Title: The Misguided Path of Neo-Paganism and the Loss of Transcendence
Tags: #Evola #Traditionalism #NeoPaganism #Transcendence #AryanSpirituality #Christianity #ModernDegeneration

1. Transcending Christianity: The possibility of transcending Christianity lies not in denying it but in integrating it into a broader framework, aligning it with pre-Christian Aryan spirituality. This requires discerning its essential aspects while discarding those incompatible with the renewing forces of the modern world.
   
2. Neo-Paganism’s Trap: Modern neo-paganism has fallen into a trap, reducing itself to a naturalistic, particularistic, and pantheistic mysticism. This distorted view stems from a Christian misunderstanding of pre-Christian traditions and represents a degeneration of true Aryan spirituality.
   
3. Anti-Catholic Polemics: Many neo-pagans adopt anti-Catholic arguments rooted in modern rationalism, Protestantism, and Enlightenment thought. These arguments, often aligned with liberalism and democracy, betray a lack of understanding of true traditional values.
   
4. Immanence vs. Transcendence: Neo-paganism’s exaltation of immanence, “life,” and “nature” contradicts the Olympian and heroic ideals of ancient Aryan civilizations. True spirituality transcends the material world, a concept lost in modern neo-paganism.
   
5. Denial of the Supra-Sensible: The rejection of a supra-sensible world and the denial of the distinction between body and mind are signs of involution. Such views align with materialistic and anti-traditional thought, undermining the Aryan spirit’s connection to transcendence.
   
6. Misunderstanding of Asceticism: Neo-paganism rejects asceticism, failing to recognize its role in traditional Aryan spirituality. True mysticism involves a balance between the material and the spiritual, not a rejection of the latter.
   
7. Ritual and the Sacred: Ancient Aryan civilizations understood ritual as a bridge between human and supra-sensible forces. Modern neo-paganism dismisses this, reducing sacred practices to superstition or empty ceremony.
   
8. Misinterpretation of Nature: The neo-pagan glorification of “nature” is a rationalist construct, influenced by Enlightenment thought. This contrasts sharply with the traditional view of nature as a realm to be transcended through spiritual discipline.
   
9. Lutheranism and Semitisation: Lutheranism, far from awakening the Nordic spirit, contributed to its involution and Semitisation. This misunderstanding reflects a broader trend of misinterpreting historical movements through a modern lens.
   
10. The Choice Ahead: The modern world faces a clear choice: return to sacred traditions and spiritual origins or continue down the path of secularism and materialism. Only by reconnecting with true Aryan spirituality can the errors of neo-paganism and modernity be overcome.

OTHER “PAGAN” MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT WORLDVIEW

Once these points are established, the possibility of “transcending” certain aspects of Christianity becomes viable. Etymologically, “to transcend” means “to go beyond from above.” This does not imply a denial of Christianity or a repetition of the misunderstandings it historically displayed—and often still displays—toward “paganism.” Instead, it suggests integrating Christianity into a broader framework, potentially overlooking some of its elements that clash with the spirit of contemporary renewing forces, particularly in Germanic regions. The goal would be to emphasize more essential aspects of Christianity that align with the spiritual conceptions of pre- and non-Christian Aryan and Nordic-Aryan traditions.

Unfortunately, the path taken by extreme racialist neo-paganism has diverged significantly. These neo-pagans have, as if trapped, adopted a superficial, naturalistic paganism devoid of light and transcendence. This form of paganism is particularistic yet infused with a misguided pantheistic mysticism, shaped by Christian polemics against the pre-Christian world. At best, it reflects sporadic degenerations of that world. Compounding this, many neo-pagans engage in anti-Catholic polemics that echo modern, rationalist, and Protestant arguments, reminiscent of liberalism, democracy, and Freemasonry. Figures like Chamberlain and certain Italian racialist trends influenced by Gentile’s philosophy exemplify this, equating Fascism with anti-Catholicism and reducing Roman tradition to a rhetoric of rebellion and heresy, starting with figures like Giordano Bruno.

