) and acting in hubristic isolation from the gods.

This worldview mirrors the principles of traditional technology: just as modern engineers harness natural laws for efficiency, ancient Romans sought to align with cosmic laws to achieve “felicitous” action. Rome’s greatness, as some historians recognize, lay in this sacred discipline—where freedom meant not rebellion against fate, but conscious participation in its divine order.

The same principles apply when confronting spiritual and divine forces rather than mere material laws. For traditional man, understanding—or at least sensing—these forces was essential to discern the conditions favorable to action and to recognize what should or should not be done. To defy fate, to rebel against destiny, was not some Romantic “Promethean” defiance celebrated by modernity—it was sheer folly. Impiety—the absence of pietas, the rupture of religio, the severance from the sacred order—was synonymous with stupidity, childishness, and arrogance.

Unlike modern technology, the laws of historical reality were not seen as dead, mechanical forces detached from man and his purpose. The divine order, linked to fate, operates up to a certain threshold—beyond which it is no longer absolute but merely influential (astra inclinant, non determinant). Here begins the properly human and historical domain. Ideally, this realm should extend the divine will: man’s free action must actualize what was only latent. When this occurs, history becomes sacred revelation, and man—no longer acting for himself—assumes a transcendent dignity, elevating the human world into a higher order.

This is far from fatalism. To oppose fate is irrational; to align with it is transformative. The ignorant are dragged by events (fata nolentem trahunt), while the knowing, by embracing fate, are guided toward a higher purpose (volentem ducunt). Thus, man transcends his individuality, becoming an instrument of the cosmic will.

In ancient Rome, history and institutions often reflected a sacred encounter between the human and the divine—where higher forces manifested through human action. Consider the Roman cult of Jupiter: the vir triumphalis did not merely celebrate the god but embodied his victorious essence. As Kerényi and Altheim observed, the triumphant imperator wore Jupiter’s insignia because the god was not just the cause of victory—he was the victor. Rome’s genius lay in realizing the divine in action and political order, transforming myth into history and history into a higher, fateful mythos.

This reveals a profound truth: such moments signify an identity between human will and transcendent forces. Here, freedom is not mere subjective choice but alignment with a higher order. To resist fatum is a sterile defiance, a hollow gesture against the fabric of reality. True freedom emerges when the individual becomes an instrument of this order, channeling forces that would otherwise remain indifferent to human desires.

How, then, did modernity reduce fatum to a blind, oppressive force? This degradation stems from the rise of individualism and humanism—the severance from the sacred, leaving only an incomprehensible, alien power. “Fate” now symbolizes forces man neither understands nor controls, yet which he has unwittingly empowered through his own spiritual decline.

These reflections on fatum conclude our examples, illustrating the need for a philology that penetrates beyond words to their spiritual roots. Such study should extend beyond Latin to the broader Indo-European tradition, revealing deeper connections obscured by time.

Title: The Decay of Words: A Traditionalist Critique of Modern Linguistic Degeneration
Tags: #Language #Rome #SpiritualDecline #Modernity #Tradition

  1. Virtus vs. Virtue – Ancient virtus signified virile strength and heroism; modern “virtue” is moralistic, puritanical, and effeminate.
  2. Honestus vs. Honest – Originally denoting nobility and honor, now reduced to bourgeois “decency.”
  3. Gentilis vs. Gentle – Once tied to lineage and racial quality, now mere superficial politeness.
  4. Genialitas vs. Genius – From a racial-spiritual force of the gens to individualistic artistic fetishism.
  5. Pietas vs. Piety – Sacred duty to gods and state degraded into sentimental humanitarianism.
  6. Innocentia vs. Innocence – Once implied purity and integrity; now connotes weakness and idiocy.
  7. Patientia vs. Patience – Roman endurance and fortitude diminished into passive tolerance.
  8. Humilitas vs. Humility – A Roman vice (baseness) twisted into a Christian “virtue.”
  9. Labor vs. Work – From toil and punishment to a plebeian cult of mechanized drudgery.
  10. Otium vs. Idleness – Sacred contemplation replaced by modern distraction and decadence.
    The decay of language mirrors the decline of the West—words once anchored in hierarchy, race, and sacred order now reflect democratic vulgarity. Only a return to Tradition can restore their true meaning.

Catholic Inquisition &: “Modernity”.

From Isabelle et Ferdinand, Rois catholiques d’Espagne/Isabelle and Ferdinand, Catholic Kings of Spain by Joseph Pérez:

“Is the Inquisition a medieval relic, an anachronism or, on the contrary, one of the first manifestations of modernity in Europe?

For me, the response is without doubt: the Inquisition prefigures the modern state in this most terrible of ways—the tendency toward totalitarianism.”

And to say that the Populace “thinks that democracy and modernity will save them”. L.O.L.. The Future 'will be fun'. And it 'will be joyful' to see the 'next progroms' that are being prepared 'now'.

The masses will remain the masses. 'Stupid and not UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING'.

“The Inquisition is charged with defending the catholic faith, with rooting out heterodox deviations [...].

[...] Since 1480, there has been this formidable machine of war against heresy, the Inquisition, but precisely, if it was necessary to set up this repressive apparatus and to use constraint to preserve the catholic faith FROM ANY HETERODOXIC DEVIATION [...].”

FROM ANY HETERODOXIC DEVIATION. That is 'why it's useless to fight against the Dogma of the “pro-vaccination”'. Everything what you would say, WILL “BE SYSTEMATICALLY CUT”.

From Critical Theories of Globalization: An Introduction by C. el-Ojeili and P. Hayden:

“[...] in regard to morality and politics, Nietzsche argued that Judeo-Christian morality was life-denying [...] promoted the values of humility, self-denial, meekness, and submission to authority.

By extension, modern egalitarianism and democracy exhibited the same [...] as Christian ‘slave morality’, by promoting [...] the equal worth and equal rights of the ‘common man’ and conformity TO MAJORITY OPINION.”

TOWARDS 'MAJORITY OPINION': This is why JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ethics always 'LEAD TO COLLECTIVISM'.

DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS 'ARE TOTALITARIAN':

In any democratic system “the voice of the majority” IS 'THE ONLY ONE THAT IS ALLOWED'. 'All personal aspiration' and 'dissonance' 'MUST BE SUPPRESSED'.

