periodic reset of civilizations

AntiModernity

Lunar spirituality is regressive, sub-terranean, and chthonic—bound to the forces of dissolution, chaos, and the telluric (earthly) abyss. It is the spirituality of the feminine, the matriarchal, and the democratic masses, fostering weakness, emotionalism, and surrender to the baser instincts.

To grasp the decadence of Zionism—a pure expression of modernity—one must analyze it metaphysically, not materially. This is not about religion but forces, for metaphysics transcends the material.

Zionism is nothing but Modernity—in other words, “the West”—and Israel is merely Modernity’s Middle Eastern outpost.

A materialist might claim: “Israel is a Rothschild construct.” But such an analysis is sterile. Material forces only amplify materialist masses. Do not mistake the battle.

Israel is a manifestation of decadent modernity. To resist it, one must reject the modern world entirely—its democratic delusions, its rootless cosmopolitanism, its defiance of sacred hierarchy. The conflict is metaphysical: Tradition against dissolution. Only by restoring a true imperial, aristocratic, and sacred order can modernity—whether Zionism, liberalism, or globalism—be vanquished.

Title: The Metaphysical War Against Zionism and Modern Decadence
Tags: #Zionism #Tradition #Metaphysics #AntiModernity #ImperialOrder

  1. Zionism as Modernity’s Outpost – Israel is not merely a political entity but a manifestation of the modern world’s decay, an extension of the West’s rootless, democratic sickness.
  2. Hamas and the Illusion of Modernity – Just as al-Qaeda shattered America’s false sense of security, Hamas exposes the artificiality of the Zionist construct—not through material struggle, but as a metaphysical revelation.
  3. Beyond Materialist Analysis – Reducing Zionism to “Rothschild influence” is sterile. The battle is not economic but spiritual—a clash between Tradition and dissolution.
  4. The Failure of Christianity – Western religiosity, bound to moralism and the “humanized God,” lacks transcendent force. Only a return to pre-Christian esotericism (the Impersonal, the One) can counter modernity.
  5. Nietzsche’s Incomplete Revelation – The “death of God” was merely the death of the moral deity. The true metaphysical principle—beyond good and evil—remains, as seen in Hindu, Buddhist, and Neoplatonic traditions.
  6. Dissolution as Initiation – The collapse of modernity is a trial for the superior man, separating those shackled to materialism from those awakening to transcendent order.
  7. Rejecting the Modern in Totality – No compromise with democracy, egalitarianism, or cosmopolitanism. Only the restoration of sacred hierarchy—Imperial, aristocratic—can defeat modernity’s forces.
  8. The God Beyond Morality – The crisis demands rediscovery of the metaphysical Absolute, not as faith but as immanent-transcendent reality—unshaken by nihilism.
  9. Chaos as Opportunity – For the differentiated man, disintegration is not defeat but a call to stand firm in the transcendent Self, turning collapse into awakening.
  10. Tradition or Annihilation – The final choice: submit to modernity’s entropy or reclaim the Imperium of the Spirit, where Zionism, liberalism, and globalism are swept aside by the eternal return of Order.

Metaphysical part:

The Crisis of Modernity and the Metaphysical Beyond

The crisis of the modern world manifests on both social and spiritual planes. Bourgeois society and civilization have reached their breaking point, while the process of “emancipation” has unfolded in two ways: first, as a purely destructive and regressive force, and second, as a trial of complete inner liberation for a differentiated human type.

A key factor in this dissolution has been the recognition that Western religiosity—particularly Christianity—remains bound to the “all too human,” lacking any real connection to transcendent values. Christianity, unlike other traditional forms, is fundamentally incomplete, missing an esoteric, metaphysical dimension beyond exoteric faith. Without this higher teaching, Christianity was vulnerable to the assaults of free thought, unlike traditions that preserved an inner doctrine beyond mere religion.

Nietzsche proclaimed the “death of God,” but this was only the death of the moral God—the personal deity shaped by human weakness and social values. Beyond this lies the true metaphysical God, a principle transcending good and evil, found in the great pre-Christian traditions. Hinduism speaks of Shiva’s divine dance; Buddhism teaches the identity of samsara and nirvana; Neoplatonism points to the impersonal One. Even within Christianity, marginal currents—such as Joachim de Flore’s “Age of the Spirit” or the Brethren of the Free Spirit—hinted at a higher freedom beyond moral law.

The modern West has lost these metaphysical horizons, reducing the sacred to mere morality and devotion. Yet the collapse of the moral God opens the possibility of rediscovering a higher, metaphysical essence—one untouched by nihilism. This is not a God of faith or belief but an immanent-transcendent reality, a dimension of pure Being beyond human categories.

For the superior man, dissolution becomes a test of strength. He does not flee into religion but anchors himself in the transcendent within, turning chaos into an opportunity for awakening. As Seneca observed, adversity reveals true power. The modern world’s collapse can thus serve as a catalyst for those capable of perceiving the higher order behind apparent disorder.

The true challenge is existential: to confront life’s negativity while rooted in metaphysical certainty. This is not Stoic hardening or Nietzschean will-to-power but the conscious activation of the transcendent principle within. Even in disintegration, moments of liberation arise—where chaos is peripheral, and the center remains inviolate.

The task, then, is not to lament the death of the moral God but to reclaim the God beyond good and evil—the absolute foundation of Tradition.