More broadly, neo-paganism’s exaltation of immanence, “life,” and “nature” contradicts the superior “Olympian” and “heroic” ideals of ancient Aryan civilizations. Statements such as “Faith in a supra-sensible world is schizophrenia” or the denial of the distinction between body and mind as an anti-Aryan, Orientaloid construct further illustrate this regression. By rejecting the soul’s immortality and reducing it to mere generational continuity, neo-paganism aligns itself with a materialistic worldview vulnerable to annihilation by natural disasters or epidemics.

Neo-paganism also displays a profound misunderstanding of asceticism, claiming that Aryans never practiced it and that their mysticism was solely focused on the “hither side.” This ignores the ritualistic and sacred character of ancient Aryan and Roman civilizations, where rites served as a bridge between human and supra-sensible forces, not as empty ceremonies. Chamberlain’s attribution of modern secular scientific inquiry to the Aryan spirit further distorts the traditional understanding of nature and knowledge.

The confusion deepens when neo-pagans, influenced by Enlightenment rationalism, exalt a constructed “nature” akin to the French Encyclopaedists’ myth of a benevolent, wise nature. This myth, tied to Rousseau’s optimism and natural law, has fueled universalism, humanitarianism, and egalitarianism, undermining traditional hierarchies and states. Similarly, modern natural sciences, focused on abstract uniformities, fail to grasp the sacred and symbolic understanding of nature held by traditional, solar man.

In light of these misconceptions, the choice becomes clear: either return to sacred and spiritual traditions or continue to indulge in the fragmented and secular tendencies of modern thought. Italian racism, having not yet fully ventured into these areas, should heed the lessons of others and avoid these pitfalls.

Metaphysical part:

At a certain stage of spiritual development, it becomes clear that the myths of the Mystery religions are allegories of the states of consciousness experienced by initiates on the path to self-realization. The deeds and adventures of mythical heroes are not mere poetry but real inner experiences, reflecting the actions of one’s inner being as they progress beyond ordinary human existence. These are not abstract allegories but lived realities. The philosophical or allegorical interpretation of myths remains superficial, akin to naturalistic or anthropomorphic readings. True understanding requires prior knowledge; otherwise, the “door” remains closed. This applies to the inner meaning of the Mithras myth as well.

The Mithraic mysteries are central to the Western magical tradition, embodying self-affirmation, light, greatness, and regal spirituality. This path rejects escapism, religious asceticism, self-mortification, humility, devotion, renunciation, and contemplative abstraction. It is a path of action, solar power, and spirituality, distinct from both Eastern universalism and Christian sentimentalism. Only a “man” can tread this path; a “woman” would be overwhelmed by its “taurine strength.” The radiant Mithraic halo, the hvareno, emerges from intense tension and crowns the “eagle” capable of staring at the Sun.

Mithras symbolizes those who follow this path. He is the primordial heavenly light, a “god born from a rock” (theos ek petras). Emerging from the riverbank, he frees himself from the mineral darkness using a sword and torch, tools from his time in the “mother’s womb.” This miraculous birth is witnessed only by “shepherds” on the “mountaintops.” These symbols represent the initiation phase, where the heavenly light, the light of the Word, is rekindled in the initiate. This spiritual birth occurs when one breaks free from the “god of this earth” and resists the chaotic “waters” of ordinary life, characterized by frenzied activity, greed, and transience.

The initiate is “rescued from the waters,” akin to Moses in Exodus, and “walks on water,” echoing Christ’s miracle. Such a being masters their cravings and deficiencies, learning to resist and transcend them. In contrast, those of the “sub-lunar world” remain trapped in cycles of death and reabsorption. Initiation is like crossing a river, leaving behind the miseries of ordinary life, battling the current, and reaching the opposite bank where a new spiritual being—Mithras, the Divine Child—is born.