'THERE IS NO INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM' in a democratic system. 'The FABLE that has been SOLD FOR DEMOCRACY'; IS THAT CASTE SOCIETY 'broke the individuals'.

Let's go back to the text Isabelle et Ferdinand, Rois catholiques d’Espagne/Isabelle and Ferdinand, Catholic Kings of Spain by Joseph Pérez:

“[...] but here we are dealing with an organized, systematic, bureaucratized intolerance: civil servants are specially charged with collecting denunciations, investigating, making files, compiling dossiers... THIS FORM OF INSTITUTIONAL INTOLERANCE, even if it is less bloody than the other, is infinitely more redoubtable because it poses a permanent threat to the population. IT IS THE FIRST FORM OF TOTALITARIANISM IN MODERN TIMES.

I SAY: MODERN TIMES.

IS THE INQUISITION A MEDIEVAL RELIC, AN ANACHRONISM OR, ON THE CONTRARY, ONE OF THE FIRST MANIFESTATIONS OF MODERNITY IN EUROPE?

For me, the response is without doubt: THE INQUISITION PREFIGURES THE MODERN STATE IN THIS MOST TERRIBLE OF WAYS—THE TENDENCY TOWARD TOTALITARIANISM.

INQUISITION IS MODERN, in fact, from yet another point of view, perhaps more important than the previous one: it is, in Spain, for the entire duration of the Old Regime, the only court that has the right to PROSECUTE EVERYONE, without distinction of privilege, throughout the territory.

THE INQUISITION ESTABLISHES THE EQUALITY OF ALL before its law; it knows no privileged people; it is even much more severe towards the powerful than towards the little people who do not risk much: the poor devils, those who have not studied, who do not read, who do not write, WHO DO NOT TRAVEL ABROAD, WHO DO NOT MEDDLE WITH IDEAS, ALL OF THESE ARE NOT A THREAT AGAINST ORTHODOXY.

On the contrary, they willingly BECOME VOLUNTEERING AUXILIARIES OF THE INQUIRERS BY DENOUNCING COMMENTS and attitudes that they consider unconformist.

The Inquisition was based on the EGALITARIAN TENDENCIES of the spanish people. This is what Menéndez Pelayo called in the last century the “MONASTIC DEMOCRACY” (democracia frailuna): the Inquisition, he wrote, is a form of tyranny, if you like, but it was a “popular tyranny” (tirania popular), “A ROBUST UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE, A DEMOCRATIC JUSTICE THAT LEVELED EVERYTHING, FROM THE KING TO THE PLEBEIAN, FROM THE ARCHBISHOP TO THE TYCOON”.

THE INQUISITION IS THUS AN INSTITUTION THAT GOES IN THE DIRECTION OF MODERNITY [...] IT ANNOUNCES TOTALITARIANISM [...].

IT IS A MATTER, FOR SPAIN, OF BUILDING AN IDEOLOGICALLY HOMOGENEOUS NATION.”

HOMOGENEOUS, FUNNY, IN RELATION 'TO WHAT THIS HOMOGENEITY'?

WHAT IS THE STANDARD THAT IS USED “TO ESTABLISH THIS HOMOGENEITY”?

“So there is confusion OF THE POLITICAL AND THE RELIGIOUS.”

WHOSE FAULT IS IT?

WHO WANTED TO CONVERT “THE WHOLE WORLD” 'WITH HIS CHRISTIANISM'?

Where is, THIS TOTALITARIAN PROJECT, which 'says you HAVE TO BE CONVERTED'. I 'still find it funny' 'that this judeo-christian religion' complains 'hundreds of years' after its creation, ABOUT 'ITS OWN DESIRE TO CONVERT THE WHOLE EARTH' and understands NOW THE 'SOCIAL RAMIFICATIONS'.

As if they were “TRYING TO ABSOLVE THEMSELVES of their project” which has caused “SO MUCH HARM”.

“Christianism” “WILL BE JUDGED ONE DAY”, and WHEN THAT VERDICT will comes from 'THE CIVIL SOCIETY'; it “will not be good 'to be a Christian' anymore”; LET THAT BE SAID.

From The New Inquisitions: Heretic-Hunting and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Totalitarianism by Arthur Versluis:

“[...] THE EMERGENCE OF MODERNITY ULTIMATELY MEANT THE DEPOLITICIZATION OF THE WORLD—THE ABSENCE OF ENEMIES, OF HERETICS, OF THOSE AGAINST WHOM OTHERS CAN DEFINE THEMSELVES—NONE OTHER THAN THE CULTURAL VACUUM REPRESENTED BY TECHNOLOGICAL-CONSUMERIST MODERN SOCIETY.

[...] CATHOLIC INQUISITIONS PROVIDED AN ARCHETYPAL PREDECESSOR FOR ONE OF THE FUNDAMENTALLY NEW POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS OF MODERNITY: TOTALITARIANISM.”

Although the last great PAGE OF MODERNITY was turned by the 'JEWISH RELIGION' and its salesman in the west; 'CHRISTIANISM', modernity 'is thousands of years old'. 'Little by little'; “the Erosion of Tradition” Has taken place.

'The Cinematographer Jacques Tati' 'Had seen in the middle of the last century', 'this Western Society' Advancing 'EVEN MORE TOWARDS' what is now called “THE WESTERNIZATION OF THE WORLD”.

If you watch his film “MY UNCLE”, 'one of his two Poetic films' with “Monsieur Hulot's Holiday”, YOU CLEARLY 'SEE THIS MODERNIZATION' in action. THAT OF THE LIVES OF DAILY USES; everything BECOMES MECHANICAL, ROBOTIC, “COLD”.

The other films of JACQUES TATI, are more “TO WATCH TO SEE THE MASTERY” 'that he had'; 'A TRUE GENIUS', 'ONE OF THE GREATEST OF THE 20TH CENTURY'.

'I leave the Following video examples', 'One After The Other'; because 'THIS MARCH TOWARDS MODERNITY cannot be stopped'. If you look at his film “Playtime” shot '8 years after' “My uncle”; you see 'THAT URBANISM HAS 'BEEN TOTALLY TRANSFORMED' TOWARDS THIS TREND'.

And Jacques Tati shows you 'to WHAT EXTENT LIFE HAS BEEN DESACRALIZED'. It is therefore 'A COLDER FILM'.