Title: Julius Evola's Critique of America and Modernity
Tags: #Evola #Traditionalism #AntiModernity #SpiritualDecline #Americanism #CritiqueOfMaterialism

America as a Symbol of Decadence

  1. America as a Symbol of Decadence: Evola viewed America as the epitome of a mechanized, materialistic civilization, devoid of spiritual depth and rooted in utilitarianism.
  2. Rejection of Modern Values: He saw America as the antithesis of traditional values, emphasizing progress, egalitarianism, and individualism—principles he considered corrosive to hierarchical and transcendent ideals.
  3. Critique of Modernity: Evola's disdain for America was part of his broader critique of modernity, which he saw as a decline from a sacred, ordered, and aristocratic past.
  4. Chain of Decline: He traced the decline of Western civilization through liberalism, democracy, socialism, and communism, viewing them as interconnected stages of the same degenerative process.
  5. Illusion of Democracy: Evola argued that democracy and liberalism are not antithetical to communism but are earlier stages of the same subversive current leading to societal collapse.
  6. Radicalism and Intransigence: He advocated for a radical rejection of political decadence in all its forms, emphasizing the need for intransigence and purity in resisting subversion.
  7. Rejection of Progressivism: Evola dismissed the notion of “progress” as a destructive force, urging a return to timeless, traditional truths rather than chasing futuristic illusions.
  8. Americanism as a Trojan Horse: He considered Americanism more dangerous than communism because it subtly undermines traditional values through materialism, consumerism, and cultural influence.
  9. Convergence of East and West: Evola saw both Americanism and communism as two sides of the same coin, working to destroy Europe's spiritual and cultural heritage.
  10. Call to Resistance: He called for a steadfast defense of traditional values, warning against the passive acceptance of modernity's corrosive forces and the ultimate abdication of Europe's spiritual legacy.

Some European:

“Had we Europeans foreseen the artificial construct that America is, we might not have allowed its creation.”

Julius Evola's perspective on America aligns with his critique of modernity and materialism. He viewed America as emblematic of a decadent, mechanized civilization, devoid of spiritual depth and rooted in utilitarianism. For Evola, America represented the antithesis of traditional values, emphasizing instead progress, egalitarianism, and individualism—principles he rejected as corrosive to higher, hierarchical, and transcendent ideals. His disdain for America was part of his broader critique of the modern world, which he saw as a decline from a sacred, ordered, and aristocratic past.

It is crucial, both for doctrinal orientation and for the world of action, that the men of the new order clearly recognize the chain of causes and effects, as well as the essential continuity of the current that has given rise to the various political forms now clashing in the chaos of modernity. Liberalism, democracy, socialism, radicalism, and ultimately Communism and Bolshevism are not isolated phenomena but successive stages of the same degenerative process. This process began when Western man broke free from the bonds of tradition, rejected higher symbols of authority and sovereignty, and embraced an illusory individualism, reducing himself to an atomized entity rather than a conscious part of an organic, hierarchical whole. This atomization inevitably led to the tyranny of quantity, where the mass of individuals, devoid of higher ideals, succumbed to materialism and the worship of economic power.

This decline is a unified process, with each stage preparing the next. Without the French Revolution and liberalism, democracy would not have emerged; without democracy, socialism and demagogic nationalism would not have followed; and without socialism, radicalism and Communism would not have taken root. These forms, though often seen as opposing one another, are in fact interconnected, each a step in the same downward spiral. The illusion that democracy and liberalism are antithetical to Communism is a grave error. They are not opposites but different phases of the same subversion, much like dusk is not the antithesis of night but its precursor.

The so-called “liberated” governments of today, particularly in Italy, remain blind to these truths. They cling to outdated political concepts, engaging in a futile parliamentary dance while ignoring the lessons of history. What is needed is not compromise but radical intransigence—a firm rejection of all forms of political decay, whether from the Left or the so-called Right. Concessions to subversion only hasten our downfall. We must stand firm in our principles, ready to act with pure forces when the time is right.

This also requires purging ourselves of ideological distortions, which have unfortunately infected even some of our youth. They mistakenly believe that the destruction wrought by modernity is necessary for “progress,” that we must fight for some distant future rather than uphold the timeless truths that have always been the foundation of legitimate social and political order. These truths, though expressed in different forms across history, remain constant. The youth must reject the false allure of progressivism and recognize that there is no such thing as “History” as an inevitable force. Men shape history, provided they remain true to their principles.

The charge of being “reactionary” is meaningless. When faced with destruction and profanation, should we not react? We are not reactionaries in the weak sense of the word; we stand for positive, original values that do not depend on the illusory promises of a “sun of the future.” Our radicalism renders the supposed antithesis between the red “East” and the democratic “West” irrelevant. Both are manifestations of the same hostile force, working in different but converging ways to undermine Europe. Americanism, with its cult of materialism, consumerism, and economic growth, is in many ways more dangerous than Communism because it operates subtly, eroding tradition and quality through cultural and societal means rather than overt coercion. It is a Trojan horse, paving the way for collectivism under the guise of democracy.

In this context, Europe's submission to Americanism is a prelude to its ultimate abdication. Whether through military defeat or a “progressive” social crisis, the end result is the same: the complete triumph of the forces of decline. There is no middle ground. Americanism, whether intentionally or not, serves the same end as Communism—the destruction of Europe's spiritual and cultural heritage.