The “rock” symbolizes the body, the substratum of cosmic yearning, dominated by the “wet principle.” Initiation requires freedom from this bodily limitation, achieving a consciousness no longer bound by physical constraints. The phrase theos ek petras also signifies the individuation and actualization of the spiritual element within the body. Magical initiation strengthens this nucleus of energy rather than dissolving it into cosmic flux. The spirit is immanent, needing elevation from the “rock” of human reality, which is divine by nature, not grace. Hence, Mithras is petrogenos, born from the Earth, not descended from Heaven.

The “nakedness” of the divine child symbolizes purity, autarchy, and detachment. In esoteric traditions, an impure will is one driven by external factors, unable to act independently. The pure will, symbolized by the “Virgin,” tramples the “Snake” and the “Moon” (symbols of the waters) and gives birth to the divine child through a “virginal conception.” This autozoon, a self-generated life beyond human contingency, arises from a purified will, free of all bonds. In Mithraic ritual, the soul’s uncontaminated purity generates a new nucleus beyond the waters, populating a world beyond human dimensions, space, and time.

Title: The Misunderstanding of Racist Neo-Paganism Tags: #Evola #Traditionalism #NeoPaganism #Racism #ChristianApologetics #AryanCivilization #SpiritualHierarchy #Symbolism #Initiation #Metaphysics

1. Misconstruction of Paganism by Christian Apologetics: The term “paganism” was constructed by early Christian apologetics as a derogatory label to discredit pre-Christian traditions, focusing on their decadent aspects rather than their original, sacred forms.
2. Neo-Paganism’s Paradox: Modern neo-pagan and racist movements often adopt this distorted view of paganism, perpetuating a false narrative that aligns with Christian polemics rather than the true essence of pre-Christian traditions.
3. Naturalism Misinterpreted: Contrary to the Christian portrayal, the Aryan and pre-Christian worldview was not naturalistic but symbolic-sacral, seeing nature as a manifestation of a higher, supra-sensitive reality.
4. Symbolic Understanding of Blood and Race: Ancient traditions understood blood and race not in a biological or superstitious sense but as carriers of supra-biological, spiritual elements, reflecting a deeper metaphysical knowledge.
5. Initiation and Mysteries: Pre-Christian civilizations, particularly Aryan ones, emphasized initiation and mysteries as paths to spiritual liberation and the reconquest of a primordial, Hyperborean state of being.
6. Healthy Dualism: The pagan worldview embraced a dualism that subordinated nature to a higher spiritual order, rejecting the notion of a purely naturalistic or deterministic existence.
7. Aspiration to Supernatural Freedom: The Aryan traditions sought metaphysical fulfillment and the realization of personality, transcending the material world through initiation and spiritual discipline.
8. Imperial Vocation and Sacred Hierarchy: The Aryan concept of empire was not merely political but metaphysical, reflecting a sacred hierarchy where the spiritual authority guided the temporal, as seen in Roman and Indo-Aryan traditions.
9. Critique of Neo-Pagan License: The idea of pagan “innocence” or license is a myth; even in primitive societies, life was governed by strict taboos, and the classical ideal was not the cult of the body but the dominance of spirit over matter.
10. Rectification of Historical Distortions: A proper understanding of pre-Christian traditions requires rejecting the polemical distortions of Christian apologetics and recognizing the sacred, hierarchical, and metaphysical dimensions of Aryan civilizations.

THE MISINTERPRETATION OF RACIST NEO-PAGANISM

The term paganus appears in ancient Latin writers, such as Livy, without any specific intent. However, from the rise of Christianity onward, paganus took on a derogatory meaning, used by early Christian apologists for polemical purposes. Derived from pagus (village or township), it came to signify something rustic, primitive, and uncultured. To elevate the new faith, Christian apologetics systematically distorted and denigrated pre-Christian doctrines, cults, and traditions, labeling them collectively as “paganism.”