Modernity is really 'CHARACTERIZED BY THIS ABSENCE OF MEANING'. Doing things, 'but the things are the end'; 'it is therefore the opposite of the Sacred'.

It is strange, and we have seen it underlined with the vaccination 'rates of covid', that the 'whole world' or almost the whole world, excluding for the 'moment Africa', IS NO LONGER interested in 'HAVING A MEANING to their lives'.

Which brings us back 'TO THE WANDERING JEW'.

For the more astute, they have understood 'that this WORLD IS NOT TO BE SAVED'. You don't save a 'DEAD WORLD'. Besides, if you reach 'A POINT OF INITIATION' 'you don't care about 'the drift of others''. On the contrary; 'IT FEEDS YOU'.

You 'see them 'DESTROY THEMSELVES', 'AND YOU ARE FED': 'FOR THE SPIRIT' IS STRONGER 'THAN THE MIND'.

The Elitism of INITIATION 'Has Been In Effect' in the world 'For A Long Time'. And 'IT'S NOT ABOUT TO CHANGE SOON'.

“I leave again” the Text on the 'jew-christian' and 'the hatred of paganism'.

The Jew ... the Christian, the Hatred for Nature: Paganism.

“Paganism is the true science. Jews have problem thriving in a NATURAL WORLD [...].”

There is a statistic I like to repeat:

The Jewish problem 0.2% World Population/20% of the Nobel prizes. When you understand THIS STATISTIC, you understand 'THE WORLD PROBLEM'.

“No one is safe until everyone is safe”, you can read 'ALL OVER THE PLACE' among the 'Covid Vaccination Promoters'.

This is the Judeo-Christian ethic of 'CONTROL OVER NATURE', originally driven by the 'JEWISH RELIGION'. THE CONTROL OF NATURE IS OF COURSE AN ILLUSION.

“For God's sake, BROTHERS, get vaccinated.”

Brothers?

Are we all brothers?

BY VIRTUE OF WHAT?

This judeo-christian ethic IS UNBEARABLE. NO, WE ARE NOT BROTHERS. BROTHERHOOD 'HAS NEVER EXISTED' WITHIN HUMANITY: 'THIS COLLECTIVIST CONCEPT IS TO BE VOMITED'.

THE HUMAN BEING IS UNIQUE 'IN HIS ESSENCE'.

If one day “You Awaken”; you will find yourself 'on the other side of the mind' “CONTEMPLATING THE MIND”, and you will understand “THAT DUALITY IS AN ILLUSION”.

BUT UNITY DOES NOT MEAN COLLECTIVISM, IT'S THE OPPOSITE.

THIS COLLECTIVIST INSANITY has given us all the socialisms and even their application... COMMUNISM.

NO WE ARE NOT BROTHERS.

From Swami Abhayananda:

“[...] in the following “Great Exposition” attributed to the gnostic, Simon Magus of Samaria, who was a contemporary of the Christian apostle, Peter, this mystically perceived duality-in-Unity is magnificently explained:

“There are two aspects of the One. The first of these is the Higher, the Divine Mind of the universe, which governs all things, and is masculine. The other is the lower, the Thought (epinoia) which produces all things, and is feminine. As a pair united, they comprise all that exists.

The Divine Mind is the Father who sustains all things and nourishes all that begins and ends. He is the One who eternally stands, without beginning or end. He exists entirely alone; for, while the Thought arising from Unity, and coming forth from the Divine Mind, creates [the appearance of] duality, the Father remains a Unity. The Thought is in Himself, and so He is alone. Made manifest to Himself from Himself, He appears to be two. He becomes “Father” by virtue of being called so by His own Thought.

Since He, Himself, brought forward Himself, by means of Himself, manifesting to Himself His own Thought, it is not correct to attribute creation to the Thought alone. For She (the Thought) conceals the Father within Herself; the Divine Mind and the Thought are intertwined. Thus, though [they appear] to be a pair, one opposite the other, the Divine Mind is in no way different from the Thought, inasmuch as they are one.

Though there appears to be a Higher, the Mind, and a lower, the Thought, truly, It is a Unity, just as what is manifested from these two [that is, the universe] is a unity, while appearing to be a duality. The Divine Mind and the Thought are discernible, one from the other, but they are one, though they appear to be two.””

It has been said for hundreds of years, the Christian and the Judeo-Christian ethic IS THE LOWEST IN TERMS OF INTELLIGENCE.

And this is confirmed with the covid, and these western hicks 'WHO TRY TO STOP NATURE'.

THE WESTERNER IS THE ULTIMATE IN DEPRAVITY; YOU CAN'T GET ANY LOWER.

That the Westerner HAS ADHERED 'to this Jewish ethic' IS 'ANOTHER THING', WHICH SHOWS 'HOW LITTLE VIABILITY THIS PEOPLE OF THE WEST HAD'.

No viable people would have adhered 'to the Jewish Ethic' 'if they WERE NOT ALREADY DESTROYED INTERNALLY'. The fact that they have not been able to CREATE ELITES since that time 'IS ANOTHER PROOF'.

From A Courtship after Marriage: Sexuality and Love in Mexican Transnational Families by Jennifer Hirsch:

“Habermas, DESCRIBES AS THE “PROJECT OF MODERNITY”:

“THE SCIENTIFIC DOMINATION OF NATURE PROMISED FREEDOM FROM SCARCITY, WANT, AND THE ARBITRARINESS OF NATURAL CALAMITY.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF RATIONAL FORMS OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION AND RATIONAL MODES OF THOUGHT PROMISED LIBERATION from the irrationalities of myth, religion, superstition, release from the arbitrary use of power as well as from the dark side of our own human natures.

Only through such a project could the universal, eternal, and the immutable qualities of all humanity be revealed.

Enlightenment thought ... embraced the idea of progress, and actively sought that break with history and tradition which modernity espouses.

It was, above all, a secular movement that sought the demystification and desacralization of knowledge and social organization in order to liberate human beings from their chains.””

If you have a ruling class, which deals WITH KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION.

WHY CHANGE THIS?

UNLESS YOU WANT TO 'BECOME THE RULER' INSTEAD OF THE RULER; “WHICH IS THE TRUE PROJECT OF MODERNITY” ... OF DEMOCRACY. 'THE POWER TO THE MANY'. NIHILISM, THROUGH THE ABANDONMENT 'OF THE SOCIAL PROJECT' AKA 'THE JEWISH ETHICS'.