Thus, “paganism” as constructed by Christian apologetics lacks true correspondence with historical reality, particularly the “normal” forms of pre-Christian, especially Aryan, civilizations. Ironically, many neo-pagan and anti-Christian nationalist and racist movements today base their ideologies on this distorted construct, effectively bringing it to life for the first time in history.

The predominant Christian portrayal of paganism includes several key features:
1. Naturalism: Paganism is depicted as ignoring transcendence, conflating spirit and nature, and divinizing natural phenomena or racial energies.
2. Particularism and Polytheism: It is characterized by earth- and blood-bound polytheism.
3. Absence of Personality and Freedom: Paganism is seen as a state of “innocence” or natural license, devoid of supernatural aspiration.
4. Superstition and Materialism: It is associated with superstition or a purely materialistic, fatalistic worldview.

Christianity, by contrast, is portrayed as introducing supernatural freedom, grace, and personality, along with a universal ideal that subordinates nature to a higher spiritual order.

However, this portrayal is inaccurate and one-sided. The non-Christian, particularly Aryan, world in its normal forms was not defined by superstitious naturalism but by a symbolic-sacral understanding of reality, where the material world reflected a supra-sensory dimension. Far from promoting license, pre-Christian civilizations embraced a healthy dualism, evident in Aryan-Iranian, Doric-Aryan, and Indo-Aryan traditions, which distinguished between the material and the transcendent.

Moreover, the aspiration to supernatural freedom and metaphysical fulfillment was central to pre-Christian Aryan civilizations, as seen in their mystery traditions and initiations. These often aimed at reclaiming a primordial, Hyperborean spirituality. The so-called “cult of the body” in paganism is a myth; even among so-called primitive societies, life was governed by rigid taboos, often stricter than those of organized religions.

Finally, the “pagan” world, particularly in its Aryan manifestations, exhibited a super-particularistic aspiration toward empire, rooted in a metaphysical vision of the state. This is evident in the Aryan-Iranian concept of the “king of kings,” the Indo-Aryan cakravartin, and the sacred aspects of the Roman Empire. Far from promoting statolatry or totalitarianism, these traditions upheld a hierarchical unity of spiritual and temporal authority, reflecting the sacred order of the “solar race.”

In summary, the neo-paganism embraced by extremist racist movements is based on a distorted construct of paganism, one that fails to reflect the true historical and spiritual richness of pre-Christian Aryan civilizations.

Metaphysical part:

The religious perspective can be succinctly defined as centered on the conception of the deity as a person (theism), characterized by an essential, ontological distance between this personal God and humanity, and thus by a transcendence that allows only relations of dependence, devotion, or mystical ecstasy, while maintaining the boundary between the human “I” and the divine “You.” In contrast, initiation is premised on the removal of this boundary, replacing it with the principle of “supreme identity,” which corresponds to a supra-personal conception of the First Principle. Beyond the personal God lies the Unconditioned, a reality superior to both Being and non-Being, transcending any religious representation. In Hindu metaphysics and original Buddhism, for example, personal gods and celestial realms are acknowledged but are considered part of the conditioned realm, with the absolute lying beyond them. Similar conceptions are found in Neoplatonism, which is linked to the Greek Mysteries. This demonstrates the arbitrariness of indiscriminately using the term “religion” when discussing humanity's relation to the supra-human world.

From a practical standpoint, the metaphysical principle of identity shifts the focus from moral and devotional relations to those based on knowledge. The human condition is defined not by ontological distance but by “ignorance” or “oblivion.” This idea is echoed in high mysticism, such as in Meister Eckhart's assertion that man is God but does not know it, paralleling the Hindu concept of avidya (ignorance). Salvation or redemption is thus replaced by awakening, a metaphysical awareness of transcendence. The initiate's realization is characterized by “centrality,” opposing ecstasy with en-stasy, a reconvergence toward the center rather than an outward movement. Mysticism also recognizes the idea that the divine is found within, not outside, oneself.

The distinction between the religious and initiatory horizons is further clarified by the traditional esoteric doctrines, which differentiate between immortality and mere survival. In religious conceptions, the soul is inherently immortal, with its post-death state determined by moral criteria (heaven or hell). In contrast, esoteric doctrines view immortality as uncertain and problematic, with the alternative being survival or non-survival, particularly at the moment of a “second death.” True immortality, as a deconditioning of being, is an exceptional possibility and the aim of high initiation. This concept is evident in ancient Egyptian texts, the Old Testament, Greek traditions, and operative Taoism, where immortality is tied to initiatory conditions. The Tibetan Book of the Dead further elaborates on these ideas, presenting the phenomenology of post-death experiences and emphasizing the realization of the unconditioned over transient forms of existence.

The initiatory perspective also contrasts with exoteric religious views on the naturally immortal soul, often seen as a democratization and degradation of earlier esoteric teachings. For instance, in ancient Greece, the original conception of the “hero” was diluted over time. The Mystery traditions highlight the ontological distinction between initiation and religion, as seen in the Greek scandal over the idea that even a criminal could achieve a privileged post-death destiny through initiation, regardless of moral standing. This “transcendental realism” is reflected in the objective effectiveness of initiatory rites, which operate impersonally and independently of morality, akin to a craft.

The presence of moral precepts in initiatory traditions, such as yoga, does not negate the distinction between religion and initiation. In religion, moral laws are intrinsically imperative, often seen as divine or absolute. In initiation, moral precepts are instrumental, serving as provisional means to create favorable conditions for transformation. This is illustrated by the Buddhist metaphor of the raft: moral precepts are tools to cross a river but are discarded once the goal is achieved. The relativity of moral precepts is evident in their social and transcendent applications, with their value determined by their effectiveness in achieving the initiatory goal. This instrumental approach allows for diverse paths, including the “Left-Hand Path” of Tantra and the “heroic path,” which may reject conventional moral and religious rules while pursuing the same ultimate end as the “Right-Hand Path.” Antinomianism, the rejection of religious norms, is often linked to esotericism and initiation, further underscoring the distinction between religious and initiatory perspectives.

Title: The Aryan Tradition as the Sole Foundation of True European Identity Tags: #AryanTradition #SacralHierarchy #NeoPaganism #AntiNeoPaganism #KshatriyaDharma #SolarImperialism #HyperboreanRestoration

“The Spirit of Europa is Eternal From Greenland to Russia… you have the Ancient Blood of Poets, Warriors, and Geniuses”

Me: no “European spirit” independent of the Aryan universalist tradition

For Evola:
– True European identity is an expression of the primordial Aryan tradition, rooted in sacrality, caste hierarchy, and the warrior-ascetic ideal.
– Neo-paganism, like all forms of modernist revivalism, is a degeneration—a sentimental, naturalistic distortion of Tradition.
– “European identity” outside the Indo-European metaphysical framework is inauthentic.

The Degeneration of Neo-Paganism
Neo-paganism is a modernist aberration, a sentimental regression into naturalism and particularism.

True European identity is inseparable from the Aryan universalist tradition, which is:
– Transcendent – Rejecting materialist fixation on blood or soil as ends in themselves. The Aryan cult of race was supra-biological, a vehicle for higher forces (for example, Roman gens rites, Vedic gotra).
– Hierarchical – Opposed to egalitarian tribalism. The Indo-European cakravartin and solar imperialism embodied sacral sovereignty, not primitive collectivism.
– Anti-Modern – The warrior-ascetic ideal (kshatriya-dharma, Mithraism) rejects hedonistic “natural innocence,” seeking liberation (moksha) through discipline.