But can the general public understand how the PCR Test WORKS, why it is unsuitable 'for testing diseases'?

Can the people understand 'that a virus can't be stopped', 'because humans ARE MOBILE BEINGS'?

Is the majority of the people able to understand 'that this mask that they wear IS USELESS'?

That vaccines WILL BE USELESS to stop this virus, 'BECAUSE HUMAN NATURE AS NATURE IS ORGANIC AND NOT ROBOTIC'. YOU CANNOT ANTICIPATE/ORGANIZE NATURE.

It is the OLD DREAM OF THE JEW and HIS HATRED OF THE PAGAN, TAKEN UP 'BY THAT IDIOT CHRISTIAN IN THE WEST'.

… NO, AGAINST ALL THIS, THE CHRISTIAN ETHIC OF MONOTHEISM “REBELS”; AGAINST NATURE … AGAINST LIFE. “EVERYTHING MUST BE CONTROLLED”, “AND ALL THE TIME”.

Nietzsche was right:

“Christianity is a revolt of all creatures that creep on the ground against everything that is lofty: the gospel of the “lowly” lowers....”

It happened in history, 'A REVOLT OF THE PEOPLE AGAINST THE TRUE ELITE', and who decided “to take in hand their destiny”. Except that 'this project 'DESTROYS EVERYTHING' that is ALIVE', and behind, IT IS THE GOAL; 'TO DESTROY LIFE'.

Who in his right mind WOULD HAVE STOPPED LIFE for months in order to stop nature.

THE OLD HATRED OF THE JEW, THEN 'OF THE CHRISTIAN' 'FOR EVERYTHING THAT IS ALIVE', EVERYTHING 'THAT IS INCARNATED' ... AND INSTEAD 'TO PREFER THE INTELLECT'.

THIS PEOPLE ARE UNABLE TO ORIENT THEMSELVES. Further on ... THIS PEOPLE have NO INTERNAL CONNECTION, 'NO CONNECTION WITH NATURE', NO CONNECTION WITH ANIMALS. THEY SEE THEMSELVES AS 'SUPERIOR' TO OTHER ANIMALS, TO NATURE'.

THEY WANDER; 'THE WANDERING JEW' … IN THE WEST 'IT IS THE CHRISTIAN'.

... Deep Connection which “Would allow them to have Deep Thoughts”, BUT ONLY HAVE THE INTELLECT 'TO RELY ON'.

IT IS THIS ESTABLISHED ORDER; OF THE TRADITION, THAT THE MODERNITY ATTACKED BY THE CHRISTIANISM 'HAS TRIED TO ERASE', 'UNTIL THE CURRENT TOTAL IMPLOSION OF THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

NOTHING 'WILL REMAIN OF THIS CONTINENT'. 'NOTHING'. 'OF THIS WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

WHICH 'ASKS FOR DEATH'.

'THIS IS WHAT THE JEW DEMANDS', BUT THE WESTERNER 'HAS ACCEPTED HIS THOUGHT'. 'HE IS AS MUCH A JEW AS THE JEW'.

AND AS THIS CONTINENT DOES NOT WANT TO RETURN TO THE TRADITION, “AND TO ADMIT ITS ERROR”; 'IT WILL PREFER TO COMMIT' SUICIDE RATHER 'THAN TO SURVIVE'.

THE WESTERN CONTINENT IS 'NOW TO FLEE', FOR THE 'ENTERPRISING' YOUNG GENERATIONS OF THE WEST.

THEY HAVE 'TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE', 'WHERE LIFE CAN TAKE'.

THE “MONOTHEISTIC” VIRUS 'HAS COME TO THE WEST'. IT IS NOW NECESSARY THAT THE BRAVEST LEAVE 'THIS CONTINENT', AND CONTINUE 'TO SPREAD' THE TRADITION 'IN ITS WESTERN FORM', WHICH EXISTED BEFORE 'IT WAS RAVAGED BY MONOTHEISM'.

THIS UNBEARABLE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC.

From A Freethinker's Primer of Male Love by John Lauritsen:

“In classical antiquity, sex between males was just that, sex between males; then, with the intrusion of Judeo-Christian morality, it became an abomination and a sin. With the desacralization of the penal code it became a crime (sodomy, buggery, unnatural lewdness, indecency, etc.).

Under the Medical and Minority Models it became a sickness and then a forme of deviance — which is precisely what is implied by the word “queer”.

The gay movement has lost its bearings: mired down in identity politics, masochistically committed to the cult of victimhood, and futilely striving for a simulacrum of respectability (for example “gay marriages”).”

QUEERS and all those who claim to be “different” HAVE BEEN OSTRACIZED BY THE “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT”, IN ANTIQUITY 'THEY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT “THOSE DIFFERENCES”'.

I'm not sure that this public now struggling not to be ostracized understand that THIS PURITANICAL JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT 'IS PRECISELY THAT WHICH OSTRACIZES THEM'. OR THAT THEY 'WANT TO UNDERSTAND', 'FAR TOO COILED UP “IN THEIR MASOCHISTIC CULT OF VICTIM”'.

THE CULT OF THE VICTIM IS PRECISELY DICTATED BY THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC. 'AS SOON AS YOU WANT TO CREATE A PERFECT SOCIETY', 'YOU ARE OBLIGED TO DESTROY THE ORGANIC SOCIETY'.

AND IT IS FROM THIS HORROR OF THE ORGANIC MODEL, 'OF BIOLOGY', OF LIFE, 'THAT THE MONOTHEIST HAS'.

'THIS HATRED OF THE LIVING', 'THIS HATRED OF NATURE'. 'NATURE THAT THEY SEEK TO DESTROY' 'BY THE ECOLOGIST MOVEMENT' applying Global Solutions.

THIS JEW ... THIS CHRISTIAN CANNOT STAND BEING 'AT THE MERCY OF THE ELEMENTS'. HENCE THE NEED TO TO BREAK AWAY 'WITH ANTIQUITY'. THE NEED 'TO TO BREAK AWAY WITH HIERARCHY'–'WITH POWER', 'AND THE CLASS MODEL'.