Christianity’s polemical “paganism” (naturalism, amorality, tribalism) is not the Aryan tradition. Neo-pagans perpetuate this distortion, mistaking decadence for Tradition.

The Only Path:
Restoration of the Hyperborean-Uralic cycle—solar, virile, and aristocratic—against chthonic and democratic decline. All else is kali-yuga deviation.

The Aryan Tradition as the Sole Foundation of True European Identity
1. Primordial Aryan Supremacy
European identity is valid only as an expression of the Indo-European metaphysical framework—rooted in transcendent hierarchy, not racial or geographic sentimentalism.
2. Rejection of Neo-Pagan Degeneration
Modern “pagan revivals” are modernist deviations, collapsing into naturalism, tribalism, and democratic primitivism—antithetical to the Aryan warrior-ascetic ideal.
3. Transcendence Over Materialism
The Aryan cult of race was supra-biological—blood as a vehicle for higher forces (Vedic gotra, Roman gens rites), never an end in itself.
4. Hierarchy Against Egalitarianism
True tradition demands sacred sovereignty (cakravartin, solar imperialism), rejecting tribal collectivism and egalitarian decay.
5. Anti-Modern Asceticism
The kshatriya-dharma and Mithraic disciplines exemplify liberation through conquest of weakness, not hedonistic “natural innocence.”
6. Christian Polemical Distortion
Christianity’s caricature of “paganism” (amorality, naturalism) is a lie—yet neo-pagans perpetuate it, mistaking decadence for tradition.
7. Hyperborean Restoration
Only the solar-uralic cycle—aristocratic, virile, and transcendent—can reverse the kali-yuga’s chthonic democratization.
8. False Paganism Exposed
Neo-pagan racialists unknowingly adopt Christianity’s fabricated “paganism,” a rustic, materialist parody alien to Aryan metaphysics.
9. Aryan Universalism
Indo-European empire (Rome, Vedic kingship) embodied sacred universalism, not tribal particularism.
10. Initiation or Oblivion
Tradition is restored through elite asceticism and sacred authority—all else is dissolution.

Metaphysical part:

The Misconception of Racist Neo-Paganism

Certain extremist racialist currents today mistakenly believe they have resolved the problem of tradition through neo-paganism—a position we once held but now reject.

The term paganism itself is a Christian polemical construct, derived from pagus (village), implying rusticity and primitivism. Early Christian apologetics systematically distorted pre-Christian traditions, reducing them to a caricature of decadence and naturalism. Ironically, many modern anti-Christian racialists unconsciously adopt this very caricature, perpetuating a false “paganism” that never truly existed.

The Christian portrayal of paganism includes:
1. Naturalism – Allegedly denying transcendence, reducing religion to superstition and deification of nature or race.
2. Particularism – A polytheism bound to earth and blood, lacking universalism.
3. Amorality – A state of “innocence” equated with license, devoid of true spiritual freedom.
4. Profane Materialism – A fatalistic worldview, contrasted with Christian “supernatural” liberation.

Yet historical Aryan traditions contradict this caricature:
– Symbolism, Not Superstition – Pre-Christian civilizations saw nature not as an object of worship but as a manifestation of higher realities.
– Supra-Biological Knowledge – Ancient racial cults (for example, Roman gens traditions) understood blood as a vehicle for transcendent forces.
– Initiation & Liberation – Mystery traditions sought metaphysical freedom (for example, mukti in Hinduism, Iranian dualism, the Aryan “second birth”).
– Sacral Empire – The Indo-European imperial idea (for example, cakravartin, Roman solar imperialism) reflected a universalist, hierarchical vision, not mere tribalism.
– Spiritual Authority – The unity of temporal and spiritual power was hierarchical, not chaotic, opposing modern statolatry.

Thus, neo-pagan racialists risk actualizing a distorted, historically nonexistent paganism—one invented by Christianity itself. True tradition lies not in regression to a fabricated naturalism but in the restoration of sacred, hierarchical order.