AND YET, TO TAKE THE EXAMPLE OF HOMOSEXUALS, “THEY CAN ONLY BE STRONG” IF THEY RESPECT “THEIR CLASS OF HOMOSEXUALS”.

THEY LOSE ALL THEIR POWER, THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT EQUALITY FOR ALL'. THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT TO BE EQUAL TO HETEROSEXUALS'.

OBVIOUSLY 'THERE WILL ALWAYS BE HETEROSEXUALS', SO THIS FEELING OF REJECTION TOWARDS HOMOSEXUALS 'WILL ALWAYS BE THERE'.

MONOTHEISM SEEKS TO RESOLVE ALL CONFLICTS, 'TO PACIFY ALL TIME'.

'LOOK AT THE JEWS', 'THEY ARE OBSESSED BY THIS', and do not understand that “like the homosexuals”, 'they do the opposite of what they should do'. Hence the reason for their systematic expulsion FROM ALMOST EVERYWHERE HISTORICALLY, BECAUSE THERE IS NO MORE INORGANIC PEOPLE THAN THEM.

THE MONOTHEIST “WANTS AN UNATTAINABLE PROJECT”; 'PEACE OF THE WORLD' WHERE THE ESOTERIC TEXTS SPEAK OF 'PEACE WITHIN'.

That's why 'I say THAT THIS IDIOT, FROM THE CHRISTIAN TO THE JEW' 'HAVE NEVER UNDERSTOOD ANYTHING ABOUT ESOTERICISM'. They don't get the Old and New Testament, they don't understand 'what is esoterically written 'in it'. They don't get Unity, they whom they awkwardly call 'God'.

IN SHORT, they don't understand 'ANYTHING', and 'destroy this world'.

PEACE IS AN 'ESOTERIC PROJECT'. It's giving up the ego. Christ means death: coffin (qrsw),

bury (qrs). The 'DEATH OF THE EGO' and 'THEREFORE OF THE INTELLECT'. The Monotheists DON'T WANT THIS, INVENT 'HISTORICAL FABLES'.

To awaken is 'to awaken INTERNALLY'.

THE MONOTHEIST, THE JEW...THE CHRISTIAN SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', 'BECAUSE HE IS UNABLE TO FIND CALM-PEACE 'WITHIN HIMSELF'.

'HE DOES NOT FIND THIS CALM'; 'HE THEREFORE PERPETUALLY PROJECTS 'WARS' IT ON THE OUTSIDE'; ONTO A 'POLITICAL WORLD'. THROUGH MORE INTELLECT 'GAMES', 'WITH MORE PROBLEM CREATIONS'.

AND THE MORE HE SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', THROUGH THE WEST 'AND ITS RAYS OF ACTION'; THE MORE 'HE WILL DESTABILIZE THIS WORLD'.

AND I BET THAT THE 'THIRD WORLD WAR' WILL BE AGAINST 'MONOTHEISM'. It was already 'More or Less' Latent 'WITH THE SECOND WORLD WAR'. AND THAT IT WILL BE ASIA AGAINST 'THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT'. ASIA THAT 'HAS NO DESIRE TO SUCCUMB TO THIS MORIBUND JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC'. AND THIS ASIA WHICH IS “GROWING DAY BY DAY”. THIS FORESHADOWS THE OUTCOME OF THE CONFLICT.

CHRISTIANISM HAS DESTROYED EVERYTHING IN ITS PATH:

  • CASTE SYSTEM, PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM, FAMILY, TRIBES, PAGANISM. BUT IN DESTROYING 'ALL THIS':

IT HAS LEFT THE 'WHOLE WORLD' 'WITHOUT SUPPORT'. WITHOUT THE GROUP: ESSENTIAL 'CORE TO LIFE'.

IT HAS 'SUPPLANTED THIS' 'BY THE EGALITARIAN TOTALITARIAN MODEL'.

THE WESTERN FAMILY 'UNIT'; 'THE NUCLEAR FAMILY' HAS SUCCUMBED TO THE NUMBER OF DIVORCES, 'TO ITS UNREALISTIC NATURE'.

THESE CHRISTIAN STORIES 'WILL END BADLY'.

BY DINT OF PISSING OFF ALL THE TEMPERS, IT WILL CREATE THIS THIRD WORLD WAR.

WHICH IF PROJECTED, WILL BE GIGANTIC IN ITS MAGNITUDE MUCH MORE THAN THE TWO PREVIOUS ONES.

THIS CHRISTIAN ETHIC 'LEADS TO THAT'; TO DESTRUCTION.

THE WEST AND THE WESTERNER 'WILL PAY DEARLY FOR HIS AFFRONT TO NATURE'.

THE CHRISTIAN-JEW IS REALLY 'THE MOST VILE THING' 'THERE IS'. HE'S THE ACTUAL 'FIGURE OF REBELLION AGAINST NATURE'. BEYOND THAT ... IT'S THE DOMINATION OF THE INTELLECT 'OVER THE DAILY LIFE OF THE PEOPLE; A DOMINATION SOLD 'AS A LIBERATION'.

BUT WESTERNERS DON'T KNOW THAT, DON'T UNDERSTAND IT ... EXCEPT THAT THIS LIBERATION IS 'THE ONE ON THE MATTER' ... 'AND THAT IN THE END', “IT MEANS NOTHING”. “FOR YOU HAVE REALLY DOMINATED NOTHING”. YOU DESTROY YOURSELVES, YOU KNOW IT, BUT YOU ARE TOO MORBID 'TO GO BACK'.

IT IS THUS A 'FALSE DOMINATION' 'THAT IT IS ABOUT'. A DOMINATION “OF THE DEMOS” ... 'SOLD AS PROGRESS AND LIBERATION'.

EXCEPT THAT THE INTELLECT IS PRECISELY 'WHAT ONE MUST GET RID OF IN ORDER TO REACH AWAKENING'. AND THAT THE CHRISTIAN WESTERNERS 'HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT FAVOR IT SINCE THEY ARRIVED'.

THAT THE WESTERNERS CONTINUE 'THEIR WORK OF DESTRUCTION OF THE WORLD'. 'WORLD WHICH IN 'ITS TURN WILL DESTROY THEM''.

APPARENTLY, IT WILL TAKE 'A NEW CIVILIZATION TO UNDERSTAND THAT'.

Catholic Inquisition &: “Modernity” #Inquisition #Catholic-Inquisition #Catholicism #Christianism #Modernity #Christianity #west #Tatischeff #Jacques-Tati #Tati #Esotericism #Esoterism #Esoteric

https://bittube.tv/post/ead075a9-06ea-4bc7-8a60-c06da766c0e4 https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/Catholic-Inquisition-----Modernity-:6 https://tube.midov.pl/w/gfr1wAqfoXLtrvBnfp25Si https://www.bitchute.com/video/WPB043O1FPem/

All the platforms I Am on: https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s

▶ BITCOIN 34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH ▶ ETHEREUM 0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457 ▶ FINEARTAMERICA https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/periodicreset-ofcivilizations ▶ TEESPRING https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com ▶ ZAZZLE https://www.zazzle.com/store/periodic_reset/products

Queers homos and 'modernity': Exasperation of Judeo-Christian Ethics.

“Paganism is the true science. Jews have problem thriving in a NATURAL WORLD [...].”

There is a statistic I like to repeat:

The Jewish problem 0.2% World Population/20% of the Nobel prizes. When you understand THIS STATISTIC, you understand 'THE WORLD PROBLEM'.

“No one is safe until everyone is safe”, you can read 'ALL OVER THE PLACE' among the 'Covid Vaccination Promoters'.

This is the Judeo-Christian ethic of 'CONTROL OVER NATURE', originally driven by the 'JEWISH RELIGION'. THE CONTROL OF NATURE IS OF COURSE AN ILLUSION.

“For God's sake, BROTHERS, get vaccinated.”

Brothers?

Are we all brothers?

BY VIRTUE OF WHAT?

This judeo-christian ethic IS UNBEARABLE. NO, WE ARE NOT BROTHERS. BROTHERHOOD 'HAS NEVER EXISTED' WITHIN HUMANITY: 'THIS COLLECTIVIST CONCEPT IS TO BE VOMITED'.

THE HUMAN BEING IS UNIQUE 'IN HIS ESSENCE'.

If one day “You Awaken”; you will find yourself 'on the other side of the mind' “CONTEMPLATING THE MIND”, and you will understand “THAT DUALITY IS AN ILLUSION”.

BUT UNITY DOES NOT MEAN COLLECTIVISM, IT'S THE OPPOSITE.

THIS COLLECTIVIST INSANITY has given us all the socialisms and even their application... COMMUNISM.

NO WE ARE NOT BROTHERS.

From Swami Abhayananda:

“[...] in the following “Great Exposition” attributed to the gnostic, Simon Magus of Samaria, who was a contemporary of the Christian apostle, Peter, this mystically perceived duality-in-Unity is magnificently explained:

“There are two aspects of the One. The first of these is the Higher, the Divine Mind of the universe, which governs all things, and is masculine. The other is the lower, the Thought (epinoia) which produces all things, and is feminine. As a pair united, they comprise all that exists.

The Divine Mind is the Father who sustains all things and nourishes all that begins and ends. He is the One who eternally stands, without beginning or end. He exists entirely alone; for, while the Thought arising from Unity, and coming forth from the Divine Mind, creates [the appearance of] duality, the Father remains a Unity. The Thought is in Himself, and so He is alone. Made manifest to Himself from Himself, He appears to be two. He becomes “Father” by virtue of being called so by His own Thought.

Since He, Himself, brought forward Himself, by means of Himself, manifesting to Himself His own Thought, it is not correct to attribute creation to the Thought alone. For She (the Thought) conceals the Father within Herself; the Divine Mind and the Thought are intertwined. Thus, though [they appear] to be a pair, one opposite the other, the Divine Mind is in no way different from the Thought, inasmuch as they are one.

Though there appears to be a Higher, the Mind, and a lower, the Thought, truly, It is a Unity, just as what is manifested from these two [that is, the universe] is a unity, while appearing to be a duality. The Divine Mind and the Thought are discernible, one from the other, but they are one, though they appear to be two.””

It has been said for hundreds of years, the Christian and the Judeo-Christian ethic IS THE LOWEST IN TERMS OF INTELLIGENCE.

And this is confirmed with the covid, and these western hicks 'WHO TRY TO STOP NATURE'.

THE WESTERNER IS THE ULTIMATE IN DEPRAVITY; YOU CAN'T GET ANY LOWER.

That the Westerner HAS ADHERED 'to this Jewish ethic' IS 'ANOTHER THING', WHICH SHOWS 'HOW LITTLE VIABILITY THIS PEOPLE OF THE WEST HAD'.

No viable people would have adhered 'to the Jewish Ethic' 'if they WERE NOT ALREADY DESTROYED INTERNALLY'. The fact that they have not been able to CREATE ELITES since that time 'IS ANOTHER PROOF'.

From A Courtship after Marriage: Sexuality and Love in Mexican Transnational Families by Jennifer Hirsch:

“Habermas, DESCRIBES AS THE “PROJECT OF MODERNITY”:

“THE SCIENTIFIC DOMINATION OF NATURE PROMISED FREEDOM FROM SCARCITY, WANT, AND THE ARBITRARINESS OF NATURAL CALAMITY.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF RATIONAL FORMS OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION AND RATIONAL MODES OF THOUGHT PROMISED LIBERATION from the irrationalities of myth, religion, superstition, release from the arbitrary use of power as well as from the dark side of our own human natures.

Only through such a project could the universal, eternal, and the immutable qualities of all humanity be revealed.

Enlightenment thought ... embraced the idea of progress, and actively sought that break with history and tradition which modernity espouses.

It was, above all, a secular movement that sought the demystification and desacralization of knowledge and social organization in order to liberate human beings from their chains.””

If you have a ruling class, which deals WITH KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION.

WHY CHANGE THIS?

UNLESS YOU WANT TO 'BECOME THE RULER' INSTEAD OF THE RULER; “WHICH IS THE TRUE PROJECT OF MODERNITY” ... OF DEMOCRACY. 'THE POWER TO THE MANY'. NIHILISM, THROUGH THE ABANDONMENT 'OF THE SOCIAL PROJECT' AKA 'THE JEWISH ETHICS'.

But can the general public understand how the PCR Test WORKS, why it is unsuitable 'for testing diseases'?

Can the people understand 'that a virus can't be stopped', 'because humans ARE MOBILE BEINGS'?

Is the majority of the people able to understand 'that this mask that they wear IS USELESS'?

That vaccines WILL BE USELESS to stop this virus, 'BECAUSE HUMAN NATURE AS NATURE IS ORGANIC AND NOT ROBOTIC'. YOU CANNOT ANTICIPATE/ORGANIZE NATURE.

It is the OLD DREAM OF THE JEW and HIS HATRED OF THE PAGAN, TAKEN UP 'BY THAT IDIOT CHRISTIAN IN THE WEST'.

… NO, AGAINST ALL THIS, THE CHRISTIAN ETHIC OF MONOTHEISM “REBELS”; AGAINST NATURE … AGAINST LIFE. “EVERYTHING MUST BE CONTROLLED”, “AND ALL THE TIME”.

Nietzsche was right:

“Christianity is a revolt of all creatures that creep on the ground against everything that is lofty: the gospel of the “lowly” lowers....”

It happened in history, 'A REVOLT OF THE PEOPLE AGAINST THE TRUE ELITE', and who decided “to take in hand their destiny”. Except that 'this project 'DESTROYS EVERYTHING' that is ALIVE', and behind, IT IS THE GOAL; 'TO DESTROY LIFE'.

Who in his right mind WOULD HAVE STOPPED LIFE for months in order to stop nature.

THE OLD HATRED OF THE JEW, THEN 'OF THE CHRISTIAN' 'FOR EVERYTHING THAT IS ALIVE', EVERYTHING 'THAT IS INCARNATED' ... AND INSTEAD 'TO PREFER THE INTELLECT'.

THIS PEOPLE ARE UNABLE TO ORIENT THEMSELVES. Further on ... THIS PEOPLE have NO INTERNAL CONNECTION, 'NO CONNECTION WITH NATURE', NO CONNECTION WITH ANIMALS. THEY SEE THEMSELVES AS 'SUPERIOR' TO OTHER ANIMALS, TO NATURE'.

THEY WANDER; 'THE WANDERING JEW' … IN THE WEST 'IT IS THE CHRISTIAN'.

... Deep Connection which “Would allow them to have Deep Thoughts”, BUT ONLY HAVE THE INTELLECT 'TO RELY ON'.

IT IS THIS ESTABLISHED ORDER; OF THE TRADITION, THAT THE MODERNITY ATTACKED BY THE CHRISTIANISM 'HAS TRIED TO ERASE', 'UNTIL THE CURRENT TOTAL IMPLOSION OF THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

NOTHING 'WILL REMAIN OF THIS CONTINENT'. 'NOTHING'. 'OF THIS WESTERN CIVILIZATION'.

WHICH 'ASKS FOR DEATH'.

'THIS IS WHAT THE JEW DEMANDS', BUT THE WESTERNER 'HAS ACCEPTED HIS THOUGHT'. 'HE IS AS MUCH A JEW AS THE JEW'.

AND AS THIS CONTINENT DOES NOT WANT TO RETURN TO THE TRADITION, “AND TO ADMIT ITS ERROR”; 'IT WILL PREFER TO COMMIT' SUICIDE RATHER 'THAN TO SURVIVE'.

THE WESTERN CONTINENT IS 'NOW TO FLEE', FOR THE 'ENTERPRISING' YOUNG GENERATIONS OF THE WEST.

THEY HAVE 'TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE', 'WHERE LIFE CAN TAKE'.

THE “MONOTHEISTIC” VIRUS 'HAS COME TO THE WEST'. IT IS NOW NECESSARY THAT THE BRAVEST LEAVE 'THIS CONTINENT', AND CONTINUE 'TO SPREAD' THE TRADITION 'IN ITS WESTERN FORM', WHICH EXISTED BEFORE 'IT WAS RAVAGED BY MONOTHEISM'.

THIS UNBEARABLE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC.

From A Freethinker's Primer of Male Love by John Lauritsen:

“In classical antiquity, sex between males was just that, sex between males; then, with the intrusion of Judeo-Christian morality, it became an abomination and a sin. With the desacralization of the penal code it became a crime (sodomy, buggery, unnatural lewdness, indecency, etc.).

Under the Medical and Minority Models it became a sickness and then a forme of deviance — which is precisely what is implied by the word “queer”.

The gay movement has lost its bearings: mired down in identity politics, masochistically committed to the cult of victimhood, and futilely striving for a simulacrum of respectability (for example “gay marriages”).”

QUEERS and all those who claim to be “different” HAVE BEEN OSTRACIZED BY THE “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT”, IN ANTIQUITY 'THEY DIDN'T CARE ABOUT “THOSE DIFFERENCES”'.

I'm not sure that this public now struggling not to be ostracized understand that THIS PURITANICAL JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT 'IS PRECISELY THAT WHICH OSTRACIZES THEM'. OR THAT THEY 'WANT TO UNDERSTAND', 'FAR TOO COILED UP “IN THEIR MASOCHISTIC CULT OF VICTIM”'.

THE CULT OF THE VICTIM IS PRECISELY DICTATED BY THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC. 'AS SOON AS YOU WANT TO CREATE A PERFECT SOCIETY', 'YOU ARE OBLIGED TO DESTROY THE ORGANIC SOCIETY'.

AND IT IS FROM THIS HORROR OF THE ORGANIC MODEL, 'OF BIOLOGY', OF LIFE, 'THAT THE MONOTHEIST HAS'.

'THIS HATRED OF THE LIVING', 'THIS HATRED OF NATURE'. 'NATURE THAT THEY SEEK TO DESTROY' 'BY THE ECOLOGIST MOVEMENT' applying Global Solutions.

THIS JEW ... THIS CHRISTIAN CANNOT STAND BEING 'AT THE MERCY OF THE ELEMENTS'. HENCE THE NEED TO TO BREAK AWAY 'WITH ANTIQUITY'. THE NEED 'TO TO BREAK AWAY WITH HIERARCHY'–'WITH POWER', 'AND THE CLASS MODEL'.

AND YET, TO TAKE THE EXAMPLE OF HOMOSEXUALS, “THEY CAN ONLY BE STRONG” IF THEY RESPECT “THEIR CLASS OF HOMOSEXUALS”.

THEY LOSE ALL THEIR POWER, THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT EQUALITY FOR ALL'. THE MOMENT 'THEY WANT TO BE EQUAL TO HETEROSEXUALS'.

OBVIOUSLY 'THERE WILL ALWAYS BE HETEROSEXUALS', SO THIS FEELING OF REJECTION TOWARDS HOMOSEXUALS 'WILL ALWAYS BE THERE'.

MONOTHEISM SEEKS TO RESOLVE ALL CONFLICTS, 'TO PACIFY ALL TIME'.

'LOOK AT THE JEWS', 'THEY ARE OBSESSED BY THIS', and do not understand that “like the homosexuals”, 'they do the opposite of what they should do'. Hence the reason for their systematic expulsion FROM ALMOST EVERYWHERE HISTORICALLY, BECAUSE THERE IS NO MORE INORGANIC PEOPLE THAN THEM.

THE MONOTHEIST “WANTS AN UNATTAINABLE PROJECT”; 'PEACE OF THE WORLD' WHERE THE ESOTERIC TEXTS SPEAK OF 'PEACE WITHIN'.

That's why 'I say THAT THIS IDIOT, FROM THE CHRISTIAN TO THE JEW' 'HAVE NEVER UNDERSTOOD ANYTHING ABOUT ESOTERICISM'. They don't get the Old and New Testament, they don't understand 'what is esoterically written 'in it'. They don't get Unity, they whom they awkwardly call 'God'.

IN SHORT, they don't understand 'ANYTHING', and 'destroy this world'.

PEACE IS AN 'ESOTERIC PROJECT'. It's giving up the ego. Christ means death: coffin (qrsw),

bury (qrs). The 'DEATH OF THE EGO' and 'THEREFORE OF THE INTELLECT'. The Monotheists DON'T WANT THIS, INVENT 'HISTORICAL FABLES'.

To awaken is 'to awaken INTERNALLY'.

THE MONOTHEIST, THE JEW...THE CHRISTIAN SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', 'BECAUSE HE IS UNABLE TO FIND CALM-PEACE 'WITHIN HIMSELF'.

'HE DOES NOT FIND THIS CALM'; 'HE THEREFORE PERPETUALLY PROJECTS 'WARS' IT ON THE OUTSIDE'; ONTO A 'POLITICAL WORLD'. THROUGH MORE INTELLECT 'GAMES', 'WITH MORE PROBLEM CREATIONS'.

AND THE MORE HE SEEKS 'TO PACIFY THE WORLD', THROUGH THE WEST 'AND ITS RAYS OF ACTION'; THE MORE 'HE WILL DESTABILIZE THIS WORLD'.

AND I BET THAT THE 'THIRD WORLD WAR' WILL BE AGAINST 'MONOTHEISM'. It was already 'More or Less' Latent 'WITH THE SECOND WORLD WAR'. AND THAT IT WILL BE ASIA AGAINST 'THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THOUGHT'. ASIA THAT 'HAS NO DESIRE TO SUCCUMB TO THIS MORIBUND JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC'. AND THIS ASIA WHICH IS “GROWING DAY BY DAY”. THIS FORESHADOWS THE OUTCOME OF THE CONFLICT.

CHRISTIANISM HAS DESTROYED EVERYTHING IN ITS PATH:

  • CASTE SYSTEM, PATRIARCHAL SYSTEM, FAMILY, TRIBES, PAGANISM. BUT IN DESTROYING 'ALL THIS':

IT HAS LEFT THE 'WHOLE WORLD' 'WITHOUT SUPPORT'. WITHOUT THE GROUP: ESSENTIAL 'CORE TO LIFE'.

IT HAS 'SUPPLANTED THIS' 'BY THE EGALITARIAN TOTALITARIAN MODEL'.

THE WESTERN FAMILY 'UNIT'; 'THE NUCLEAR FAMILY' HAS SUCCUMBED TO THE NUMBER OF DIVORCES, 'TO ITS UNREALISTIC NATURE'.

THESE CHRISTIAN STORIES 'WILL END BADLY'.

BY DINT OF PISSING OFF ALL THE TEMPERS, IT WILL CREATE THIS THIRD WORLD WAR.

WHICH IF PROJECTED, WILL BE GIGANTIC IN ITS MAGNITUDE MUCH MORE THAN THE TWO PREVIOUS ONES.

THIS CHRISTIAN ETHIC 'LEADS TO THAT'; TO DESTRUCTION.

THE WEST AND THE WESTERNER 'WILL PAY DEARLY FOR HIS AFFRONT TO NATURE'.

THE CHRISTIAN-JEW IS REALLY 'THE MOST VILE THING' 'THERE IS'. HE'S THE ACTUAL 'FIGURE OF REBELLION AGAINST NATURE'. BEYOND THAT ... IT'S THE DOMINATION OF THE INTELLECT 'OVER THE DAILY LIFE OF THE PEOPLE; A DOMINATION SOLD 'AS A LIBERATION'.

BUT WESTERNERS DON'T KNOW THAT, DON'T UNDERSTAND IT ... EXCEPT THAT THIS LIBERATION IS 'THE ONE ON THE MATTER' ... 'AND THAT IN THE END', “IT MEANS NOTHING”. “FOR YOU HAVE REALLY DOMINATED NOTHING”. YOU DESTROY YOURSELVES, YOU KNOW IT, BUT YOU ARE TOO MORBID 'TO GO BACK'.

IT IS THUS A 'FALSE DOMINATION' 'THAT IT IS ABOUT'. A DOMINATION “OF THE DEMOS” ... 'SOLD AS PROGRESS AND LIBERATION'.

EXCEPT THAT THE INTELLECT IS PRECISELY 'WHAT ONE MUST GET RID OF IN ORDER TO REACH AWAKENING'. AND THAT THE CHRISTIAN WESTERNERS 'HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT FAVOR IT SINCE THEY ARRIVED'.

THAT THE WESTERNERS CONTINUE 'THEIR WORK OF DESTRUCTION OF THE WORLD'. 'WORLD WHICH IN 'ITS TURN WILL DESTROY THEM''.

APPARENTLY, IT WILL TAKE 'A NEW CIVILIZATION TO UNDERSTAND THAT'.

Queers homos and 'modernity': Exasperation of Judeo-Christian Ethics #Judeo-Christian_Ethics #modernity #Judeo-Christian #Ethics #Queers #homos #Esotericism #Esoterism